http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106
--- Comment #17 from ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ygribov
Date: Mon Nov 18 08:03:16 2013
New Revision: 204934
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204934&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libsanitizer:
2013-11-18 Yury Gribov
PR sanitizer/591
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59167
Bug ID: 59167
Summary: Add a specialization for
std::hash<__gnu_debug::string>
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106
--- Comment #18 from Yury Gribov ---
Created attachment 31233
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31233&action=edit
Libubsan -fno-rtti patch
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #16)
> See my http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59142
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm |arm-linxux-gnueabihf
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51828
--- Comment #5 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Mon Nov 18 09:27:11 2013
New Revision: 204940
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204940&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libfortran/51828
* intrinsics/unpack_generic.c (unp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51828
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59168
Bug ID: 59168
Summary: Wrong result with non-optimized (!) compilation
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59168
--- Comment #1 from Sarantis Pantazis ---
Created attachment 31234
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31234&action=edit
Bug code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59165
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59165
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to thakis from comment #0)
> This compiles, but shouldn't:
You add declarations to namespace std which is undefined behaviour, so any
result is valid.
The DR looks wrong to me, the point of treat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59163
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59165
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think I remember the rationale now: std::begin and std::end only work if
c.begin() and c.end() xist, in which case range-based for will use those
members directly anyway.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59164
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59152
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58038
--- Comment #5 from Mario Bielert ---
Hello Jonathan,
I wonder whether this bug is solved or not, as you already posted in July a
posible solution?
Best Regards,
Mario
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59166
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59164
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59163
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.3
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58038
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It's not fixed yet, sorry
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59159
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59083
--- Comment #20 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
I've tested this further on my Gentoo box and it turned out
the many nontrivial packages that I've compiled failed
with "trap invalid opcode". From a QOI perspective this is a
nightmare. Not every user
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59146
Jean-Charles Papin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59159
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Or have a pass that automates your asm() barrier instrumentation for all values
that are life across a FENV affecting call.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59157
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu|x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*
Status|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59155
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59154
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
Component|lto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59152
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Hm, -O0 and loops. IPA opts are not really supposed to run at -O0. But
the issue here seems to be that this loop has multiple latches but has
->latch != NULL.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59169
Bug ID: 59169
Summary: symbol mismatch
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59149
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Agreed - the code should have a gcc_unreachable () else.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59170
Bug ID: 59170
Summary: pretty printers: end iterator invalid pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59169
--- Comment #1 from Chandra sekhar r ---
Full text of error :
/usr/bin/ld: sslssThreadtltm_: TLS definition in libportal.so section .tbss
mismatches non-TLS definition in libclntsh.so section .bss
libclntsh.so: could not read symbols: Bad value
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59171
Bug ID: 59171
Summary: pretty printers: reverse iterator off by one
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59168
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59168
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59154
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59159
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> I wonder whether a very early pass splitting functions at FENV clobber
> points and preventing re-inlining would be a better solution
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59173
Bug ID: 59173
Summary: Alias template in partial specialization finds name
from primary template
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59170
Jan Kratochvil changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59157
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
> long double f(long double x){
> asm volatile("":"+mf"(x));
"+t"(x) should be used here.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59157
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57517
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, so we are having a combined chain where the combination is in a
conditional path.
Reduced testcase:
SUBROUTINE cal_helicity (uh, ph, phb, wavg, ims, ime, its, ite)
INTEGER, INTENT( IN ) :: ims, ime, i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59173
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Thanks for the report, John. I'll fix the library parts (assuming the corrected
versions still compile with G++)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59173
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini ---
It does, AFAICS.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53473
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.1, 4.9.0
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57517
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rakdver at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59157
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #2)
> > long double f(long double x){
> > asm volatile("":"+mf"(x));
>
> "+t"(x) should be used here.
That's not really the same thing. The idea is that if I have:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58742
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Nov 18 15:13:14 2013
New Revision: 204965
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204965&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-18 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2013-10-21
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58653
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Nov 18 15:13:14 2013
New Revision: 204965
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204965&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-18 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2013-10-21
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58794
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Nov 18 15:13:14 2013
New Revision: 204965
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204965&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-18 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2013-10-21
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59047
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Nov 18 15:13:14 2013
New Revision: 204965
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204965&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-18 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2013-10-21
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58143
--- Comment #32 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Nov 18 15:13:14 2013
New Revision: 204965
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204965&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-18 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2013-10-21
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58742
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58653
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.3
Summary|[4.7/4.8 Regres
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58143
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58794
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58742
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59125
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Nov 18 15:25:05 2013
New Revision: 204966
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204966&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-18 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/59125
PR tree-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59125
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.0
Summary|[4.8/4.9 Regres
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54570
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Nov 18 15:25:05 2013
New Revision: 204966
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204966&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-18 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/59125
PR tree
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53473
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53473
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Nov 18 15:26:45 2013
New Revision: 204967
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204967&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-18 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/53473
* g++.dg/cpp0x/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54570
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.0
Summary|[4.8/4.9 Regres
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59085
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 31236
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31236&action=edit
autoreduced testcase
autoreduced (may be now invalid)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58742
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58742
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.3 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160
--- Comment #1 from Aldy Hernandez ---
> Is the line
>
> /* FIXME: This test has been xfailed until reductions are fixed. */
>
> still relevant? I don't see any xfail in the source.
>
The FIXME is not relevant anymore. Can you post a patch to g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> The FIXME is not relevant anymore. Can you post a patch to gcc-patches
> with your fix as well as removing the FIXME note?
Is the use of stdlib.h OK for other targets?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160
--- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez ---
On 11/18/13 09:02, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160
>
> --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
>> The FIXME is not relevant anymore. Can you post a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59174
Bug ID: 59174
Summary: [avr] Suboptimal multiplication when indexing an array
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> You need to post it on gcc-patches because I am not a maintainer for
> this piece of code.
Well, the test is yours. Who should I CC besides Iain Sandoe and Mike Stump?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160
--- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez ---
On 11/18/13 09:45, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160
>
> --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
>> You need to post it on gcc-patches because I am not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56869
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59096
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> If your change passes on, say...Linux, OK as obvious.
That's the critical point: I cannot test the patch "on, say...Linux".
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59080
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160
--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #6)
> > If your change passes on, say...Linux, OK as obvious.
>
> That's the critical point: I cannot test the patch "on, say...Linux".
I'll check it out on Linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58701
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |
Priority|P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 58824, which changed state.
Bug 58824 Summary: Lambda trigger internal compiler error
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58824
What|Removed |Added
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58616
Bug 58616 depends on bug 58824, which changed state.
Bug 58824 Summary: Lambda trigger internal compiler error
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58824
What|Removed |Added
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58824
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|thomas.sanchz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I'll check it out on Linux.
Thanks. BTW the test fails also on powerpc-apple-darwin9 (it was indeed
expected).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58761
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thomas.sanchz at gmail dot com
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59175
Bug ID: 59175
Summary: gcc.target/i386/memcpy-2.c fails with -m32
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-
it
Test case: Run as "g++ -O3 -c test24.ii"
The attached file fails on x86-64-gnu-linux with GCC 4.9.0 20131118 (r204944).
$ g++ -O2 -c test24.ii
$ g++ -O3 -c test24.ii
...
test24.ii:19:27: error: edge points to wrong declaration:
...
test24.ii:19:27: internal compiler error: verify_c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59176
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
Created attachment 31238
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31238&action=edit
Full output of "g++ -c -O3 test24.ii"
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59019
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160
--- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #8)
> > I'll check it out on Linux.
>
> Thanks. BTW the test fails also on powerpc-apple-darwin9 (it was indeed
> expected).
no difference in results for "make ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59177
Bug ID: 59177
Summary: steady_clock::now() and system_clock::now do not use
the vdso (and are therefore very slow)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59177
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Patch submitted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg02098.html.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59043
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Patch submitted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg02105.html.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59168
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #4 from Domi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59177
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Just install glibc 2.17 or later if you care about the speed, otherwise it is
fixing much more important problem that the clocks had ABI incompatible
settings depending on common libstdc++ configure options.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sarantis.pantazis at gmail dot
com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160
--- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Patch installed.
Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59178
Bug ID: 59178
Summary: Stack corruption on register save/restore when using
frame pointer on pdp-11
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59178
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |target
Severity|blocker
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37132
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus ---
Updated patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-11/msg00060.html
DWARF question asked (accessrequires subscription)
http://lists.dwarfstd.org/private.cgi/dwarf-discuss-dwarfstd.org/2013-November/001289.ht
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59177
--- Comment #3 from Andy Lutomirski ---
I can't get gcc trunk to build right now, but I just distcleaned and rebuilt
the 4.8 branch truck on Fedora 19, which has glibc-2.17-19.fc19.x86_64. It
defines _GLIBCXX_USE_CLOCK_GETTIME_SYSCALL. This happ
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo