[Bug sanitizer/59106] Failure to link against static libasan

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106 --- Comment #17 from ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ygribov Date: Mon Nov 18 08:03:16 2013 New Revision: 204934 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204934&root=gcc&view=rev Log: libsanitizer: 2013-11-18 Yury Gribov PR sanitizer/591

[Bug libstdc++/59167] New: Add a specialization for std::hash<__gnu_debug::string>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59167 Bug ID: 59167 Summary: Add a specialization for std::hash<__gnu_debug::string> Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Pr

[Bug sanitizer/59106] Failure to link against static libasan

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106 --- Comment #18 from Yury Gribov --- Created attachment 31233 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31233&action=edit Libubsan -fno-rtti patch (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #16) > See my http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2

[Bug target/59142] [4.8 / 4.9 Regression] internal compiler error while compiling OpenCV 2.4.7

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59142 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Target|arm |arm-linxux-gnueabihf CC|

[Bug libfortran/51828] libgfortran build warnings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51828 --- Comment #5 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- Author: fxcoudert Date: Mon Nov 18 09:27:11 2013 New Revision: 204940 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204940&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libfortran/51828 * intrinsics/unpack_generic.c (unp

[Bug libfortran/51828] libgfortran build warnings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51828 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/59168] New: Wrong result with non-optimized (!) compilation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59168 Bug ID: 59168 Summary: Wrong result with non-optimized (!) compilation Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fo

[Bug fortran/59168] Wrong result with non-optimized (!) compilation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59168 --- Comment #1 from Sarantis Pantazis --- Created attachment 31234 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31234&action=edit Bug code

[Bug c++/59165] gcc looks up begin(), end() for for-range loops for ints in namespace std

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59165 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug c++/59165] gcc looks up begin(), end() for for-range loops for ints in namespace std

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59165 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to thakis from comment #0) > This compiles, but shouldn't: You add declarations to namespace std which is undefined behaviour, so any result is valid. The DR looks wrong to me, the point of treat

[Bug rtl-optimization/59163] program compiled with g++ -O3 segfaults

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59163 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/59165] gcc looks up begin(), end() for for-range loops for ints in namespace std

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59165 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- I think I remember the rationale now: std::begin and std::end only work if c.begin() and c.end() xist, in which case range-based for will use those members directly anyway.

[Bug tree-optimization/59164] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ice: tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘integer_cst’ in get_var_info, at tree-into-ssa.c:380

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59164 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug middle-end/59152] [4.9 Regression] ICE: loop 2's latch does not have an edge to its header with -fopenmp -fipa-pure-const

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59152 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/58038] std::this_thread::sleep_until can cause inifinite sleep

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58038 --- Comment #5 from Mario Bielert --- Hello Jonathan, I wonder whether this bug is solved or not, as you already posted in July a posible solution? Best Regards, Mario

[Bug rtl-optimization/59166] [4.9 Regression] ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5901 on valid code (at -O1 and above with -g enabled)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59166 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-* Priority|P3

[Bug tree-optimization/59164] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ice: tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘integer_cst’ in get_var_info, at tree-into-ssa.c:380

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59164 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug rtl-optimization/59163] [4.8/4.9 Regression] program compiled with g++ -O3 segfaults

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59163 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.7.3 Target Milestone|---

[Bug libstdc++/58038] std::this_thread::sleep_until can cause inifinite sleep

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58038 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- It's not fixed yet, sorry

[Bug c/59159] Need opaque pass-through as optimization barrier

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59159 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/59083] -fisolate-erroneous-paths produces illegal instruction with enabled -fprofile-generate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59083 --- Comment #20 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- I've tested this further on my Gentoo box and it turned out the many nontrivial packages that I've compiled failed with "trap invalid opcode". From a QOI perspective this is a nightmare. Not every user

[Bug fortran/59146] Segfault when ommiting '&' in 'bind (C) ' procedure call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59146 Jean-Charles Papin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/59159] Need opaque pass-through as optimization barrier

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59159 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Or have a pass that automates your asm() barrier instrumentation for all values that are life across a FENV affecting call.

[Bug target/59157] "+f" constraint rejected: output constraint 0 must specify a single register

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59157 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu|x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-* Status|

[Bug inline-asm/59155] ICE: in reg_overlap_mentioned_p, at rtlanal.c:1473

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59155 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/59154] [4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59154 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto Component|lto

[Bug middle-end/59152] [4.9 Regression] ICE: loop 2's latch does not have an edge to its header with -fopenmp -fipa-pure-const

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59152 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Hm, -O0 and loops. IPA opts are not really supposed to run at -O0. But the issue here seems to be that this loop has multiple latches but has ->latch != NULL.

[Bug c/59169] New: symbol mismatch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59169 Bug ID: 59169 Summary: symbol mismatch Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned a

[Bug tree-optimization/59149] diagnose_tm_1 calls flags_from_decl_or_type on an ADDR_EXPR

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59149 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Agreed - the code should have a gcc_unreachable () else.

[Bug debug/59170] New: pretty printers: end iterator invalid pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59170 Bug ID: 59170 Summary: pretty printers: end iterator invalid pointer Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debu

[Bug c/59169] symbol mismatch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59169 --- Comment #1 from Chandra sekhar r --- Full text of error : /usr/bin/ld: sslssThreadtltm_: TLS definition in libportal.so section .tbss mismatches non-TLS definition in libclntsh.so section .bss libclntsh.so: could not read symbols: Bad value

[Bug debug/59171] New: pretty printers: reverse iterator off by one

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59171 Bug ID: 59171 Summary: pretty printers: reverse iterator off by one Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug

[Bug fortran/59168] Wrong result with non-optimized (!) compilation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59168 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug fortran/59168] Wrong result with non-optimized (!) compilation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59168 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/59154] [4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59154 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 f

[Bug c/59159] Need opaque pass-through as optimization barrier

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59159 --- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > I wonder whether a very early pass splitting functions at FENV clobber > points and preventing re-inlining would be a better solution

[Bug c++/59173] New: Alias template in partial specialization finds name from primary template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59173 Bug ID: 59173 Summary: Alias template in partial specialization finds name from primary template Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug debug/59170] pretty printers: end iterator invalid pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59170 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/59157] "+f" constraint rejected: output constraint 0 must specify a single register

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59157 --- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak --- > long double f(long double x){ > asm volatile("":"+mf"(x)); "+t"(x) should be used here.

[Bug target/59157] "+f" constraint rejected: output constraint 0 must specify a single register

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59157 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/57517] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: in eliminate_temp_copies, at tree-predcom.c:1913

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57517 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Ok, so we are having a combined chain where the combination is in a conditional path. Reduced testcase: SUBROUTINE cal_helicity (uh, ph, phb, wavg, ims, ime, its, ite) INTEGER, INTENT( IN ) :: ims, ime, i

[Bug c++/59173] Alias template in partial specialization finds name from primary template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59173 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Thanks for the report, John. I'll fix the library parts (assuming the corrected versions still compile with G++)

[Bug c++/59173] Alias template in partial specialization finds name from primary template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59173 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini --- It does, AFAICS.

[Bug c++/53473] [C++11] static constexpr noexcept cannot be specialized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53473 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.8.1, 4.9.0 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Ca

[Bug tree-optimization/57517] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: in eliminate_temp_copies, at tree-predcom.c:1913

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57517 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rakdver at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug target/59157] "+f" constraint rejected: output constraint 0 must specify a single register

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59157 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #2) > > long double f(long double x){ > > asm volatile("":"+mf"(x)); > > "+t"(x) should be used here. That's not really the same thing. The idea is that if I have:

[Bug middle-end/58742] [4.7/4.8 Regression] pointer arithmetic simplification

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58742 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Nov 18 15:13:14 2013 New Revision: 204965 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204965&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-11-18 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2013-10-21

[Bug tree-optimization/58653] [4.7/4.8 Regression] wrong code (segfaults) at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 64-bit mode (affecting gcc 4.6 to trunk)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58653 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Nov 18 15:13:14 2013 New Revision: 204965 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204965&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-11-18 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2013-10-21

[Bug tree-optimization/58794] [4.8 Regression] ICE in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:455 on x86_64-linux-gnu (at -O1, -O2, and -O3)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58794 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Nov 18 15:13:14 2013 New Revision: 204965 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204965&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-11-18 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2013-10-21

[Bug tree-optimization/59047] [4.9 Regression] wrong code for bitfields at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59047 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Nov 18 15:13:14 2013 New Revision: 204965 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204965&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-11-18 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2013-10-21

[Bug tree-optimization/58143] [4.8 regression] wrong code at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58143 --- Comment #32 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Nov 18 15:13:14 2013 New Revision: 204965 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204965&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-11-18 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2013-10-21

[Bug middle-end/58742] [4.7/4.8 Regression] pointer arithmetic simplification

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58742 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/58653] [4.7 Regression] wrong code (segfaults) at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 64-bit mode (affecting gcc 4.6 to trunk)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58653 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.8.3 Summary|[4.7/4.8 Regres

[Bug tree-optimization/58143] [4.8 regression] wrong code at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58143 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/58794] [4.8 Regression] ICE in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:455 on x86_64-linux-gnu (at -O1, -O2, and -O3)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58794 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug middle-end/58742] pointer arithmetic simplification

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58742 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug middle-end/59125] [4.8/4.9 Regression] gcc triggers wrong strncpy_chk

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59125 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Nov 18 15:25:05 2013 New Revision: 204966 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204966&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-11-18 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/59125 PR tree-

[Bug middle-end/59125] [4.8 Regression] gcc triggers wrong strncpy_chk

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59125 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.9.0 Summary|[4.8/4.9 Regres

[Bug tree-optimization/54570] [4.8/4.9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-8.c execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54570 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Nov 18 15:25:05 2013 New Revision: 204966 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204966&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-11-18 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/59125 PR tree

[Bug c++/53473] [C++11] static constexpr noexcept cannot be specialized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53473 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/53473] [C++11] static constexpr noexcept cannot be specialized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53473 --- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Nov 18 15:26:45 2013 New Revision: 204967 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204967&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-11-18 Paolo Carlini PR c++/53473 * g++.dg/cpp0x/

[Bug tree-optimization/54570] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-8.c execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54570 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.9.0 Summary|[4.8/4.9 Regres

[Bug c++/59085] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59085 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 31236 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31236&action=edit autoreduced testcase autoreduced (may be now invalid)

[Bug middle-end/58742] pointer arithmetic simplification

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58742 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEW --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener

[Bug middle-end/58742] pointer arithmetic simplification

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58742 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.8.3 |---

[Bug testsuite/59160] The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)*.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160 --- Comment #1 from Aldy Hernandez --- > Is the line > > /* FIXME: This test has been xfailed until reductions are fixed. */ > > still relevant? I don't see any xfail in the source. > The FIXME is not relevant anymore. Can you post a patch to g

[Bug testsuite/59160] The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)*.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > The FIXME is not relevant anymore. Can you post a patch to gcc-patches > with your fix as well as removing the FIXME note? Is the use of stdlib.h OK for other targets?

[Bug testsuite/59160] The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)*.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160 --- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez --- On 11/18/13 09:02, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160 > > --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- >> The FIXME is not relevant anymore. Can you post a

[Bug target/59174] New: [avr] Suboptimal multiplication when indexing an array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59174 Bug ID: 59174 Summary: [avr] Suboptimal multiplication when indexing an array Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug testsuite/59160] The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)*.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > You need to post it on gcc-patches because I am not a maintainer for > this piece of code. Well, the test is yours. Who should I CC besides Iain Sandoe and Mike Stump?

[Bug testsuite/59160] The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)*.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160 --- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez --- On 11/18/13 09:45, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160 > > --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- >> You need to post it on gcc-patches because I am not

[Bug c++/56869] [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) Error reporting routines re-entered

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56869 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/59096] [4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with template attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59096 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/59160] The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)*.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > If your change passes on, say...Linux, OK as obvious. That's the critical point: I cannot test the patch "on, say...Linux".

[Bug c++/59080] [4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with array of auto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59080 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/59160] The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)*.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160 --- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #6) > > If your change passes on, say...Linux, OK as obvious. > > That's the critical point: I cannot test the patch "on, say...Linux". I'll check it out on Linux

[Bug c++/58701] [4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE initializing member of static union

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58701 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-valid-code | Priority|P1

[Bug c++/54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367 Bug 54367 depends on bug 58824, which changed state. Bug 58824 Summary: Lambda trigger internal compiler error http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58824 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/58616] [meta-bug] nsdmi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58616 Bug 58616 depends on bug 58824, which changed state. Bug 58824 Summary: Lambda trigger internal compiler error http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58824 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/58824] Lambda trigger internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58824 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|thomas.sanchz

[Bug testsuite/59160] The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)*.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I'll check it out on Linux. Thanks. BTW the test fails also on powerpc-apple-darwin9 (it was indeed expected).

[Bug c++/58761] ICE with a lambda capturing this in a NSDMI

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58761 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thomas.sanchz at gmail dot com --- Commen

[Bug middle-end/59175] New: gcc.target/i386/memcpy-2.c fails with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59175 Bug ID: 59175 Summary: gcc.target/i386/memcpy-2.c fails with -m32 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-

[Bug middle-end/59176] New: [4.9 Regression] ICE edge points to wrong declaration / verify_cgraph_node failed

it Test case: Run as "g++ -O3 -c test24.ii" The attached file fails on x86-64-gnu-linux with GCC 4.9.0 20131118 (r204944). $ g++ -O2 -c test24.ii $ g++ -O3 -c test24.ii ... test24.ii:19:27: error: edge points to wrong declaration: ... test24.ii:19:27: internal compiler error: verify_c

[Bug middle-end/59176] [4.9 Regression] ICE edge points to wrong declaration / verify_cgraph_node failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59176 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus --- Created attachment 31238 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31238&action=edit Full output of "g++ -c -O3 test24.ii"

[Bug rtl-optimization/59019] [4.9 regression] ICE in advance_target_bb, at sched-rgn.c:3561

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59019 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/59160] The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)*.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160 --- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #8) > > I'll check it out on Linux. > > Thanks. BTW the test fails also on powerpc-apple-darwin9 (it was indeed > expected). no difference in results for "make ch

[Bug libstdc++/59177] New: steady_clock::now() and system_clock::now do not use the vdso (and are therefore very slow)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59177 Bug ID: 59177 Summary: steady_clock::now() and system_clock::now do not use the vdso (and are therefore very slow) Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/59177] steady_clock::now() and system_clock::now do not use the vdso (and are therefore very slow)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59177 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug testsuite/59160] The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)*.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Patch submitted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg02098.html.

[Bug testsuite/59043] [4.9 Regression] FAIL: (gcc|++).dg/pubtypes* scan-assembler long.*Length of Public Type Names Info

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59043 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Patch submitted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg02105.html.

[Bug fortran/59168] Wrong result with non-optimized (!) compilation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59168 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from Domi

[Bug libstdc++/59177] steady_clock::now() and system_clock::now do not use the vdso (and are therefore very slow)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59177 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Just install glibc 2.17 or later if you care about the speed, otherwise it is fixing much more important problem that the clocks had ABI incompatible settings depending on common libstdc++ configure options.

[Bug middle-end/323] optimized code gives strange floating point results

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sarantis.pantazis at gmail dot com

[Bug testsuite/59160] The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)*.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug testsuite/59160] The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)*.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160 --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Patch installed. Thanks.

[Bug c/59178] New: Stack corruption on register save/restore when using frame pointer on pdp-11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59178 Bug ID: 59178 Summary: Stack corruption on register save/restore when using frame pointer on pdp-11 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blo

[Bug target/59178] Stack corruption on register save/restore when using frame pointer on pdp-11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59178 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |target Severity|blocker

[Bug debug/37132] Debug: No DW_TAG_namelist emitted for NAMELISTS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37132 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus --- Updated patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-11/msg00060.html DWARF question asked (accessrequires subscription) http://lists.dwarfstd.org/private.cgi/dwarf-discuss-dwarfstd.org/2013-November/001289.ht

[Bug libstdc++/59177] steady_clock::now() and system_clock::now do not use the vdso (and are therefore very slow)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59177 --- Comment #3 from Andy Lutomirski --- I can't get gcc trunk to build right now, but I just distcleaned and rebuilt the 4.8 branch truck on Fedora 19, which has glibc-2.17-19.fc19.x86_64. It defines _GLIBCXX_USE_CLOCK_GETTIME_SYSCALL. This happ

  1   2   >