http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59365
djfd at mail dot ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVAL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59365
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59275
--- Comment #7 from Kostya Serebryany ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #6)
> Close as sufficiently FIXED.
>
> However, on the Wiki side, one should add the missing items, cf. comment 2,
> to ASAN/TSAN - and LSAN completely misses a fla
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59365
Bug ID: 59365
Summary: Configure script does not pass CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS down to
subtargets @ stage1
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57163
Conrad changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||conradsand.arma at gmail dot
com
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59364
Bug ID: 59364
Summary: C++11 extern thread_local breaks linking: undefined
reference to TLS init function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59362
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59363
Bug ID: 59363
Summary: [4.9 Regression] r203886 miscompiles git
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57522
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59313
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59313
--- Comment #5 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun Dec 1 20:56:21 2013
New Revision: 205574
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205574&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libfortran/59313
* intrinsics/erfc_scaled.c (erfc_scaled_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59362
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Reduced:
markus@x4 tmp % cat test.i
char *a;
long int b;
void enc_format() {
b = __builtin_object_size(0, 0);
a = __builtin___stpcpy_chk(0, "", b);
b = __builtin_object_size(a, 0);
}
markus@x4 tm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59362
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||octoploid at yandex dot com
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59313
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59362
Bug ID: 59362
Summary: Abort in fini_object_sizes
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58845
--- Comment #14 from Marc Glisse ---
Created attachment 31343
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31343&action=edit
WIP
Let me attach this here. save_expr+build_vector_from_val is unnecessary, the
BIT_*_EXPR case would handle it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59360
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
another dup of PR 57899 ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59361
Bug ID: 59361
Summary: cannot expand parenthesized pack expression
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59360
Bug ID: 59360
Summary: Complicated bind expression causing infinite recursive
template instantiations
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57543
Daniel Frey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d.frey at gmx dot de
--- Comment #2 from Da
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59358
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57386
--- Comment #5 from Roland Stigge ---
More info: I just checked that the issue is still present in 4.8.2.
Without --with-long-double-128, the problem doesn't occur.
Any hint where I should look for?
Thanks in advance!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57354
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Dec 1 11:50:20 2013
New Revision: 205567
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205567&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-12-01 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/57354
* trans-array.c (gfc_conv_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58410
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Dec 1 11:42:25 2013
New Revision: 205566
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205566&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-12-01 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/58410
* trans-array.c (gfc_alloc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57354
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #3)
> This patch is preliminary since a temporary is produced, for each
> assignment, copied to the newly reallocated lhs and then deallocated.
> Clearly it would be more
: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: antoine.balestrat at gmail dot com
Hello !
The following testcase makes GCC 4.9.0 as of 20131201 crash.
$ cat seg.c
int a, b;
void f()
{
int c = 0;
for(; b; b++)
{
for(a = 0; a; a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34547
--- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #8)
> Confirmed, however compiling the second test in comment #0, namely
>
> integer, allocatable :: i(:)
> print *, NULL(i)
> end
> gives an ICE with 4.8.1 a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
28 matches
Mail list logo
