[Bug c/59717] New: better warning when using functions when including appropriate header files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59717 Bug ID: 59717 Summary: better warning when using functions when including appropriate header files Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug c++/59716] New: variadic template multiple parameter pack expansion fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59716 Bug ID: 59716 Summary: variadic template multiple parameter pack expansion fails Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug tree-optimization/59715] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59715 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milesto

[Bug tree-optimization/59715] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59715 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/59715] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59715 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/59715] New: wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

--enable-multilib Thread model: posix gcc version 4.9.0 20140107 (experimental) [trunk revision 206387] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -O1 small.c; a.out 0 $ gcc-4.6 -Os small.c; a.out 0 $ gcc-trunk -Os small.c; a.out 2 $ gcc-4.8 -Os small.c; a.out 2 $ gcc-4.7 -Os small.c; a.out 2

[Bug middle-end/53623] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] sign extension is effectively split into two x86-64 instructions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53623 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/53623] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] sign extension is effectively split into two x86-64 instructions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53623 --- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Wed Jan 8 06:03:12 2014 New Revision: 206418 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206418&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/53623 * ree.c (combine_set_extension): Handle case wher

[Bug middle-end/59285] [4.9 Regression] gcc.dg/builtin-unreachable-6.c:17:1: internal compiler error: in rtl_verify_fallthru, at cfgrtl.c:2862

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59285 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/59285] [4.9 Regression] gcc.dg/builtin-unreachable-6.c:17:1: internal compiler error: in rtl_verify_fallthru, at cfgrtl.c:2862

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59285 --- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Wed Jan 8 05:56:31 2014 New Revision: 206417 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206417&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/59285 * ifcvt.c (merge_if_block): If we are me

[Bug c++/59709] break program behavior with optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59709 Akira Takahashi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/59652] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:411

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59652 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgcc/59714] complex division is inaccurate on aarch64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59714 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- You'll find other cases where fused operations make complex multiplication and division *more* accurate. There is, I suppose, a case for having a version of complex multiplication and divis

[Bug libgcc/59714] complex division is inaccurate on aarch64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59714 --- Comment #2 from Michael Hudson-Doyle --- Oh right. I saw that bug but didn't read enough of the comments to see that the same thing was mentioned. I still think fma is inappropriate for this function...

[Bug target/59652] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:411

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59652 --- Comment #8 from John David Anglin --- Author: danglin Date: Wed Jan 8 02:01:50 2014 New Revision: 206414 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206414&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/59652 * config/pa/pa.c (pa_legitimate_address_p): Re

[Bug target/59652] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:411

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59652 --- Comment #7 from John David Anglin --- Author: danglin Date: Wed Jan 8 01:58:35 2014 New Revision: 206413 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206413&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/59652 * config/pa/pa.c (pa_legitimate_address_p): Re

[Bug libgcc/59714] complex division is inaccurate on aarch64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59714 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19974#c6

[Bug libgcc/59714] New: complex division is inaccurate on aarch64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59714 Bug ID: 59714 Summary: complex division is inaccurate on aarch64 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgcc

[Bug go/59430] [4.9 regression] os/user FAILs on Solaris

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59430 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug go/59430] [4.9 regression] os/user FAILs on Solaris

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59430 --- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Wed Jan 8 01:08:29 2014 New Revision: 206412 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206412&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR go/59430 os/user: Use POSIX functions on Solaris. Added:

[Bug middle-end/59584] [4.8/4.9 Regression]: cannot handle define_split for insn emitted for __builtin_stack_restore

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59584 --- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- With the latest backports by Jakub (206335:206398], it regressed on the 4.8 branch.

[Bug go/59433] [4.9 regression] Many 64-bit Go tests SEGV on Solaris

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59433 --- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Wed Jan 8 00:42:45 2014 New Revision: 206411 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206411&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR go/59433 net: Don't use stack space for fd_sets when using sel

[Bug go/59433] [4.9 regression] Many 64-bit Go tests SEGV on Solaris

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59433 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/59713] New: unordered_map constructor / destructor / move

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59713 Bug ID: 59713 Summary: unordered_map constructor / destructor / move Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libs

[Bug rtl-optimization/59137] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Miscompilation at -O1 on mips/mipsel

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59137 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC

[Bug rtl-optimization/59649] [4.9 regression] conftest.c miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59649 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou --- Everything seems to be OK with the patch.

[Bug target/59459] MIPS target tests failing (gcc.target/mips/fpr-moves-7.c, fpr-moves-8.c, int-moves-1.c, etc)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59459 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug target/59460] [4.9 Regression] ICE with -mips16 and __attribute__((nomips16))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59460 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug tree-optimization/59643] Predictive commoning unnecessarily punts on scimark2 SOR

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59643 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug tree-optimization/23384] escaped set should be flow sensitive

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23384 --- Comment #6 from Steven Bosscher --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) Would it be possible to compute ESCAPED per basic block as a local set, compute transitive closure over the CFG, and use that information when constructing the p

[Bug middle-end/59711] ICE in force_constant_size, at gimplify.c:619 with variably-modified return type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59711 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #31765|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/59614] [4.9 regression] Explostion in compile time of heavily templated code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59614 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug c++/58856] [4.9 Regression] spurious 'wrong number of template arguments' error for template alias

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58856 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue Jan 7 21:28:33 2014 New Revision: 206406 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206406&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/58856 * pt.c (num_innermost_template_parms): New. (get_un

[Bug c++/58965] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with member initializer in static union

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58965 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue Jan 7 21:24:37 2014 New Revision: 206405 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206405&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/58965 * mangle.c (write_guarded_var_name): Handle null DECL_N

[Bug middle-end/56791] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Segmentation fault in stage2 gengenrtl -- Incorrect instruction sequence generated by reload

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56791 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #12 fr

[Bug c/59708] clang-compatible checked arithmetic builtins

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708 --- Comment #6 from Josh Triplett --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #5) > See what I said in about > the issues with something type-generic regarding detecting overflow on > t

[Bug target/57386] ICE: hash-long-double-tr1-aux.cc:54:7: error: unrecognizable insn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57386 --- Comment #16 from Michael Meissner --- Author: meissner Date: Tue Jan 7 20:10:01 2014 New Revision: 206402 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206402&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-01-07 Roland Stigge Michael Meissner PR 57386/

[Bug target/57386] ICE: hash-long-double-tr1-aux.cc:54:7: error: unrecognizable insn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57386 --- Comment #15 from Michael Meissner --- Author: meissner Date: Tue Jan 7 19:57:11 2014 New Revision: 206401 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206401&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-01-07 Roland Stigge Michael Meissner PR 57386/

[Bug libstdc++/59712] unordered_map : clang fails with "member access into incomplete type"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59712 --- Comment #2 from Olivier Parcollet --- I am not sure. If I understood correctly, clang is stricter on this sort of issue than gcc, but I do not know what the standard says. A minimal version of such code is (from hashtable.h) : #include t

[Bug libstdc++/59712] unordered_map : clang fails with "member access into incomplete type"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59712 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Are you sure this is not a clang issue?

[Bug rtl-optimization/59649] [4.9 regression] conftest.c miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59649 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Two out of the 3 get_mode_bounds calls pass the same mode as the first and third argument, so in that case it would be BImode in both cases and even before Nick's change while min_val/max_val would be -128/127

[Bug libstdc++/59712] New: unordered_map : clang fails with "member access into incomplete type"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59712 Bug ID: 59712 Summary: unordered_map : clang fails with "member access into incomplete type" Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major

[Bug rtl-optimization/59649] [4.9 regression] conftest.c miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59649 --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou --- > Untested fix (well, tested on the conftest.c and eyeballing it using cross). > Don't have spare cycles to waste on a ia64 though, so if somebody is willing > to bootstrap/regtest it, I'd appreciate it. I wi

[Bug sanitizer/56535] ICE: in build2_stat, at tree.c:3885 when compiling with -fsanitize=address

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56535 --- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Still ICEs on todays trunk: ../../gcc/gcc/genmodes.c: In function ‘void make_complex_modes.constprop(mode_class, unsigned int)’: ../../gcc/gcc/genmodes.c:423:1: internal compiler error: in build2_stat,

[Bug ipa/59610] [4.8 Regression] ICE in parm_preserved_before_stmt_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59610 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p

[Bug rtl-optimization/59649] [4.9 regression] conftest.c miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59649 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 31767 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31767&action=edit gcc49-pr59649.patch Untested fix (well, tested on the conftest.c and eyeballing it using cross). Don't have spare

[Bug fortran/58182] [4.9 Regression] ICE with global binding name used as a FUNCTION

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58182 --- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- I think the patch in comment 2 is simple enough to be committed as obvious, which I will do shortly.

[Bug fortran/58182] [4.9 Regression] ICE with global binding name used as a FUNCTION

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58182 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|una

[Bug middle-end/58585] [4.9 Regression] ICE in ipa with virtual inheritance

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58585 --- Comment #16 from Jan Hubicka --- Created attachment 31766 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31766&action=edit Proposed fix 3 Hi, it is still lightly tested due lack of time, but fixes the previous issue with missing vtable.

[Bug c/59708] clang-compatible checked arithmetic builtins

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708 --- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- See what I said in about the issues with something type-generic regarding detecting overflow on types smaller than int.

[Bug fortran/58182] [4.9 Regression] ICE with global binding name used as a FUNCTION

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58182 --- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #2) > This is slightly different from the error message in comment 0, but it still > sounds reasonable to me. The error message depends on whether the code is in one

[Bug rtl-optimization/58668] [4.8/4.9 regression] internal compiler error: in cond_exec_process_insns, at ifcvt.c:339

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58668 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug pch/59436] [4.9 Regression] FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++200x/stdc++.cc (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59436 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/59470] [4.8 Regression] libstdc++ miscompilation after r205709

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59470 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/58668] [4.8/4.9 regression] internal compiler error: in cond_exec_process_insns, at ifcvt.c:339

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58668 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 7 16:51:16 2014 New Revision: 206398 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206398&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/58668 * cfgcleanup.c (flow_find_cross_jump): Do

[Bug pch/59436] [4.9 Regression] FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++200x/stdc++.cc (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59436 --- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 7 16:50:06 2014 New Revision: 206397 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206397&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR pch/59436 * tree.h (struct tree_optimization_option): Change opt

[Bug middle-end/59470] [4.8 Regression] libstdc++ miscompilation after r205709

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59470 --- Comment #25 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 7 16:49:22 2014 New Revision: 206396 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206396&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2013-12-16 Jakub Jelinek PR middle

[Bug middle-end/58956] [4.7 Regression] wrong code at -O1 and above (affecting gcc 4.6 to trunk)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58956 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 7 16:49:22 2014 New Revision: 206396 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206396&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2013-12-16 Jakub Jelinek PR middle-

[Bug sanitizer/56535] ICE: in build2_stat, at tree.c:3885 when compiling with -fsanitize=address

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56535 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug sanitizer/56535] ICE: in build2_stat, at tree.c:3885 when compiling with -fsanitize=address

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56535 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Markus, Are you still seeing the bootstrap failure with --with-build-config="bootstrap-asan" and profiled bootstrap? If yes, could you open a new PR for it?

[Bug other/59384] Cilk Plus array notation with for loop after segfaults

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59384 --- Comment #1 from Balaji V. Iyer --- Hi Nick, I am sorry for taking a while to get back to you. As you can tell from gcc-patches mailing list, we are actively pursuing to try and push Cilk Plus into trunk. We have submitted a updated patch

[Bug target/58115] testcase gcc.target/i386/intrinsics_4.c failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58115 --- Comment #13 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Tue Jan 7 15:26:41 2014 New Revision: 206394 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206394&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ PR target/58115 * target-globals.c (save_tar

[Bug middle-end/59711] ICE in force_constant_size, at gimplify.c:619 with variably-modified return type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59711 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/59711] ICE in force_constant_size, at gimplify.c:619 (nested function and variably-modified type)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59711 --- Comment #1 from Florian Weimer --- Created attachment 31765 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31765&action=edit funcpointer.c Test case without nested function.

[Bug tree-optimization/59660] We fail to optimize common boolean checks pre-inlining

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59660 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 7 Jan 2014, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59660 > > --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka --- > > Not all testcases can be handled at gimplification

[Bug middle-end/59711] New: ICE in force_constant_size, at gimplify.c:619 (nested function and variably-modified type)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59711 Bug ID: 59711 Summary: ICE in force_constant_size, at gimplify.c:619 (nested function and variably-modified type) Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/59660] We fail to optimize common boolean checks pre-inlining

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59660 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka --- > Not all testcases can be handled at gimplification time IIRC. Which > means "testcases welcome" first, so we can look at them individually. The GCC one I saw was equivalent of: #include bool m_is_less_than_

[Bug fortran/52387] I/O output of write after nonadvancing read

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52387 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/52884] double precision constants promoted to 16 byte by -fdefault-real-8

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52884 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59192 --- Comment #6 from Rajveer Aujla --- Thank you for the quick reply. Looking at release dates of previous releases, I'm guessing this will be earliest around next year? Looks like I'd better get coding a workaround :)

[Bug fortran/56293] Segfault when trying to access pass-by-reference value of a not-word-aligned REAL(16) / -fno-align-commons

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56293 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/56201] Realloc on assignment: Wrong code when assigning a zero-sized array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56201 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/58334] preprocessor behavior diffs under line continuation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58334 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/56341] GCC produces unaligned data access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56341 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/59660] We fail to optimize common boolean checks pre-inlining

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59660 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 7 Jan 2014, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59660 > > --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka --- > > I have noticed these, too (-Og is pessimzed by the

[Bug middle-end/58585] [4.9 Regression] ICE in ipa with virtual inheritance

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58585 --- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka --- > markus@x4 gcc % cat test.ii > class A { > void m(); > }; > void A::m() {} > > markus@x4 gcc % /var/tmp/gcc_build_dir_/./prev-gcc/xg++ > -B/var/tmp/gcc_build_dir_/./prev-gcc/ -r -nostdlib -flto -O2 -pipe te

[Bug tree-optimization/59660] We fail to optimize common boolean checks pre-inlining

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59660 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka --- > I have noticed these, too (-Og is pessimzed by them). The pattern is > generated > by gimplifying. I wondered why we can't simply update gimplifier to not produce them? (this is what I wanted to look into t

[Bug fortran/59706] [4.9 Regression] ICE with do concurrent and internal subprogram

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59706 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug fortran/56132] Lengths incorrect on assignment to an allocatable character scalar.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56132 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c/59708] clang-compatible checked arithmetic builtins

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708 --- Comment #4 from Josh Triplett --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > Not sure I like their naming though, I'd say they should be type generic > builtins handled in the FEs depending on the first argument's type, so that > it works e

[Bug c++/59633] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with __attribute((vector_size(...))) for enum

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59633 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4

[Bug c++/59645] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with covariant return and volatile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59645 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4

[Bug tree-optimization/59586] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [graphite] Segmentation fault with -Ofast -floop-parallelize-all -ftree-parallelize-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59586 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.3

[Bug fortran/59700] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Misleading/buggy runtime error message: Bad integer for item 0 in list input

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59700 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.3

[Bug c++/59646] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with volatile in initializer list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59646 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4

[Bug rtl-optimization/57320] [4.9 Regression] Shrink-wrapping leaves unreachable blocks in the CFG

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57320 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug target/59652] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:411

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59652 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.3

[Bug c++/59614] [4.9 regression] Explostion in compile time of heavily templated code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59614 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug fortran/59706] [4.9 Regression] ICE with do concurrent and internal subprogram

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59706 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug libstdc++/58764] [4.9 Regression] [lwg/2193] error: converting to ‘const std::vector >’ from initializer list would use explicit constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58764 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug middle-end/59584] [4.9 Regression]: cannot handle define_split for insn emitted for __builtin_stack_restore

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59584 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug lto/59626] [4.9 lto] /usr/include/bits/unistd.h:173:1: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline 'readlinkat': recursive inlining

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59626 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug debug/59575] [4.9 regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2239

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59575 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug c/59708] clang-compatible checked arithmetic builtins

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > Not sure I like their naming though, I'd say they should be type generic > builtins handled in the FEs depending on the first argument's type, so that > it works

[Bug middle-end/59658] Document -f* flags enabled by -Og

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59658 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/59659] large zero-initialized std::array compile time excessive

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59659 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||compile-time-hog, |

[Bug tree-optimization/59660] We fail to optimize common boolean checks pre-inlining

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59660 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/59708] clang-compatible checked arithmetic builtins

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug libfortran/52879] Pathological reseeding of PRNG generator genernates poor sequence

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52879 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/59670] ICE: expected gimple_call(error_mark), have gimple_assign(plus_expr) in gimple_call_internal_p, at gimple.h:2432

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59670 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

  1   2   >