[Bug debug/60603] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] .debug_macinfo/.debug_macro has wrong line numbers for built-in macros

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60603 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Mar 22 07:18:38 2014 New Revision: 208763 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208763&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR debug/60603 c-family/ * c-opts.c (c_finish_options): Restore cb_f

[Bug debug/60603] [4.7/4.8 Regression] .debug_macinfo/.debug_macro has wrong line numbers for built-in macros

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60603 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.6.0, 4.9.0 Summary|[4.7/4.8/

[Bug target/60607] -march=native command line option handling breaks LTO option machinery

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60607 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Variation of the problem without -march=native: markus@x4 tmp % cat foo.ii markus@x4 tmp % cat bar.ii typedef int __m128i __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (16))); __m128i a, b, c; void dequant_scaling ()

[Bug middle-end/60429] [4.7 Regression] Miscompilation (aliasing) with -finline-functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60429 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Comme

[Bug ipa/60600] [4.9 Regression] ICE in ipa_get_indirect_edge_target_1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60600 --- Comment #5 from lucdanton at free dot fr --- (In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #2) > Well, this is ICE on code with undefined behavior. Function test > calls itself with a parameter which is a reference to an object of > type child2 and

[Bug ada/60620] New: missing gnattools dependency causes highly parallel build failure with --disable-bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60620 Bug ID: 60620 Summary: missing gnattools dependency causes highly parallel build failure with --disable-bootstrap Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/60452] [4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code at -O1 on x86_64-linux-gnu (affecting trunk and 4.8.x)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60452 --- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou --- This also happens for regular objects on stack, i.e. with a MEM_EXPR: int a; int main (void) { char e[3] = { 0, 0, 0 }, f = 0; if (a == 131072) f = e[a]; return f; } But I think that using MEM_OF

[Bug fortran/55850] [OOP] SELECT TYPE issues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55850 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/58189] Color diagnostics for gfortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58189 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/58331] [OOP] Bogus rank checking with explicit-/assumed-size arrays and CLASS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58331 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/58644] [OOP] Missing .data ref in passing a CLASS array as actual argument to a TYPE.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58644 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/58620] [OOP] Defined assignment not called for TYPE when the type's extension is used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58620 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/56038] declarations in xmmintrin.h conflict with mingw-w64 intrin.h in c++ mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56038 tim.lebedkov at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tim.lebedkov at gmail dot c

[Bug fortran/59202] Erroneous argument aliasing with defined assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59202 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/56670] Allocatable-length character var causes bogus warning with -Wall

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56670 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/56491] [OOP] Memory leak with vtab's type-bound-procedures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56491 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/60613] Invalid signed subtraction ubsan diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60613 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Mar 22 16:25:50 2014 New Revision: 208766 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208766&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR sanitizer/60613 * internal-fn.c (ubsan_expand_si_overflow_addsub_

[Bug sanitizer/60613] Invalid signed subtraction ubsan diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60613 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libfortran/46800] Handle CTRL-D correctly with STDIN

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46800 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/41816] ldconfig warnings vs. libstdc++.so.6.0.14-gdb.py

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41816 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/30830] Bootstrap failure in stage 2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30830 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/36815] gnattools related error when building only c and fortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36815 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/60582] gfortran.dg/fmt_en.f90 FAILs on Solaris 9/x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60582 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Component|fortran |target --- Comment #1 from Dominiq

[Bug fortran/47506] [OOP][Fortran 90+] Assumed-size array checks (polymorphic and component)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47506 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/60334] Segmentation fault on character pointer assignments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60334 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/57079] [Fortran-dev] version/type/attribute fields not set with CLASS components

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57079 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/55849] [OOP] Implement temporary support for SELECT TYPE(name => array ( [vector-subscript] ))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55849 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/55758] LOGICAL and BIND(C): Reject kind=2/4/8/16 with -std=f2008, improve warning, switch to nonBOOLEAN_TYPE for those

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55758 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/47605] Document that C_Bool might be the wrong constant for C Booleans

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47605 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/46496] Missing strlen check / interop warnings with BIND(C) and non-C_* kinds

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46496 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/46020] Improve error string for BIND(C) diagnostic for len>1 character return type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46020 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/47648] libgfortran/libgfortran.h:53:29: fatal error: quadmath_weak.h: No such file or directory - FreeBSD ia64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47648 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/49331] Accepts invalid specification expressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49331 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/59537] "An automatic object shall not have the SAVE attribute." is not diagnosed.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59537 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid Summary

[Bug fortran/51292] RESULT var with -finit-local-zero -fno-automatic results in error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51292 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/60601] [4.9 Regression] profiledbootstrap fails with Ada

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60601 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|ebotcazou at

[Bug fortran/60477] unlimited type class(*) not working properly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60477 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/60601] [4.9 Regression] profiledbootstrap fails with Ada

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60601 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou --- fix_up_fall_thru_edges is apparently looking for EDGE_CAN_FALLTHRU edges but this flag is only set during bb-reorder. Testing trivial patch.

[Bug fortran/52176] Valgrind complains about some realloc on assignment to unallocated LHS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52176 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- With valgrind 3.7.0 and gfortran 4.9.0 r208594, I no longer see the Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialized value if I don't use -flto, while I still see them with 4.8.2. Note the errors are

[Bug libfortran/48961] EXECUTE_COMMAND_LINE(WAIT=.false.) fails on MinGW

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48961 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/60601] [4.9 Regression] profiledbootstrap fails with Ada

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60601 --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou --- The next error is: In file included from /home/eric/svn/gcc/gcc/gcc.c:36:0: /home/eric/svn/gcc/gcc/../include/obstack.h: In function 'const char* handle_spec_function(const char*, bool*)': /home/eric/svn/gcc/

[Bug fortran/59537] "An automatic object shall not have the SAVE attribute." is not diagnosed.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59537 --- Comment #4 from Lorenz Hüdepohl --- > From the above gfortran is right to reject the code with initialization. > > > Without the SAVE statement it compiles fine. > > From the above (C513) this is a bug, the code should give an error > without

[Bug fortran/29892] substring out of bounds: Missing variable name for variables with parameter attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29892 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/60621] New: std::vector::emplace_back generates massively more code than push_back

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60621 Bug ID: 60621 Summary: std::vector::emplace_back generates massively more code than push_back Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/59537] No "Automatic array cannot have an initializer", for -finit-real without a SAVE statement present in subroutine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59537 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|"An automatic object shall |No "Automatic array cannot

[Bug libfortran/35667] HP-UX 10 has broken strtod

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35667 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/42945] Gcov -a fails on Fortan generated object file (infinite loop?)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42945 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/49802] [F2003, F2008] Wrong code with VALUE, F2008: VALUE with arrays/DIMENSION

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49802 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #7 from Dominique

[Bug fortran/54070] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Wrong code with allocatable deferred-length (array) function results

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54070 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Summary|Wrong code

[Bug c/60622] New: [4.9 Regression] symbol missing when compiled with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60622 Bug ID: 60622 Summary: [4.9 Regression] symbol missing when compiled with -flto Product: gcc Version: lto Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority

[Bug fortran/37355] Request runtime preconnected buffer option for gfortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37355 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW --- Comment #6 from Dominique

[Bug fortran/27436] gfortran: Abort compiling if there are insufficient data descriptors in format after reversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27436 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- (In reply to comment #1) > Adding to my list Do you mean that you assign this PR to you?

[Bug libstdc++/60623] New: FAIL: libstdc++-abi/abi_check

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60623 Bug ID: 60623 Summary: FAIL: libstdc++-abi/abi_check Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++