[Bug c++/60893] New: Unable to use link time optimizer with profiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60893 Bug ID: 60893 Summary: Unable to use link time optimizer with profiler Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c+

[Bug c++/60872] Cannot memcpy array of restricted pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60872 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/60892] New: GCC fails to build with Linux 2.6.21 headers.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60892 Bug ID: 60892 Summary: GCC fails to build with Linux 2.6.21 headers. Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sani

[Bug c/21664] array-of-empty-structure extension not properly defined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21664 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/50773] float values are printed with greater precision than the float data type has when given as an argument to printf()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50773 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug bootstrap/60830] [4.9 Regression] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 --- Comment #27 from Bernd Edlinger --- (In reply to Denis Excoffier from comment #26) > After more investigation, it seems that the culprit can be > --disable-sjlj-exceptions. Since the beginning (last Sunday), each time i > use it on the command

[Bug tree-optimization/60891] New: [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV (Invalid write/read) in pre_and_rev_post_order_compute_fn with -O -fno-tree-ch -fno-tree-cselim -fno-tree-dominator-opts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60891 Bug ID: 60891 Summary: [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV (Invalid write/read) in pre_and_rev_post_order_compute_fn with -O -fno-tree-ch -fno-tree-cselim -fno-tree-d

[Bug tree-optimization/60890] Performance regression in 4.8 for memory postinc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60890 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- This just sounds like IV-opts going wrong.

[Bug tree-optimization/60890] New: Performance regression in 4.8 for memory postinc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60890 Bug ID: 60890 Summary: Performance regression in 4.8 for memory postinc Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug c++/60872] Cannot memcpy array of restricted pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60872 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Apr 18 18:11:22 2014 New Revision: 209520 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209520&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/60872 * call.c (standard_conversion): Don't try to apply rest

[Bug c/25801] bad diagnostic for increment/decrement of pointer to incomplete array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25801 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug middle-end/60889] New: -Os generate much bigger code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60889 Bug ID: 60889 Summary: -Os generate much bigger code Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug libstdc++/42857] std::istream::ignore(std::streamsize n) calls unnecessary underflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42857 Sergey Zubkov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cubbi at cubbi dot org --- Comment #5 fro

[Bug target/60879] Wrong decision in decide_alg in i386.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60879 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > Does this ever matter though? I mean, wouldn't we expand it as move by > pieces or store by pieces for such small constant length anyway and thus > never reach the targ

[Bug debug/60885] typeless DW_TAG_typedef

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60885 --- Comment #2 from Mark Wielaard --- I think this is caused by the following in add_type_attribute: if (code == ERROR_MARK /* Handle a special case. For functions whose return type is void, we generate *no* type attribute. (No

[Bug tree-optimization/60888] New: x86 vector widen multiplication by constant is not replaced with shift and sub

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60888 Bug ID: 60888 Summary: x86 vector widen multiplication by constant is not replaced with shift and sub Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug bootstrap/60887] [4.10 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with profiledbootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60887 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- I got /export/project/git/gcc-regression-bootstrap/master/209484/bld/./prev-gcc/xg++ -B/export/project/git/gcc-regression-bootstrap/master/209484/bld/./prev-gcc/ -B/usr/local/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -nostdinc

[Bug bootstrap/60887] New: [4.10 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with profiledbootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60887 Bug ID: 60887 Summary: [4.10 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with profiledbootstrap Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug debug/60885] typeless DW_TAG_typedef

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60885 Mark Wielaard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mark at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 fr

[Bug c++/60886] poor parse error recovery for missing parenthesis in mem-initializer-list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60886 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery Status|UNCON

[Bug c++/60886] New: poor parse error recovery for missing parenthesis in initializer-list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60886 Bug ID: 60886 Summary: poor parse error recovery for missing parenthesis in initializer-list Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/60539] [SH] builtin string functions ignore loop and label alignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60539 --- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo --- As mentioned here http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg01692.html: > IMHO the problem is with the > non-aligned loop stems from to the generic alignment code in final.c. > Further tuning of static branch

[Bug bootstrap/60830] [4.9 Regression] ICE on bootstrapping on cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60830 --- Comment #26 from Denis Excoffier --- After more investigation, it seems that the culprit can be --disable-sjlj-exceptions. Since the beginning (last Sunday), each time i use it on the command line, the build fails and each time i don't use it,

[Bug debug/60885] New: typeless DW_TAG_typedef

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60885 Bug ID: 60885 Summary: typeless DW_TAG_typedef Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug Assignee:

[Bug libstdc++/60883] std::ostringstream::str(const std::string&) works strangely

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60883 Michal Strnad changed: What|Removed |Added CC||michal at mistrnet dot cz --- Comment #2

[Bug target/60884] New: [SH] improve inlined strlen-like builtin functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60884 Bug ID: 60884 Summary: [SH] improve inlined strlen-like builtin functions Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug libstdc++/60883] std::ostringstream::str(const std::string&) works strangely

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60883 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/60883] New: std::ostringstream::str(const std::string&) works strangely

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60883 Bug ID: 60883 Summary: std::ostringstream::str(const std::string&) works strangely Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug target/60882] New: [ARM] Execution fail on spec2K/197.parser

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60882 Bug ID: 60882 Summary: [ARM] Execution fail on spec2K/197.parser Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug fortran/60881] ICE on dummy argument that extends a type with scalar and scalar coarry components

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60881 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Stat

[Bug fortran/60881] New: ICE on dummy argument that extends a type with scalar and scalar coarry components

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60881 Bug ID: 60881 Summary: ICE on dummy argument that extends a type with scalar and scalar coarry components Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

[Bug target/60062] [4.7 Regression] wrong code (for code with the optimize attribute) at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60062 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mnp at agtmt dot com --- Comment #10 from

[Bug target/60877] __attribute__optimize("O0") conflict with static function at -O1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60877 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/60879] Wrong decision in decide_alg in i386.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60879 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug target/60851] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE: in extract_constrain_insn_cached, at recog.c:2117 with -flive-range-shrinkage -mdispatch-scheduler -march=bdver4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60851 --- Comment #4 from Zdenek Sojka --- Created attachment 32629 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32629&action=edit testsuite ICEs with -flive-range-shrinkage/-mdispatch-scheduler/-march=bdver3 I did a testsuite run with RUNTESTFL