[Bug lto/60981] New: lto-plugin configuration doesn't test for -static-libgcc (OSX gcc - clang)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60981 Bug ID: 60981 Summary: lto-plugin configuration doesn't test for -static-libgcc (OSX gcc - clang) Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug lto/60981] lto-plugin configuration doesn't test for -static-libgcc (OSX gcc - clang)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60981 --- Comment #1 from Tony Theodore tony.theodore at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 32691 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32691action=edit add -static-libgcc to lto-plugin/configure This is the modified lto-plugin/configure

[Bug c++/60980] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in build_special_member_call, at cp/call.c:7447

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60980 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug pch/60982] New: Very long compilation of precompiled headers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60982 Bug ID: 60982 Summary: Very long compilation of precompiled headers Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: pch

[Bug c++/60980] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in build_special_member_call, at cp/call.c:7447

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60980 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Note I think this code is invalid due to the struct not having a size.

[Bug c++/60980] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in build_special_member_call, at cp/call.c:7447

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60980 --- Comment #4 from Paul Pluzhnikov ppluzhnikov at google dot com --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) Note I think this code is invalid due to the struct not having a size. Making the array non-empty makes no difference: struct x0 {

[Bug c/60983] New: Fix for pr60114 introduced FAILs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60983 Bug ID: 60983 Summary: Fix for pr60114 introduced FAILs Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug pch/60982] Very long compilation of precompiled headers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60982 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- How much RAM do you have? Is the machine swapping while running that command? How much memory is the cc1plus process using?

[Bug libstdc++/60966] std::call_once sometime hangs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60966 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Sanchez thomas.sanchz at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3) N.B. the std::move in Manager::cancelConnection is redundant, the return value from cancel_connection is already an rvalue.

[Bug pch/60982] Very long compilation of precompiled headers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60982 --- Comment #2 from Yuriy Chernyshov georgthegreat at gmail dot com --- Memory usage is 0.1%. Building host has 32g of RAM.

[Bug libstdc++/60966] std::call_once sometime hangs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60966 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Sanchez thomas.sanchz at gmail dot com --- With my previous mail, the link I added was because I wanted to ask that if you were not able to reproduce the problem I could use CARE to recreate the environment I'm running

[Bug c/60983] Fix for pr60114 introduced FAILs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60983 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/60966] std::call_once sometime hangs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60966 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Sanchez thomas.sanchz at gmail dot com --- Last comment on myself: I got some errors relates to the promise with valgrind but they do not cause an hangs ==30999== Thread 2: ==30999== Invalid read of size 4 ==30999==

[Bug libstdc++/60966] std::call_once sometime hangs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60966 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Thomas Sanchez from comment #4) Anyway, I pushed the actual code in this branch: https://github.com/daedric/httpp/tree/bug-promise-test I was able to do a small test

[Bug rtl-optimization/60866] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE: in get_seqno_for_a_jump, at sel-sched-ir.c:4068 with -fselective-scheduling -fno-if-conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60866 Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug bootstrap/60984] New: AIX: gcc-4.9.0 bootstrap fails in stage-2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60984 Bug ID: 60984 Summary: AIX: gcc-4.9.0 bootstrap fails in stage-2 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug lto/58528] lto1: internal compiler error: in build_abbrev_table, at dwarf2out.c:7478

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58528 Viktor Ostashevskyi ostash at ostash dot kiev.ua changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ostash

[Bug c/60983] Fix for pr60114 introduced FAILs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60983 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Instead use 'signed char' types please.

[Bug pch/60982] Very long compilation of precompiled headers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60982 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- As a workaround you can configure with --disable-libstdcxx-pch (the generated PCHs are not too useful anyway).

[Bug pch/60982] Very long compilation of precompiled headers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60982 --- Comment #4 from Yuriy Chernyshov georgthegreat at gmail dot com --- Thanks, Richard and Jonathan (you both gave me the same solution). Hope, this helps. I'll post the results here, once I'll get them.

[Bug tree-optimization/60979] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE: in gimple_redirect_edge_and_branch_force, at tree-cfg.c:5544, w/ -O -ftree-loop-linear or -fgraphite-identity

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60979 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/60947] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Unable to handle kernel paging request (linux kernel 2.6.28.9) with gcc 4.9 release

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60947 --- Comment #10 from YuFan yufan8.chen at gmail dot com --- After more tests, I figure out the issue is caused by the commit: SVN revision: r206552 | amker | 2014-01-11 17:33:39 +0800 (六, 11 1月 2014) | 7 lines * tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c

[Bug c++/60978] -Wenum-compare warns too eagerly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60978 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug preprocessor/60975] -Wvariadic-macros does not print warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60975 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Please send patches to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org and specify how you tested it Bootstrapped and tested on .

[Bug ipa/60973] Invalid propagation of a tail call in devirt pass

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60973 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug debug/60929] [4.8/4.9 regression] ICE in get_ref_die_offset, at dwarf2out.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60929 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.10.0

[Bug driver/60968] [4.9 Regression] Bootstrap fails on mingw32 with -dumpspecs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60968 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build

[Bug ipa/60965] [4.10 Regression] IPA: Devirtualization versus placement new

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60965 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0

[Bug c++/51424] [C++11] G++ should diagnose self-delegating constructors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51424 --- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- I seem to remember that the reason why I didn't close it completely at the time is that we may want to extend the diagnostic to cover non-trivial cycles too... Opinions? Could

[Bug c++/51424] [C++11] G++ should diagnose self-delegating constructors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51424 --- Comment #8 from Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com --- My 2 cents is to open a separate bug if we want diagnostics for the more elaborate self-delegating cases.

[Bug tree-optimization/60979] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE: in gimple_redirect_edge_and_branch_force, at tree-cfg.c:5544, w/ -O -ftree-loop-linear or -fgraphite-identity

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60979 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- create_single_exit_edge uses make_forwarder_block which doesn't really do things in a way that works for incoming abnormal edges. I can fix it by constraining SCOP detection.

[Bug c++/59120] [c++11] ICE with invalid template alias

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59120 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Apr 28 12:32:06 2014 New Revision: 209857 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209857root=gccview=rev Log: /cp 2014-04-28 Paolo Carlini

[Bug c++/59120] [c++11] ICE with invalid template alias

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59120 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c/60983] Fix for pr60114 introduced FAILs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60983 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c/60983] Fix for pr60114 introduced FAILs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60983 --- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Mon Apr 28 12:42:54 2014 New Revision: 209858 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209858root=gccview=rev Log: [ARM/AArch64] Use signed chars in gcc.dg/pr60114.c. PR

[Bug c/60985] New: _mm_blendv_pd requires the '-msse4.1' option to compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60985 Bug ID: 60985 Summary: _mm_blendv_pd requires the '-msse4.1' option to compile Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug tree-optimization/60979] [4.9 Regression] ICE: in gimple_redirect_edge_and_branch_force, at tree-cfg.c:5544, w/ -O -ftree-loop-linear or -fgraphite-identity

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60979 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Apr 28 13:13:50 2014 New Revision: 209859 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209859root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-04-28 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug c++/60986] New: Wrong handling of const variables in lambda functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60986 Bug ID: 60986 Summary: Wrong handling of const variables in lambda functions Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/60985] _mm_blendv_pd requires the '-msse4.1' option to compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60985 Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic ---

[Bug tree-optimization/60902] [4.9 Regression] ffmpeg built with gcc 4.9 RC produces incorrect flac playback code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60902 --- Comment #34 from Jeffrey A. Law law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: law Date: Mon Apr 28 13:38:19 2014 New Revision: 209860 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209860root=gccview=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/60902 *

[Bug c++/60978] -Wenum-compare warns too eagerly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60978 --- Comment #7 from Paul Pluzhnikov ppluzhnikov at google dot com --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) Warns since forever (checked up to GCC 4.3.x), confirmed. Interesting. In my non-reduced test case, the warning is new with

[Bug bootstrap/60984] AIX: gcc-4.9.0 bootstrap fails in stage-2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60984 --- Comment #1 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org --- I have been bootstrapping GCC trunk and 4.9 on AIX 7.1 without any failures.

[Bug middle-end/60957] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Bogus error: array subscript is above array bounds [-Werror=array-bounds]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60957 Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/39501] -O -ffinite-math-only gets min(x,y) optimization wrong for soft-float on arm-*-gnueabi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39501 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/60092] posix_memalign not recognized to derive alias and alignment info

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60092 --- Comment #27 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Apr 28 14:36:13 2014 New Revision: 209863 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209863root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-04-28 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug c++/60986] Wrong handling of const variables in lambda functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60986 --- Comment #1 from physik3 at gmx dot net --- Created attachment 32694 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32694action=edit file containing the code

[Bug libstdc++/60987] libstdc++ header file tr1/regex causes clang++ compilation error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60987 Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0

[Bug libstdc++/60987] New: libstdc++ header file tr1/regex causes clang++ compilation error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60987 Bug ID: 60987 Summary: libstdc++ header file tr1/regex causes clang++ compilation error Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/60987] libstdc++ header file tr1/regex causes clang++ compilation error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60987 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/60958] Initialization of arrays in tr1/regex ill-formed or with undefined behaviour

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60958 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bergner at gcc

[Bug c/60988] New: transparent_union doesn't appear in the gcc manual index

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60988 Bug ID: 60988 Summary: transparent_union doesn't appear in the gcc manual index Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/60989] New: automatic increase of global array for vectorization doesn't work due to flag_section_anchors==0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60989 Bug ID: 60989 Summary: automatic increase of global array for vectorization doesn't work due to flag_section_anchors==0 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/60989] automatic increase of global array for vectorization doesn't work due to flag_section_anchors==0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60989 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug c++/60894] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] Use of redundant struct keyword in virtual function prototype combined with using statement causes compilation error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60894 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug bootstrap/60984] AIX: gcc-4.9.0 bootstrap fails in stage-2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60984 David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc-ibm-aix6.1 |powerpc-ibm-aix*

[Bug bootstrap/60984] AIX: gcc-4.9.0 bootstrap fails in stage-2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60984 --- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org --- 731 templatetypename T, typename A 732 inline T 733 vecT, A, vl_embed::operator[] (unsigned ix) 734 { 735 gcc_checking_assert (ix m_vecpfx.m_num); 736

[Bug c++/60986] Wrong handling of const variables in lambda functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60986 Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/60986] Wrong handling of const variables in lambda functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60986 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug ipa/60990] New: [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE: in try_make_edge_direct_virtual_call, at ipa-prop.c:2796 with -O3 -fno-early-inlining -fno-ipa-cp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60990 Bug ID: 60990 Summary: [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE: in try_make_edge_direct_virtual_call, at ipa-prop.c:2796 with -O3 -fno-early-inlining -fno-ipa-cp Product: gcc

[Bug bootstrap/60984] AIX: gcc-4.9.0 bootstrap fails in stage-2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60984 David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug c++/60976] Compilation with G++ 4.9.0 is 2-3 times slower than with 4.8.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60976 --- Comment #4 from Chernyshev Viacheslav astellar at ro dot ru --- After a series of tests I'm pretty sure that it is not a problem of g++, but libstdc++. Let me explain why do I think so. First, I was not able to reduce real life case to

[Bug c++/60976] Compilation with G++ 4.9.0 is 2-3 times slower than with 4.8.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60976 --- Comment #5 from Chernyshev Viacheslav astellar at ro dot ru --- Created attachment 32696 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32696action=edit Test file used

[Bug c++/60976] Compilation with G++ 4.9.0 is 2-3 times slower than with 4.8.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60976 --- Comment #6 from Chernyshev Viacheslav astellar at ro dot ru --- Created attachment 32697 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32697action=edit ftime-report, preprocessed by 4.8.2, compiled by 4.8.2

[Bug c++/60976] Compilation with G++ 4.9.0 is 2-3 times slower than with 4.8.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60976 --- Comment #7 from Chernyshev Viacheslav astellar at ro dot ru --- Created attachment 32698 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32698action=edit ftime-report, preprocessed by 4.8.2, compiled by 4.9.0

[Bug c++/60976] Compilation with G++ 4.9.0 is 2-3 times slower than with 4.8.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60976 --- Comment #8 from Chernyshev Viacheslav astellar at ro dot ru --- Created attachment 32699 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32699action=edit ftime-report, preprocessed by 4.9.0, compiled by 4.8.2

[Bug c++/60976] Compilation with G++ 4.9.0 is 2-3 times slower than with 4.8.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60976 --- Comment #9 from Chernyshev Viacheslav astellar at ro dot ru --- Created attachment 32700 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32700action=edit ftime-report, preprocessed by 4.9.0, compiled by 4.9.0

[Bug target/60991] New: [avr] Stack corruption when using 24-bit integers __int24 or __memx pointers in large stack frame

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60991 Bug ID: 60991 Summary: [avr] Stack corruption when using 24-bit integers __int24 or __memx pointers in large stack frame Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/60991] [avr] Stack corruption when using 24-bit integers __int24 or __memx pointers in large stack frame

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60991 --- Comment #1 from johnst...@inn-soft.com --- I don't really know GCC source code well enough to feel comfortable changing and testing this myself, but I suspect the problem lies with this code? gcc/config/avr/avr.c: avr_out_store_psi function:

[Bug tree-optimization/60989] automatic increase of global array for vectorization doesn't work due to flag_section_anchors==0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60989 Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/60992] New: [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:12637

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60992 Bug ID: 60992 Summary: [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:12637 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/60993] New: Trouble initializing double precision variable using boz literals

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60993 Bug ID: 60993 Summary: Trouble initializing double precision variable using boz literals Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/60810] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] list directed io from array results in end of file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60810 --- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Tue Apr 29 03:13:34 2014 New Revision: 209888 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209888root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-04-28 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu

[Bug fortran/60810] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] list directed io from array results in end of file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60810 Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/60971] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Wrong code when coercing unsigned char to bool

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60971 --- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com --- Isn't the real problem here that we emitted the tail call because we thought the return type from foo was close enough to the return type from bar that no coercion was needed? In the