http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60980
--- Comment #4 from Paul Pluzhnikov ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> Note I think this code is invalid due to the struct not having a size.
Making the array non-empty makes no difference:
struct x0
{
x0 () = default;
};
stru
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60983
Bug ID: 60983
Summary: Fix for pr60114 introduced FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60982
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
How much RAM do you have? Is the machine swapping while running that command?
How much memory is the cc1plus process using?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60966
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Sanchez ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> > > N.B. the std::move in Manager::cancelConnection is redundant, the return
> > > value from cancel_connection is already an rvalue.
> >
> > Yes, I know, the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60982
--- Comment #2 from Yuriy Chernyshov ---
Memory usage is 0.1%.
Building host has 32g of RAM.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60966
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Sanchez ---
With my previous mail, the link I added was because I wanted to ask that if you
were not able to reproduce the problem I could use CARE to recreate the
environment I'm running my test.
With lambda replaced (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60983
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60966
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Sanchez ---
Last comment on myself:
I got some errors relates to the promise with valgrind but they do not cause an
hangs
==30999== Thread 2:
==30999== Invalid read of size 4
==30999==at 0x4E44A91: pthread_once (pt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60966
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Thomas Sanchez from comment #4)
> Anyway, I pushed the actual code in this branch:
> https://github.com/daedric/httpp/tree/bug-promise-test
>
> I was able to do a small test that can *sometimes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60866
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassign
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60984
Bug ID: 60984
Summary: AIX: gcc-4.9.0 bootstrap fails in stage-2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: bootstr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58528
Viktor Ostashevskyi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ostash at ostash dot kiev.ua
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60983
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Instead use 'signed char' types please.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60982
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
As a workaround you can configure with --disable-libstdcxx-pch (the generated
PCHs are not too useful anyway).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60982
--- Comment #4 from Yuriy Chernyshov ---
Thanks, Richard and Jonathan (you both gave me the same solution).
Hope, this helps.
I'll post the results here, once I'll get them.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60979
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60947
--- Comment #10 from YuFan ---
After more tests, I figure out the issue is caused by the commit:
SVN revision:
r206552 | amker | 2014-01-11 17:33:39 +0800 (六, 11 1月 2014) | 7 lines
* tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c (iv_ca_narrow): New parameter
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60978
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60975
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Please send patches to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org and specify how you tested it
"Bootstrapped and tested on ".
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60973
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60929
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.10.0
Summary|[4.8/4.9/4.10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60968
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60965
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51424
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini ---
I seem to remember that the reason why I didn't close it completely at the time
is that we may want to extend the diagnostic to cover non-trivial cycles too...
Opinions? Could also be a separate bug, that for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51424
--- Comment #8 from Ville Voutilainen ---
My 2 cents is to open a separate bug if we want diagnostics for the more
elaborate self-delegating cases.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60979
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
create_single_exit_edge uses make_forwarder_block which doesn't really do
things
in a way that works for incoming abnormal edges.
I can fix it by constraining SCOP detection.
Index: gcc/graphite-scop-detect
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59120
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Apr 28 12:32:06 2014
New Revision: 209857
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209857&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-04-28 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/59120
* parser.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59120
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60983
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60983
--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Mon Apr 28 12:42:54 2014
New Revision: 209858
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209858&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM/AArch64] Use signed chars in gcc.dg/pr60114.c.
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60985
Bug ID: 60985
Summary: _mm_blendv_pd requires the '-msse4.1' option to
compile
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60979
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Apr 28 13:13:50 2014
New Revision: 209859
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209859&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-04-28 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/60979
* graphi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60986
Bug ID: 60986
Summary: Wrong handling of const variables in lambda functions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60985
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60902
--- Comment #34 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Mon Apr 28 13:38:19 2014
New Revision: 209860
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209860&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/60902
* tree-ssa-threadedge.c
(record_tempo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60978
--- Comment #7 from Paul Pluzhnikov ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> Warns since forever (checked up to GCC 4.3.x), confirmed.
Interesting. In my non-reduced test case, the warning is new with gcc-4.9.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60984
--- Comment #1 from David Edelsohn ---
I have been bootstrapping GCC trunk and 4.9 on AIX 7.1 without any failures.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60957
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39501
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60092
--- Comment #27 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Apr 28 14:36:13 2014
New Revision: 209863
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209863&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-04-28 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/60092
* builtins.def
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60986
--- Comment #1 from physik3 at gmx dot net ---
Created attachment 32694
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32694&action=edit
file containing the code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60987
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
Known to fail|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60987
Bug ID: 60987
Summary: libstdc++ header file tr1/regex causes clang++
compilation error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60987
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60958
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60988
Bug ID: 60988
Summary: "transparent_union" doesn't appear in the gcc manual
index
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60989
Bug ID: 60989
Summary: automatic increase of global array for vectorization
doesn't work due to flag_section_anchors==0
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60989
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60894
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|un
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60984
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc-ibm-aix6.1 |powerpc-ibm-aix*
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60984
--- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn ---
731 template
732 inline T &
733 vec::operator[] (unsigned ix)
734 {
735 gcc_checking_assert (ix < m_vecpfx.m_num);
736 return m_vecdata[ix];
737 }
3153 gcc_checking_asser
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60986
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60986
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60990
Bug ID: 60990
Summary: [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE: in
try_make_edge_direct_virtual_call, at ipa-prop.c:2796
with -O3 -fno-early-inlining -fno-ipa-cp
Product: gcc
Ve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60984
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60976
--- Comment #4 from Chernyshev Viacheslav ---
After a series of tests I'm pretty sure that it is not a problem of g++, but
libstdc++. Let me explain why do I think so.
First, I was not able to reduce real life case to reasonably small subset that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60976
--- Comment #5 from Chernyshev Viacheslav ---
Created attachment 32696
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32696&action=edit
Test file used
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60976
--- Comment #6 from Chernyshev Viacheslav ---
Created attachment 32697
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32697&action=edit
ftime-report, preprocessed by 4.8.2, compiled by 4.8.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60976
--- Comment #7 from Chernyshev Viacheslav ---
Created attachment 32698
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32698&action=edit
ftime-report, preprocessed by 4.8.2, compiled by 4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60976
--- Comment #8 from Chernyshev Viacheslav ---
Created attachment 32699
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32699&action=edit
ftime-report, preprocessed by 4.9.0, compiled by 4.8.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60976
--- Comment #9 from Chernyshev Viacheslav ---
Created attachment 32700
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32700&action=edit
ftime-report, preprocessed by 4.9.0, compiled by 4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60991
Bug ID: 60991
Summary: [avr] Stack corruption when using 24-bit integers
__int24 or __memx pointers in large stack frame
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60991
--- Comment #1 from johnst...@inn-soft.com ---
I don't really know GCC source code well enough to feel comfortable changing
and testing this myself, but I suspect the problem lies with this code?
gcc/config/avr/avr.c: avr_out_store_psi function: r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60989
Andi Kleen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60992
Bug ID: 60992
Summary: [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in tsubst_copy, at
cp/pt.c:12637
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60993
Bug ID: 60993
Summary: Trouble initializing double precision variable using
boz literals
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60810
--- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Apr 29 03:13:34 2014
New Revision: 209888
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209888&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-04-28 Jerry DeLisle
PR libfortran/60810
* gfortran.dg/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60810
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60971
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Isn't the real problem here that we emitted the tail call because we thought
the return type from "foo" was close enough to the return type from "bar" that
no coercion was needed?
In the .optimized dump we h
69 matches
Mail list logo