http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61114
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61119
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Tricky case, but fold also handles REALPART / IMAGPART of +, - and conjugate
and of a cexpi call. Of course that may not matter in the end, as
"easily decompose" probably doesn't apply to those simplificatio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61122
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
No. At file or function scope the initializer is definitely used, and can
provide the array bound. On a non-static data member it is not used until the
object is constructed (and then might be ignored if th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61120
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61123
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61047
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60973
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61125
Bug ID: 61125
Summary: static_cast of null pointer return invalid pointer
(not null)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61122
--- Comment #2 from Frank Heckenbach ---
If it's not allowed, it should also fail at file-scope or function-scope,
shouldn't it?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61122
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55561
--- Comment #46 from Dmitry Vyukov ---
Roland, why do you think that what you see is false positives? I think these
are real, potentially harmful, races. Please test with gcc 4.9, and file bugs
if you still see any races.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43491
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61124
Bug ID: 61124
Summary: GCC manual has 68HC11/68HC12 info
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: other
A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60172
--- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 9 May 2014, thomas.preudhomme at arm dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60172
>
> Thomas Preud'homme changed:
>
>What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60172
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thomas.preudhomme at arm dot
com
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50459
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri May 9 08:24:37 2014
New Revision: 210262
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210262&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/50459
c-family/
* c-common.c (check_user_alignment): Return
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50459
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61121
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
101 - 119 of 119 matches
Mail list logo