https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61307
Bug ID: 61307
Summary: gccgo: ICE in Create_function_descriptors::expression
[GoSmith]
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61308
Bug ID: 61308
Summary: gccgo: ICE in Expression::check_bounds [GoSmith]
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61309
Bug ID: 61309
Summary: cilk-plus tests fail with: hidden symbol `__cpu_model'
in /x/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../libgcc.a(cpuinfo.o) is
referenced by DSO
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57625
--- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com ---
The failure of 4.7 being built w/ --disable-bootstrap by 4.8+ stopped with the
PR54638 fix in r191605. It's clear that the problem was undefined behaviour in
4.7.2, not a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60925
--- Comment #6 from Aaro Koskinen aaro.koskinen at iki dot fi ---
Created attachment 32852
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32852action=edit
Simplified reproducer.
I tried to make a simpler reproducer.
$ hppa-linux-gnu-gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61292
vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|auto keyword to vector
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61138
--- Comment #4 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #2)
gfc_trans_pointer_assignment sets lse.descriptor_only before calling
gfc_conv_expr_descriptor (for the lhs), and later on reuses lse for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55789
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56724
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61279
--- Comment #4 from Arseny Solokha asolokha at gmx dot com ---
I even have another reproducer which is basically identical to the original one
but not completely.
int t;
int n[1] = { 0 };
void
x(void)
{
int v;
int r;
int i[4] = { 0 };
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61141
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22434
Harald van Dijk harald at gigawatt dot nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||harald at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60925
--- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 25-May-14, at 7:11 AM, aaro.koskinen at iki dot fi wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60925
--- Comment #6 from Aaro Koskinen aaro.koskinen at iki dot fi ---
Created
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61187
--- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jb
Date: Sun May 25 19:29:00 2014
New Revision: 210914
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210914root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR 61187 Avoid reading uninitialized memory.
2014-05-25
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61187
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61310
Bug ID: 61310
Summary: Regression, CTIME intrinsic incorrect result string
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61176
PaX Team pageexec at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pageexec at gmail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61311
Bug ID: 61311
Summary: missing LTO/WPA serialization API for use by regular
IPA passes implemented in a plugin
Product: gcc
Version: lto
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61310
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61312
Bug ID: 61312
Summary: variable function parameters declared as const in the
class may not be declared as const in the function
definition
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61312
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61312
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
http://www.dansaks.com/articles/2000-02%20Top-Level%20cv-Qualifiers%20in%20Function%20Parameters.pdf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61249
Michael Tautschnig mt at debian dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #32843|0 |1
is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61249
--- Comment #8 from Michael Tautschnig mt at debian dot org ---
I've just updated the patch to include a similar amendment for the
__builtin_ia32_mpsadbw256 function. I'll do as suggested and will post to
gcc-patches.
Best,
Michael
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61300
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61312
--- Comment #3 from Alexis Wilke alexis at m2osw dot com ---
Wow! I see that is now... normal behavior. If you ask me, it sucks. But
well... I suppose I don't count.
Thank you for the PDF reference.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61313
Bug ID: 61313
Summary: configure incorrectly strips $target_alias from
PLUGIN_LD_SUFFIX
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61300
--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 32854
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32854action=edit
quick and dirty fix
This fixes the problem in a fairly obvious way, but I think we can use a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61176
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Macleod amacleod at redhat dot com ---
so. Include them all with an accumulator file as suggested? Over a run of
multiple generations you have to expect some sort of flux in include structure,
especially since we
30 matches
Mail list logo
