[Bug ada/61505] [4.10 Regression] bootstrap broken by ada/gnat_rm.texi after r211448

2014-06-14 Thread charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61505 --- Comment #4 from Arnaud Charlet charlet at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: charlet Date: Sat Jun 14 06:55:49 2014 New Revision: 211665 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211665root=gccview=rev Log: PR ada/61505 * gnat_rm.texi:

[Bug ada/61505] [4.10 Regression] bootstrap broken by ada/gnat_rm.texi after r211448

2014-06-14 Thread charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61505 --- Comment #5 from Arnaud Charlet charlet at gcc dot gnu.org --- Never mind, I'm using makeinfo 4.8, so this is indeed another issue. Let me know if my latest commit improves things. Arno

[Bug c/61502] == comparison on one-past pointer gives wrong result

2014-06-14 Thread harald at gigawatt dot nl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61502 --- Comment #4 from Harald van Dijk harald at gigawatt dot nl --- That's an interesting argument. You may well be right that the original code, strictly speaking, does not prove that GCC has a bug, but I do think GCC has a bug nonetheless, and

[Bug ada/61505] [4.10 Regression] bootstrap broken by ada/gnat_rm.texi after r211448

2014-06-14 Thread bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61505 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug ada/61505] [4.10 Regression] bootstrap broken by ada/gnat_rm.texi after r211448

2014-06-14 Thread bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61505 --- Comment #7 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de --- Created attachment 32936 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32936action=edit this patch works for me the main problem seems to be, that @item is not working

[Bug c++/61506] ICE [4.10 Regression] triggered by solution to #61446

2014-06-14 Thread juergen.reuter at desy dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61506 --- Comment #2 from Jürgen Reuter juergen.reuter at desy dot de --- This is the remark what I got from Andy Buckley: Line 29 of PDF.cc is the end of the file, which suggests to me an unclosed scope or similar higher up. The reported errors are

[Bug c++/61506] ICE [4.10 Regression] triggered by solution to #61446

2014-06-14 Thread juergen.reuter at desy dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61506 --- Comment #3 from Jürgen Reuter juergen.reuter at desy dot de --- Created attachment 32937 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32937action=edit Code that triggers the ICE

[Bug c++/61506] ICE [4.10 Regression] triggered by solution to #61446

2014-06-14 Thread juergen.reuter at desy dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61506 --- Comment #4 from Jürgen Reuter juergen.reuter at desy dot de --- I reduced the case to the code attached. But you need to include the boost headers (which are pretty standard tho; I have version 1.55.0). /opt/local/include is my path for the

[Bug bootstrap/61508] New: [4.10 regression] fold-const.c:14863:55: error: cannot convert 'const char*' to 'const_tree

2014-06-14 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61508 Bug ID: 61508 Summary: [4.10 regression] fold-const.c:14863:55: error: cannot convert 'const char*' to 'const_tree Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/61360] [4.10 Regression] ICE: in lra_update_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:1363 with -mtune=bdver4

2014-06-14 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61360 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug ada/61505] [4.10 Regression] bootstrap broken by ada/gnat_rm.texi after r211448

2014-06-14 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61505 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- Created attachment 32936 [details] this patch works for me Works for me too (powerpc-apple-darwin9, makeinfo (GNU texinfo) 5.1), now at stage 2.

[Bug target/61387] [4.10 Regression] ~900 test failures on on x86_64-apple-darwin13 for g++ with -m64 after r211088

2014-06-14 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61387 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- Could this PR get some attention please? To have an idea about how fun it is, look at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2014-06/msg01182.html.

[Bug ada/61505] [4.10 Regression] bootstrap broken by ada/gnat_rm.texi after r211448

2014-06-14 Thread charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61505 --- Comment #9 from Arnaud Charlet charlet at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch looks reasonable to me at first sight, can you please post it to gcc-patches for a final review and approval? Thanks for looking into it! Arno

[Bug c++/61507] GCC does not compile function with parameter pack.

2014-06-14 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61507 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug c++/61489] Wrong warning with -Wmissing-field-initializers.

2014-06-14 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61489 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c++/57644] [C++1y] Cannot bind bitfield to lvalue reference

2014-06-14 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57644 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- And with the released 4.9.0 too. We should add the testcase and close it.

[Bug c++/57573] [C++1y] bogus taking address of temporary error

2014-06-14 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57573 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- And with the released 4.9.0 too. We should add the testcase and close it.

[Bug ada/61505] [4.10 Regression] bootstrap broken by ada/gnat_rm.texi after r211448

2014-06-14 Thread edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61505 --- Comment #10 from edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: edlinger Date: Sat Jun 14 14:31:55 2014 New Revision: 211667 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211667root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-06-14 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de

[Bug c++/61482] ICE when compiling Firefox ESR 24 with r211488

2014-06-14 Thread tsaunders at mozilla dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61482 --- Comment #3 from Trevor Saunders tsaunders at mozilla dot com --- Created attachment 32938 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32938action=edit test case Its pretty close to undreadable, but its fairly reduced, it started at

[Bug c++/61482] ICE when compiling Firefox ESR 24 with r211488

2014-06-14 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61482 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/61482] ICE when compiling Firefox ESR 24 with r211488

2014-06-14 Thread tsaunders at mozilla dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61482 --- Comment #5 from Trevor Saunders tsaunders at mozilla dot com --- Could you please post the full gcc invocation? Err yeah that would be useful ;) gcc -flto -r -Os -nostdlib -std=gnu++11 start.ii

[Bug c++/61482] ICE when compiling Firefox ESR 24 with r211488

2014-06-14 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61482 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/61509] New: GCC miscompilation on ARM during RTL optimization when compiled with -O3

2014-06-14 Thread quentusrex at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61509 Bug ID: 61509 Summary: GCC miscompilation on ARM during RTL optimization when compiled with -O3 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major

[Bug rtl-optimization/61509] GCC miscompilation on ARM during RTL optimization when compiled with -O3

2014-06-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61509 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug rtl-optimization/61509] GCC miscompilation on ARM during RTL optimization when compiled with -O3

2014-06-14 Thread quentusrex at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61509 --- Comment #2 from William King quentusrex at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 32939 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32939action=edit Source file for switch_core_media.c Line 3356 is the strcasecmp that is being

[Bug rtl-optimization/61509] GCC miscompilation on ARM during RTL optimization when compiled with -O3

2014-06-14 Thread quentusrex at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61509 --- Comment #3 from William King quentusrex at gmail dot com --- Line 7945 has the strcasecmp of the gcc output 'original' pass: https://github.com/quentusrex/FS-6495/blob/master/gcc_debug_orig/switch_core_media.c.003t.original

[Bug rtl-optimization/61509] GCC miscompilation on ARM during RTL optimization when compiled with -O3

2014-06-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61509 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to William King from comment #2) Created attachment 32939 [details] Source file for switch_core_media.c This is the source and not the preprocessed source.

[Bug rtl-optimization/61509] GCC miscompilation on ARM during RTL optimization when compiled with -O2

2014-06-14 Thread quentusrex at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61509 --- Comment #5 from William King quentusrex at gmail dot com --- Preprocessed file located here: http://quentusrex.com/switch_core_media.c.preprocessed

[Bug c++/33101] [DR 577] allow typedefs for void in empty parameter list

2014-06-14 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33101 --- Comment #17 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Sat Jun 14 22:55:40 2014 New Revision: 211673 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211673root=gccview=rev Log: /cp 2014-06-14 Paolo Carlini

[Bug c++/33101] [DR 577] allow typedefs for void in empty parameter list

2014-06-14 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33101 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/33101] [DR 577] allow typedefs for void in empty parameter list

2014-06-14 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33101 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug regression/61510] New: [4.10 Regression]: 20_util/scoped_allocator/requirements/explicit_instantiation.cc and tr1/6_containers/tuple/requirements/explicit_instantiation.cc

2014-06-14 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61510 Bug ID: 61510 Summary: [4.10 Regression]: 20_util/scoped_allocator/requirements/explicit_instant iation.cc and

[Bug regression/61510] [4.10 Regression]: 20_util/scoped_allocator/requirements/explicit_instantiation.cc and tr1/6_containers/tuple/requirements/explicit_instantiation.cc

2014-06-14 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61510 --- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- What happens at the line 1054 of cgraphunit.c. = cgraph_get_node (DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN (decl)); origin_node-used_as_abstract_origin = true; Do you