https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61653
Bug ID: 61653
Summary: Warning 'literal-suffix' is not suppressed by gcc
pragma
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61654
Bug ID: 61654
Summary: [4.9.1] ICE in release_function_body, at cgraph.c:1699
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39612
Bug 39612 depends on bug 61607, which changed state.
Bug 61607 Summary: DOM missed jump threading and destroyed loops
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61607
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61607
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61654
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61628
--- Comment #7 from Arjen Markus arjen.markus895 at gmail dot com ---
Hi Jerry,
no, it does not - it should have printed all values in the array
(matrix) that are not 1, the first one thousand elements and finally
it should have printed Done.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61320
--- Comment #46 from thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
After expand, the newly created 16bit big endian load becomes:
(insn 688 687 689 (set (reg:HI 482)
(mem:HI (reg/v/f:SI 189 [ ptr ]) [0 MEM[base: ptr_110, offset: 0B]+0 S2
A8]))
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61654
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61655
Bug ID: 61655
Summary: Copy constructor not called on CRTP schema
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60968
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61655
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Try -fno-elide-constructors. Why would you want a copy? Is it because of the
parentheses in the return statement that you expect elision not to be
performed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61655
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61633
--- Comment #1 from mshawcroft at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mshawcroft
Date: Mon Jun 30 07:54:59 2014
New Revision: 212137
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212137root=gccview=rev
Log:
[AArch64] Fix register clobber in,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57541
--- Comment #10 from Kirill Yukhin kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Mon Jun 30 08:14:39 2014
New Revision: 212138
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212138root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/57541
gcc/c/
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52268
--- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia from comment #8)
Seems to work to me in gcc-4.6:
TLS _is_ supported on Darwin by means of emutls (emulation using pthreads
interfaces).
This
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61655
--- Comment #3 from Fabien Picarougne fabien.picarou...@univ-nantes.fr ---
This code is minimal and is just here to illustrate the problem, I use a more
complex one to handle generic matrix.
But The copy constructor here is not neutral, there is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60947
--- Comment #19 from YuFan yufan8.chen at gmail dot com ---
After patching the memset.S, it works correctly.
Thanks a lot.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57541
--- Comment #11 from Kirill Yukhin kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Mon Jun 30 08:22:43 2014
New Revision: 212139
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212139root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/57541
gcc/c/
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61655
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Look up copy elision (the wikipedia article will do).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61637
--- Comment #13 from Krishnamoorthy C chandrakm at hotmail dot com ---
(In reply to Krishnamoorthy C from comment #12)
(In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #11)
I tested a corrected version of your example with both G++ 4.8.1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61518
--- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com ---
Isn't this fixed now?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61517
--- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com ---
Isn't this fixed now?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61517
thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61656
Bug ID: 61656
Summary: Undefined behavior in classify_argument
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61657
Bug ID: 61657
Summary: Undefined behavior in loop-iv.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61160
christophe.lyon at st dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||christophe.lyon at st dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60968
--- Comment #8 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
So fixed?
yes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60968
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61633
--- Comment #2 from mshawcroft at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mshawcroft
Date: Mon Jun 30 11:58:18 2014
New Revision: 212143
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212143root=gccview=rev
Log:
[AArch64] Fix register clobber in,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61616
niva at niisi dot msk.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.1
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61633
mshawcroft at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61214
Vadim Zeitlin vz-gcc at zeitlins dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vz-gcc at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61488
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jun 30 12:36:37 2014
New Revision: 212145
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212145root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/61488
* pt.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61500
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jun 30 12:36:28 2014
New Revision: 212144
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212144root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/61500
* tree.c (lvalue_kind): Handle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58286
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61658
Bug ID: 61658
Summary: Invalid std::string(size_type, value_type) constructor
implementation
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61658
--- Comment #1 from __vic d.v.a at ngs dot ru ---
If replace with:
std::string st(1U, '0');
then prints as expected:
1
0
Why {1U, '0'} is treated as std::initializer_listchar ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61647
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61639
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61634
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58845
--- Comment #22 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #21)
One argument against the sequence point is that we don't have one for ?: .
If we add one for ?: several testcases regress, so we have to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61658
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51253
--- Comment #17 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jun 30 14:25:21 2014
New Revision: 212150
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212150root=gccview=rev
Log:
DR 1030
PR c++/51253
PR c++/61382
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61382
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jun 30 14:25:21 2014
New Revision: 212150
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212150root=gccview=rev
Log:
DR 1030
PR c++/51253
PR c++/61382
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61488
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659
Bug ID: 61659
Summary: Extra undefined symbol because of devirtualization
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61500
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jun 30 15:05:32 2014
New Revision: 212152
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212152root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/61500
* tree.c (lvalue_kind): Handle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659
--- Comment #1 from Rafael Avila de Espindola rafael.espindola at gmail dot
com ---
The undefined is still present with -fno-devirtualize-speculatively.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61539
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jun 30 15:11:14 2014
New Revision: 212154
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212154root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/61539
* pt.c (unify_one_argument):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61555
Rafael Avila de Espindola rafael.espindola at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I don't see why you think this is a bug. parserint::getOption will be part
of the vtable of PassNameParser anyways.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Oh I see it, it is declared inside the template.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659
--- Comment #4 from Rafael Avila de Espindola rafael.espindola at gmail dot
com ---
I ran the testcase with just -O2 (original code with -O3, but the reduced
testcase with -O2).
getOption will be part of the vtable, but it can end up being
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61660
Bug ID: 61660
Summary: static_assert triggering when it should not
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51400
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Jun 30 15:41:16 2014
New Revision: 212155
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212155root=gccview=rev
Log:
/c-family
2014-06-30 Paolo Carlini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51400
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 51400, which changed state.
Bug 51400 Summary: [c++0x] ICE with constexpr and attribute noreturn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51400
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61637
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61539
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jun 30 15:58:58 2014
New Revision: 212156
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212156root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/61539
* pt.c (unify_one_argument):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61500
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61566
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61660
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
That's not how static_assert works.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61539
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61660
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51849
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57233
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jun 30 16:56:01 2014
New Revision: 212158
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212158root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-06-30 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61660
--- Comment #3 from Udo Steinberg us15 at os dot inf.tu-dresden.de ---
Created attachment 33035
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33035action=edit
Testcase 2
Then, similar to this new test case, I would expect something like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61299
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jun 30 16:56:01 2014
New Revision: 212158
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212158root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-06-30 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61299
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57233
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61637
--- Comment #15 from Krishnamoorthy C chandrakm at hotmail dot com ---
Thanks for the info.
Sorry, the original intent was to generate a shared lib hence the shared
options, but i have moved the code to generate executable program, but the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at redhat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61660
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Udo Steinberg from comment #3)
Created attachment 33035 [details]
Testcase 2
Then, similar to this new test case, I would expect something like the
following:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61539
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jun 30 17:30:22 2014
New Revision: 212161
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212161root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/61539
* pt.c (unify_one_argument):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61539
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61647
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52268
--- Comment #10 from Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia jeremyhu at macports dot org
---
Ah, gotcha. In that case, please retitle as well to indicate such. Prior to
gcc-4.5, even support via emutls was not available on darwin, so some people in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61660
--- Comment #5 from Udo Steinberg us15 at os dot inf.tu-dresden.de ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
That is still correct s is not a constant expression.
Yes, I'm saying a similar warning should be emitted for x.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61660
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Udo Steinberg from comment #5)
Yes, I'm saying a similar warning should be emitted for x.
No it should not, you are using x and s in completely different ways.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61661
Bug ID: 61661
Summary: [C++11][4.9/4.10 Regression] Bogus error: ‘const
Outer::Foo{Outer::Bar}’ is not a constant expression
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52268
--- Comment #11 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed title to reflect that this is for native tls.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54891
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Jun 30 18:30:50 2014
New Revision: 212162
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212162root=gccview=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-06-30 Paolo Carlini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 54891, which changed state.
Bug 54891 Summary: [C++11] lambda-expression and explicit type conversion (cast
notation)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54891
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54891
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61647
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jun 30 18:44:24 2014
New Revision: 212163
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212163root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/61647
* pt.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61566
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jun 30 18:51:29 2014
New Revision: 212165
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212165root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/61566
* mangle.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61566
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jun 30 18:52:39 2014
New Revision: 212166
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212166root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/61566
* mangle.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61647
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jun 30 18:52:45 2014
New Revision: 212167
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212167root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/61647
* pt.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61566
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61647
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jun 30 19:09:57 2014
New Revision: 212168
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212168root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/61647
* pt.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61647
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53662
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36299
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39433
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61608
--- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rth
Date: Mon Jun 30 20:14:42 2014
New Revision: 212172
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212172root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR rtl-opt/61608
PR target/39284
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39284
--- Comment #15 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rth
Date: Mon Jun 30 20:14:42 2014
New Revision: 212172
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212172root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR rtl-opt/61608
PR target/39284
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61648
Ed Smith-Rowland 3dw4rd at verizon dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||3dw4rd at
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo