[Bug lto/61715] [4.9/4.10 Regression] binutils trunk ld/LTO 11 test fails when built using GCC 4.9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61715 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/61718] New: Visibility issue with template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61718 Bug ID: 61718 Summary: Visibility issue with template class Product: gcc Version: 4.8.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/61717] seg fault on using variadic templates to initialize array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61717 --- Comment #1 from programmerjake at gmail dot com --- gcc version string: gcc (Debian 4.9.0-6) 4.9.0

[Bug c++/61717] New: seg fault on using variadic templates to initialize array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61717 Bug ID: 61717 Summary: seg fault on using variadic templates to initialize array Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug c++/61716] New: internal compiler error: Seg Fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61716 Bug ID: 61716 Summary: internal compiler error: Seg Fault Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug libstdc++/61582] C++11 regex memory corruption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61582 --- Comment #14 from Tim Shen --- (In reply to Maksymilian Arciemowicz from comment #13) > @Tim: do you need help? This is what I'm going to do: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2014-07/msg8.html Please send to libstdc++ ml if you have any

[Bug libfortran/61499] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Internal read of negative integer broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61499 --- Comment #9 from Keith Refson --- This fix checks out for the full code in context as well as the boiled-down example. Happy for this to be closed.

[Bug libgcc/61666] go float32/64 to int64 conversion segfaults on mips32 when libgcc_cv_mips_hard_float=yes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61666 Ed Swierk changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/61544] ICE due to thumb1_reorg function mishandles label type insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61544 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/61203] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] g++.old-deja/g++.jason/rvalue2.C FAILs with -O2 -fno-inline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61203 --- Comment #3 from Michael Matz --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > same spot. No idea what to do against this though, treating a CLOBBER as a > barrier for propagation of addresses to other local variables would penalize > stuff

[Bug target/61656] Undefined behavior in classify_argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61656 --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #0) > /usr/src/gcc/obj052/gcc/xgcc -B/usr/src/gcc/obj052/gcc/ > -fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fdiagnostics-color=never -O0 -w -c -o pr4 > 2025-2.o /usr/src/gcc/gcc/testsui

[Bug lto/61715] New: [4.9/4.10 Regression] binutils trunk ld/LTO 11 test fails when built using GCC 4.9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61715 Bug ID: 61715 Summary: [4.9/4.10 Regression] binutils trunk ld/LTO 11 test fails when built using GCC 4.9 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug tree-optimization/57233] Vector lowering of LROTATE_EXPR pessimizes code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57233 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/61714] configure --with-arch and --with-cpu are ignored on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61714 --- Comment #1 from Richard Earnshaw --- Author: rearnsha Date: Fri Jul 4 10:51:56 2014 New Revision: 212295 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212295&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/61714 * aarch64.h (OPTION_DEFAULT_SPECS): Define.

[Bug target/61714] New: configure --with-arch and --with-cpu are ignored on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61714 Bug ID: 61714 Summary: configure --with-arch and --with-cpu are ignored on aarch64 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug libstdc++/61582] C++11 regex memory corruption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61582 --- Comment #13 from Maksymilian Arciemowicz --- @Tim: do you need help?

[Bug rtl-optimization/61712] thumb1_reorg crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61712 --- Comment #16 from linzj --- Thanks amker.

[Bug target/61618] [4.10 Regression]: ICE in expand_vec_perm_pblendv, at config/i386/i386.c with -mavx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61618 --- Comment #3 from Stupachenko Evgeny --- The patch fix the fail: diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c index 8046c67..2cffcef 100644 --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c @@ -43211,12 +43211,10 @@ exp

[Bug rtl-optimization/61712] thumb1_reorg crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61712 --- Comment #15 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- I think this is fixed on trunk by: https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=3df31d76aa8c14ff871fc15b931d277b8d68626a 2014-06-18 Terry Guo PR target/61544 * config/arm/arm.c (thumb1_re

[Bug middle-end/61654] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in release_function_body, at cgraph.c:1699

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61654 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/61684] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in tree check: expected ssa_name, have addr_expr in recognize_single_bit_test, at tree-ssa-ifcombine.c:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61684 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/61654] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in release_function_body, at cgraph.c:1699

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61654 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Jul 4 08:38:45 2014 New Revision: 212293 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212293&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/61654 * cgraphunit.c (expand_thunk): Call free_domin

[Bug middle-end/61654] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in release_function_body, at cgraph.c:1699

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61654 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Jul 4 08:39:31 2014 New Revision: 212294 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212294&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/61654 * cgraphunit.c (expand_thunk): Call free_domin

[Bug tree-optimization/61684] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in tree check: expected ssa_name, have addr_expr in recognize_single_bit_test, at tree-ssa-ifcombine.c:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61684 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Jul 4 08:37:39 2014 New Revision: 212292 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212292&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/61684 * tree-ssa-ifcombine.c (recognize_singl

[Bug c++/61668] Division returns an error in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61668 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- Please go and complain somewhere else, it's not GCC's problem that you are surprised by the behaviour of binary floating point logic. There are several ways to work with exact decimal numbers. See https://

[Bug tree-optimization/61684] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in tree check: expected ssa_name, have addr_expr in recognize_single_bit_test, at tree-ssa-ifcombine.c:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61684 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Jul 4 08:35:20 2014 New Revision: 212291 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212291&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/61684 * tree-ssa-ifcombine.c (recognize_singl

[Bug tree-optimization/61684] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in tree check: expected ssa_name, have addr_expr in recognize_single_bit_test, at tree-ssa-ifcombine.c:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61684 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Jul 4 08:32:56 2014 New Revision: 212290 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212290&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/61684 * tree-ssa-ifcombine.c (recognize_singl

[Bug c++/52595] [DR 325] commas and non-static data member initializers don't mix

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52595 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||siim.schults at gmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug c++/61690] aliasing base template class variable doesn't work in template derived class, when base class has two or more template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61690 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/61382] parameter pack expansion unexpected order

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61382 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Jul 4 08:23:28 2014 New Revision: 212289 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212289&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/61382 Backport from mainline 2014-06-05 Andreas Schwa

[Bug rtl-optimization/61712] thumb1_reorg crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61712 --- Comment #14 from linzj --- I have already submited a patch too.

[Bug c++/61691] [4.10 Regression] invalid use of incomplete type in Firefox

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61691 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/61712] thumb1_reorg crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61712 --- Comment #13 from linzj --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #12) > I can't reproduce this with current trunk, on what compiler version does > this trigger? > > *gcc -v should tell this arm-linux-androideabi-gcc (GC

[Bug rtl-optimization/61712] thumb1_reorg crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61712 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/61712] thumb1_reorg crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61712 --- Comment #11 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 61711 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug rtl-optimization/61712] thumb1_reorg crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61712 --- Comment #10 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 61709 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug rtl-optimization/61711] thumb1_reorg crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61711 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug rtl-optimization/61709] thumb1_reorg crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61709 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug rtl-optimization/61712] thumb1_reorg crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61712 --- Comment #9 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 61710 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug rtl-optimization/61708] thumb1_reorg crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61708 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug rtl-optimization/61712] thumb1_reorg crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61712 --- Comment #8 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 61708 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug rtl-optimization/61707] thumb1_reorg crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61707 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug rtl-optimization/61710] thumb1_reorg crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61710 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug rtl-optimization/61712] thumb1_reorg crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61712 --- Comment #7 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 61707 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug rtl-optimization/61705] thumb1_reorg crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61705 --- Comment #2 from linzj --- I am so sorry. I click submit multiple times for not being patient.

[Bug rtl-optimization/61704] thumb1_reorg crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61704 --- Comment #2 from linzj --- I am so sorry. I click submit multiple times for not being patient.

[Bug rtl-optimization/61712] thumb1_reorg crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61712 --- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 61706 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug rtl-optimization/61706] thumb1_reorg crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61706 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug rtl-optimization/61712] thumb1_reorg crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61712 --- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 61702 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug rtl-optimization/61702] thumb1_reorg crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61702 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug rtl-optimization/61712] thumb1_reorg crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61712 --- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 61705 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug rtl-optimization/61705] thumb1_reorg crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61705 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug rtl-optimization/61712] thumb1_reorg crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61712 --- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 61704 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug rtl-optimization/61704] thumb1_reorg crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61704 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug rtl-optimization/61703] thumb1_reorg crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61703 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug rtl-optimization/61712] thumb1_reorg crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61712 --- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 61703 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/61713] ICE when building c++ code with atomic functions for thumb1 target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61713 --- Comment #2 from zhenqiang.chen at linaro dot org --- Root cause: When expand_call_stmt, if gimple_call_lhs (stmt) is NULL, it will set target to const0_rtx. Then when expand_atomic_test_and_set, it tries to emit_move_insn (subtarget, mem). M

[Bug sanitizer/61693] [asan] is not intercepting aligned_alloc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61693 Kostya Serebryany changed: What|Removed |Added CC||eugeni.stepanov at gmail dot com,

[Bug c++/61668] Division returns an error in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61668 --- Comment #8 from Peter Ketel --- So what is the use of a math library that is only capable of binary computations? In the real world we use the decimal system for all computations. Do we need binary computations? In most cases NO. What is th

[Bug c++/61382] parameter pack expansion unexpected order

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61382 --- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12) > I'm seeing: > FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist86.C -std=c++11 execution test > FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist86.C -std=c++1y execution test > on 4.9 branch (but not on

[Bug sanitizer/61693] [asan] is not intercepting aligned_alloc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61693 --- Comment #3 from Kostya Serebryany --- yep, that's the plan...

[Bug sanitizer/61693] [asan] is not intercepting aligned_alloc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61693 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Just declare it yourself? If libasan always contains the aligned_alloc symbol, then the testcase will link even when system glibc does not contain it...

[Bug target/61713] ICE when building c++ code with atomic functions for thumb1 target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61713 --- Comment #1 from wangzheyu --- This ICE also happened on the trunk.

[Bug middle-end/61654] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in release_function_body, at cgraph.c:1699

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61654 --- Comment #4 from Manuel Lauss --- The patch shifted the ICE to the following, same source file: In file included from ./engines/tony/input.h:32:0, from engines/tony/font.cpp:32: ./common/events.h:239:7: internal compiler erro