https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61742
--- Comment #5 from Kirill Yukhin ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Thu Jul 10 07:38:39 2014
New Revision: 212421
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212421&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/61742
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.dg/torture/pr61
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61742
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61756
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61766
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61713
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||robertgjenssen at gmail dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61763
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61713
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
isable-libmudflap
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --with-arch=armv7-a --with-fpu=vfpv3-d16
--with-float=softfp --with-thumb
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.10.0 20140710 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59131
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Marlier ---
Created attachment 33098
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33098&action=edit
reduced testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61331
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm*
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61762
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61757
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61661
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61757
--- Comment #7 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Don't know if this will help, but the bootstrap works fine on
arm-none-linux-gnueabihf (but breaks on aarch64 as mentioned previously)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61769
Bug ID: 61769
Summary: const reference value is changed to random by a
range-for loop
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61769
theemathas at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||theemathas at hotmail dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61769
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to theemathas from comment #1)
> I am having some problems with uploading the "main.ii" file (apparently it
> is too big because I #include 3 standard libraries). I am uploading the
> non-preproce
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61769
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61769
theemathas at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61769
theemathas at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61769
--- Comment #5 from theemathas at hotmail dot com ---
Created attachment 33100
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33100&action=edit
"main.ii.gz" preprocessed and compressed code
Since the "main.ii" file exceeds the 1000 KB limit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61769
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61757
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab ---
$ diff -u gcc-201407{08,10}/Build/20030922-2.c.079t.dom1
--- gcc-20140708/Build/20030922-2.c.079t.dom1 2014-07-10 12:25:20.886372197
+0200
+++ gcc-20140710/Build/20030922-2.c.079t.dom1 2014-07-10 12:25
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61769
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
If you change it to:
const int& aa = std::abs(a);
const int& foo=std::max(aa, aa);
You'll see that the problem goes away because the value returned by std::abs
gets its lifetime extended, then std
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53590
--- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Jul 10 10:38:30 2014
New Revision: 212424
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212424&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/53590
* function.c (allocate_struct_function):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61769
--- Comment #8 from theemathas at hotmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7)
> If you change it to:
>
> const int& aa = std::abs(a);
> const int& foo=std::max(aa, aa);
>
> You'll see that the problem goes away
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53590
--- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Jul 10 10:41:15 2014
New Revision: 212425
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212425&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/53590
* function.c (allocate_struct_function):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53590
--- Comment #15 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Jul 10 10:43:46 2014
New Revision: 212426
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212426&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/53590
* function.c (allocate_struct_function):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59131
--- Comment #6 from Patrick Marlier ---
This bug seems to be the same as this one:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52173
Maybe the patch can be backported to 4.7 (hopefully without breaking
anything?).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59131
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61016
--- Comment #3 from Kostya Serebryany ---
Ping. Any interest?
The bug is still present in r212279
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61770
Bug ID: 61770
Summary: march=native detects corei7-avx on non avx cpu
(Celeron 847)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61771
Bug ID: 61771
Summary: Regressions in ASan testsuite on ARM Linux
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61741
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jul 10 12:20:32 2014
New Revision: 212430
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212430&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-07-10 Richard Biener
PR c-family/61741
* c-c++-common/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61772
Bug ID: 61772
Summary: RTL if-conversion removes asm volatile goto
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61772
--- Comment #1 from Michael Matz ---
Created attachment 33102
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33102&action=edit
Patch
Possible patch for the problem. There are many predicates for testing various
forms of jump, after ponder
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61762
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61762
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61762
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61762
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ah, no, we've optimized the memcpy to the assignment and so we don't go through
expand_builtin_memcpy then that would be able to handle this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61773
Bug ID: 61773
Summary: [4.10 Regression] ICE in tree-ssa-strlen.c:417
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61773
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61773
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Fixed with adding a prototype
char *stpcpy (char*, const char *);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61773
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Proper testcase (string init was missing):
char *stpcpy (char*, const char *);
char *foo (void)
{
char *p = __builtin_calloc (64, 1);
char *q = __builtin_calloc (64, 1);
__builtin_strcat (q, "abcde");
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61773
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> Proper testcase (string init was missing):
>
> char *stpcpy (char*, const char *);
> char *foo (void)
> {
> char *p = __builtin_calloc (64, 1);
> char *q =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61774
Bug ID: 61774
Summary: ICE (regression?) in lra_update_insn_recog_data, at
lra.c:1219
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61360
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slayoo at staszic dot waw.pl
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61774
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61757
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jul 10 14:43:07 2014
New Revision: 212433
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212433&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-07-10 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/61757
* tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61671
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61757
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61656
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61016
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61656
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, are you ok with the #c0 pseudo patch? I guess I can bootstrap/regtest it
today.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61656
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> So, are you ok with the #c0 pseudo patch? I guess I can bootstrap/regtest
> it today.
If we are narrowing the load from movq to movl for a SImode value, then the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61656
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Depends on what testcase. In pr42025-2.c, it clearly uses movl %edi, %eax,
with and without the patch. If I write:
typedef struct
{
int p;
} Ptr;
struct A
{
long int i;
union
{
Ptr p;
int q
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61656
--- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> then it uses movq %rsi, ... and the patch doesn't change anything on that.
> If you want to use movl %esi, ... in foo in this testcase, more changes are
> needed o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61656
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The patch actually just removes the undefined behavior and nothing else, it
really doesn't affect code generation. It just causes merge_classes (which is
a const function) not to be called on (initialized) s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51840
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61775
Bug ID: 61775
Summary: Allocatable array initialized by implied-do loop array
constructor gives invalid memory reference
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51840
--- Comment #8 from Kai Tietz ---
(In reply to Richard Henderson from comment #7)
> Why the check for PHI_WANTED? I must say the comment is less than
> enlightening. Is there any drawback to just
>
> if (DECL_NONLOCAL (lbl) || FORCED_LABEL (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60929
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51840
--- Comment #9 from Richard Henderson ---
Created attachment 33105
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33105&action=edit
corrected test case
I believe that the original test case is in fact invalid.
Every asm goto has N labels
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51840
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61766
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60795
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.8/4.9 Regression] Wrong |[4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44317
--- Comment #4 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> ---
After the fix for PR61389 goes in we'll get:
[ed@localhost tr2]$ /home/ed/bin/bin/g++ -std=gnu++11 -Wpedantic -c
test_pr44317.cpp
test_pr44317.cpp:7:17: warning: ISO C++11 requi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659
--- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jul 10 19:29:59 2014
New Revision: 212436
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212436&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/61659
PR c++/61687
gcc/c-family/
* c.opt (-fuse-all-vi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61687
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jul 10 19:29:59 2014
New Revision: 212436
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212436&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/61659
PR c++/61687
gcc/c-family/
* c.opt (-fuse-all-vir
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38219
Pat Haugen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sch...@linux-m68k.org
Summary|gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61763
--- Comment #2 from Douglas Mencken ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Can you check a recent 4.9.1 snapshot?
Just did it. gcc-4.9-20140709 snapshot.
...
Comparing stages 2 and 3
warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61775
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61775
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #1)
> Whatever the issue was, it appears to be fixed in HEAD.
>
> troutmask:sgk[205] gfc4x -o z h.f90
> troutmask:sgk[206] ./z
>1.
> troutmask:sgk[207] g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61775
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61190
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61121
--- Comment #8 from Jim Michaels ---
in the mingw-w64 gcc compiler at least, -ftree-parallize-loops=12 -O2 runs
single-threaded.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2007-01/msg00165.html
I probably don't understand the compiler, but I have been tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61661
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61661
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jul 10 21:48:26 2014
New Revision: 212439
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212439&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/61661
* semantics.c (reduced_constant_expression_p): Handle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61661
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jul 10 21:53:23 2014
New Revision: 212440
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212440&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/61661
* semantics.c (reduced_constant_expression_p): Handle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61661
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61389
--- Comment #8 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: emsr
Date: Thu Jul 10 22:26:50 2014
New Revision: 212441
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212441&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-07-10 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
Jon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61389
emsr at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61776
Bug ID: 61776
Summary: ICE: verify_flow_info failed: control flow in the
middle of basic block with -fprofile-generate
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61777
Bug ID: 61777
Summary: xuexi
Product: gcc
Version: new-ra
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61777
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61687
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
85 matches
Mail list logo
