https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61071
--- Comment #1 from Krzysztof Kundzicz ---
Same with gcc 4.9.1 + gdb 7.7.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61881
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
The draft patch does not fully work:
a) "class._data = desc" assignment is missing
tmp = gfc_build_addr_expr (NULL_TREE, tmp);
plus the moved gfc_add_modify works in the scalar case; for the array case, on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61881
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
Draft patch:
--- a/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
@@ -591,4 +591,10 @@ gfc_conv_intrinsic_to_class (gfc_se *parmse, gfc_expr *e,
gfc_conv_expr_reference (parmse, e);
- tm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61085
--- Comment #10 from Zdenek Sojka ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9)
> Can you open a new bug for that?
Opened PR61884 for that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61884
Bug ID: 61884
Summary: [4.10 Regression] g++.dg/ipa/pr61085.C FAILs with -Os
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61548
--- Comment #7 from wangzheyu ---
I have a simpler test case to reproduce this bug, it should be an old bug for
the tree-emutls pass. The way this pass mapping the control vars and tls vars
hasn't consider that there may more than one alias for a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61548
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
Summary|FAIL: gcc.dg/t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61883
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61548
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tony.wang at arm dot com
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61883
--- Comment #1 from wangzheyu ---
For target don't support tls, the above simple test case will fail for the same
reason of gcc.dg/tls/alias-1.c.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61883
Bug ID: 61883
Summary: [4.10 Regression]ICE for gcc.dg/tls/alias-1.c on arm
target
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55641
Tom Tromey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61826
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61878
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61748
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Component|middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61861
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
The same for __DATE__, __TIME__, __LINE__.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61881
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61861
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Seems that the location of __FILE__ is generally broken, e.g. on
extern void foo (int i);
void
f (void)
{
foo (__FILE__);
}
the column info is wrong as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61579
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61734
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Eric, dou you have any plans regarding this issue?
Sure, see comment #3.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61882
Bug ID: 61882
Summary: attribute weak ignored for function templates
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61802
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #7)
> Actually at the cauldron discussion I got an idea that it may be issue with
> anchor generation
> not bringing in all the constructors. Is the problem there that co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61802
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka ---
Actually at the cauldron discussion I got an idea that it may be issue with
anchor generation
not bringing in all the constructors. Is the problem there that constructors of
static vairables
are empty in the fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61160
--- Comment #14 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Tue Jul 22 16:20:25 2014
New Revision: 212915
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212915&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-07-22 Martin Jambor
PR ipa/61160
* g++.dg/ipa/pr61160-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61861
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61881
Bug ID: 61881
Summary: ICE in gfc_conv_intrinsic_to_class with assumed-rank
CLASS(*)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-cod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61864
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61880
Bug ID: 61880
Summary: Linking with external functions in C does not work in
GO when using gccgo, while it works in gc
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61831
--- Comment #34 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Hi Dominique,
Should one be getting false? It seems to me that the code looks right.
within the do loop:
new_prt_spec ([string_t's]) produces an array of string_t's whose
char.data
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61879
Bug ID: 61879
Summary: [4.10 Regression] GCC gives "note: non-delegitimized
UNSPEC UNSPEC_GOTOFF (1) found in variable location"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53808
--- Comment #12 from Rafael Avila de Espindola ---
Note that this bug is present once more when -fno-use-all-virtuals is used.
With the original testcase gcc again produces an undefined reference to
_ZN3barD0Ev.
Is -fno-use-all-virtuals intended
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61878
Bug ID: 61878
Summary: Missing intrinsic functions in avx512intrin.h
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61752
--- Comment #2 from jon.turney at dronecode dot org.uk ---
Better patch: https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-07/msg00180.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61822
--- Comment #5 from Kirill Yukhin ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Tue Jul 22 12:53:04 2014
New Revision: 212911
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212911&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite
PR tree-optimization/61822
* gcc.dg/vect/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61870
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61873
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61822
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #3 from Yuri Rumyantsev ---
> Hi Rainer,
>
> Could you try attached patch to check if it helps (test should not be
> run for sparc).
Indeed, the test is UNSUPPORTED now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61877
--- Comment #1 from Alexander Shopov ---
I will provide additional information if necessary
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61877
Bug ID: 61877
Summary: [4.10 Regression]: reflect: cannot use []string as
type string in Call
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61876
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61876
Bug ID: 61876
Summary: Converting __builtin_round + cast into
__builtin_lround is not always equivalent in regards
to math errno
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61822
--- Comment #3 from Yuri Rumyantsev ---
Hi Rainer,
Could you try attached patch to check if it helps (test should not be
run for sparc).
Thanks ahead.
Yuri..
2014-07-16 19:20 GMT+04:00 ro at gcc dot gnu.org :
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61867
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #3)
> I think that all that needs to happen is a warning is produced
> where either the detection or reduction takes place.
There is no single place, it's a result
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61875
Tatiana Udalova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t.udalova at samsung dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51312
--- Comment #9 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #6)
> Marc, are you going to send your patch to the mailing list (CC Jason)?
Sorry, I don't remember this patch at all. I may try again to understand what
it does at som
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61875
Marat Zakirov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m.zakirov at samsung dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61875
Yury Gribov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||y.gribov at samsung dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61734
Igor Zamyatin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izamyatin at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61875
Bug ID: 61875
Summary: ATRIBUTE_NONNULL macro error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
50 matches
Mail list logo
