https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61320
wangzheyu tony.wang at arm dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tony.wang at arm dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62030
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62030
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to vries from comment #2)
I think the test-case is reading an undefined value from n-next, but that's
easy enough to fix with an intializer for node.
Since node is a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62004
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
Heh, interesting set of events ;)
I have a store version that fires on mips64 with a modified testcase too, see
bug 62030.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62031
Bug ID: 62031
Summary: Different results between O2 and O3 for gcc-4.7.2-5
(Debian 4.7.2-5)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62030
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
(In reply to vries from comment #2)
I think the test-case is reading an undefined value from n-next, but that's
easy enough to fix with an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62014
--- Comment #15 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I can't reproduce this with current trunk and 4.9.1.
What exact compiler version and options did you use?
I used -O2 -mgeneral-regs-only on an aarch64-none-elf compiler
gcc version 4.10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62032
Bug ID: 62032
Summary: FAIL: vsnprintf-chk.c execution, -O2 -flto
-fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62031
Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62032
--- Comment #1 from bin.cheng amker.cheng at gmail dot com ---
Only fail with lto options.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61801
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Aug 6 08:40:19 2014
New Revision: 213652
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213652root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/61801
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61801
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Aug 6 08:44:05 2014
New Revision: 213653
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213653root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/61801
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61801
--- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Aug 6 08:50:12 2014
New Revision: 213654
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213654root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/61801
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62032
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62031
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62026
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62033
Bug ID: 62033
Summary: okteta 4.13.97 error at -O3 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62033
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I don't see a bug here as there is one case where addSize can return 0 and with
jump threading and basic block copying, we get a zero size passed to memset.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62030
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33258
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33258action=edit
Updated tentative patch for if-conversion, including fix for pr62030
Updated tentative patch for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62033
--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com ---
I can see where you're coming from Andrew, but what is disconcerting about this
is that the _FORTIFY_SOURCE warning is plainly incorrect here. How is one
supposed to write a string.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49571
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52401
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62031
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at
of statically initialized
data.
gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.10.0 20140806 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
gcc -flto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61320
--- Comment #65 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
--- Comment #61 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
[...]
can you test and apply that patch?
I think that it needs to be applied
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62031
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61320
--- Comment #66 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Aug 6 11:41:13 2014
New Revision: 213661
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213661root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-08-06 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61320
--- Comment #67 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Aug 6 11:42:22 2014
New Revision: 213662
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213662root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-08-06 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61320
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62021
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The problem is that get_vectype_for_scalar_type_and_size for pointers just
returns vectors of pointer sized integers instead of vectors of pointers.
So, either we need to VCE it, or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61535
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
I'm seeing the same on the 4.7, 4.8, and 4.9 branches. Also
reproducible in i386-pc-solaris2.11 x sparc-solaris2.11 and
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62034
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62034
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Better patch:
Index: gcc/lto-streamer-in.c
===
--- gcc/lto-streamer-in.c (revision 213660)
+++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62021
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
The problem is that get_vectype_for_scalar_type_and_size for pointers just
returns vectors of pointer sized integers instead of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62034
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62035
Bug ID: 62035
Summary: [4.9 Regresion] wrong code building libapache-mod-perl
with -O1, works with -O1 -fno-tree-dse
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60874
--- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
After lots of debugging...
The problem is with the label that is passed as an argument to
__go_set_defer_retaddr. In function main.$thunk0, in _.179r.cse1 dump, we have:
...
(insn 7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62035
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org ---
seen with r213518 on the trunk as well
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60874
--- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
To illustrate unreliable approach, please compile following test:
--cut here--
extern void foo (void *);
int test(void)
{
__label__ bla;
foo (bla);
bla:
return 0;
}
--cut
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61749
--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
vqdmlal_lane_s16 expects an immediate/literal lane number as the fourth
argument and the builtin expansion code in aarch64-builtins.c is actually
equipped to error out when given a variable (in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60874
--- Comment #10 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
If you never use goto *exp in the same function the value of label is
undefined.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60874
--- Comment #11 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #10)
If you never use goto *exp in the same function the value of label is
undefined.
I did try adding goto bla: just before label, but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62035
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62034
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Aug 6 13:53:09 2014
New Revision: 213664
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213664root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-08-06 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62034
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60874
--- Comment #12 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com ---
Thanks for the analysis. See also PR 60406.
Dominik sent me a patch for 60406 but 1) he has no copyright assignment; 2) I
think that his patch does not work for SJLJ exceptions.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61393
--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Wed Aug 6 13:59:18 2014
New Revision: 213666
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213666root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-08-06 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61393
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62036
Bug ID: 62036
Summary: Braced-init-list issuing -Wsequence-point warning
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60874
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60406
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62037
Bug ID: 62037
Summary: cannot pass 'int **' as a 'int const* const*'
parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62037
--- Comment #1 from Michael Rolnik mrolnik at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 33262
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33262action=edit
compiler output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61608
jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62037
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Firstly, a warning doesn't mean you cannot do it, you just get a warning.
Secondly, that's the correct behaviour, see
http://c-faq.com/ansi/constmismatch.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62002
Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izamyatin at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62036
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
As pointed out at
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/25115189/optimization-bug-regarding-gcc-stdthread#comment39095137_25115189
(where you apparently copied this code from) there's a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62037
Michael Rolnik mrolnik at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62036
--- Comment #2 from Cameron dacamara.cameron at gmail dot com ---
Welp looks like my friend got to it before I did. My bad. Carry on and good
work!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62037
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61510
jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|cris-axis-elf, |cris-axis-elf,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62023
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62022
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61294
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62033
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62002
--- Comment #3 from Viacheslav Chernyshev astellar at ro dot ru ---
No, fcilkplus switch triggers compilation error when code is perfectly valid.
Your example is wrong, as in C++ this pointer is an implicit first argument of
member function.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61923
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Aug 6 15:35:49 2014
New Revision: 213674
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213674root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-08-06 Vladimir Makarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61923
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Aug 6 15:40:26 2014
New Revision: 213675
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213675root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-08-06 Vladimir Makarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62002
--- Comment #4 from Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com ---
Right, it is mentioned explicitly in the docs. Will take a look
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61923
--- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks Vladimir.
I can now build my kernel with GCC_COMPARE_DEBUG=1 without any issues.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61749
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org |ktkachov at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61393
--- Comment #9 from torvald at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Alex, can you confirm that this is fixed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55641
--- Comment #9 from Tom Tromey tromey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I think this happens due to this code in gen_variable_die:
tree type = TREE_TYPE (decl_or_origin);
if (decl_by_reference_p (decl_or_origin))
add_type_attribute
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61954
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60406
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|reflect.go:test13reflect2 |recover.go:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62023
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
Which means the __gthread_active_p() function in libgcc/gthr-posix.h is
returning false
Looks like there's a Solaris-specific version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60874
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.10.0 |4.9.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62038
Bug ID: 62038
Summary: Out of range branch target in thunk
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62039
Bug ID: 62039
Summary: concept checking for std::prev
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62036
Cameron dacamara.cameron at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51253
Cameron dacamara.cameron at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62040
Bug ID: 62040
Summary: internal compiler error: in
simplify_const_unary_operation, at simplify-rtx.c:1555
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62040
--- Comment #1 from davidxl xinliangli at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 33264
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33264action=edit
test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62040
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(insn 144 82 145 2 (set (reg:V2DI 33 v1 [orig:96 D.2914 ] [96])
(vec_concat:V2DI (reg:DI 32 v0 [orig:95 D.2915 ] [95])
(vec_duplicate:DI (const_int 0 [0]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62040
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64*-*-*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62041
Bug ID: 62041
Summary: vector fneg codegen uses a subtract instead of an xor
(x86-64)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43906
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Aug 6 19:09:08 2014
New Revision: 213682
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213682root=gccview=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-08-06 Paolo Carlini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43906
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51312
--- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
I'm having a look at the issue and it seems rather different than I (we)
thought. Suffices to say that it does not affect constexpr non-operator member
functions, and that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62042
Bug ID: 62042
Summary: Missing optimization of copying non-limited objects
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61510
Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62039
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62014
Evandro Menezes e.menezes at samsung dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51312
--- Comment #12 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
build_expr_type_conversion is the answer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51744
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61994
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61994
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Aug 7 01:44:06 2014
New Revision: 213688
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213688root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/61994
* init.c (build_vec_init):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60417
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Aug 7 01:44:11 2014
New Revision: 213689
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213689root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/60417
* init.c (build_vec_init):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62043
Bug ID: 62043
Summary: [4.9/4.10 Regression] GCC hangs / aborts / double free
or corruption (!prev) on invalid input
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62043
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 33266
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33266action=edit
Backtrace
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
