[Bug c++/57466] [DR 1584] Argument deduction fails for 'const T*' when T is function type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57466 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug fortran/62142] [4.9/5 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (X = X - L*floor(X/L))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62142 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Aug 16 09:45:02 2014 New Revision: 214061 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214061&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-08-16 Thomas Koenig Backport from trunk PR fortran/6214

[Bug fortran/62142] [4.9/5 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (X = X - L*floor(X/L))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62142 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/52819] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'nop_expr' in decl_linkage, at cp/tree.c:3136

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52819 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Sat Aug 16 10:07:41 2014 New Revision: 214062 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214062&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-08-16 Paolo Carlini PR c++/52819 * g++.dg/temp

[Bug c++/52819] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'nop_expr' in decl_linkage, at cp/tree.c:3136

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52819 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/62161] New: more precise locations for command-line diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62161 Bug ID: 62161 Summary: more precise locations for command-line diagnostics Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug rtl-optimization/62151] [5 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62151 --- Comment #7 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- It's a combine pass issue and it happens on x86 too. Dump before combine pass is fine as below. 30: r83:SI=0 71: flags:CC=cmp(r83:SI,0x1) REG_DEAD r83:SI 72: {r83:SI=-ltu(flags:CC,0

[Bug fortran/62076] [4.9/5 Regression] testsuite failure in udr2.90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62076 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/61968] ICE (assembly failure) due to wrongly generating a vtable for TYPE(*) / BT_ASSUMED_TYPE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61968 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/60465] Compiling glibc-2.17,2.18 with gcc-4.8.2 and binutils-2.23.2,2.24 results in segfaults in _start / elf_get_dynamic_info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60465 Mike Frysinger changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug other/60465] Compiling glibc-2.17,2.18 with gcc-4.8.2 and binutils-2.23.2,2.24 results in segfaults in _start / elf_get_dynamic_info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60465 --- Comment #19 from Mike Frysinger --- Created attachment 33340 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33340&action=edit rtld.s generated -- passing w/r187038

[Bug other/60465] Compiling glibc-2.17,2.18 with gcc-4.8.2 and binutils-2.23.2,2.24 results in segfaults in _start / elf_get_dynamic_info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60465 --- Comment #20 from Mike Frysinger --- Created attachment 33341 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33341&action=edit rtld.s generated -- failing w/r187042

[Bug c++/62149] ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:12646 with constexpr and tuple_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62149 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.

[Bug c++/62160] std::uppercase does not work for std::hex output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62160 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.

[Bug tree-optimization/62112] Optimize out malloc when block is unused or write-only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62112 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 f

[Bug tree-optimization/62114] [graphite] ICE using -floop-parallelize-all and -ffast-math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62114 --- Comment #5 from Leandro Nini --- Backporting the commit r212122 from trunk fixes the error both in 4.8 and 4.9

[Bug other/60465] Compiling glibc-2.17,2.18 with gcc-4.8.2 and binutils-2.23.2,2.24 results in segfaults in _start / elf_get_dynamic_info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60465 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #21 from Eric Botcazou

[Bug target/61641] [4.9/5 Regression] undefined label in jump_table_data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61641 --- Comment #10 from John David Anglin --- Author: danglin Date: Sat Aug 16 16:36:33 2014 New Revision: 214064 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214064&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/61641 * config/pa/pa-protos.h (pa_output_addr_vec

[Bug target/61641] [4.9/5 Regression] undefined label in jump_table_data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61641 --- Comment #11 from John David Anglin --- Author: danglin Date: Sat Aug 16 16:39:17 2014 New Revision: 214065 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214065&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/61641 * config/pa/pa-protos.h (pa_output_addr_vec

[Bug debug/55794] FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/non-virtual-thunk.C -std=gnu++98 and -std=gnu++11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55794 --- Comment #11 from John David Anglin --- Author: danglin Date: Sat Aug 16 17:29:33 2014 New Revision: 214066 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214066&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from trunk: 2014-04-06 John David Anglin P

[Bug rtl-optimization/62004] dead type-unsafe load replaces type-safe load

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62004 --- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vries Date: Sat Aug 16 17:38:04 2014 New Revision: 214067 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214067&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix if-conversion pass for dead type-unsafe code 2014-08-15 To

[Bug rtl-optimization/62030] wrong code due to ifcvt merging two stores which have different aliasing sets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62030 --- Comment #10 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vries Date: Sat Aug 16 17:38:04 2014 New Revision: 214067 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214067&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix if-conversion pass for dead type-unsafe code 2014-08-15 T

[Bug target/62147] missed loop counter based optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62147 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc64le |powerpc64*-* Status|UNC

[Bug fortran/62162] New: Gfortran produces incorrect dependency files when using -MQ

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62162 Bug ID: 62162 Summary: Gfortran produces incorrect dependency files when using -MQ Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug fortran/62162] Gfortran produces incorrect dependency files when using -MQ

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62162 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/62162] Gfortran produces incorrect dependency files when using -MQ

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62162 --- Comment #2 from jpakkane at gmail dot com --- Seems to be. There are some claims that it would be fixed in 4.6 but as the comments state, is still around in 4.9.

[Bug fortran/62162] Gfortran produces incorrect dependency files when using -MQ

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62162 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Seems to be. There are some claims that it would be fixed in 4.6 but as > the comments state, is still around in 4.9. >From the comment I understand that the bug has been fixed for C, but not for gf

[Bug fortran/62162] Gfortran produces incorrect dependency files when using -MQ

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62162 --- Comment #4 from jpakkane at gmail dot com --- That seems the reasonable thing to do. Hopefully someone looks into this soon.

[Bug fortran/47485] gfortran -M output is incorrect when -MT option is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47485 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jpakkane at gmail dot com --- Com

[Bug fortran/62162] Gfortran produces incorrect dependency files when using -MQ

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62162 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/62163] New: Dependent function call in constant expression produces error in template definition context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62163 Bug ID: 62163 Summary: Dependent function call in constant expression produces error in template definition context Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/62026] [4.9/5 Regression] Crash in lto_get_decl_name_mapping

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62026 Dmitry Gorbachev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org Known