[Bug fortran/62049] Negative count_rate when calling system_clock

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62049 --- Comment #2 from Paul Martin wxcvbn789456123-nw6wda at yahoo dot fr --- Below is the output of the program given in Comment #1 , using the same version of gfortran and the same operating system (32 bits) as in Comment #0 : bash 2 : gfortran

[Bug plugins/62252] a callback to event PLUGIN_FINISH_TYPE segfaults

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62252 klemen.jan.enova at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||klemen.jan.enova at

[Bug c++/34938] ICE with function pointers and attribute noreturn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34938 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.8.3,

[Bug c++/34938] ICE with function pointers and attribute noreturn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34938 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Aug 25 08:32:04 2014 New Revision: 214415 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214415root=gccview=rev Log: /cp 2014-08-25 Paolo Carlini

[Bug c++/34938] ICE with function pointers and attribute noreturn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34938 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug libgcc/56846] _Unwind_Backtrace on ARM and noexcept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56846 wangzheyu tony.wang at arm dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tony.wang at arm dot

[Bug c++/61825] [5 regression] g++.dg/cpp0x/static_assert9.C FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61825 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug libgcc/56846] _Unwind_Backtrace on ARM and noexcept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56846 --- Comment #7 from wangzheyu tony.wang at arm dot com --- Another test case doesn't involve noexcept key workd. Cmd line: arm-none-eabi-g++ -mthumb -mcpu=cortex-m3 -O0 -g -std=c++11 -specs=rdimon.specs main.c -o main.exe #include unwind.h

[Bug target/62254] New: gcc-4.9 miscompiles linux kernel zlib for armv3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62254 Bug ID: 62254 Summary: gcc-4.9 miscompiles linux kernel zlib for armv3 Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/62254] gcc-4.9 miscompiles linux kernel zlib for armv3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62254 --- Comment #1 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Imported from LP https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+bug/1307197

[Bug bootstrap/61078] [5 Regression] ESA mode bootstrap failure since r209897

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61078 Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug bootstrap/61078] [5 Regression] ESA mode bootstrap failure since r209897

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61078 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to jgreenhalgh from comment #1) I'm happy to take a look at this, but I have no access to an s390 ESA mode environment, so will struggle to make much progress. If

[Bug c/62024] __atomic_always_lock_free is not a constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62024 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug plugins/62252] a callback to event PLUGIN_FINISH_TYPE segfaults

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62252 --- Comment #5 from klemen.jan.enova at gmail dot com --- The build passed make check, but I said invoke_plugin_callback() should be before cp_parser_set_decl_spec_type(), so I will try that way too.

[Bug other/62210] download_prerequisites does not download into current directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62210 --- Comment #2 from Richard Sharman richard_sharman at mitel dot com --- wget was installed by Centos 6.5. I did a yum reinstall [it installed ersion 1.12-1.11.el6_5] but when I ran it it still created the directory structure.

[Bug c++/62129] [4.9/5 Regression] internal compiler error: in output_constant, at varasm.c:4755

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62129 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Mon Aug 25 13:13:41 2014 New Revision: 214424 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214424root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/62129 * class.c

[Bug c++/62255] New: Introducing an unrelated template parameter causes failed compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62255 Bug ID: 62255 Summary: Introducing an unrelated template parameter causes failed compilation Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/62255] Introducing an unrelated template parameter causes compilation to fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62255 Conrad conradsand.arma at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||conradsand.arma

[Bug c++/62255] Introducing an unrelated template parameter causes compilation to fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62255 --- Comment #2 from Conrad conradsand.arma at gmail dot com --- When the irrelevant template parameter is used (arma_template_test.ii), g++ thinks that value in the following code can't be determined at compile time: templatetypename T struct

[Bug c/62141] [GCC-4.10.0][ASAN] ICE: Segmentation fault: 11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62141 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at

[Bug c++/62256] New: /usr/include/c++/4.8/tr1/random.tcc:792:2: error: no matching function for call to 'min'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62256 Bug ID: 62256 Summary: /usr/include/c++/4.8/tr1/random.tcc:792:2: error: no matching function for call to 'min' Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/61407] Build errors on latest OS X 10.10 Yosemite with Xcode 6 on GCC 4.8.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407 --- Comment #25 from James Clarke jrtc27 at jrtc27 dot com --- (In reply to Dominyk Tiller from comment #24) It looks like gcc are gonna require someone to submit this patch to their mailing list before we see any further activity on this.

[Bug target/61974] error: ‘ASM_WEAKEN_DECL’ was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61974 Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jbg...@lug-owl.de

[Bug c++/62257] New: issue with tr1/functional header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62257 Bug ID: 62257 Summary: issue with tr1/functional header Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug libstdc++/62258] New: uncaught_exception() equals to `true' after rethrow_exception()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62258 Bug ID: 62258 Summary: uncaught_exception() equals to `true' after rethrow_exception() Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/62258] uncaught_exception() equals to `true' after rethrow_exception()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62258 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry Prokoptsev dprokoptsev at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 33394 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33394action=edit A simple test case.

[Bug target/61407] Build errors on latest OS X 10.10 Yosemite with Xcode 6 on GCC 4.8.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407 --- Comment #26 from James Clarke jrtc27 at jrtc27 dot com --- Patches have been sent to the mailing list - https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-08/msg02344.html and https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-08/msg02345.html.

[Bug libstdc++/62258] uncaught_exception() equals to `true' after rethrow_exception()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62258 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry Prokoptsev dprokoptsev at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 33395 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33395action=edit Proposed patch I believe the problem is that std::rethrow_exception() does not

[Bug c++/62257] issue with tr1/functional header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62257 Nancy Wang wangn at ca dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/62259] New: atomic class doesn't enforce required alignment on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62259 Bug ID: 62259 Summary: atomic class doesn't enforce required alignment on powerpc64 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/62260] New: Build inside source tree doesn't work with lto-plugin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62260 Bug ID: 62260 Summary: Build inside source tree doesn't work with lto-plugin Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/62256] /usr/include/c++/4.8/tr1/random.tcc:792:2: error: no matching function for call to 'min'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62256 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |normal

[Bug bootstrap/62260] Build inside source tree doesn't work with lto-plugin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62260 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug target/62261] New: [sh64] ICE for negative shift counts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62261 Bug ID: 62261 Summary: [sh64] ICE for negative shift counts Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug target/62111] ICE when building Linux kernel for sh64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62111 --- Comment #17 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org --- I've filed a new PR62261 for the issue in #c7.

[Bug target/62262] New: aarch64 gcc generates invalid assembler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62262 Bug ID: 62262 Summary: aarch64 gcc generates invalid assembler Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug middle-end/62263] New: Good codegen for bitwise rotate requires code that is technically undefined behavior

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62263 Bug ID: 62263 Summary: Good codegen for bitwise rotate requires code that is technically undefined behavior Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/62263] Good codegen for bitwise rotate requires code that is technically undefined behavior

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62263 --- Comment #1 from M.E. O'Neill oneill+gccbugs at cs dot hmc.edu --- Possibly this should have been filed as a tree-level bug? Also, see https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17886 which mostly is about issues with wider types, but may

[Bug target/62262] aarch64 gcc generates invalid assembler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62262 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug target/62262] aarch64 gcc generates invalid assembler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62262 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/62262] aarch64 gcc generates invalid assembler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62262 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to amker from comment #2) (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) (insn 27 26 40 5 (set (reg:SI 73 [ D.2590 ]) (and:SI (ashift:SI (reg/v:SI 74 [ value ])

[Bug c++/62129] [4.9/5 Regression] internal compiler error: in output_constant, at varasm.c:4755

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62129 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/62262] aarch64 gcc generates invalid assembler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62262 --- Comment #4 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) (In reply to amker from comment #2) (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) (insn 27 26 40 5 (set (reg:SI 73 [ D.2590 ]) (and:SI