[Bug debug/62225] DW_AT_location for local variable is missing

2014-08-28 Thread qiyao at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62225 --- Comment #3 from Yao Qi --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > I bet if you remove register, it will work. Or compile with variable > tracking turned on. I compiled the code again with -fvar-tracking, and looks DW_AT_location for l

[Bug middle-end/62289] [5 Regression] ICE (segfault) for gfortran.dg/graphite/pr42393.f90

2014-08-28 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62289 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to amker from comment #1) > Some comments on it at > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-08/msg02274.html Namely: > This is a bug in ISL. Theyâll fix it in a new version of ISL. > https://group

[Bug bootstrap/62301] PowerPC bootstrap broken since r214654

2014-08-28 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62301 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc64le-unknown-linux-g |powerpc64*-unknown-linux-gn

[Bug c++/62302] New: Change in the comdat used for constructors

2014-08-28 Thread rafael.espindola at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62302 Bug ID: 62302 Summary: Change in the comdat used for constructors Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug bootstrap/62300] [5 Regression] internal compiler error: in as_a, at is-a.h:192

2014-08-28 Thread dmalcolm at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62300 --- Comment #6 from Dave Malcolm --- Fix committed as r214714.

[Bug bootstrap/62300] [5 Regression] internal compiler error: in as_a, at is-a.h:192

2014-08-28 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62300 --- Comment #5 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Fri Aug 29 03:12:01 2014 New Revision: 214714 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214714&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR bootstrap/62300 * function.c (assign_parm_setup

[Bug bootstrap/62301] New: PowerPC bootstrap broken since r214654

2014-08-28 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62301 Bug ID: 62301 Summary: PowerPC bootstrap broken since r214654 Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap

[Bug rtl-optimization/54300] [4.7, 4.8 Regression] regcprop incorrectly looks through parallel register swap operation

2014-08-28 Thread gregory.0xf0 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54300 gregory.0xf0 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gregory.0xf0 at gmail dot

[Bug bootstrap/62300] [5 Regression] internal compiler error: in as_a, at is-a.h:192

2014-08-28 Thread dmalcolm at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62300 --- Comment #4 from Dave Malcolm --- Sorry about this. The issue is here: 3042insn = as_a ( 3043 gen_extend_insn (op0, t, promoted_nominal_mode, 3044 data->passed_mode,

[Bug bootstrap/62300] [5 Regression] internal compiler error: in as_a, at is-a.h:192

2014-08-28 Thread dmalcolm at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62300 --- Comment #3 from Dave Malcolm --- Created attachment 33414 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33414&action=edit Candidate fix, only lightly tested so far

[Bug bootstrap/62300] [5 Regression] internal compiler error: in as_a, at is-a.h:192

2014-08-28 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62300 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/62300] [5 Regression] internal compiler error: in as_a, at is-a.h:192

2014-08-28 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62300 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 33413 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33413&action=edit A testcase [x32@gnu-35 gcc]$ ./xgcc -B./ -S -fPIC -O2 /tmp/x.i -mx32 ../../../../src-trunk/libgcc/config/libbid/bid1

[Bug bootstrap/62300] New: [5 Regression] internal compiler error: in as_a, at is-a.h:192

2014-08-28 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62300 Bug ID: 62300 Summary: [5 Regression] internal compiler error: in as_a, at is-a.h:192 Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug fortran/62298] Internal Compiler Error in fold_convert_loc

2014-08-28 Thread fmartinez at gmv dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62298 --- Comment #1 from Fran Martinez Fadrique --- Created attachment 33412 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33412&action=edit Source causing the ICE. No dependencies.

[Bug fortran/62298] New: Internal Compiler Error in fold_convert_loc

2014-08-28 Thread fmartinez at gmv dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62298 Bug ID: 62298 Summary: Internal Compiler Error in fold_convert_loc Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug c++/62299] New: [4.9/5 regression] ICE with __attribute__((__weakref__(""))) and __thread

2014-08-28 Thread lucdanton at free dot fr
ty: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: lucdanton at free dot fr $ g++-trunk --version g++-trunk (GCC) 5.0.0 20140828 (experimental) Copyright (C) 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see

[Bug fortran/62297] New: Internal Compiler Error in fold_convert_loc

2014-08-28 Thread fmartinez at gmv dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62297 Bug ID: 62297 Summary: Internal Compiler Error in fold_convert_loc Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/43849] Add _gfortran_finalize function to close down the library

2014-08-28 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43849 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW CC|

[Bug libfortran/62296] New: EXECUTE_COMMAND_LINE not F2008 conforming

2014-08-28 Thread anlauf at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62296 Bug ID: 62296 Summary: EXECUTE_COMMAND_LINE not F2008 conforming Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libfort

[Bug c++/60994] gcc does not recognize hidden/shadowed enumeration as valid nested-name-specifier

2014-08-28 Thread aaw at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60994 Ollie Wild changed: What|Removed |Added CC||potswa at mac dot com --- Comment #6 from O

[Bug c++/61492] Nested-name-specifier lookup finds function

2014-08-28 Thread aaw at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61492 Ollie Wild changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/62292] [5 Regression] FAIL: (geterrorname|getmethodname) run

2014-08-28 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62292 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The patch in comment 3 fixes the failures after a clean bootstrap (a simple update was not enough, i.e., the faulty parts of (lib)?java are not marked as depending upon gcc/gimple-fold.c). So far I hav

[Bug c++/58678] [4.9 Regression] pykde4-4.11.2 link error (devirtualization too trigger happy)

2014-08-28 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58678 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug libstdc++/58962] Pretty printers use obsolete Python syntax

2014-08-28 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58962 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.2 |4.8.4

[Bug libstdc++/58962] Pretty printers use obsolete Python syntax

2014-08-28 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58962 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Thu Aug 28 16:22:21 2014 New Revision: 214682 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214682&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-08-28 Samuel Bronson Backport r212453 from trunk 2014-07

[Bug c++/62295] New: Variable Lenth Ararys can't be passed to functions in c++

2014-08-28 Thread cdkrot at yandex dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62295 Bug ID: 62295 Summary: Variable Lenth Ararys can't be passed to functions in c++ Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug bootstrap/61078] [5 Regression] ESA mode bootstrap failure since r209897

2014-08-28 Thread jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61078 --- Comment #6 from jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org --- > Also there seem to be other code (gimplify.c) which still depends on > PUSH_ARGS_REVERSED?! Indeed. I left that out of mercy to those users (erroneously) relying on the order of evaluating

[Bug c/62294] [4.9 Regression] Missing "passing argument [...] from incompatible pointer type" warning.

2014-08-28 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62294 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/62294] New: Missing "passing argument [...] from incompatible pointer type" warning.

2014-08-28 Thread Emmanuel.Thome at inria dot fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62294 Bug ID: 62294 Summary: Missing "passing argument [...] from incompatible pointer type" warning. Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/61078] [5 Regression] ESA mode bootstrap failure since r209897

2014-08-28 Thread krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61078 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Krebbel --- Created attachment 33411 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33411&action=edit Reduced testcase compile with -O2 -mesa -m31 -march=g5

[Bug bootstrap/61078] [5 Regression] ESA mode bootstrap failure since r209897

2014-08-28 Thread krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61078 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Krebbel --- While the patch fixes this particular case the problem appears to be more fundamental. The S/390 backend only considers GPR register pairs starting with an even register to be valid (REGNO_PAIR_OK in s390.h

[Bug c++/62293] Obscure error message: declared as an 'inline' field

2014-08-28 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62293 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug libstdc++/61841] broken std::thread on Hurd

2014-08-28 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61841 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Ah I see, so Samuel's change is needed to make __gthread_active_p work on Hurd. We could have changed __gthread_active_p (as we've done e.g. for Bionic) but there's no point now.

[Bug middle-end/62292] [5 Regression] FAIL: (geterrorname|getmethodname) run

2014-08-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62292 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Index: gcc/gimple-fold.c === --- gcc/gimple-fold.c (revision 214680) +++ gcc/gimple-fold.c (working copy) @@ -1440,7 +1440,7 @@ gimple_fold

[Bug sanitizer/61422] False Asan positive in libopus

2014-08-28 Thread m.zakirov at samsung dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61422 Marat Zakirov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/55577] g++.dg/asan/asan_test.C failures

2014-08-28 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55577 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/62292] [5 Regression] FAIL: (geterrorname|getmethodname) run

2014-08-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62292 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- No difference in the code for geterrorname.jar or natgeterrorname.cc so this must be a libjava miscompile. Trying to spot the error in the patch instead.

[Bug sanitizer/58937] Preloaded libasan segfaults on unsanitized executables

2014-08-28 Thread y.gribov at samsung dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58937 Yury Gribov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/61841] broken std::thread on Hurd

2014-08-28 Thread 1o5g4r8o at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61841 --- Comment #6 from Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4r8o at gmail dot com> --- https://bugs.debian.org/749290#53 Please consider replying to its recipients.

[Bug sanitizer/55577] g++.dg/asan/asan_test.C failures

2014-08-28 Thread y.gribov at samsung dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55577 Yury Gribov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||y.gribov at samsung dot com --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/62293] New: Obsure error message

2014-08-28 Thread skvadrik at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62293 Bug ID: 62293 Summary: Obsure error message Product: gcc Version: 4.8.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unas

[Bug middle-end/62292] [5 Regression] FAIL: (geterrorname|getmethodname) run

2014-08-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62292 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/62292] New: [5 Regression] FAIL: (geterrorname|getmethodname) run

2014-08-28 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62292 Bug ID: 62292 Summary: [5 Regression] FAIL: (geterrorname|getmethodname) run Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug fortran/62283] basic-block vectorization fails

2014-08-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- testcases in comment#4 should now work (no need to file a separate bug).

[Bug fortran/62283] basic-block vectorization fails

2014-08-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Aug 28 13:13:45 2014 New Revision: 214678 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214678&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-08-28 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/62283 * tree

[Bug tree-optimization/62291] New: PRE uses too much memory and compile-time

2014-08-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62291 Bug ID: 62291 Summary: PRE uses too much memory and compile-time Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: compile-time-hog, memory-hog Severity: normal

[Bug c++/62282] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Undefined reference with __inline __attribute(__gnu_inline__) with -O0

2014-08-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62282 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/62282] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Undefined reference with __inline __attribute(__gnu_inline__) with -O0

2014-08-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62282 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Known to work|

[Bug libstdc++/61841] broken std::thread on Hurd

2014-08-28 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61841 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug c++/62282] Undefined reference with __inline __attribute(__gnu_inline__) with -O0

2014-08-28 Thread dmitry.petroff at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62282 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry Petrov --- Created attachment 33408 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33408&action=edit g++ + gperf bug in action Guys, I'm software developer myself and I can understand your attitute to "declare bu

[Bug libstdc++/61841] broken std::thread on Hurd

2014-08-28 Thread 1o5g4r8o at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61841 --- Comment #4 from Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4r8o at gmail dot com> --- FYI according to [0], Matthias Klose backported [1] but it didn't fix the issue. Samuel Thibault did fix it with [2] on libpthread side. Both needed? [0] http://patchwork.ozlabs

[Bug fortran/62283] basic-block vectorization fails

2014-08-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > (In reply to Henrik Holst from comment #4) > > Thank you Richard for looking into this issue. > > > > You probably know already exactly why this bug appeared.

[Bug fortran/62283] basic-block vectorization fails

2014-08-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Henrik Holst from comment #4) > Thank you Richard for looking into this issue. > > You probably know already exactly why this bug appeared. I just wanted to > stress the severity of this issue,

[Bug middle-end/62289] [5 Regression] ICE (segfault) for gfortran.dg/graphite/pr42393.f90

2014-08-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62289 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug driver/62290] --print-file-name doesn't work for liblto_plugin.so

2014-08-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62290 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/61886] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] LTO breaks fread with _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2

2014-08-28 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 27 Aug 2014, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886 > > --- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka --- > > Honza, did you get anything working? > Sorry, I

[Bug c++/62224] [4.9 Regression] Possible regression in gcc-4.9-20140820

2014-08-28 Thread chris2553 at googlemail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62224 --- Comment #3 from Chris Clayton --- Yes, the preprocessed file is the one providing the unresolved references. It surely won't be a surprise to anyone to here that the same failure occurs when building with yesterday's 4.9 snapshot 4.9-2014082

[Bug driver/62290] New: --print-file-name doesn't work for liblto_plugin.so

2014-08-28 Thread amker.cheng at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62290 Bug ID: 62290 Summary: --print-file-name doesn't work for liblto_plugin.so Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: