https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62620
Bug ID: 62620
Summary: 34 24 324
Product: gcc
Version: 2.95
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: spam
Assignee: unassigned at g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62623
Bug ID: 62623
Summary: Behavior change in test case with -m32 and -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62620
Lily Trish changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61897
--- Comment #2 from ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ygribov
Date: Mon Sep 1 07:47:37 2014
New Revision: 214777
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214777&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-09-01 Yury Gribov
PR sanitizer/61897
PR san
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62140
--- Comment #4 from ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ygribov
Date: Mon Sep 1 07:47:37 2014
New Revision: 214777
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214777&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-09-01 Yury Gribov
PR sanitizer/61897
PR san
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62620
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62597
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|swing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62628
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62617
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62622
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62629
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62282
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61903
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Sep 1 09:18:43 2014
New Revision: 214781
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214781&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/61903
* expmed.c (store_fixed_bit_field_1): Shift
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61903
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62224
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61641
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62307
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The reason for implied -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks for -fsanitize=null,
-fsanitize=nonnull or -fsanitize=returns-nonnull is that the checks themselves
would be optimized away. In theory we could implemen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49706
Bug 49706 depends on bug 61271, which changed state.
Bug 61271 Summary: 10 * possible coding error with logical not (!)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61271
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61271
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62312
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62308
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ABI
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62313
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to François Dumont from comment #4)
> For me there is no bug. Standard containers are known to not be thread safe.
No, containers are known to be thread-safe, when used correctly.
> I don't know
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62174
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61271
--- Comment #20 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Sep 1 10:07:05 2014
New Revision: 214782
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214782&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/61271
* cgraphunit.c (handle_alias_pairs): Fix condition.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61271
--- Comment #21 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Sep 1 10:12:00 2014
New Revision: 214783
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214783&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/61271
* cgraphunit.c (handle_alias_pairs): Fix condition.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62313
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry Vyukov ---
> The tests for the debug mode don't generally involve threads, so that isn't
> likely to help.
Then you can run any heavily multithreaded program that extensively uses stl
and is currently race-free. That
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61271
--- Comment #22 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Sep 1 10:14:22 2014
New Revision: 214784
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214784&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/61271
* expr.c (is_aligning_offset): Remove logical not.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61271
--- Comment #23 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Sep 1 10:16:43 2014
New Revision: 214785
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214785&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/61271
* expr.c (is_aligning_offset): Remove logical not.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58102
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62623
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62025
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Sep 1 11:15:41 2014
New Revision: 214786
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214786&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/62025
* sched-deps.c (add_or_update_dep_1): If ask_depe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62312
--- Comment #2 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #1)
> The patch below fixes it. I'd apply it to trunk and 4.9 without further
> testing, as it's obvious, I think. Kaz, if you'd like to run it through
> your test setu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62025
--- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Sep 1 11:49:36 2014
New Revision: 214790
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214790&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/62025
* sched-deps.c (add_or_update_dep_1): If ask_depe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62282
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Why is this marked as a regression btw? From what I can see, already G++ 4.3
behaved this way, and G++ 4.3 was the first release to support gnu_inline
attribute in C++.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62282
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659
--- Comment #25 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #24)
> Created attachment 33407 [details]
> Patch for 4.9
>
> Here's a patch for the 4.9 branch. I'm nervous about applying it because I
> suspect that we have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659
--- Comment #26 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
§14.7.3/12 says:
An explicit specialization of a function template is inline only if it is
declared with the inline specifier or defined as deleted, and independently of
whether its function template i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62265
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|ia64-*-*, m68k-*-*, |ia64-*-*, m68k-*-*,
|s39
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62630
Bug ID: 62630
Summary: [5 regression] gcc.dg/graphite/vect-pr43423.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62630
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62630
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 33425
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33425&action=edit
vect dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62291
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
So what remains is insertion computing whether a value is available on some
predecessor (partial redundancy) or all (full redundancy) which needs AVAIL_OUT
for the predecessors and the immediate dominator.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62630
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|sparc*-sun-solaris2.* |sparc*-sun-solaris2.*,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, ro at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
>
> Rainer Orth changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #12 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 33426
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33426&action=edit
vect dump
Sure, I meant to but forgot...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
Bug ID: 62631
Summary: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-lt-2.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimizati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 33427
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33427&action=edit
ivopts dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #12)
> Created attachment 33426 [details]
> vect dump
>
> Sure, I meant to but forgot...
Ok:
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-33.c:19:3: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 33428
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33428&action=edit
slp dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
--- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 33429
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33429&action=edit
bb-slp-26.c.120t.slp1 dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #14 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
> (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #12)
>> Created attachment 33426 [details]
>> vect dump
>>
>> Sure, I meant to but forgot...
>
> Ok:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
>
> --- Comment #14 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62294
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62318
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
glibc's strstr already uses an asymptotically fast (i.e. O(m+n) instead of
O(mn)) algorithm. See string/str-two-way.h.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61641
--- Comment #13 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 1-Sep-14, at 5:23 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> So fixed?
I left it open because of the following fail on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu:
FAIL: gcc.dg/delay-slot-2.c scan-assembler printf
T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62275
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53854
--- Comment #9 from Ulrich Weigand ---
I just noticed that this bug has disappeared on mainline. Binary search showed
that this happens with rev. 211007, which checks in this patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-03/msg01263.html
which
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659
--- Comment #27 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Possible fix:
diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.c b/gcc/cp/decl.c
index d03f8a4707e5..d8fb35e21237 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/decl.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/decl.c
@@ -2215,7 +2215,7 @@ duplicate_decls (tree newdecl, tree oldde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62642
Bug ID: 62642
Summary: x86 rdtsc is moved through barrier
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62642
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62313
--- Comment #7 from François Dumont ---
ok, looks like Jonathan it pretty sure it is a bug, I am going to take a closer
look at it.
When I said that you would have the same issue with all versions of Standard
lib I meant with all version of libs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62659
Bug ID: 62659
Summary: [4.9 regression] Regression in template argument
substitution in 4.9+
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62658
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62270
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62661
Bug ID: 62661
Summary: digit separator warning in if'ed out code
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62306
--- Comment #2 from Rafael Avila de Espindola ---
This is again visible on trunk now that pr62302 has been fixed (thanks!).
It doesn't seem profitable to ever put D0 in the D5 comdat. It cannot be equal
to D1 or D2, so putting it there just cons
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62659
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62224
--- Comment #5 from Chris Clayton ---
I reverted the code change from r214208 with the following patch:
--- gcc-4.9-20140827-orig/gcc/cp/decl2.c2014-08-20 02:54:40.0
+0100
+++ gcc-4.9-20140827/gcc/cp/decl2.c 2014-09-01 21:07:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62661
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11806
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62662
Bug ID: 62662
Summary: [4.9/5 Regression] Miscompilation of Qt on s390x
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62662
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62312
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Mon Sep 1 22:25:09 2014
New Revision: 214804
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214804&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/62312
* config/sh/sh.md (*cmp_div0s_0): Add missing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62312
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Mon Sep 1 22:31:55 2014
New Revision: 214805
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214805&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline
2014-09-01 Oleg Endo
PR target/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62663
Bug ID: 62663
Summary: m68k / coldfire : compiling with -msep-data breaks the
code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62313
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It might be possible to solve using the base-from-member idiom so that
_M_current is set before the iterator is added to the collection.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62312
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62663
--- Comment #1 from angelo ---
Created attachment 33431
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33431&action=edit
wrong object
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
Bug ID: 62664
Summary: MMX set intrinsics
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|other |target
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62665
Frédéric Buclin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
--- Comment #2 from g.peterhoff.home at talkplus dot de ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I think you forgot to clear the MMX state. MMX and FP share the same
> register set and need to be cleared before going from MMX to FP.
I k
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
--- Comment #3 from g.peterhoff.home at talkplus dot de ---
Sorry, I mean
typedef union
{
__m64 m;
__m128i s;
int32_t e [4];
ZZ};
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62667
Frédéric Buclin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Version|0.98
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62669
Bug ID: 62669
Summary: high quality! Watch Teen Wolf Season 4 Episode 11
Online and free
Product: gcc
Version: trans-mem
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62669
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62668
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62670
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62664
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62671
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|cp-tools
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62672
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62675
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62676
Bug ID: 62676
Summary: stream!!! Watch America's Next Top Model Season 21
Episode 3 Online Free
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62678
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62677
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62676
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62679
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62313
--- Comment #9 from Dmitry Vyukov ---
Don't forget about destructor -- the iterator must be removed from list before
it destruction starts.
1 - 100 of 167 matches
Mail list logo
