https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #21 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
I've run check-gcc for sh-lra branch on sh4-unknown-linux-gnu
and got
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes83035
# of unexpected failures169
# of unexpected successe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #22 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
Created attachment 33505
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33505&action=edit
A possible patch
These last two errors could be fixed with the attached patch:
* config/sh/predicates.m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63282
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63269
--- Comment #2 from Dominik Vogt ---
Created attachment 33506
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33506&action=edit
updated patch
Managed to get a stray character into the test between testing and committing
it. Fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63284
Bug ID: 63284
Summary: [4.9/5 Regression] -fcompare-debug issue due to
redirection to __builtin_unreachable ()
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63284
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63284
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 33507
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33507&action=edit
gcc49-pr63284.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #23 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #22)
> Created attachment 33505 [details]
> A possible patch
>
> These last two errors could be fixed with the attached patch:
>
> * config/sh/predicates.md (gen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63285
Bug ID: 63285
Summary: [4.9/5 Regression] -fcompare-debug scheduler related
failure
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63285
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.2
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58357
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63283
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63267
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63216
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63241
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini ---
This is already fixed in current 4_9-branch. I'm adding the testcase and
closing the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54452
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63241
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Sep 17 14:30:35 2014
New Revision: 215327
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215327&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-09-17 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/63241
* g++.dg/cpp0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63241
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Sep 17 14:30:18 2014
New Revision: 215326
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215326&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-09-17 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/63241
* g++.dg/cpp0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63241
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63142
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63286
Bug ID: 63286
Summary: [5 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20101014-2
cp_lto_20101014-2_0.o assemble, * after r215196
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62232
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62219
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63287
Bug ID: 63287
Summary: __STDCPP_THREADS__ is not defined
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63287
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #0)
> I'm not sure what the best way to meet that requirement is, given that .
Oops, I was going to say "... given that the availability of threads may not be
know
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61851
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62063
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62149
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|tower120 at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61975
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini ---
Related to c++/53856
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61860
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59374
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mehta at roguewave dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61863
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61951
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61951
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63282
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63288
Bug ID: 63288
Summary: [5 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/20140326-1.c
FAILs with -Og -fgcse -fif-conversion2
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63286
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63284
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Sep 17 19:05:49 2014
New Revision: 215331
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215331&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/63284
* tree-cfgcleanup.c (fixup_noreturn_call): Don't sp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63284
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Sep 17 19:07:04 2014
New Revision: 215332
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215332&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/63284
* tree-cfgcleanup.c (fixup_noreturn_call): Don't sp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63284
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Sep 17 19:08:06 2014
New Revision: 215333
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215333&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/63284
* tree-cfgcleanup.c (fixup_noreturn_call): Don't sp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63178
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
I've tried this again, and I still get the expected warning.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63178
Dima Kogan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63178
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek ---
Ah, ccache, that settles it then. NP, you're welcome.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63178
--- Comment #9 from Dima Kogan ---
For the record, here's the ccache bug I just filed:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10819
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58159
--- Comment #6 from Geoff Romer ---
A Chromium maintainer privately pointed out a use case that would be thwarted
by a check like this: basically, unique_ptr is used to hold pointers from a
legacy API, using a custom deleter that decrements a ref
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62768
--- Comment #4 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Author: jb
Date: Wed Sep 17 21:44:15 2014
New Revision: 215338
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215338&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libfortran/62768 Use gfc_unit.filename also when HAVE_TTYNAME{_R} is not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61854
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Sep 17 21:49:46 2014
New Revision: 215339
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215339&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/61854
libcpp/
* init.c (struct lang_flags): Remove cpluspl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61854
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #24 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
Author: kkojima
Date: Wed Sep 17 23:24:40 2014
New Revision: 215341
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215341&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/55212
* config/sh/predicates.md (general_movsrc_operand): T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58159
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63277
cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63289
Bug ID: 63289
Summary: ICE from --param max-vartrack-expr-depth
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63289
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63289
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with r196263.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63290
Bug ID: 63290
Summary: [C++11] alias declaration with exception specification
should cause compilation error
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
55 matches
Mail list logo