[Bug c/63326] pragma GCC causes wrong code generation

2014-09-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63326 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/63326] New: pragma GCC causes wrong code generation

2014-09-21 Thread dietmar.schind...@manroland-web.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63326 Bug ID: 63326 Summary: pragma GCC causes wrong code generation Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug rtl-optimization/63325] [5.0 regression] ICE fold check: original tree changed by fold

2014-09-21 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63325 Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug rtl-optimization/63325] New: [5.0 regression] ICE fold check: original tree changed by fold

2014-09-21 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63325 Bug ID: 63325 Summary: [5.0 regression] ICE fold check: original tree changed by fold Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug c/3885] Incorrect "invalid suffix on integer constant" error

2014-09-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3885 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||draqsn at mail dot ru --- Comment #13 fro

[Bug c/3885] Incorrect "invalid suffix on integer constant" error

2014-09-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3885 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #12

[Bug c/63324] hexidecimal integer constant and addition

2014-09-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63324 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/44272] Wrong interpretation of hex constant as floating point value.

2014-09-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44272 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pin

[Bug c/44272] Wrong interpretation of hex constant as floating point value.

2014-09-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44272 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c/63324] hexidecimal integer constant and addition

2014-09-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63324 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Actually bug 3885. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 3885 ***

[Bug c/63324] New: hexidecimal integer constant and addition

2014-09-21 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63324 Bug ID: 63324 Summary: hexidecimal integer constant and addition Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c++/63323] New: "confused by earlier errors, bailing out" with no other errors

2014-09-21 Thread tavianator at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63323 Bug ID: 63323 Summary: "confused by earlier errors, bailing out" with no other errors Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/63255] [5.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/ipareference2 c_lto_ipareference2_0.o-c_lto_ipareference2_1.o execute -O1 -flto -flto-partition=1to1 -fwhole-program

2014-09-21 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63255 --- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- Seems to be fixed, but I'm leaving the closing step to the reporter (Andreas).

[Bug c++/61825] [5 regression] g++.dg/cpp0x/static_assert9.C FAILs

2014-09-21 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61825 --- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- Seems to be fixed, but I'm leaving the closing step to the reporter (Rainer).

[Bug target/55212] [SH] Switch from IRA to LRA

2014-09-21 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212 --- Comment #29 from Kazumoto Kojima --- Created attachment 33528 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33528&action=edit A trial patch The patch is to refrain from changing to class R0_REGS for r943. With the above 2 patches, th

[Bug target/55212] [SH] Switch from IRA to LRA

2014-09-21 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212 --- Comment #28 from Kazumoto Kojima --- Created attachment 33527 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33527&action=edit Another reduced test case (with "-m4 -ml -O2 -std=gnu99") Here is a test case for the ICE in assign_by_spill

[Bug target/55212] [SH] Switch from IRA to LRA

2014-09-21 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212 --- Comment #27 from Kazumoto Kojima --- Created attachment 33526 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33526&action=edit A trial patch It disables equiv substitution when the equiv includes some reg assigned to a small register c

[Bug target/55212] [SH] Switch from IRA to LRA

2014-09-21 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212 --- Comment #26 from Kazumoto Kojima --- Created attachment 33525 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33525&action=edit .reload dump file

[Bug target/55212] [SH] Switch from IRA to LRA

2014-09-21 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212 --- Comment #25 from Kazumoto Kojima --- Created attachment 33524 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33524&action=edit Reduced test case for ICE in assign_by_spill I've looked into what is going on for the ICE in assign_by_spil

[Bug target/58757] Advertise the lack of denormal support on alpha without -mieee

2014-09-21 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58757 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #2) > Well, the testcase does fail on alpha: Thanks. In the original testcase ( https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00875.html ) I was xfailing on alpha, but Jos

[Bug target/58757] Advertise the lack of denormal support on alpha without -mieee

2014-09-21 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58757 --- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak --- As the author of the testcase kindly advises: /* Test that the smallest positive value is not 0. This needs to be true even when denormals are not supported, so we do not pass any flag like -mieee. If i

[Bug libstdc++/63322] std::atomic where T is not trivially copyable should be disabled.

2014-09-21 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63322 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #1 from Jonath

[Bug libstdc++/63322] New: std::atomic where T is not trivially copyable should be disabled.

2014-09-21 Thread roman at binarylife dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63322 Bug ID: 63322 Summary: std::atomic where T is not trivially copyable should be disabled. Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/63320] [5 Regression] bogus ‘this’ was not captured for this lambda function error

2014-09-21 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63320 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug target/63321] New: [SH] Unused T bit result of shll / shlr insns

2014-09-21 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63321 Bug ID: 63321 Summary: [SH] Unused T bit result of shll / shlr insns Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/63320] New: [5 Regression] bogus ‘this’ was not captured for this lambda function error

2014-09-21 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63320 Bug ID: 63320 Summary: [5 Regression] bogus ‘this’ was not captured for this lambda function error Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug target/50807] [avr] Constructor writing to RAM for variable in Flash

2014-09-21 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50807 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug ada/63225] ada bootstrap failure when -fno-inline in STAGE1_CFLAGS

2014-09-21 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63225 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/62318] optimization of string searches using Nigel Horspool's Boyer-Moore-Horpool algorithm

2014-09-21 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62318 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- I don't understand your concern, you don't need anyone's permission to use a published algorithm. A specific implementation of the algorithm would be covered by copyright, but not the abstract algorithm. I

[Bug pch/63319] New: [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault building qt5 with pch

2014-09-21 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63319 Bug ID: 63319 Summary: [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault building qt5 with pch Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug ipa/61283] [5 regression] SEGV in pass_ipa_comdats::execute

2014-09-21 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61283 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED

[Bug ipa/61283] [5 regression] SEGV in pass_ipa_comdats::execute

2014-09-21 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61283 --- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #3) > Does this still reproduce? It still does at least for MMIX as described, at r215419.

[Bug libstdc++/62318] optimization of string searches using Nigel Horspool's Boyer-Moore-Horpool algorithm

2014-09-21 Thread jmichae3 at yahoo dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62318 --- Comment #6 from Jim Michaels --- ummm. I could get personal permission to use the algorithm. but that does not give gnu permission to use the algorithm. that's why I posted this here. that does not necessarily mean I could post the algorithm