https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56253
--- Comment #13 from Agner Fog agner at agner dot org ---
Thank you. I agree that integer overflow should be well-defined when using
intrinsics.
Is it possible to do the same optimization with boolean vector intrinsics, such
as _mm_and_epi32 and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #33 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #32)
Patch for SH untyped_call
config/sh/sh.md (untyped_call): Clobber function value registers before
call.
(Sorry for butting in;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63351
--- Comment #3 from Kirill Yukhin kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hello,
For AVX-512F (zmm-s)
We have a patch which enables such as stuff basing
on combiner machinery: a new subst which allows
`broadcasted' version of patterns.
Combiner can
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56253
--- Comment #14 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Agner Fog from comment #13)
Is it possible to do the same optimization with boolean vector intrinsics,
such as _mm_and_epi32 and _mm_or_ps to enable optimizations such
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56253
--- Comment #15 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Oups, sorry, or_ps may be harder, because representing it with vector
extensions requires casts to integer vectors, which makes it much harder to
actually generate or_ps in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63249
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Sep 25 06:47:43 2014
New Revision: 215580
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215580root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/63249
* semantics.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63249
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Sep 25 06:50:58 2014
New Revision: 215581
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215581root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/63249
* semantics.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63348
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to baoshan from comment #1)
I believe this regression is introduced by the code for cleanup_barriers()
in jump.c of patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63366
Bug ID: 63366
Summary: C++ __complex is not equivalent to __complex double
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63249
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #34 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #33)
Will clobbering function-value registers before the call not cause problems
on SH5, where function-value registers and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63367
Bug ID: 63367
Summary: internal compiler error: tree check: expected
function_decl, have template_decl in warn_hidden, at
cp/class.c:2824
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63368
Bug ID: 63368
Summary: undefined reference to `__sync_val_compare_and_swap_8'
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63351
--- Comment #4 from Kirill Yukhin kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
;; _7 = __builtin_ia32_pbroadcastd512_gpr_mask (b_1(D), _6, -1);
(insn 7 6 8 (set (reg:SI 101)
(reg/v:SI 99 [ b ]))
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63368
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63367
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61945
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cas43
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63368
Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malaterre at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63369
Bug ID: 63369
Summary: many asan test cases fail on ARM
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63368
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63300
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Thu Sep 25 07:37:36 2014
New Revision: 215582
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215582root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-09-25 Andreas Arnez
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 25 Sep 2014, a...@cloudius-systems.com wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
--- Comment #2 from Avi Kivity a...@cloudius-systems.com ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63341
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Sep 25 08:12:49 2014
New Revision: 215583
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215583root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/63341
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63341
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Sep 25 08:17:32 2014
New Revision: 215585
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215585root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/63341
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63341
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Sep 25 08:19:14 2014
New Revision: 215587
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215587root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/63341
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63341
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63368
--- Comment #4 from Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malaterre at gmail dot com ---
As stated in my original report I am running a PowerPC/32bits machine (not an
ARM based one).
AFAIK gcc 4.9.1 does not provide such implementation [*]. Could you please
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63369
Maxim Ostapenko chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chefmax at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48850
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--with-fpmath=sse
Thread model: posix
gcc version 5.0.0 20140925 (experimental) (GCC)
At line 36:
for (i = N; i = 0; i--)
{
*cp++ = str;
*dp++ = str;
}
Here cp itself is char **, so we move cp on sizeof (char *) on each loop
iteration.
Since N == 128 here, we have 129 iterations, so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #35 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #32)
Created attachment 33557 [details]
Patch for SH untyped_call
* config/sh/sh.md (untyped_call): Clobber function value
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63368
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
ppc32 doesn't have a 64-bit CAS instruction, so this would need to be done with
a global lock, not an atomic instruction.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63332
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yes, there must be some difference that isn't visible in the serialized output,
which would imply the values fail to do a proper round trip, so we're not
writing them with enough
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63332
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|testsuite |libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #36 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #35)
I'm just wondering ... how did/does that work without LRA (i.e. with IRA)?
I'm not sure about the old reload. LRA makes only 3 uses of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61945
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63366
thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61945
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Sep 25 12:56:57 2014
New Revision: 215597
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215597root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/61945
* class.c (warn_hidden):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61945
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63369
--- Comment #2 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de ---
(In reply to Maxim Ostapenko from comment #1)
Can't reproduce this with armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabi on current GCC,
because libsanitizer merge from upstream happened
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63362
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63370
Bug ID: 63370
Summary: abi::__cxa_demangle fails when demangling globally
defined lambda (or typeid.name returns wrong value)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63335
--- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Thu Sep 25 14:06:09 2014
New Revision: 215599
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215599root=gccview=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2014-09-25 Bill Schmidt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63356
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63356
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.8/4.9/5 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63360
--- Comment #2 from camm at debian dot org ---
Created attachment 33563
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33563action=edit
gdb transcript showing longjmp clobbering of f31
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62218
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63360
--- Comment #3 from camm at debian dot org ---
Additional transcript showing the 0 f31 value is transmitted to the return of
the original call through Lnk23 in L2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63360
--- Comment #4 from camm at debian dot org ---
Created attachment 33564
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33564action=edit
additional gdb transcript showing 0 f31 transmitted to return of Lnk23 in L2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62218
--- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton nickc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: nickc
Date: Thu Sep 25 15:01:46 2014
New Revision: 215602
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215602root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/62218
* config/sh/sync.md
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63362
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33560|0 |1
is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63360
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
Please make sure all functions are called exactly as they are defined.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63335
--- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Thu Sep 25 15:12:42 2014
New Revision: 215603
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215603root=gccview=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2014-09-25 Bill Schmidt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63335
--- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Thu Sep 25 15:15:06 2014
New Revision: 215604
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215604root=gccview=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2014-09-25 Bill Schmidt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63371
Bug ID: 63371
Summary: kind() with function name (not call) as argument
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63335
Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62218
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||sh*-*-*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63332
--- Comment #4 from Richard PALO richard at netbsd dot org ---
Could you please add -fno-access-control to the dg-options flags at the top
of the file and replace the VERIFY check with the following:
std::cout (u._M_param._M_lambda ==
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63305
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 33566
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33566action=edit
A patch
Please try this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63371
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62218
--- Comment #9 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Thu Sep 25 15:50:38 2014
New Revision: 215607
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215607root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/62218
* config/sh/sync.md
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62218
--- Comment #10 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Thu Sep 25 15:53:31 2014
New Revision: 215608
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215608root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline
2014-09-25
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62218
--- Comment #11 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Thu Sep 25 16:00:58 2014
New Revision: 215609
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215609root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
2014-09-25 Oleg Endo olege...@gcc.gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63332
--- Comment #5 from Richard PALO richard at netbsd dot org ---
By the way, in gdb, here are the complete u and v variables after
serialisation:
gdb) p u
$1 = {_M_param = {_M_lambda = 2, _M_mu = 1.5, _M_nu = 3}, _M_gd1 = {
_M_param =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63332
--- Comment #6 from Richard PALO richard at netbsd dot org ---
sorry, I meant to say M_gd2._M_saved
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62218
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63360
--- Comment #6 from camm at debian dot org ---
Here is another transcript showing the innermost setjmp/longjmp pair corrupting
the f31 register. It is a little complicated as there is an inner call to the
same code which proceeds successfully.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #37 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #36)
I'm not sure about the old reload. LRA makes only 3 uses of r0 and it's
relatively easy to see what is going on there with .reload
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63332
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Aha, so that's the culprit. I really think we should be outputting in an exact
format, not via conversion to/from decimal.
BTW, I did this manually as I'm not very proficient with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63360
--- Comment #7 from camm at debian dot org ---
Created attachment 33567
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33567action=edit
gdb transcript showing innermost setjmp/longjmp f31 clobber
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63362
--- Comment #3 from Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com ---
Looks good so far. I think this is a sufficient start for implementing the
library traits. Does the patch cover template cases as well? Such as
struct B {B();};
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61880
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61877
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #38 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #34)
For reference,
i386.md emits a blockage (i.e. *using* and clobbering all
registers).
It
looks all ports including SH emit a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63360
--- Comment #8 from Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to camm from comment #6)
Here is another transcript showing the innermost setjmp/longjmp pair
corrupting the f31 register.
I've looked at the longjmp code and it seems
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63372
Bug ID: 63372
Summary: -fshort-double causes stor-layout ICE
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63373
Bug ID: 63373
Summary: ELF symbol sizes for variable-length objects are too
small
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63360
--- Comment #9 from camm at debian dot org ---
Created attachment 33570
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33570action=edit
the setjmp buffer does not appear to be clobbered
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60410
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63372
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63372
--- Comment #2 from Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org ---
Actually don't even need the test case, the error happens with an empty file
too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60410
--- Comment #9 from Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org ---
Should we just disable the option? If it hasn't worked since 4.5 probably noone
needs it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63348
--- Comment #6 from baoshan pangbw at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #5)
(In reply to baoshan from comment #1)
I believe this regression is introduced by the code for cleanup_barriers()
in jump.c of patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63348
--- Comment #7 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Sep 25 17:58:35 2014
New Revision: 215613
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215613root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/63348
* emit-rtl.c (try_split): Do not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63348
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63364
--- Comment #4 from ncomputers.org contact at ncomputers dot org ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
(In reply to ncomputers.org from comment #2)
Can we write your name in our website?
Andrew Pinski taught us something new.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63259
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63360
Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uweigand at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62233
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64le |powerpc64le
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63360
--- Comment #11 from camm at debian dot org ---
Created attachment 33571
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33571action=edit
gdb transcript showing jmp_buf is unchanged across setjmp longjmp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63360
--- Comment #12 from camm at debian dot org ---
Created attachment 33572
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33572action=edit
setjmp does write to jmp_buf, but not at the end of the buffer.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63360
--- Comment #13 from camm at debian dot org ---
Created attachment 33573
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33573action=edit
gdb transcript shoinwg f31 is correct on entry to setjmp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63360
--- Comment #14 from camm at debian dot org ---
Created attachment 33574
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33574action=edit
continuation of gdb.7 showing no stfd fp31,((39)*8)(3) executed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63360
--- Comment #15 from camm at debian dot org ---
Created attachment 33575
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33575action=edit
setjmp saves f31, then zeroes out the result with stvxv3,0,r5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62091
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61688
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61890
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45631
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Any news on this code?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45631
davidxl xinliangli at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xur at google dot
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
