https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63813
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63813
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1)
I see a different ICE:
built-in: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
0xec336e crash_signal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63813
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7651
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
--- Comment #51 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33932 [details]
Patch for gcc 4.8 branch (based on gcc 4.8.3)
The test results for this 4.8.3 GCC with the above patch are good:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63610
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63750
--- Comment #5 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Tue Nov 11 09:20:07 2014
New Revision: 217342
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217342root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/63699
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63699
--- Comment #6 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Tue Nov 11 09:20:07 2014
New Revision: 217342
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217342root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/63699
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63750
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63699
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63789
--- Comment #3 from Richard PALO richard at netbsd dot org ---
Apparently with gcc 4.8.2 on Or*acle Solaris 11.2 the error manifests itself as
well. Perhaps there is something [in the works] for s12?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63811
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63811
--- Comment #2 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The libstdc++'s own manual says that __unused is a bad identifier, because it's
reserved by BSD:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63534
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2014-11-07 00:00:00
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63812
--- Comment #2 from Tatsushi Inagaki e29253 at jp dot ibm.com ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
This might be an issue in mpfr and not GCC if I read GCC's code correctly.
Depending on how 2.22 is read in as a floating point
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63811
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Nov 11 10:41:46 2014
New Revision: 217343
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217343root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/63811
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63811
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63814
Bug ID: 63814
Summary: g++.dg/ipa/pr61160-1.C fails with -m32 on darwin14
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63814
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63815
Bug ID: 63815
Summary: g++.dg/other/pr53811.C fails on darwin14
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63815
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63815
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kyukhin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63815
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
This appeared between revisions r216154 (OK) and r216633 (ICE).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63815
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
This appeared between revisions r216154 (OK) and r216633 (ICE).
Wrong PR, sorry.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63814
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
This appeared between revisions r216154 (OK) and r216633 (ICE).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42978
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61250
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63701
--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Tue Nov 11 11:52:36 2014
New Revision: 217345
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217345root=gccview=rev
Log:
[Fortran] PR 63701 Make sure variable is always used
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61250
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63701
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42978
--- Comment #5 from simon at pushface dot org ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #4)
I posted a patch for this in
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-02/msg00325.html, and Arnaud
approved it in the followup message, but it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42978
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Nov 11 11:58:26 2014
New Revision: 217346
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217346root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR ada/42978
* mlib-utl.adb (ar):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62132
--- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
I now see the failures on 4.9 due to r216459.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42978
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42978
--- Comment #8 from Arnaud Charlet charlet at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Note that support for project files (and libraries) in gnatmake is being
deprecated in favor of gprbuild, so this patch will soon become OBE.
But no problem in applying it now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63534
--- Comment #67 from Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com ---
Posted a patch here - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg03318.html
Now discussion stop here -
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg00320.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63534
--- Comment #68 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Igor Zamyatin from comment #67)
Posted a patch here - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg03318.html
Now discussion stop here -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42978
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Nov 11 12:30:00 2014
New Revision: 217347
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217347root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR ada/42978
* mlib-utl.adb (ar):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42978
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |4.9.3
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63534
--- Comment #69 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
On top of pr63815, r216154 is also responsible of
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-kandnw-1.c scan-assembler-times kandnw[
t]+[^\\n]*%k[1-7] 1
FAIL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60487
Christian Bauer cb at cebix dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cb at cebix dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63714
--- Comment #18 from Michael Felt aixtools at gmail dot com ---
Not sure if I replied to this elsewhere, but the reason for PACKAGING
on AIX 5.3 is because it can be used on AIX 5.3 TL7 and higher
(including AIX 6.1 and AIX 7.1).
In short, the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63765
--- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
--- Comment #9 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I would have expected _XOPEN_SOURCE=500 to be defined in a host-specific
configure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33911
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The comment below is from Richard Smith. I don't think we do have the same
problem for abi_tag, so Jason must have solved this problem there.
I was amazed to discover
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63765
--- Comment #12 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Let's go with the one defining _XOPEN_SOURCE only for Solaris until someone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63765
--- Comment #13 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33933
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33933action=edit
alternative patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33911
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Also, even after the template definition (and the attribute) have been
instantiated, typedefs for the instantiation don't get a warning unless the
typedef itself is also marked
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63816
Bug ID: 63816
Summary: internal compiler error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1 on
gcc version 5.0.0 20141109 (experimental)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63795
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Nov 11 14:58:21 2014
New Revision: 217355
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217355root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR ipa/63622
PR ipa/63795
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63622
--- Comment #27 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Nov 11 14:58:21 2014
New Revision: 217355
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217355root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR ipa/63622
PR ipa/63795
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63795
Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63795
--- Comment #4 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
Resolved.
I don't think so (maybe you picked the wrong PR number, and meant PR63622 ?). I
had this patch in my tree already,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #12 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
With the commits of https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2014-11/msg00357.html and
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2014-11/msg00370.html, the darwin bootstrap
should be fully restored on darwin13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
There is still a bootstrapping issue with libcc1 when bootstrapping with gcc
4.9:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg00731.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63795
--- Comment #5 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #4)
Anyway, I'm bootstrapping a fresh compiler, including your commit, so I'll
be able to tell soon for sure.
Don't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63817
Bug ID: 63817
Summary: ICE in verify_gimple_in_cfg tree-cfg.c:5039 (arm)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63787
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63536
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63787
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2)
r217288 failed and it is fixed as of r217295.
r217295? Are you sure?
I got the same ICE today.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63817
Jiong Wang jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jiwang at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63787
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #3)
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2)
r217288 failed and it is fixed as of r217295.
r217295? Are you sure?
I got the same ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63813
Jiong Wang jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jiwang at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63808
--- Comment #1 from Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org ---
What CPU are you running this on?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63818
Bug ID: 63818
Summary: unexpected/incorrect behavior
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63818
--- Comment #1 from Blaine Bell blaine at blainebell dot org ---
This does not seem to have incorrect behavior using clang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63819
Bug ID: 63819
Summary: [5 Regression]: Cannot build compiler with
--enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats (error: default
argument given for parameter 5 of ‘void*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63818
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63808
--- Comment #2 from Sergey Belyashov Sergey.Belyashov at gmail dot com ---
Target is armv4: I use gcc options: -marm -march=armv4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63808
--- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Sergey Belyashov from comment #2)
Target is armv4: I use gcc options: -marm -march=armv4
Which doesn't really answer my question. Which *CPU* are you seeing this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63622
--- Comment #28 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
At r217355, the failures for the gfortran.dg/assumed_rank_[8/9/10].f90
execution tests , first noted in Comment 7, still remain on x86_64 darwin.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63761
--- Comment #4 from thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch has been posted for review at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg01042.html
/i386/libgfortran/
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/gcc-5-2014/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/assumed_rank_10.f90
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fdiagnostics-color=never -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-loops -fdump-tree-original
-B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/darwin_objdir/x86_64-apple
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63808
--- Comment #4 from Sergey Belyashov Sergey.Belyashov at gmail dot com ---
AT91SAM7X256
/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/gcc-5-2014/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/assumed_rank_10.f90
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fdiagnostics-color=never -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-loops -fdump-tree-original
-B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/darwin_objdir/x86_64-apple-darwin13.4.0/i386/libgfortran/.libs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63820
Bug ID: 63820
Summary: [5.0 regression] c++ ICE since libcpp change r217202
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63765
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #11)
--- Comment #9 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I would have expected _XOPEN_SOURCE=500 to be defined
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63622
--- Comment #31 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to howarth from comment #28)
As noted before, passing -fno-ipa-icf to these failing fortran test cases
suppresses the execution failure.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63821
Bug ID: 63821
Summary: ICE in verify_gimple during libgcc build starting with
r217349
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63808
--- Comment #5 from Sergey Belyashov Sergey.Belyashov at gmail dot com ---
Sorry. I am wrong about register corruption. It is bug of my simulator. But r8
in the list is not neccessary in fiq handler.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63818
--- Comment #3 from Blaine Bell blaine at blainebell dot org ---
thanks for the quick response, much appreciated.
To be honest, I really don't understand this post/FAQ. Looking at these
examples, I do not see any ambiguity. This problem seems
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63820
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||61997
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63820
Jiong Wang jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64-*-*
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63265
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Nov 11 17:34:12 2014
New Revision: 217361
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217361root=gccview=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-11-11 Paolo Carlini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63265
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63818
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
With the line:
testouter(++i, ++i, ++i);
There is no sequence point between the pre-increments of i as common inside a
function call is not a sequence point. So the order of which
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63821
--- Comment #1 from Pat Haugen pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33937
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33937action=edit
reduced testcase
Reduced testcase, fails when compiled with '-O2 -m32'.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63818
--- Comment #5 from Blaine Bell blaine at blainebell dot org ---
There is no sequence point between the pre-increments of i as common inside a
function call is not a sequence point. So the order of which arguments are
evaluated
is not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33911
--- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33938
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33938action=edit
patch
Here's a compiler patch. Jonathan, can you decide what to do with the library
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60804
Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
-2014/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/assumed_rank_10.f90
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fdiagnostics-color=never -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fdump-tree-original
-B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/darwin_objdir/x86_64-apple-darwin13.4.0/i386/libgfortran/.libs
-L/sw/src/fink.build/gcc50
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63822
Bug ID: 63822
Summary: tree-chkp.c: missing init for local variable
found_valid ?
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
-2014/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/assumed_rank_10.f90
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fdiagnostics-color=never -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fdump-tree-original
-B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/darwin_objdir/x86_64-apple-darwin13.4.0/i386/libgfortran/.libs
-L/sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63823
Bug ID: 63823
Summary: [5.0 Regression] MIPS will not build due to LRA ICE
with 64 bit ABI
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63823
--- Comment #1 from Steve Ellcey sje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33941
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33941action=edit
Preprocessed test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63787
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63823
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This was working as of revision 217256 for me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63622
--- Comment #34 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Reduced test case for assumed_rank_10.f90
program test
implicit none
type t
integer :: aa
end type t
integer, pointer :: iip
type(t), pointer :: jjp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63823
--- Comment #3 from Steve Ellcey sje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I think the failure may have started with r217265, but I have not confirmed
that for sure.
r217265 | vmakarov | 2014-11-09 08:45:15 -0800 (Sun, 09 Nov 2014) | 34 lines
2014-11-09
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63824
Bug ID: 63824
Summary: [5.0 Regression]: ICE with -mcmodel=large -fpic and
pseudo PIC
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
