https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63970
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
I do not think we have problem with -g/without, because abstract origins are
set independently on debugger setting.
Normally callgraph will release function body when it is found unreachable.
This breaks debug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63731
--- Comment #12 from Yohei Ueda ---
"pure-Go goLookupIP" means that goLookupIP is written in Go as usual.
https://code.google.com/p/go/source/browse/src/net/dnsclient_unix.go#364
cgoLookupIP uses getaddrinfo via CGO unless the netgo tag is set.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63956
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
In the light of -std=c++14 constexprs, please try to write testcases like
(-std=c++14 -fsanitize=undefined,float-divide-by-zero,float-cast-overflow):
constexpr int
f1 (int a, int b)
{
if (b != 2)
a <<=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63988
Bug ID: 63988
Summary: heap-buffer-overflow in combine.c on ppc64
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-opti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63969
--- Comment #5 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Note: with the fix, the testcase (with an unset PATH) emits these error
messages for me:
libgccjit.so: error trying to exec 'x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc-5.0.0':
execvp: No such file or director
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63969
--- Comment #4 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch posted for review as
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg02617.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63969
--- Comment #3 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to dmalcolm from comment #2)
> Segfault occurs if driver is not found on PATH *and* the context's
> GCC_JIT_STR_OPTION_PROGNAME is NULL.
...and hence only the tutorials run into this;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63969
dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63983
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot
ethz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63987
Bug ID: 63987
Summary: [lra] internal compiler error: in
decompose_normal_address, at rtlanal.c:5851
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63942
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
I'm not able to reproduce this with a cross compiler at r217823; is it still
happening for you?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63986
Bug ID: 63986
Summary: [5 Regression][SH] gcc.target/sh/pr51244-15.c failures
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57979
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 57979, which changed state.
Bug 57979 Summary: G++ accepts constant expression defined using floating point
non-constexpr glvalue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57979
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 56041, which changed state.
Bug 56041 Summary: Constexpr conversion function definition not found in
template argument context
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56041
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63885
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56041
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 63885, which changed state.
Bug 63885 Summary: [5 Regression] ICE in static assert of constexpr forwarding
xvalue container member rvalue reference
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63885
What|R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56041
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Nov 20 03:25:26 2014
New Revision: 217823
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217823&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/56041
* cp-tree.h (struct processing_template_decl_sentinel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63923
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
I have the sense these failures are caused by gnu offload support
being used when it shouldn't:
Section Headers:
[Nr] Name TypeAddr OffSize ES Flg Lk Inf
Al
[ 0]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63718
--- Comment #14 from Joey Ye ---
Em. Probably a more favorable solution is fix expand_epilogue to precisely
elaborate the side effect?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63970
--- Comment #1 from wmi at google dot com ---
> I think we need to keep the functions but do not need to account for them in
> the unit size if we otherwise could remove them
>
> Richard.
But there is code in symbol_table::remove_unreachable_nod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63969
dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63939
--- Comment #24 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
Yes, the c-c++-common/asan/null-deref-1.c failures are only at -m32.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63939
--- Comment #23 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I still see failures for...
>
> FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/null-deref-1.c -O1 output pattern test, is
> ASAN:SIGSEGV
I guess this is with -m32. For some reasons only one # line is emitted.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63985
Bug ID: 63985
Summary: Accepts invalid range-based for declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63982
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code, patch,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63981
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63982
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 63981 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63939
--- Comment #22 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
At r217817 on x86_64-apple-darwin14, without llvm-symbolizer in the path but
with https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63534#c50 applied, I still
see failures for...
FAIL: c-c++-com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63982
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 34045
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34045&action=edit
Patch which needs testing
A simple s/GET_MODE_BITSIZE (Pmode)/POINTER_SIZE in ipa-polymorphic-call.c
fixes the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63982
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49379
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63984
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63947
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
ative
--with-tune=native --enable-languages=c --enable-lto --enable-gold
--enable-stage1-languages=c
Thread model: posix
gcc version 5.0.0 20141119 (experimental) (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-nostdinc' '-isystem'
'/home/sasha/gcc-inst/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63947
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed Nov 19 23:29:51 2014
New Revision: 217819
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217819&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/63947
* config/i386/i386.c (put_condition_code)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63947
--- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed Nov 19 23:00:02 2014
New Revision: 217818
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217818&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/63947
* config/i386/i386.c (put_condition_code)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63956
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63931
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Marking as P1 regression so we don't forget to resolve this bug before the
> release.
Or to drop this brain-damaged numbering scheme when we can still do it...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63956
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #6)
> Earlier today I tried the following and it seemed to work, but I don't know
> constexpr.c, so it may be totally bogus.
>
> --- gcc/cp/constexpr.c
> +++ gcc/cp/co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63939
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63956
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Earlier today I tried the following and it seemed to work, but I don't know
constexpr.c, so it may be totally bogus.
--- gcc/cp/constexpr.c
+++ gcc/cp/constexpr.c
@@ -1149,6 +1149,10 @@ cxx_eval_call_express
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63939
--- Comment #20 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Wed Nov 19 22:33:36 2014
New Revision: 217817
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217817&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/63939
* c-c++-common/asan/global-overf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63958
--- Comment #6 from Kostya Serebryany ---
I am not at war with anyone and if I am, I give up and surrender.
But whoever wants the sanitizers to work on SPARC [s]he will have to work with
us upstream. We can not fix build failures on SPARC upstre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63924
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Nikos from comment #5)
> I am sorry, it is missing from the original test case, but
>
> noop<
> require_costexpr< size0(ar) >,
> require_constexp< size1(ar) >
> >();
>
> compiles fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63939
--- Comment #19 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
(In reply to howarth from comment #18)
> Why are we checking in these changes in a piecemeal fashion instead of
> addressing all those failing test cases listed in the "Updated patch"?
I don't kno
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63939
--- Comment #18 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
Why are we checking in these changes in a piecemeal fashion instead of
addressing all those failing test cases listed in the "Updated patch"?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63958
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63924
--- Comment #5 from Nikos ---
I am sorry, it is missing from the original test case, but
noop<
require_costexpr< size0(ar) >,
require_constexp< size1(ar) >
>();
compiles fine. If the issue about test's trivial byte-wise copy constru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63958
--- Comment #4 from davem at gcc dot gnu.org ---
You cannot have it both ways.
If you demand people go through upstream, you have to be responsive to fixing
build failures yourselves. Because it is the sanitizer developers who
introduced this bu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63956
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
If it would be just because of these 3-4 builtins/internal calls, then it is
not worth it IMHO, making a copy would increase compiler memory footprint.
Already from the earlier phases there are some ubsan bui
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63956
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Supposedly with the C++14 constexpr changes we need to be prepared to handle
> all the ubsan builtins and internal calls we create during genericization.
Hmm, ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63939
--- Comment #17 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Wed Nov 19 22:06:47 2014
New Revision: 217816
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217816&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/63939
* g++.dg/asan/large-func-test-1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63885
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Nov 19 22:06:26 2014
New Revision: 217815
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217815&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/63885
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_constant_expression) [PARM_DE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57979
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Nov 19 22:06:17 2014
New Revision: 217814
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217814&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/57979
* init.c (decl_really_constant_value): Rename from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58783
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63978
--- Comment #2 from John Breitenbach ---
Sorry for the noise ... didn't think I submitted this [yet]. I'm attempting to
confirm it fails in 4.9.2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63978
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63939
--- Comment #16 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Wed Nov 19 21:31:23 2014
New Revision: 217813
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217813&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/63939
* c-c++-common/asan/heap-overflo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63983
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63958
--- Comment #3 from Kostya Serebryany ---
I am very sorry that you are so upset, but the workflow will not change.
All changes to sanitizer files (except for GCC-specific tests and make files)
have to go to upstream first.
If any change goes di
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63958
davem at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davem at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63966
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
> Can you please test this patch:
i386-apple-darwin14.0.0 bootstrap into stage2 now, so seems ok.
Thanks.
Rainer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63980
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot
ethz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63965
--- Comment #3 from Pat Haugen ---
Created attachment 34043
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34043&action=edit
reduced testcase
Another example of error, from CPU2000 benchmark 188.ammp. Compiled with 'gcc
-c -m32 -O2 -mcpu=p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63983
Bug ID: 63983
Summary: compile time hog with -fsanitize=undefined
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitize
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63980
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63854
--- Comment #19 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Nov 19 20:45:03 2014
New Revision: 217812
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217812&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR jit/63854: Fix leaks in test-fuzzer.c
gcc/testsuite/C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63854
--- Comment #18 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Nov 19 20:42:29 2014
New Revision: 217811
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217811&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR jit/63854: Fix leak in ipa-icf.c
gcc/ChangeLog:
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63947
--- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed Nov 19 20:38:59 2014
New Revision: 217810
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217810&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/63947
* config/i386/i386.c (put_condition_code)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63963
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Wed Nov 19 20:35:49 2014
New Revision: 217809
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217809&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/63963
* tree-streamer-out.c (write_ts_function_decl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63731
--- Comment #11 from boger at us dot ibm.com ---
What I was asking is: what does it mean to call the pure-Go goLookupIP?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63967
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Depends
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63854
--- Comment #17 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Nov 19 20:31:52 2014
New Revision: 217808
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217808&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR jit/63854: Fix leaking vec in jit
gcc/jit/ChangeLog:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63981
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||63982
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63982
Bug ID: 63982
Summary: Almost all of the devirt testcases fail with
-mabi=ilp32
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63981
Bug ID: 63981
Summary: [5 Regression] some C++ tests fail with -mabi=ilp32 on
aarch64 (with -O2 and above)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63854
--- Comment #16 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Nov 19 20:26:57 2014
New Revision: 217807
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217807&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR jit/63854: Add all_late_ipa_passes to GCC_PASS_LISTS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63981
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63980
Bug ID: 63980
Summary: ICE: -O0 -fsanitize=undefined
-fno-sanitize=object-size
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63854
--- Comment #15 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Nov 19 20:21:19 2014
New Revision: 217806
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217806&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR jit/63854: lra.c: Fix leak of point_freq_vec's buffer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63854
--- Comment #14 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Nov 19 20:17:44 2014
New Revision: 217804
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217804&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR jit/63854: Fix leak of paths within jump threading
gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63854
--- Comment #13 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Nov 19 20:14:18 2014
New Revision: 217803
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217803&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR jit/63854: Fix leak of "avail" within tree-ssa-pre.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63854
--- Comment #12 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Nov 19 20:10:00 2014
New Revision: 217802
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217802&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR jit/63854: Fix leak of worklist within jit-recording.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63979
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I only run into this with -flto-partition=balanced.
>From the exe.wpa.000i.cgraph dump:
...
Total unit size: 2034, partition size: 1000
Step 0: added main._omp_fn.0/24, size 22, cost 1/0 best 1/0,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63965
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63979
Bug ID: 63979
Summary: [openacc] undefined reference to main._omp_fn.x
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63978
Bug ID: 63978
Summary: ICE vcvt_fixed_float_VFP
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63854
--- Comment #11 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Nov 19 19:57:09 2014
New Revision: 217801
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217801&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR jit/63854: Don't leak producer_string in dwarf2out.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63977
Bug ID: 63977
Summary: [5 Regression] r217769 caused many failures
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63965
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63854
--- Comment #10 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Nov 19 19:49:28 2014
New Revision: 217800
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217800&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR jit/63854: Add ira_costs_c_finalize
gcc/ChangeLog:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63854
--- Comment #9 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Nov 19 19:45:39 2014
New Revision: 217797
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217797&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR jit/63854: Fix leak of optimization_summary_obstack
gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63854
--- Comment #8 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Nov 19 19:43:20 2014
New Revision: 217796
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217796&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR jit/63854: Fix leak of opts_obstack
gcc/ChangeLog:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63854
--- Comment #7 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Nov 19 19:33:49 2014
New Revision: 217795
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217795&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR jit/63854: Fix memory leak of save_decoded_options
gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63854
--- Comment #5 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Nov 19 19:23:06 2014
New Revision: 217793
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217793&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR jit/63854: Fix memory leaks within context/pass_manager
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63854
--- Comment #6 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Nov 19 19:28:33 2014
New Revision: 217794
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217794&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR jit/63854: Fix memory leak within bb-reorder.c
gcc/Cha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63966
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Can you please test this patch:
--cut here--
Index: lex.c
===
--- lex.c (revision 217789)
+++ lex.c (working copy)
@@ -471,7 +471,11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63958
--- Comment #1 from Kostya Serebryany ---
Please send patches upstream:
https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/wiki/HowToContribute
1 - 100 of 348 matches
Mail list logo
