https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64077
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Dixie ---
(In reply to Daniel Krügler from comment #1)
Thanks for investigating and providing the reference.
I did not understand that upcasts were intended to override potential cross
casts, issue 665 makes this clea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64015
--- Comment #7 from Zhenqiang Chen ---
Sorry for blocking your benchmark tests. I had reverted the ccmp patch.
I will rework the patch based on Richard Henderson's comments:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg03100.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63703
--- Comment #22 from Denis Excoffier ---
I'm also happy with the above patch. Thank you.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61294
--- Comment #13 from Siddhesh Poyarekar ---
Fixed in glibc:
commit 1721f0a406e52f976f9daf6f59acf42c1dbd33ff
Author: Siddhesh Poyarekar
Date: Thu Nov 27 11:15:45 2014 +0530
Don't use __warn_memset_zero_len for gcc-5.0 or newer
gcc no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64091
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62231
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57872
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54670
--- Comment #3 from Arseny Solokha ---
Also failed to reproduce this w/ 4.9.2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51905
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57353
--- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha ---
Cannot reproduce this with neither 4.9.2 nor 5.0 (20141123) for
powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63671
--- Comment #21 from Jan Hubicka ---
My CPU is AMD Opteron(TM) Processor 6272 and 5.0 doesn't beat 4.9 generic even
with -fmarch=native (the time is 2.9 wrt 2.7). May be some tuning issue?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64091
Bug ID: 64091
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE in update_debug_stmt, at
tree-ssa-tail-merge.c:1620
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64089
--- Comment #6 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to dmalcolm from comment #5)
> (In reply to howarth from comment #1)
> > Failing build configured with...
> >
> > ../gcc-5-20141126/configure --prefix=/sw --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64090
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note comment #1 in bug 63569 was the reduced testcase from the linux kernel
that I had created originally and then I saw it was volatile related so I
reduced it to comment #0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64090
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63569
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anton at samba dot org
--- Comment #7 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64087
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64090
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64089
--- Comment #5 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to howarth from comment #1)
> Failing build configured with...
>
> ../gcc-5-20141126/configure --prefix=/sw --prefix=/sw/lib/gcc5.0
> --mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64089
--- Comment #4 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
We are testing in gcc/configure for...
configure:14564: checking for -exported_symbols_list linker flag
configure:14584:
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/darwin_objdir/./prev-gcc/xgcc
-B
9
0x10724587 execute_todo
../../gcc/gcc/passes.c:1997
gcc version 5.0.0 20141126 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64019
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner ---
Created attachment 34127
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34127&action=edit
Proposed patch to fix the problem
I believe this patch fixes the problem. If nothing else crops up, I will
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64089
--- Comment #3 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
Note that on darwin libgcc handles its symbol map using...
-Wl,-exported_symbols_list,$(SHLIB_MAP)
on SHLIB_LINK.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64089
--- Comment #2 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
I see that the libgcc build handles this issue by passing the --version-script
linker option selectively using config/t-slibgcc-gld.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64089
--- Comment #1 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
Failing build configured with...
../gcc-5-20141126/configure --prefix=/sw --prefix=/sw/lib/gcc5.0
--mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/sw/lib/gcc5.0/info
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto
-1000/gcc-5-20141126/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++
-L/sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/darwin_objdir/prev-x86_64-apple-darwin14.1.0/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs
-L/sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/darwin_objdir/prev-x86_64-apple-darwin14.1.0/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/.libs
-g -O2 -gtoggle -DIN_GCC-fno
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64088
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64077
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64088
Bug ID: 64088
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE: in fold_abs_const, at
fold-const.c:15550
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64088
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Sorry copy&pasted the wrong revision:
r218086 causes the ICE (not r214957).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63757
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63757
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Nov 26 20:11:16 2014
New Revision: 218098
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218098&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-11-26 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/63757
* call.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63671
--- Comment #20 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
At some point you start measuring processor characteristics.
On my old AMD box (Phenom II) gcc-5 now is the fastest:
-Ofast: 2.9
-O3 : 3.6
PGO/-Ofast: 2.7
gcc-4.9:
-Ofast: 3.0
-O3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64086
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Status|UNCONFIRMED
/gcc-trunk
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 5.0.0 20141126 (experimental) [trunk revision 218072] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -m64 -O2 small.c; a.out
$ gcc-trunk -m32 -O3 small.c; a.out
$ gcc-4.9 -m64 -O3 small.c; a.out
$
$ gcc-trunk -m64 -O3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64086
Bug ID: 64086
Summary: [5 Regression] building patched libstdc++ on
powerpc64-linux-gnu gets ICE in
expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:7716
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63671
--- Comment #19 from Jan Hubicka ---
Richard, I still get 2.7 per iteration for GCC 4.9.
For mainline and inline limits bumped ad extermum I can not get better than 3.3
(and it is what I get with -O3 -Ofast too). I am not sure if inliner is to
bl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61190
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61190
--- Comment #5 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Wed Nov 26 18:10:29 2014
New Revision: 218091
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218091&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-11-26 Bernd Edlinger
PR ipa/61190
* cgraph.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64075
--- Comment #7 from Ilya Enkovich ---
(In reply to Dmitry Gorbachev from comment #6)
> The patch works, thanks! But the committed test is incorrect, because the
> original, unpatched compiler, does not fail on it. It failed on functions
> __mulsc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58174
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63733
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60753
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60709
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60692
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60894
--- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini ---
Fabien?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53932
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53910
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53837
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64067
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64085
--- Comment #1 from Maxim Yegorushkin ---
It compiles fine if I replace the line in question with:
return [&captive = static_cast(arg)](auto&& a) {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64075
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry Gorbachev ---
The patch works, thanks! But the committed test is incorrect, because the
original, unpatched compiler, does not fail on it. It failed on functions
__mulsc3, __muldc3, __mulxc3, __multc3, __divsc3, __divdc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64085
Bug ID: 64085
Summary: ICE on C++14 lambda by-reference capture with an
initializer
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59244
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61420
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
There is a piece of code in resolve_variable (resolve.c, line 4911) that looks
like it is related to this problem:
if (sym->attr.flavor == FL_PROCEDURE
&& (!sym->attr.function
|| (sym
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63661
--- Comment #23 from Renlin Li ---
I am using x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc toolchain.
Reproduce the issue in 4.9 branch with "-O2 -fPIC -mtune=native" options.
With 4.9.2 release, I reproduced the problem with "-O2 -fPIC -mtune=nehalem"
options
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59114
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59114
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Nov 26 16:06:53 2014
New Revision: 218090
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218090&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-11-26 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/59114
* g++.dg/cpp0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63994
--- Comment #5 from Ilya Enkovich ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #4)
> Any reason why non-C-family languages cannot use MPX?
>
> Richard.
There is no fundamental restriction. If someone wants to implement Pointer
Bounds Checke
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63671
--- Comment #18 from Jan Hubicka ---
With Martin's fibheap long->sreal change some of anomalies went away. -ficf is
no longer an issue, but mainline still produces slower binary than 4.9 and
-fwhole-program hurts code quality.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59114
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini ---
Let's add the testcase and close the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63994
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 26 Nov 2014, enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63994
>
> --- Comment #3 from Ilya Enkovich ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64084
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64084
Bug ID: 64084
Summary: [5 Regression] match-and-simplify prefers complex
matches
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59759
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.4 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63738
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 26 15:17:31 2014
New Revision: 218089
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218089&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-11-26 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/63738
* tree-data-r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63738
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63738
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 26 15:16:24 2014
New Revision: 218088
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218088&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-11-26 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/63738
* tree-data-r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59759
--- Comment #10 from Gereon Kremer ---
Any news?
The problem persists for the following versions:
- 4.8.3, error at line 17225
- 4.9.1, error at line 18149
- 4.9.2, error at line 18149
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63994
--- Comment #3 from Ilya Enkovich ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #2)
>
> > TARGET_CFLAGS="-O2 -g -mmpx -fcheck-pointer-bounds" TARGET_CXXFLAGS="-O2
> -g -mmpx -fcheck-pointer-bounds" BOOT_CFLAGS="-O2 -g -mmpx
> -fcheck-pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64024
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64058
--- Comment #4 from Igor Zamyatin ---
Partition maps differ
216303:
Partition 0 (_1 - 1 101 200 252 267 316 348 )
Partition 16 (l1_lsm.7_159 - 106 159 238 253 )
and for 216304:
Partition 3 (l1_lsm.7_58 - 58 106 238 253 315 316 )
...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63995
--- Comment #10 from ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Wed Nov 26 14:37:07 2014
New Revision: 218085
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218085&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR bootstrap/63995
* tree-chkp-opt.c (chk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64083
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Seems I have an (untested) fix in my dev tree:
Index: gcc/tree-ssa-threadupdate.c
===
--- gcc/tree-ssa-threadupdate.c (revision 218078)
+++ gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63788
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63788
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Nov 26 14:05:21 2014
New Revision: 218084
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218084&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/63788
* asan.c (initialize_sanitizer_builtins): Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64075
--- Comment #5 from ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Wed Nov 26 13:53:38 2014
New Revision: 218083
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218083&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR lto/64075
* tree-streamer-in.c (unpack_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63573
--- Comment #24 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The code in comment 23 compiled OK at r215990 (I couldn't test with r216304 to
confirm t his is definitely the same issue because that failed to bootstrap on
powerpc for a different reason)
You only need
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64083
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64054
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63704
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Oh, no. It's actually a genuine bug.
__attribute__((optimize("O3"))) enables -fstrict-aliasing, so if the
rest of the TU is compiled with -fno-strict-aliasing it depends on
prue luck if 'int' (as in this c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64054
--- Comment #11 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Wed Nov 26 13:22:27 2014
New Revision: 218081
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218081&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
XFAIL 27_io/basic_ostream/inserters_arithmetic/char/hexfloat.cc on Solaris (PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63665
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63665
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 26 13:15:16 2014
New Revision: 218079
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218079&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-11-26 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2014-10-08
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63379
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63605
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62031
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64083
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50414
Bug 50414 depends on bug 63379, which changed state.
Bug 63379 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Incorrect vectorization when enabling SSE
and O3, initialises loop with wrong value
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63379
What|R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63605
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 26 13:15:16 2014
New Revision: 218079
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218079&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-11-26 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2014-10-08
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62031
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 26 13:15:16 2014
New Revision: 218079
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218079&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-11-26 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2014-10-0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63379
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 26 13:15:16 2014
New Revision: 218079
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218079&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-11-26 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2014-10-0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61969
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 26 13:15:16 2014
New Revision: 218079
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218079&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-11-26 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2014-10-0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64054
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61969
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64079
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64083
Bug ID: 64083
Summary: ICE compiling Linux Kernel drivers/isdn/i4l/isdn_net.c
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64078
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
I also saw
FAIL: c-c++-common/ubsan/object-size-10.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin
-fno-fat-lto-objects execution test
at random on Linux/ia32.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63663
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61927
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
