https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64116
--- Comment #3 from hete2 at gmx dot de ---
Created attachment 34172
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34172action=edit
preprozessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60978
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paul Pluzhnikov from comment #9)
In glibc-2.19, include/netinet/in.h:
Interesting, in glibc 2.18 (at least in glibc-headers-2.18-16.fc20.x86_64) they
are in the same
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64116
--- Comment #4 from hete2 at gmx dot de ---
I found out that -march=native is not needeed. The following prerequisites were
used: gmp-6.0.0, mpfr-3.1.2, mpc-1.0.2, isl-0.12.2, cloog-0.18.1.
pt.ii.bz2 is the compressed preprocessed source. Log is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57168
hete2 at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hete2 at gmx dot de
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57168
--- Comment #2 from hete2 at gmx dot de ---
Sorry.. should be sended to bug 64116.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64116
--- Comment #5 from hete2 at gmx dot de ---
Created attachment 34174
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34174action=edit
Output of gcc -v ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60978
--- Comment #11 from Paul Pluzhnikov ppluzhnikov at google dot com ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #10)
Interesting, in glibc 2.18 (at least in glibc-headers-2.18-16.fc20.x86_64)
they are in the same enum.
The in.h is actually
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
--- Comment #24 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
builtin-arith-overflow-14.c still fails on ppc32 as of r218249.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64157
Bug ID: 64157
Summary: [5.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr52429.c -O2
-flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none
(internal compiler error)
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64157
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64158
Bug ID: 64158
Summary: [5.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr44194-1.c
scan-rtl-dump dse1 global deletions = (2|3)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64158
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64159
Bug ID: 64159
Summary: [5.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse-2.c
scan-tree-dump optimized return 28;
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64159
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64156
--- Comment #3 from Wilco wdijkstr at arm dot com ---
(In reply to Michael Meissner from comment #2)
Note, the fix proposed in PR64151 DOES NOT work on the PowerPC, so it may be
a dup in terms of what change broke the build, but the potential
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64010
--- Comment #6 from Peter A. Bigot pab at pabigot dot com ---
The alternative patch (using find_reg_fusage) does fix the problem in my
reproducing test case and in a real application. Thank you.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64160
Bug ID: 64160
Summary: msp430 code generation error adding 32-bit integers
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64010
--- Comment #7 from Peter A. Bigot pab at pabigot dot com ---
I don't know if https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64160 is related;
it appears to be a similar problem affecting a value returned in multiple
registers. It's present both
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61129
Andy Lutomirski luto at mit dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64161
Bug ID: 64161
Summary: bootstrap error: condition_variable.cc:134:7: error:
'atexit' is not a member of 'std'
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64161
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64161
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2-Dec-14, at 8:17 PM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
#include cstdlib in the .cc file should fix it.
Thanks Jonathon, I'll give it a try.
--
John David Anglindave.ang...@bell.net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64161
--- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2-Dec-14, at 8:17 PM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
#include cstdlib in the .cc file should fix it.
Actually, .cc already includes it...
--
John David Anglindave.ang...@bell.net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60978
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64161
--- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2-Dec-14, at 8:26 PM, dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote:
Actually, .cc already includes it...
Sorry, looked at wrong file.
--
John David Anglindave.ang...@bell.net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64161
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It looks like it includes stdlib.h but not the C++ wrapper, cstdlib
I'm going to commit a patch to include cstdlib as that's correct anyway, I hope
that will fix it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64161
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Dec 3 01:34:03 2014
New Revision: 218300
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218300root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/64161
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64159
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5.0 regression] FAIL: |FAIL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64001
--- Comment #1 from Michael Hudson-Doyle michael.hudson at canonical dot com
---
Created attachment 34175
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34175action=edit
very small reproducer
Well, here is a very small reproducer indeed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64001
--- Comment #2 from Michael Hudson-Doyle michael.hudson at canonical dot com
---
Oh, I was wrong in my initial comment. Setting a breakpoint like this:
(gdb) br *0x7971
Breakpoint 5 at 0x7971: file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64010
--- Comment #8 from Alex Mykyta amykyta3 at gmail dot com ---
Also confirmed Ulrich's patch.
Thank you for taking care of this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64162
Bug ID: 64162
Summary: ICE: in emit_library_call_value_1, at calls.c:3779
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64156
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Wilco from comment #3)
Anyway it looks like this patch has triggered some complex allocation
issues, so it seems best to revert it. I'll get someone to do that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64110
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
Vlad, can you please have a look? Thanks.
I'll work on this. But the related code in LRA is very tricky. It can take a
few
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64017
--- Comment #5 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
Do we still need to be passing -DCLOOG_INT_GMP from config/isl.m4 now that the
cloog support is fully deprecated in gcc 5.0?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64001
--- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com ---
On GNU/Linux gdb can usually print TLS variables fine. It knows how to look up
the value for the current thread. Make sure you are using a sufficiently new
version of gdb, although I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28154
Sean Santos quantheory at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||quantheory at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52714
--- Comment #16 from Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Dec 3 06:00:54 2014
New Revision: 218302
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218302root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/52714
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64163
Bug ID: 64163
Summary: [5 Regression] r218024 causes qt5 build failure
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
URL: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17670
Status:
101 - 139 of 139 matches
Mail list logo