https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56203
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
"dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" writes:
> --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Without feedback I'll close this PR as WONTFIX.
This has become more pronounced with increased gfor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56203
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Without feedback I'll close this PR as WONTFIX.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56744
Bug 56744 depends on bug 56660, which changed state.
Bug 56660 Summary: Fails to read NAMELIST with certain form array syntax
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56660
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56660
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61947
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|4.10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63840
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63840
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Sat Dec 6 22:24:11 2014
New Revision: 218456
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218456&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/63840
* include/std/functional (function::function(c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61947
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Sat Dec 6 22:24:16 2014
New Revision: 218457
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218457&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/61947
* include/std/tuple (_Head_base): Use allocato
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60751
--- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Is there an agreement to downgrade the error from GFC_STD_GNU in
gcc/fortran/io.c: && !gfc_notify_std (GFC_STD_GNU, "Comma before i/o item
list at %L",
to GFC_STD_LEGACY? If yes, I'll submit a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62007
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62094
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59603
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63840
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Sat Dec 6 20:37:54 2014
New Revision: 218452
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218452&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/63840
* include/std/functional (function::function(c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61947
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Sat Dec 6 20:38:01 2014
New Revision: 218453
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218453&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/61947
* include/std/tuple (_Head_base): Use allocato
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59603
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Sat Dec 6 20:38:07 2014
New Revision: 218454
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218454&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/59603
* include/bits/stl_algo.h (random_shuffle): P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26731
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot
ethz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64203
--- Comment #4 from Sandra Loosemore ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> How's this one?
Looks better; this version fixes the compile-time errors.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63829
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Aaron Graham from comment #3)
> I've solved this problem in my own setup by building the toolchain and
> application binaries with the same -mcpu.
>
> A more general solution might be to move
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54742
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19794
Bug 19794 depends on bug 54742, which changed state.
Bug 54742 Summary: Switch elimination in FSM loop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54742
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54742
--- Comment #39 from Sebastian Pop ---
Author: spop
Date: Sat Dec 6 19:19:37 2014
New Revision: 218451
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218451&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
extend jump thread for finite state automata
PR tree-optimization/547
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63529
--- Comment #10 from Steve Kargl ---
On Sat, Dec 06, 2014 at 04:38:53PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63529
>
> --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> > Not sure what correct etiq
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64207
--- Comment #4 from Joost VandeVondele
---
(In reply to Mike Page from comment #3)
> BTW, I was using
> https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/tree-ssa/vectorization.html#using
> for my info on optimization options.
yes, I agree that there is lots of ou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64210
Bug ID: 64210
Summary: FAIL:
gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-(vmovdqa64|vpbroadcastd)-1.c
... with -fpic
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64207
--- Comment #3 from Mike Page ---
BTW, I was using
https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/tree-ssa/vectorization.html#using
for my info on optimization options.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64207
--- Comment #2 from Mike Page ---
Thanks, Joost.
I need to go find some current documentation.
Thanks for fixing the typo in my bad example.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64203
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64203
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #34208|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63529
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Not sure what correct etiquette is for checking on bug status, but this has
> been sitting for close to two months now, so I thought I would poke my head
> in again.
Nasty answer: what did you do to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63829
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59398
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Any progress or should this PR be closed as INVALID?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64209
Bug ID: 64209
Summary: [OOP] copy class(*) component from type with a
subroutine
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59345
--- Comment #3 from Joost VandeVondele
---
I'm pasting here another testcase, since I think it is related.
This works as it should (i.e. no pack/unpack), an allocatable as function
result:
> cat tt.f90
SUBROUTINE S1(A)
INTERFACE
FUNCTION
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64208
Bug ID: 64208
Summary: [4.9 Regression][iwmmxt] ICE: internal compiler error:
Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is
achieved (90)
Product: gcc
Version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61179
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64138
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61768
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61928
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62296
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
(In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #4)
> (In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #3)
> > One might be able to do better on any reasonable Unix/Linux system.
>
> Replying to myself: Intel has chang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62087
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60238
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64183
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Sat Dec 6 13:10:31 2014
New Revision: 218447
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218447&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/64183
* c-gimplify.c (c_gimplify_expr): Do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64183
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64140
--- Comment #2 from Tim Shen ---
Author: timshen
Date: Sat Dec 6 11:32:21 2014
New Revision: 218445
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218445&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/64140
Backport form mainline
2014-12-04 Tim Shen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64200
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Sat Dec 6 11:32:46 2014
New Revision: 218446
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218446&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Don't assert "alg != libcall" for -minline-stringops-dynamically
g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48244
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I didn't send testresults to the list because without a dozen patches gcc
> won't compile at all.
Did someone opened PRs for these failures? Patches should be submitted to
gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63831
--- Comment #19 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #17)
> Created attachment 34199 [details]
> gcc5-pr63831.patch
>
> Untested fix.
Thanks Jakub - Works for me - on x86_64-darwin12 all langs (incl. Ada, Java
and Obj-C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64207
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59016
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2013-11-17 00:00:00 |2014-12-6
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59345
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2013-12-22 00:00:00 |2014-12-6
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48244
--- Comment #6 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt ---
> --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Any progress?
Gerald Pfeifer offered to help, but somehow it slipped through. The
patch still works for the latest 5.0 snapshot 20141130:
> Hi Kai-Uwe,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61604
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
52 matches
Mail list logo
