https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64325
Bug ID: 64325
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
Bug 63426 depends on bug 63397, which changed state.
Bug 63397 Summary: signed integer overflows in ira.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63397
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63397
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64217
Chung-Ju Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64217
--- Comment #3 from Chung-Ju Wu ---
Author: jasonwucj
Date: Tue Dec 16 06:22:35 2014
New Revision: 218774
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218774&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/64217
* config/nds32/nds32.md (casesi_internal): Add '
c++,fortran --enable-libgomp --enable-checking=release
Thread model: posix
gcc version 5.0.0 20141215 (experimental) (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-c' '-mtune=generic' '-march=x86-64'
/home/MEGMS2/ian/usr/gcc-5.0.0/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/5.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56459
Ian Harvey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian_harvey at bigpond dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64298
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64323
Bug ID: 64323
Summary: LRA: ICE when compiling newlib for ARM.
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimiz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64240
--- Comment #5 from Fei Yang ---
I'm investigating for a solution, please assign me as owner. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64322
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64300
--- Comment #3 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #2)
> Thanks for reporting. I've just committed a patch focusing on the same
> problem. Could you check that the patch solves the problem.
It fixes the ICE for
6_64-tools/gcc-5.0.0/
--with-gmp=/usr/local/gmp-5.1.1/ --with-mpfr=/usr/local/mpfr-3.1.2/
--with-mpc=/usr/local/mpc-1.0.1/ --disable-multilib --disable-nls
--enable-languages=c
Thread model: posix
gcc version 5.0.0 20141215 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64043
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Mon Dec 15 22:35:20 2014
New Revision: 218767
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218767&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/64043
* gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1_0.c: New testcase.
* t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63397
--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Mon Dec 15 22:18:51 2014
New Revision: 218766
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218766&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-12-15 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/63397
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58623
--- Comment #6 from Evandro ---
What's the PR of the fwprop issue?
Thank you.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64321
Bug ID: 64321
Summary: -ffixed-line-length-none doesn't work
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic, rejects-valid
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64309
--- Comment #12 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #11)
> ((pow2< p==n
Oups, it wasn't supposed to be the same power of 2, so:
(((1< p==n+(l-k)
(k and l are constants)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63347
--- Comment #9 from Mikael Pettersson ---
This wrong-code started with Bernd's r171845, possibly by exposing a latent
issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64309
--- Comment #11 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #7)
> (1 << n) & 6 != 0 -> n > 0 && n < 3 (not beneficial)
We usually spell it (unsigned)n-1<2 (still not that great).
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #8)
> > > I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64309
--- Comment #10 from Marek Polacek ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #7)
> (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #5)
> >
> > I don't think so. I tried to come up with a more general transformation
> > that would simplify ((CST << n) & C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64309
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(1 << n) & 5 != 0 -> n == 0 || n == 2 (not beneficial)
Not only that, we actually emit similar comparisons as a bit test intentionally
even if you write it in a switch or series of ifs that way, so undoing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64309
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #6)
> (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #5)
> > I don't think so. I tried to come up with a more general transformation
> > that would simplify ((CST << n) & CST)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64309
--- Comment #7 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #5)
>
> I don't think so. I tried to come up with a more general transformation
> that would simplify ((CST << n) & CST) != 0, but I haven't found anything
> yet. So may
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64316
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64300
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #1)
> I get the same ICE on my local sh-lra branch after r218688. I've looked
> at what is going on the test case in c#0 with the cross s390 compiler.
> It seems
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61255
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Mon Dec 15 20:20:22 2014
New Revision: 218764
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218764&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/61255
compiler: Copied variadic calls should copy lowerin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64297
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64297
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Dec 15 20:19:51 2014
New Revision: 218763
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218763&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/64297
* typeck.c (apply_memfn_quals): Correct wrong TYPE_CA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64309
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #5)
> I don't think so. I tried to come up with a more general transformation
> that would simplify ((CST << n) & CST) != 0, but I haven't found anything
If both CST ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrestelli at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61115
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64316
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 15 20:10:45 2014
New Revision: 218762
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218762&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/64316
* simplify-rtx.c (simplify_relational_op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62642
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Mon Dec 15 20:04:04 2014
New Revision: 218761
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218761&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-12-15 Vladimir Makarov
PR target/62642
* ira.c (rtx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64320
Bug ID: 64320
Summary: Missing config.h during findcomp.cc compilation
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: boo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61255
Chris Manghane changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64318
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The original testcase does indeed have a data race. The revised testcase is
valid.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64297
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64318
--- Comment #4 from zhouyan at me dot com ---
The new example can be unsafe, if the constructor of the two classes are
unsafe. However, I went through the source of before (during 4.8, 4.9
release), unless something changed, it's not the case.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64318
--- Comment #3 from zhouyan at me dot com ---
Here is version that shall be thread-safe, that produce the same problem,
#include
int main ()
{
_Cilk_for (int i = 0; i != 1; ++i) {
std::mt19937 eng(i);
std::normal_distrib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64309
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #4)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> > Confirmed. Sth like
> >
> > (simplify
> > (ne (bit_and (lshift integer_onep @0) integer_onep) integer_zerop)
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64318
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64319
Bug ID: 64319
Summary: add alias runtime check to remove load after load
redundancy
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16797
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23455
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steinmtz at us dot ibm.com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64230
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64309
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Confirmed. Sth like
>
> (simplify
> (ne (bit_and (lshift integer_onep @0) integer_onep) integer_zerop)
> (eq @0 { build_zero_cst (TREE_TYPE (@0)); })
>
> wit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63804
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62084
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Looking at this again, this might be a "debug" issue instead rather than
"target".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63832
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61360
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61360
Bug 61360 depends on bug 60704, which changed state.
Bug 60704 Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE: in extract_constrain_insn_cached, at
recog.c:2156 with -flive-range-shrinkage -march=amdfam10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60704
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60704
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63832
--- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Dec 15 18:43:26 2014
New Revision: 218759
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218759&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libgcc/63832
* crtstuff.c (__do_global_dtors_aux) [HIDD
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63804
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 15 18:40:35 2014
New Revision: 218758
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218758&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/63804
* gcc.dg/pr63804.c: New test.
Added:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61669
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 15 18:37:59 2014
New Revision: 218757
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218757&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/61669
* gfortran.h (struct gfc_namespace): Add OLD_DATA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64318
--- Comment #1 from zhouyan at me dot com ---
I forgot to mention that, the system is CentOS 7 (with all updates)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64312
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Dec 15 18:33:16 2014
New Revision: 218756
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218756&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-12-15 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/64312
* tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64193
Bug 64193 depends on bug 64312, which changed state.
Bug 64312 Summary: [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64312
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64312
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Blocks|
le-nls --disable-werror
--enable-checking=release --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran
--enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-lto --enable-stage1-checking
--enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --with-system-zlib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 5.0.0 20141215 (experimental) (GCC)
The problem does not always sh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62084
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Marek, would you give a pointer for why this is a target issue and what the
backend should do to fix it? Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64297
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
struct A {
typedef int X;
template X m_fn1() const;
};
template struct is_function {};
is_function i;
struct D {
template > D(Y);
} b(&A::m_fn1<0>);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61360
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61248
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Mon Dec 15 17:33:43 2014
New Revision: 218754
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218754&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/61248
compiler: Ignore argument when typechecking convert
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64218
--- Comment #8 from Antony Polukhin ---
A few more observations:
* Same Boost test compiles and works well on -mcpu=power8 with -fno-rtti
* Test fails to compile on -mcpu=power8 *WITH RTTI on*:
0x109ccb0b crash_signal
?../../gcc/gcc/toplev.c:358
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61253
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Mon Dec 15 17:12:26 2014
New Revision: 218753
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218753&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/61253
compiler: Support RecvStmt = ExpressionList "=" Rec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56846
thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64149
--- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Sounds sensible to me.
We switched to LRA quite late in gcc-4.9, so keeping a way to switch back in
case of problems was pragmatic. But we've been running with the new code now
for a year and not encou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63889
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64314
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63313
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop ---
Confirmed: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218640&root=gcc&view=rev
has fixed the bug that I was seeing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58882
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58882
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Dec 15 16:16:29 2014
New Revision: 218752
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218752&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-12-15 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/58882
* decl.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63727
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63727
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Mon Dec 15 16:10:50 2014
New Revision: 218751
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218751&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-12-15 Janus Weil
PR fortran/63727
* resolve.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64037
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||temporal at gmail dot com
--- Comment #26 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58192
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64297
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #4)
> Here is a draft patch which does this (making the ICE disappear):
Regtests cleanly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64231
--- Comment #8 from Tejas Belagod ---
Hi Sandra, I'm unable to reproduce this SEGV with a x-build of
aarch64-linux-gcc/native gcc with -O2 on the attached prepocessed test case.
Are there any other options I'm missing?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64316
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64316
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60511
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54890
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64316
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64317
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target Milestone|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64317
Bug ID: 64317
Summary: [5 Regression] Ineffective allocation of PIC base
register
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63594
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58192
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #11)
> Does this still fail after r218720, AKA [1]?
>
> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg01183.html
I think it is a dup of PR64037.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64312
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Started with r218515.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64316
Bug ID: 64316
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE in simplify_const_unary_operation
after r218503
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64312
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58192
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|uros at gcc dot gnu.org|hjl.tools at gmail dot
com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61524
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64312
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64312
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Created attachment 34283
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34283&action=edit
reduced testcase
markus@x4 tmp % g++ -w -O2 -std=c++11 type_erased_mix_values.ii
type_erased_mix_values.i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58796
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
However with that patch the caught pointer is not null, so it's not right.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64244
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> Likely r181107 for pr50919.
Yes, this commit (authored by myself) is definitely the culprit here.
The nontriviality in the given test case is t
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
