[Bug lto/64374] New: [5.0 regression] LTO ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2327

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64374 Bug ID: 64374 Summary: [5.0 regression] LTO ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2327 Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/63805] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2327 with -mcpu=power8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63805 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Dmitry G. Dyachenko from comment #2) I have similar error in LTO/x86_64, but stack is slightly different. Its different issue (now PR64374) Sorry for noise.

[Bug target/62231] [4.8/4.9 regression] Exception handling broken on powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62231 --- Comment #8 from manfred.rudigier at omicron dot at --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) GCC 4.8.4 has been released. I have tried out GCC 4.8.4 today, but it still has this issue.

[Bug lto/64374] [5.0 regression] LTO ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2327

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64374 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Looks like mixing of pic and non pic is causing the issue.

[Bug rtl-optimization/63259] Detecting byteswap sequence

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63259 --- Comment #19 from thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yeah, when doing something like (x[0] 8) | x[1]) 8) | x[2]) 8) | x[3] there is already a depth proportional to the size of the value being byte swapped with a coefficient due to casting.

[Bug target/63651] Lot of failures in obj(c|-c++) with yosemite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651 --- Comment #14 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 34310 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34310action=edit Arrange for the instancetype type to be recognised This makes instancetype a synonym for

[Bug rtl-optimization/62151] [5 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62151 --- Comment #17 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: amker Date: Mon Dec 22 10:25:10 2014 New Revision: 219008 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219008root=gccview=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/62151 * combine.c (try_combine):

[Bug rtl-optimization/62151] [5 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62151 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/62178] [5.0 regression] [AArch64] Performance regression on matrix matrix multiply due to r211211

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62178 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug lto/64374] [5.0 regression] LTO ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2327

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64374 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) Looks like mixing of pic and non pic is causing the issue. May be one more issue : -- without '-O3' during compilation there are no

[Bug lto/64374] [5.0 regression] LTO ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2327

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64374 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Dmitry G. Dyachenko from comment #0) Oh, I edit files after copy/paste error message. The correct one is the following: e.ii: In function ‘main’: e.ii:9:1: error:

[Bug target/62231] [4.8/4.9 regression] Exception handling broken on powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62231 --- Comment #9 from Arseny Solokha asolokha at gmx dot com --- Sure it has. The fix wasn't committed to the tree, otherwise it would be reported here.

[Bug other/63758] liblto_plugin.so has undefined reference to _environ on OSX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63758 Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #33903|0 |1 is

[Bug bootstrap/54696] Makefile doesn't propagate CPPFLAGS to host libraries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54696 Eric Gallager egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egall at

[Bug libstdc++/60396] Missing time_get::get() functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60396 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: redi Date: Mon Dec 22 13:45:44 2014 New Revision: 219012 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219012root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-12-22 Rüdiger Sonderfeld

[Bug libstdc++/54354] TODO extended iomanip manipulators std::get_time and std::put_time (C++11, section 27.7.5)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54354 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: redi Date: Mon Dec 22 13:45:52 2014 New Revision: 219013 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219013root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-12-22 Rüdiger Sonderfeld

[Bug libstdc++/60396] Missing time_get::get() functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60396 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/54354] TODO extended iomanip manipulators std::get_time and std::put_time (C++11, section 27.7.5)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54354 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/24882] [meta-bug] Non-refcounted, moveable basic_string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24882 Bug 24882 depends on bug 60278, which changed state. Bug 60278 Summary: string::erase() (and other containers) does not take const_iterators https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60278 What|Removed

[Bug libstdc++/60278] string::erase() (and other containers) does not take const_iterators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60278 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/54392] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] std::string::assign() fails to update length

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54392 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/56437] basic_string assumes that allocators are default-constructible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56437 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/24882] [meta-bug] Non-refcounted, moveable basic_string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24882 Bug 24882 depends on bug 56437, which changed state. Bug 56437 Summary: basic_string assumes that allocators are default-constructible https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56437 What|Removed |Added

[Bug libstdc++/24882] [meta-bug] Non-refcounted, moveable basic_string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24882 Bug 24882 depends on bug 54392, which changed state. Bug 54392 Summary: [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] std::string::assign() fails to update length https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54392 What|Removed

[Bug libstdc++/53221] [C++11] basic_string lacks copy/move constructors with allocator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53221 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/24882] [meta-bug] Non-refcounted, moveable basic_string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24882 Bug 24882 depends on bug 53221, which changed state. Bug 53221 Summary: [C++11] basic_string lacks copy/move constructors with allocator https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53221 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/63651] Lot of failures in obj(c|-c++) with yosemite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651 --- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- With the patch in comment 14, I get === obj-c++ Summary for unix/-m64 === # of expected passes3073 # of unexpected failures13 # of expected failures

[Bug bootstrap/11799] The toplevel should handle multi-libs.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11799 Eric Gallager egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egall at

[Bug libstdc++/60271] [C++1y] std::max(initializer_listT) cannot use std::max_element

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60271 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-active.html#2369

[Bug lto/64043] [5 Regression] ICE (segfault) with LTO: in tree_check/tree.h:2758 get_binfo_at_offset/tree.c:11914

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64043 Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||izamyatin at

[Bug target/64375] New: m32c ICE building newlib in calls.cL3638

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64375 Bug ID: 64375 Summary: m32c ICE building newlib in calls.cL3638 Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug lto/64043] [5 Regression] ICE (segfault) with LTO: in tree_check/tree.h:2758 get_binfo_at_offset/tree.c:11914

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64043 --- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz --- Hi, do you use same flags at compile time and link time? I did not see anything unusual at our testers, but perhaps some of the optimization flags are streamed wrong? Honza

[Bug target/64376] New: [SH] Improve bswap support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64376 Bug ID: 64376 Summary: [SH] Improve bswap support Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug rtl-optimization/63259] Detecting byteswap sequence

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63259 --- Comment #20 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- BTW, PR 42587 contains a few other cases. I've created PR 64376 for the SH specific parts.

[Bug target/64377] nios2 compile error in options-save.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64377 --- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org --- Looking at the generated options-save.c, the first line of this method is clearly incorrect in the cast on the RHS. It looks like a full declaration and not a type. If anyone familiar

[Bug target/64377] New: nios2 compile error in options-save.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64377 Bug ID: 64377 Summary: nios2 compile error in options-save.c Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug lto/64043] [5 Regression] ICE (segfault) with LTO: in tree_check/tree.h:2758 get_binfo_at_offset/tree.c:11914

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64043 --- Comment #15 from Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com --- Just checked: everywhere -Ofast -flto -funroll-loops -static -m64 -march=core-avx2 used (not -O3 as I mentioned before)

[Bug fortran/54756] [OOP] [F08] Should reject CLASS, intent(out) in PURE procedures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54756 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/54756] [OOP] [F08] Should reject CLASS, intent(out) in PURE procedures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54756 --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Closely related: PR 59103.

[Bug libstdc++/60271] [C++1y] std::max(initializer_listT) cannot use std::max_element

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60271 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: redi Date: Mon Dec 22 16:00:16 2014 New Revision: 219015 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219015root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-12-22 Ville Voutilainen

[Bug other/36994] gcc/makefile contains one very long line (over 2k)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36994 Eric Gallager egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egall at

[Bug libstdc++/61580] stoi function unknown on W7/Cygwin/x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61580 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- This is similar to PR 58393, it's due to using a single _GLIBCXX_USE_C99 macro instead of more fine-grained tests for specific features.

[Bug target/52933] SH Target: Use div0s for integer sign comparisons

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52933 --- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: olegendo Date: Mon Dec 22 16:19:11 2014 New Revision: 219017 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219017root=gccview=rev Log: gcc/testsuite/ PR target/52933 *

[Bug preprocessor/48839] #error should terminate compilation - similar to missing #include

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48839 Eric Gallager egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egall at

[Bug libstdc++/37522] [4.4 regression] Incorrect vswprintf prototype breaks __to_xstring

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37522 --- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: redi Date: Mon Dec 22 16:41:39 2014 New Revision: 219019 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219019root=gccview=rev Log: PR libstdc++/37522 *

[Bug libstdc++/60271] [DR2369] [C++1y] std::max(initializer_listT) cannot use std::max_element

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60271 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|SUSPENDED

[Bug preprocessor/48839] #error should terminate compilation - similar to missing #include

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48839 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Makes sense to me.

[Bug fortran/63363] No diagnostic for passing function as actual argument to KIND

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63363 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Mon Dec 22 18:15:08 2014 New Revision: 219027 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219027root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-12-22 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org PR fortran/63363

[Bug fortran/63363] No diagnostic for passing function as actual argument to KIND

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63363 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/60550] [OOP] ICE on factory design pattern

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60550 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug preprocessor/48839] #error should terminate compilation - similar to missing #include

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48839 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joseph at

[Bug target/58314] SH4 error: 'asm' operand requires impossible reload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58314 --- Comment #21 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: olegendo Date: Mon Dec 22 18:53:44 2014 New Revision: 219030 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219030root=gccview=rev Log: gcc/testsuite/ PR target/58314 *

[Bug fortran/63205] [OOP] Wrongly rejects type = class (for identical declared type)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63205 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- For the record, I have a patch in my working tree such that gfortran.dg/widechar_intrinsics_10.f90 is miscomputed with -m32 (I did not yet investigate the problem: too many

[Bug c/37041] -Wc++-compat refinements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37041 --- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #5) #ifdef __cplusplus extern C { #endif /* code that is C-only */ This is not what extern C means. The code still needs to be

[Bug c++/64372] [DR1560] Gratuitous lvalue-to-rvalue conversion in conditional-expression with throw-expression operand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64372 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic,

[Bug c++/64372] [DR1560] Gratuitous lvalue-to-rvalue conversion in conditional-expression with throw-expression operand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64372 --- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- BTW Harald, GCC needs more C++ FE developers, have you considered joining the project? Even if you don't end up contributing much code, you can get a gcc.gnu.org account for

[Bug target/64377] nios2 compile error in options-save.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64377 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build

[Bug sanitizer/59410] tsan tests fail with address randomization disabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59410 Phil Miller unmobile at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||unmobile at gmail

[Bug c++/59759] internal compiler error: in unify, using std::enable_if on classes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59759 Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktietz at gcc dot

[Bug c++/64105] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE: in strip_typedefs, at cp/tree.c:1326

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64105 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/37704] RFE: Need specific version of --disable-multilib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37704 Eric Gallager egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egall at

[Bug other/43171] build: target modules Makefiles have broken rebuild rules (multilib issue)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43171 Eric Gallager egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egall at

[Bug target/63651] Lot of failures in obj(c|-c++) with yosemite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651 --- Comment #16 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- We can fixincludes NS_BLOCKS_AVAILABLE support back in, this would disappear interfaces that cannot be supported. In the past, this was a safe thing to do, and might well be

[Bug ipa/64378] New: [5 Regression] ICE: in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:347 with -O3 -fno-ipa-cp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64378 Bug ID: 64378 Summary: [5 Regression] ICE: in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:347 with -O3 -fno-ipa-cp Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/63651] Lot of failures in obj(c|-c++) with yosemite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651 --- Comment #17 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to m...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #16) We can fixincludes NS_BLOCKS_AVAILABLE support back in, this would disappear interfaces that cannot be supported. In the past, this

[Bug ipa/64378] [5 Regression] ICE: in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:347 with -O3 -fno-ipa-cp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64378 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug bootstrap/25508] MULTILIB_OSDIRNAMES undocumented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25508 Eric Gallager egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egall at

[Bug bootstrap/25537] EXTRA_MULTILIB_PARTS undocumented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25537 Eric Gallager egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egall at

[Bug c/64379] New: VFP register restore in ARM epilogue can break indirect tailcalls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64379 Bug ID: 64379 Summary: VFP register restore in ARM epilogue can break indirect tailcalls Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/64379] VFP register restore in ARM epilogue can break indirect tailcalls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64379 --- Comment #1 from Donn Seeley donn.seeley at windriver dot com --- Created attachment 34315 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34315action=edit generated assembly code for content.i

[Bug target/64379] VFP register restore in ARM epilogue can break indirect tailcalls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64379 --- Comment #2 from Donn Seeley donn.seeley at windriver dot com --- Created attachment 34316 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34316action=edit compiler parameters for the build

[Bug target/53987] [SH] Unnecessary zero-extensions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53987 --- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- In the following example function bool stack_is_background_free( unsigned short* _data, const size_t _size){ size_t num_pixels_above_128 = 0; for(size_t index = 0;index

[Bug target/63810] gcc sets incorrect macro for OS X deployment targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810 Eric Gallager egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egall at

[Bug target/64379] VFP register restore in ARM epilogue can break indirect tailcalls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64379 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Can you add a main() with the necessary parameter setup and call to mark_set() to make the testcase self-contained and executable? You can annotate mark_set() with

[Bug target/55023] hppa: wrong code generated with tail call optimisation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55023 --- Comment #14 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: danglin Date: Mon Dec 22 23:10:18 2014 New Revision: 219037 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219037root=gccview=rev Log: PR target/55023 * dse.c

[Bug c++/64380] New: Missed optimization: smarter dead store elimination in dtors

-gnu Configured with: ../configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-multilib --program-suffix=-5.0.0 Thread model: posix gcc version 5.0.0 20141222 (experimental) (GCC) Compliled with g++-5.0.0 -g -O3 -Wall 20141222-dtor-deadstore.cpp Dump of assembler code for function test_ra(Foo

[Bug target/62231] [4.8/4.9 regression] Exception handling broken on powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62231 --- Comment #11 from Dan Wilder dan.wilder at watchguard dot com --- Created attachment 34318 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34318action=edit Backport msg02605 patch to gcc-4.8.3 Apply after other attachment

[Bug target/62231] [4.8/4.9 regression] Exception handling broken on powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62231 --- Comment #12 from Dan Wilder dan.wilder at watchguard dot com --- I have a backport of the patches referenced in comment 4, which I applied to the gcc-4.8.3 we are using for e500v2. If anybody would care to look at it, comment whether it has

[Bug target/62231] [4.8/4.9 regression] Exception handling broken on powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62231 --- Comment #10 from Dan Wilder dan.wilder at watchguard dot com --- Created attachment 34317 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34317action=edit Backport cfispan.diff to gcc-4.8.3 Attempt to backport cfispan.diff from

[Bug target/64379] VFP register restore in ARM epilogue can break indirect tailcalls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64379 --- Comment #4 from Donn Seeley donn.seeley at windriver dot com --- Created attachment 34319 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34319action=edit main.i to go with content.i I copied content.i to main.i and added just enough

[Bug c++/63522] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression 'ElementIndices' of kind template_parm_index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63522 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug sanitizer/59410] tsan tests fail with address randomization disabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59410 --- Comment #39 from Dmitry Vyukov dvyukov at google dot com --- Isomalloc works best when we can assure it as large a range of common, unoccupied virtual address space as possible. Thus, it's much happier when ASLR is disabled. I do not

[Bug sanitizer/59410] tsan tests fail with address randomization disabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59410 --- Comment #40 from Dmitry Vyukov dvyukov at google dot com --- Phil, please move the discussion to: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/thread-sanitizer This is not gcc specific, and more people will be able to see it in the tsan group.