https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63892
--- Comment #23 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #22)
> yeah, it's not right yet.. looking at this:
> diff --git a/gcc/ipa-icf.c b/gcc/ipa-icf.c
> index e1af8bf..3b5553e 100644
> --- a/gcc/ipa-icf.c
> +++ b/gcc/ipa-icf.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65032
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Started with r220060.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65169
Bug ID: 65169
Summary: [5 Regression] r210201 miscompiles LLVM's TableGen on
ppc64
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64531
Harald van Dijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65136
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65136
>
> --- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47738
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63593
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
*** Bug 47738 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65084
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015, law at redhat dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65084
>
> --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Some of
> the stuff you're doing in that patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
Summary|r220875 causes b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65153
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65151
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65152
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
So it sounds like the friend declaration injects 'test' into N and thus 'test'
is found but overload resolution fails. Whether that injection is correct or
not I don't know. But given you can even define t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65162
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65148
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Works for me on x86_64, so probably also latent on trunk?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65164
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65163
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65170
Bug ID: 65170
Summary: curve25519-donna-c64 miscompilation
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: inline-asm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65169
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65171
Bug ID: 65171
Summary: [5 Regression] r214254 causes thousands of
std::length_errors running boost testsuite on ppc64le
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63892
--- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek ---
As written right now, redirect_callers case doesn't have a fallthru into the
create_thunk case, i.e. we have to redirect all callers (and all other
references to it, but the latter we don't handle right now)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63892
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65172
Bug ID: 65172
Summary: rs6000 rtl checking failure
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65172
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62109
--- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson ---
Do you have a test case which fails without your patch?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59354
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Feb 23 11:14:25 2015
New Revision: 220912
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220912&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-02-23 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2014-11-1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63844
--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Feb 23 11:14:25 2015
New Revision: 220912
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220912&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-02-23 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2014-11-1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61634
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Feb 23 11:14:25 2015
New Revision: 220912
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220912&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-02-23 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2014-11-1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64909
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Feb 23 11:14:25 2015
New Revision: 220912
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220912&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-02-23 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2014-11-1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65171
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65152
--- Comment #2 from bugger_gcc at interia dot pl ---
This is not what is specified, because C++11 7.3.1.2/3 states that such friend
functions can't be found by name lookup unless it's ADL.
Note that the friend 'test' incorrectly hides the global
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65173
Bug ID: 65173
Summary: ICE while compiling wrong code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65170
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65174
Bug ID: 65174
Summary: noexcept() returns true when operator delete with the
object that has a throwing destructor
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65175
Bug ID: 65175
Summary: [4.9.2] ICE forming a typedef with an alias template
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64980
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65175
--- Comment #1 from Ben Pope ---
Whoops, I just realised I should have reported this downstream.
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.9/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65170
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65175
--- Comment #2 from Ben Pope ---
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/libexec/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65171
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65170
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65176
Bug ID: 65176
Summary: config.guess failed to guess machine with 64-bit
kernel and 32-bit user space:
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65174
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Hmm, interesting. When the operand of the delete expression is null the
destructor is not invoked, so it can't throw. It's not obvious to me whether
GCC's result is allowed by the standard or not.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65174
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
FWIW clang and EDG both fail the first two static assertions here, while GCC
passes all three:
struct foo {
~foo() throw(int) {}
};
int main() {
static_assert( noexcept(delete static_cast(nullptr)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65177
Bug ID: 65177
Summary: [5 Regression]: extend jump thread for finite state
automata causes miscompilation
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64876
--- Comment #8 from boger at us dot ibm.com ---
Yes, I can see that these regressions have gone away in the latest gcc
testresults on ppc64.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65177
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64876
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65177
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65170
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 34844
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34844&action=edit
gcc5-pr65170.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65178
Bug ID: 65178
Summary: incorrect -Wmaybe-uninitialized when nested loops
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65179
Bug ID: 65179
Summary: Introduce new C warning: -Wshift-negative-value
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65179
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65180
Bug ID: 65180
Summary: regression in gccgo testcase runtime/pprof on ppc64le,
ppc64 following move to go 1.4 from 1.3
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65180
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
See PR 64999 for more discussion.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65177
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #0)
> Hello.
>
> Starting with r218451, http://hmmer.janelia.org/ started to be miscompiled.
>
> Steps to reproduce:
> wget
> http://selab.janelia.org/software/hmmer3/3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65032
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, from what I can see, the problem is that we have during IRA:
(insn 48 47 49 6 (parallel [
(set (reg:DI 93 [ D.2201 ])
(sign_extend:DI (reg/v:SI 88 [ b ])))
(clobber
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65177
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop ---
The miscompile happens when compiling src/generic_optacc.c:
with -fdbg-cnt=registered_jump_thread:167 it passes, and with
-fdbg-cnt=registered_jump_thread:168 it segfaults.
The difference is:
--- /tmp/167
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65177
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop ---
command line:
cd src
gcc -g -O1 -ftree-vrp -fexpensive-optimizations -pthread -fPIC -msse2
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../easel -I../libdivsufsort -I../easel -I. -I. -o
generic_optacc.o -c generic_optacc.c -fdbg-cnt=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65176
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61831
--- Comment #40 from Mikael Morin ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #39)
> A function will do a deep copy, so I think the only problematic cases are
> EXPR_ARRAY, and maybe EXPR_STRUCTURE.
EXPR_STRUCTURE deep-copy variable components, a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61831
--- Comment #41 from Mikael Morin ---
Created attachment 34846
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34846&action=edit
extended testcase
My work patch is:
Index: trans-expr.c
==
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150
--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> So, patch for discussions:
> 1) for DECL_VIRTUAL_P trying redirect_callers will unlikely help (not sure
> about that too)
> 2) don't remove alias even if it is virt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63888
--- Comment #36 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Yury Gribov from comment #35)
> (In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #34)
> > Frankly, I am not at all motivated to do any significant surgery in the llvm
> > compiler instrumentation bec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65181
Bug ID: 65181
Summary: Support for alloca in nvptx
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: target
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
On I also see
FAIL: c-c++-common/attr-used.c -std=gnu++(11|14|98) scan-assembler
function_declaration_before
or
FAIL: c-c++-common/attr-used.c -Wc++-compat scan-assembler
function_declaration_b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65181
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Mon Feb 23 17:51:41 2015
New Revision: 220915
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220915&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR target/65181] nvptx libgcc: Prevent building "advanced" stuff (f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60741
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||24639
Depends on|24639
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62630
--- Comment #18 from Mircea Namolaru ---
I've succeeded to explain why these casts are generated, and they seem correct.
Graphite introduces new induction variables with a larger size type (then the
type of original
induction variable), to make s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63748
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||24639
Depends on|24639
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56670
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65178
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61831
--- Comment #42 from Mikael Morin ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #41)
> My work patch is:
updated work patch below.
The testcase passes with it, at the price of leaking memory
Index: trans-expr.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #7)
> here we fall through to the case were we make a thunk - IFF we were not able
> to rmove the alias. However, potentially, we already moved all the callers
> from th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65061
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64988
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 34847
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34847&action=edit
gcc5-pr64988.patch
Patch I've been thinking about, fixes the testcase, but doesn't survive
bootstrap - apparent
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65163
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Mon Feb 23 19:16:34 2015
New Revision: 220916
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220916&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/65163
* config/sh/sh.md (swapbsi2, related peephole2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65182
Bug ID: 65182
Summary: -Wuninitialized fails when pointer to variable later
passed to function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64158
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150
--- Comment #10 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9)
What about the significance (if any) of the observed regressions introduced by
the patch proposed in Comment 6?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64158
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Looks reasonable to me if it works properly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65183
Bug ID: 65183
Summary: ICE: verify_ssa failed: virtual use of statement not
up-to-date with -fcheck-pointer-bounds
-fchkp-use-nochk-string-functions -mmpx
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65184
Bug ID: 65184
Summary: ICE: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:7760 with
-mabi=ms -fcheck-pointer-bounds -mmpx
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65163
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Mon Feb 23 20:37:20 2015
New Revision: 220917
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220917&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline
2015-02-23 Oleg Endo
PR target/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65163
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Mon Feb 23 20:40:45 2015
New Revision: 220918
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220918&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline
2015-02-23 Oleg Endo
PR target/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65163
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61692
David changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63888
--- Comment #37 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Feb 23 21:01:57 2015
New Revision: 220919
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220919&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/63888
* asan/asan_globals.cc (RegisterGlobal): Disab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61740
David changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63888
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150
--- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #7)
> > here we fall through to the case were we make a thunk - IFF we were not able
> > to rmove the alias. However, potent
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65109
--- Comment #14 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Mon Feb 23 21:46:18 2015
New Revision: 220920
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220920&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/65109
* gcc.target/powerpc/ppc64-abi-1.c: Split test fun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65109
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315
--- Comment #17 from Aldy Hernandez ---
BTW, if it isn't clear from the previous comment, the reason I believe this
test may be inefficient is because we have pages upon pages of:
cs.insert(Coefficient("1125899906842624")*B
>= Coef
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65117
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65182
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19430
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tisaac at ices dot utexas.edu
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65185
Bug ID: 65185
Summary: avr-gcc mcus.def missing rfr2 devices
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65169
--- Comment #1 from Alan Modra ---
Preprocessed source for llvm-tblgen and gcc command line to compile same would
be appreciated.
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
