[Bug lto/65252] Link time optimization breaks use of filenames in linker scripts

2015-02-28 Thread goswin-v-b at web dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65252 --- Comment #2 from Goswin von Brederlow --- As long as it's only one C/C++ file that works. But if one has multiple files then -fno-lto would optimize less. I was thinking of a more general case than mine.

[Bug libfortran/65234] Output descriptor (*(1E15.7)) not accepted

2015-02-28 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65234 --- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle --- Created attachment 34906 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34906&action=edit Patch tested on x86-64 This patch passes regression testing and NIST testing. Fairly simple.

[Bug fortran/57822] I/O: "(g0)" wrongly prints "E+0000"

2015-02-28 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57822 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/64506] FORMAT Parse Error with Continuation Line

2015-02-28 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64506 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/65257] New: cin not working with empty string when _GLIBCXX_DEBUG is defined on Windows

2015-02-28 Thread melnakeeb at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65257 Bug ID: 65257 Summary: cin not working with empty string when _GLIBCXX_DEBUG is defined on Windows Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug target/65251] sh4: internal compiler error: Bus error when compiling cpp-netlib

2015-02-28 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65251 --- Comment #2 from Kazumoto Kojima --- FYI, I can't reproduce the problem on i686-gcc cross sh4-unknown-linux-gnu 4.9/5 compilers, though the preprocessed source can be compiled as is.

[Bug bootstrap/65232] [5 Regression] bootstrap failure (ICE in change_symbol_block, at varasm.c:1230) on arm-linux-gnueabihf, in libstdc++ stage1

2015-02-28 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65232 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/65237] [5 Regression] r221040 caused many regressions

2015-02-28 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237 --- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Sat Feb 28 22:53:37 2015 New Revision: 221079 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221079&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR ipa/65237 * ipa-icf.c (sem_function::merge): Do not attempt to

[Bug bootstrap/65232] [5 Regression] bootstrap failure (ICE in change_symbol_block, at varasm.c:1230) on arm-linux-gnueabihf, in libstdc++ stage1

2015-02-28 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65232 --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Sat Feb 28 22:46:22 2015 New Revision: 221078 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221078&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR ipa/65232 * ipa-icf.c (clear_decl_rtl): New function. (sem_

[Bug middle-end/65256] New: [5 regression] Undefined symbols linking f951

2015-02-28 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65256 Bug ID: 65256 Summary: [5 regression] Undefined symbols linking f951 Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middl

[Bug c++/65255] std::thread does not work for cross compiling on ARM

2015-02-28 Thread yyc1992 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65255 --- Comment #4 from Yichao Yu --- Created attachment 34905 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34905&action=edit config.log of a more recent snapshot

[Bug bootstrap/65232] [5 Regression] bootstrap failure (ICE in change_symbol_block, at varasm.c:1230) on arm-linux-gnueabihf, in libstdc++ stage1

2015-02-28 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65232 --- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka --- Aha, the DECL is first seen by notice_global_symbol and then turned to alias. I guess we just need to clear DECL_RTL on the path producing aliases.

[Bug c++/65255] std::thread does not work for cross compiling on ARM

2015-02-28 Thread yyc1992 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65255 --- Comment #3 from Yichao Yu --- I didn't keep the config.log file used to compile the gcc I used to compile the binary attached but here's the config.log of a slightly later snapshot (20150204, which is the same used for the arm native compiler

[Bug c++/65255] std::thread does not work for cross compiling on ARM

2015-02-28 Thread yyc1992 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65255 --- Comment #2 from Yichao Yu --- ARM environment is ArchLinuxARM (armv7h)[1] on a Xilinx Zynq 0702 Eval board which has a dual-core Cortex-a9 processor. [1] http://archlinuxarm.org/packages

[Bug c++/65255] std::thread does not work for cross compiling on ARM

2015-02-28 Thread yyc1992 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65255 --- Comment #1 from Yichao Yu --- Created attachment 34904 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34904&action=edit Source and output programs

[Bug c++/65255] New: std::thread does not work for cross compiling on ARM

2015-02-28 Thread yyc1992 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65255 Bug ID: 65255 Summary: std::thread does not work for cross compiling on ARM Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug target/65249] unable to find a register to spill in class 'R0_REGS' when compiling protobuf on sh4

2015-02-28 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65249 --- Comment #7 from Oleg Endo --- Created attachment 34902 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34902&action=edit Various R0 pre-alloc splits I've tried compiling CSiBE with the two split patterns in comment #5 ... It's a can of

[Bug ipa/65236] [5 Regression]: IPA ICF causes miscompilation in Chromium built with -Os

2015-02-28 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65236 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/65236] [5 Regression]: IPA ICF causes miscompilation in Chromium built with -Os

2015-02-28 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65236 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Sat Feb 28 20:32:15 2015 New Revision: 221077 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221077&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR ipa/65236 * g++.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-6.C: New testcase. * cgraph

[Bug ipa/65237] [5 Regression] r221040 caused many regressions

2015-02-28 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237 --- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Pat Haugen from comment #12) > Commentary got lost for prior attachment... > > 483.xalancbmk from cpu2006 started to fail building on powerpc64[le] with > the subject revision. > I got the same err

[Bug other/65254] New: libiberty produces using extended field designator is an extension warnings in clang

2015-02-28 Thread howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu The simple-object-xcoff.c file in libiberty produces a number of warnings of the form... ./../../gcc-5-20150228/libiberty/simple-object

[Bug ipa/65237] [5 Regression] r221040 caused many regressions

2015-02-28 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237 --- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka --- The alias is really in a wrong comdat group. C++ FE should produce lthunk correctly. It may be related to PR64988 I suppose the code I added to resolve_alias to redirect aliases of aliases to their target tri

[Bug bootstrap/65232] [5 Regression] bootstrap failure (ICE in change_symbol_block, at varasm.c:1230) on arm-linux-gnueabihf, in libstdc++ stage1

2015-02-28 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65232 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka --- Hmm, it seems we triggered another bug of aliases WRT anchors. How does the declarations in question look like? (basically all aliases introduced by ipa-icf can also be coded by hand). Is it the path /* For

[Bug middle-end/65224] fprofile-reorder-functions reorders using expand order

2015-02-28 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65224 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka --- Yep, I am aware of this problem. Good we have tracking bug for this. LRA is not the first pass down top-down propagation and I originally set up the topological order precisely to make these kind of tricks pos

[Bug go/63731] Fallback to netgo does not work

2015-02-28 Thread ian at airs dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63731 --- Comment #26 from Ian Lance Taylor --- Tatsushi: are you asking about gccgo, or about gc?

[Bug bootstrap/65232] [5 Regression] bootstrap failure (ICE in change_symbol_block, at varasm.c:1230) on arm-linux-gnueabihf, in libstdc++ stage1

2015-02-28 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65232 --- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez --- For the following symbol: (symbol_ref:SI ("_ZTCSt9strstream8_So") [flags 0x82] ) We fail this assertion: change_symbol_block (rtx symbol, struct object_block *block) { if (block != SYMBOL_REF_BLOCK (sym

[Bug target/65249] unable to find a register to spill in class 'R0_REGS' when compiling protobuf on sh4

2015-02-28 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65249 --- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #5) > > While we probably could add those two patterns as a quick fix, I don't think > it's a great solution, because we'd actually need to add such patterns for > *all* insns

[Bug target/65248] [5 Regression] Copy relocation in PIE against protected symbol

2015-02-28 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65248 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/65249] unable to find a register to spill in class 'R0_REGS' when compiling protobuf on sh4

2015-02-28 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65249 --- Comment #5 from Oleg Endo --- On trunk, I've tried adding this: (define_split [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "arith_reg_dest") (mem:SI (plus:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "arith_reg_operand") (match_operand:SI 2 "arith_reg_operand")))

[Bug bootstrap/65232] [5 Regression] bootstrap failure (ICE in change_symbol_block, at varasm.c:1230) on arm-linux-gnueabihf, in libstdc++ stage1

2015-02-28 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65232 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/65251] sh4: internal compiler error: Bus error when compiling cpp-netlib

2015-02-28 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65251 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug bootstrap/65232] [5 Regression] bootstrap failure (ICE in change_symbol_block, at varasm.c:1230) on arm-linux-gnueabihf, in libstdc++ stage1

2015-02-28 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65232 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose --- reverting r221040 lets the bootstrap succeed.

[Bug target/65249] unable to find a register to spill in class 'R0_REGS' when compiling protobuf on sh4

2015-02-28 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65249 --- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo --- For some reason r0 is live throughout the whole basic block where the problem occures. The basic block starts with: (note 36 35 38 5 [bb 5] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK) (note 38 36 39 5 NOTE_INSN_DELETED) (note 39 38

[Bug target/65249] unable to find a register to spill in class 'R0_REGS' when compiling protobuf on sh4

2015-02-28 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65249 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/65249] unable to find a register to spill in class 'R0_REGS' when compiling protobuf on sh4

2015-02-28 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65249 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug c++/62182] New warning wished: operator== and "equality comparison result unused [-Wunused-comparison]"/-Wunsed-value

2015-02-28 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62182 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/65253] New: Wmemsize-comparison

2015-02-28 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65253 Bug ID: 65253 Summary: Wmemsize-comparison Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee:

[Bug bootstrap/65232] [5 Regression] bootstrap failure (ICE in change_symbol_block, at varasm.c:1230) on arm-linux-gnueabihf, in libstdc++ stage1

2015-02-28 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65232 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose --- Created attachment 34900 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34900&action=edit preprocessed source preprocessed source, produced with r221076

[Bug lto/65252] Link time optimization breaks use of filenames in linker scripts

2015-02-28 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65252 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug lto/65252] New: Link time optimization breaks use of filenames in linker scripts

2015-02-28 Thread goswin-v-b at web dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65252 Bug ID: 65252 Summary: Link time optimization breaks use of filenames in linker scripts Product: gcc Version: 4.8.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/65251] New: sh4: internal compiler error: Bus error when compiling cpp-netlib

2015-02-28 Thread glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65251 Bug ID: 65251 Summary: sh4: internal compiler error: Bus error when compiling cpp-netlib Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/65246] [5 Regression] libstdc++ pretty printers don't work anymore with Python3

2015-02-28 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65246 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug libstdc++/65246] [5 Regression] libstdc++ pretty printers don't work anymore with Python3

2015-02-28 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65246 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/65250] New: [SH] Improve comparisons followed by a negated cstore

2015-02-28 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65250 Bug ID: 65250 Summary: [SH] Improve comparisons followed by a negated cstore Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug libstdc++/65246] [5 Regression] libstdc++ pretty printers don't work anymore with Python3

2015-02-28 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65246 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose --- Author: doko Date: Sat Feb 28 09:22:43 2015 New Revision: 221076 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221076&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-02-28 Matthias Klose PR libstdc++/65246 * python/

[Bug target/64760] [SH] Avoid multiple #imm,r0 insns with the same #imm value

2015-02-28 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64760 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|