https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65836
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65378
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65892
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64919
John Buddery jvb at cyberscience dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvb at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65864
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65875
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
Created attachment 35395 [details]
gcc5-pr65875.patch
Untested fix. IMHO vrp_visit_phi_node was missing the vr_result VR_VARING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65893
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
IMHO it makes sense to move stdarg a bit earlier, after pass_dce.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65894
--- Comment #7 from Jürgen Reuter juergen.reuter at desy dot de ---
Created attachment 35404
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35404action=edit
Code that triggers the segmentation fault.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65886
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65217
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65549
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65874
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65873
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I think simply honoring always_inline (the attribute! not just
DECL_DISREGARD_INLINE_LIMITS) regardless of any options would be ok as well
(and maybe simply reject optimize/target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65894
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65894
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65894
--- Comment #5 from Jürgen Reuter juergen.reuter at desy dot de ---
Here is a reduced test case (where iso_varying_string.f90 is the standard
module with 1 or 2 modifications by us). As this is at the core of our program,
we do rely on a timely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65894
--- Comment #6 from Jürgen Reuter juergen.reuter at desy dot de ---
Created attachment 35403
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35403action=edit
Auxiliary module
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53184
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #35353|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62258
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
doko, I'm still curious if you can verify if you see a regression here or not.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62258
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed on trunk so far
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62258
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Apr 27 19:44:30 2015
New Revision: 222480
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222480root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-04-27 Dmitry Prokoptsev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #17 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net ---
Patch applied. Mikael, the next time you upload a f90 script, Bugzilla will
correctly detect it as text/plain. Note that it won't convert the MIME type of
already uploaded
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64230
Mat Cross mathewc at nag dot co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65896
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65882
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65886
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65887
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35402
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35402action=edit
patch to remove copyback
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65873
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #1)
I think certain combinations of flag will trigger ICE, such as one
enabling/disabling vector builtins. But I suppose we may want to bypass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65887
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to vries from comment #2)
I.
After removing the copyback using attached patch, and marking the va_arg
first argument as addressable as suggested here (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65887
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I.
After removing the copyback using attached patch, and marking the va_arg first
argument as addressable as suggested here (
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-04/msg01314.html ) using this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65873
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The diff in flags is the following:
not inlinable: bar/1 - memcpy/0, optimization level attribute mismatch
align_functions (0/0x10)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65899
Bug ID: 65899
Summary: std::basic_stringbuf member __xfer_bufptrs should be
explicitly declared private
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65886
--- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12)
First of all, why is this filed as a GCC bug? And what is PIE specific on
the issue? I mean, if -Bsymbolic doesn't cope well with like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65895
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65296
Bug 65296 depends on bug 65895, which changed state.
Bug 65895 Summary: Segfault building cross GCC 5.1.0 for Target AVR on Mac OSX
10.10.3 (using Apple LLVM version 6.1.0 (clang-602.0.49))
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65895
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65886
--- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #16)
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #15)
Unless we state -Bsymbolic should never be used with GCC, we should
provide a way to make PIE to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65899
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65886
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #13)
It is true that the testcase doesn't work with normal executable. I
don't believe GCC is wrong to generate copy relocation in PIE. It
is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65875
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Apr 27 12:21:17 2015
New Revision: 222461
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222461root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/65875
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65875
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65900
Bug ID: 65900
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/pr65345-2.c (test for excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65296
--- Comment #12 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Apr 27 11:43:20 2015
New Revision: 222459
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222459root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/65296
PR target/65895
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65895
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Apr 27 11:43:20 2015
New Revision: 222459
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222459root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/65296
PR target/65895
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65886
--- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #14)
As it doesn't work with normal executables, I'm not convinced we need such
an option or that it is right to assume it should work.
People
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65886
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #15)
Unless we state -Bsymbolic should never be used with GCC, we should
provide a way to make PIE to compatible with -Bsymbolic.
Well, there is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65901
Bug ID: 65901
Summary: no warning or error for va_arg (ap, void)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65886
--- Comment #18 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #17)
Since -Bsymbolic is allowed with PIE, we should take advantage of it.
-fsymbolic -fPIE is the same as -fPIC and -fsymbolic -fPIC generates
much
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65875
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Apr 27 11:26:12 2015
New Revision: 222458
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222458root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/65875
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65895
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Apr 27 11:49:42 2015
New Revision: 222460
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222460root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backport from 2015-04-27 trunk r222459.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65296
--- Comment #13 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Apr 27 11:49:42 2015
New Revision: 222460
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222460root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backport from 2015-04-27 trunk r222459.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65855
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65899
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Ugh, -fno-access-control doesn't prevent the error.
Then I suggest using -include sstream, so that stringstream is included before
some idiot comes along and redefines a keyword.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64921
--- Comment #14 from Mat Cross mathewc at nag dot co.uk ---
For the record, perhaps it is of interest for me to note that we are running
into this (cf. PR64230 comment 9) on code like
Program test
Implicit None
Type :: t1
Integer,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65907
Bug ID: 65907
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE: in set_lattice_value, at
tree-ssa-ccp.c:535
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64579
--- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: bergner
Date: Mon Apr 27 14:52:50 2015
New Revision: 222467
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222467root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/64579
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65892
--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor msebor at gcc dot gnu.org ---
If one of you can explain the problem with it I'm willing to write up a paper
and submit it to WG14 and request to have the standard changed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65904
Bug ID: 65904
Summary: Memory corruption with acc_shutdown, nvptx offloading,
libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/asyncwait-1.c
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65905
Bug ID: 65905
Summary: Building eCos fails with clist.hxx:304:1: error:
template with C linkage
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65902
Bug ID: 65902
Summary: GCC-5.1 fails to bootstrap for eCos/arm-eabi
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51617
torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||torvald at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65902
--- Comment #1 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de ---
this would fix the regression:
--- libgcc/unwind-arm-common.inc.jj 2015-01-05 13:33:28.0 +0100
+++ libgcc/unwind-arm-common.inc2015-04-27
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65903
Bug ID: 65903
Summary: Line continuation followed by comment character in
string fails to compile
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65886
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I know it isn't the same. But, IMHO this isn't worth adding another knob which
will be a maintainance nightmare.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65906
Bug ID: 65906
Summary: using-declaration allowed for non-direct base class
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65906
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Adamski danregister at poczta dot fm ---
Just to clarify, it is Base() that's being called, not Base(int, int) (I
should have used something else than __func__).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65909
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39813
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65447
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65362
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65909
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65909
Bug ID: 65909
Summary: check_v3_target_namedlocale blows up on targets that
don't support command-line arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65839
--- Comment #3 from Doug Evans dje at google dot com ---
[fyi]
Here's the tentative patch for gdb.
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-04/msg00947.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65908
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc
-format-attribute -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic -Wno-long-long
-Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -fno-common -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I. -I../../gcc-6-20150427/gcc -I../../gcc-6-20150427/gcc/.
-I../../gcc-6-20150427/gcc/../include
-I../../gcc-6-20150427/gcc/../libcpp/include -I/sw/include -I/sw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65909
--- Comment #3 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sandra
Date: Tue Apr 28 02:40:56 2015
New Revision: 222497
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222497root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-04-27 Sandra Loosemore san...@codesourcery.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65810
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65217
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law law at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: law
Date: Tue Apr 28 04:01:28 2015
New Revision: 222499
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222499root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/65217
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65910
--- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com ---
This is from a bootstrap on darwin14 with the command...
% ../gcc-6-20150427/configure --prefix=/Users/howarth/dist
-enable-languages=c,c++ --with-gmp=/sw --with-libiconv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65810
--- Comment #7 from Alan Modra amodra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amodra
Date: Tue Apr 28 03:47:19 2015
New Revision: 222498
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222498root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/65810
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65907
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
Is this a dup of PR 65851?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65858
--- Comment #2 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hi,
Sorry for late response, I applied your patch and got the following ICE:
-std=gnu++11 -flto --param lto-partitions=1
Full command line options: http://pastebin.com/6JSWH9YM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65901
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Untested patch:
--- a/gcc/c/c-typeck.c
+++ b/gcc/c/c-typeck.c
@@ -12648,6 +12648,11 @@ c_build_va_arg (location_t loc, tree expr, tree type)
if (warn_cxx_compat TREE_CODE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65887
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
(In reply to vries from comment #2)
Rather than marking the va_list arg addressable in all the cases above
you should probably simply ensure the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65907
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65851
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65907
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63540
Daniel Adamski danregister at poczta dot fm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danregister
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65901
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65891
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65894
--- Comment #8 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35407
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35407action=edit
A first patch.
With the attached patch your small test case and the testsuite runs w/o
segfault now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64610
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65862
Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #13 from Frank Ch. Eigler fche at redhat dot com ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #12)
Hello, not sure this is due to the upgrade, but the attachment
appears empty in the page:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60322
--- Comment #9 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Mon Apr 27 17:41:01 2015
New Revision: 222478
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222478root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-04-27 Andre Vehreschild ve...@gmx.de
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57335
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ktietz at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49171
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ktietz at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65906
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65841
--- Comment #5 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Mon Apr 27 17:34:11 2015
New Revision: 222477
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222477root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran
2015-04-27 Andre Vehreschild ve...@gmx.de
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
