https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66017
Bug ID: 66017
Summary: Undefined behaviour in std::setlong long
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
--- Comment #37 from Jürgen Reuter juergen.reuter at desy dot de ---
(In reply to vehre from comment #36)
I am waiting for an official review of the patch, to be allowed to commit to
trunk. So I am not waiting on you. :-)
I see. Got it. :D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66019
Bug ID: 66019
Summary: Corrupt libstdc++ on AIX 6.1
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16351
pmatos at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pmatos at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66017
--- Comment #1 from M. Hanselmann public at hansmi dot ch ---
Forgot to add that A. Bougacha has analyzed the issue. According to him it's a
cast (or casts) invoking undefined behaviour.
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23413#c2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52159
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66017
--- Comment #2 from M. Hanselmann public at hansmi dot ch ---
This may be related to bug 63345.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16351
--- Comment #24 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tim Ruehsen from comment #23)
The requested warning is an absolutely must-have (enabled by default).
Seeing this bug open since 2004 is... well ... I have no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66018
Bug ID: 66018
Summary: opendir configure test not working when
GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66011
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59000
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matt at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65456
--- Comment #25 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
--- Comment #24 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org ---
No, I don't think so. The same change was made in GCC 4.9, and it didn't
cause
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61352
--- Comment #12 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Wed May 6 00:33:49 2015
New Revision: 222835
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222835root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-05-05 Jack Howarth
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66029
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66030
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Sailer sailer at sailer dot dynip.lugs.ch ---
Created attachment 35471
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35471action=edit
preprocessed testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66020
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66031
Bug ID: 66031
Summary: Spurious array bounds warning
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54835
--- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed May 6 02:07:34 2015
New Revision: 222836
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222836root=gccview=rev
Log:
DR 1518
DR 1630
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60417
--- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed May 6 02:07:34 2015
New Revision: 222836
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222836root=gccview=rev
Log:
DR 1518
DR 1630
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59678
--- Comment #19 from Hossein Talebi talebi.hossein at gmail dot com ---
Hi,
This patch goes to Gfortran 4.8 or the current version? Thank you.
Cheers
H.
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 7:03 PM, vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66021
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66027
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66030
Bug ID: 66030
Summary: [5.1.0] std::codecvt_byname missing from libstdc++ DLL
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66032
Bug ID: 66032
Summary: RTEMS MIPS build fails on FreeBSD
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65957
--- Comment #2 from Scott Brozell sbrozell at rci dot rutgers.edu ---
Ok, we shall add this to the todo list.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66029
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Also what version of binutils is on the system? Can you try using latest
release from FSF rather than SUSE one?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66004
Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66033
Bug ID: 66033
Summary: rs6000 nops removed by rtl_dce
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66032
--- Comment #2 from Chris Johns chris at contemporary dot net.au ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
Have you tried GNU sed rather than BSD sed?
No and a good idea. I will.
FYI I tend to keep the machines used for testing builds
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66032
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Have you tried GNU sed rather than BSD sed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65995
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Starke daniel.f.starke at freenet dot de ---
I was able to build r222810 without bootstrap. However, the result remains the
same. I am still getting the following error when linking all together:
lto1.exe: internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64579
--- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: bergner
Date: Tue May 5 14:25:35 2015
New Revision: 222808
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222808root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16351
--- Comment #26 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to pmatos from comment #25)
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #24)
I can give you many examples of old must-have bugs that are easy to fix,
but simply
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64579
--- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: bergner
Date: Tue May 5 14:22:33 2015
New Revision: 222807
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222807root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65886
--- Comment #27 from Thiago Macieira thiago at kde dot org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #26)
Plus, if KDE uses so small binaries, why don't just compile them with -fPIC
then?
You can then link them as normal executables or PIEs,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65886
--- Comment #28 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Thiago Macieira from comment #27)
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #26)
Plus, if KDE uses so small binaries, why don't just compile them with -fPIC
then?
You
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65886
--- Comment #30 from Thiago Macieira thiago at kde dot org ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #28)
(In reply to Thiago Macieira from comment #27)
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #26)
Can you guarantee that the linker won't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64579
--- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: bergner
Date: Tue May 5 14:27:30 2015
New Revision: 222809
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222809root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65886
--- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Plus, if KDE uses so small binaries, why don't just compile them with -fPIC
then?
You can then link them as normal executables or PIEs, depending on what you
prefer, and still it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65854
Tom Honermann tom at honermann dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65886
--- Comment #25 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Thiago Macieira from comment #23)
$ pmap `pidof qtcreator` | perl -ne '@_ = split / +/; if ($_[6] eq r-xp
$_[7] !~ /\[/) { $_[1] =~ s/K//; $total += $_[1]; $bin =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837
--- Comment #26 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
So, out of interest, what is needed to make this work properly with target
attributes?
What hooks do we need to implement?
Looking at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16351
--- Comment #29 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tim Ruehsen from comment #28)
I far as I can read, not a patch is missing. A review + commit is missing.
How can you ask for more developers (=patches) when the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65886
--- Comment #29 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Thiago Macieira from comment #27)
Still, if this were solved properly, relocations that resolved back into the
executable itself would still be bound locally, even
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65886
--- Comment #23 from Thiago Macieira thiago at kde dot org ---
$ pmap `pidof qtcreator` | perl -ne '@_ = split / +/; if ($_[6] eq r-xp
$_[7] !~ /\[/) { $_[1] =~ s/K//; $total += $_[1]; $bin = $_[1] unless $bin; }
END { print $bin $total\n; }'
72
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65915
--- Comment #4 from tocarip at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: tocarip
Date: Tue May 5 15:43:13 2015
New Revision: 222811
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222811root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/65915
* config/i386/i386.md (vector convert to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16351
--- Comment #28 from Tim Ruehsen tim.ruehsen at gmx dot de ---
I far as I can read, not a patch is missing. A review + commit is missing.
How can you ask for more developers (=patches) when the work is ignored ?
Don't get me wrong, I just try to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16351
--- Comment #27 from pmatos at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #26)
A good place to start is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.
cgi?keywords=easyhacklist_id=116934order=bug_idquery_format=advanced
Thanks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65886
--- Comment #24 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Thiago Macieira from comment #23)
$ pmap `pidof qtcreator` | perl -ne '@_ = split / +/; if ($_[6] eq r-xp
$_[7] !~ /\[/) { $_[1] =~ s/K//; $total += $_[1]; $bin = $_[1]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65916
Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66022
Bug ID: 66022
Summary: 4.8.4 build fails with stage 2 and 3 comparison error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66016
--- Comment #5 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue May 5 17:46:31 2015
New Revision: 222820
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222820root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR go/66016
runtime: Don't crash in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66021
--- Comment #3 from Nuno Lopes nunoplopes at sapo dot pt ---
Created attachment 35467
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35467action=edit
reduced test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66023
Bug ID: 66023
Summary: Investigate and fix IBM z Systems `guality' testsuite
failures
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66029
Bug ID: 66029
Summary: Build error compiling gcc5.1 using LTO
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66029
--- Comment #1 from JD t at sharklasers dot com ---
I compiled with used:
-O3 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects
and tried to link with:
-flto=4 -O3 -fuse-linker-plugin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65990
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue May 5 16:53:27 2015
New Revision: 222817
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222817root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/65990
* config/i386/i386.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65990
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66020
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65894
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #35407|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64304
--- Comment #7 from fyang at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: fyang
Date: Tue May 5 15:50:18 2015
New Revision: 222812
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222812root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2015-01-19 Jiong Wang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64304
--- Comment #8 from fyang at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: fyang
Date: Tue May 5 15:59:12 2015
New Revision: 222814
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222814root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2015-01-19 Jiong Wang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66016
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65983
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65915
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|65983 |
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66021
--- Comment #1 from Nuno Lopes nunoplopes at sapo dot pt ---
Sorry, a bit more information the problem:
On function void
reduce_args_tactic::imp::populate_decl2args_proc::operator()(app * n), when
compiled with -O0 no call to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65915
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66016
--- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue May 5 16:38:45 2015
New Revision: 222815
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222815root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR go/66016
runtime: Don't crash in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65990
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66020
Bug ID: 66020
Summary: [6.0 regression] FAIL:
gcc.target/powerpc/ppc64-abi-2.c execution test
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65886
--- Comment #31 from Thiago Macieira thiago at kde dot org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #29)
You are missing the point of copy relocations. Consider:
int a = 1;
extern int b, c;
int foo (void)
{
return a + b + c;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66016
--- Comment #3 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue May 5 16:38:57 2015
New Revision: 222816
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222816root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR go/66016
runtime: Don't crash in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66021
Bug ID: 66021
Summary: GCC miscompiles Z3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66021
--- Comment #2 from Nuno Lopes nunoplopes at sapo dot pt ---
Created attachment 35465
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35465action=edit
test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65995
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Starke daniel.f.starke at freenet dot de ---
I have yet to bootstrap the current trunk (r222810). It currently fails with
/usr/new-gcc/bin32/./prev-gcc/xg++ -B/usr/new-gcc/bin32/./prev-gcc/
-B/mingw/mingw32/bin/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66023
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66027
Bug ID: 66027
Summary: lto1: internal compiler error: in
odr_types_equivalent_p
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64835
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
Also fails on powerpc{-m32,-m64}.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66013
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Before postponing expansion of va_arg to pass_stdarg, we had at pass_stdarg:
...
f2: va_list escapes 0, needs to save 4 GPR units and all FPR units.
...
On one hand, the optimization in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65873
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Honza, any progress on this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65990
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
We are passing (unsupported on 32bit target) DImode to
expand_set_or_movmem_via_rep:
(gdb) bt
#0 expand_set_or_movmem_via_rep (destmem=0x2e8b8d68,
srcmem=0x2e8b8d80,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66013
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Before pass_stdarg, we observe in f1 that va_start and va_arg use the same
argument:
...
# .MEM_2 = VDEF .MEM_1(D)
# USE = nonlocal escaped
# CLB = nonlocal escaped { D.1806 } (escaped)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66011
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66012
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66013
Bug ID: 66013
Summary: Missed optimization after inlining va_list parameter,
-m32 case
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66013
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
And in the pass_stdarg dump, for f2 we see why the va_list escapes:
...
va_list escapes in # .MEM_4 = VDEF .MEM_2
apD.1830 = ap.0_3;
...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66010
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Investigated -m32 case in twin PR66013.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65990
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
Proposed patch:
--cut here--
Index: i386.c
===
--- i386.c (revision 222796)
+++ i386.c (working copy)
@@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66014
Bug ID: 66014
Summary: 5.1 mingw64 fails to perform slim bootstrap-lto:
ccEt8YNj.ltrans4.ltrans.o:artificial:(.text+0x628):
undefined reference to `stpcpy'
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65841
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16351
Tim Ruehsen tim.ruehsen at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tim.ruehsen at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65932
--- Comment #5 from Christian Eggers christian.eggers at kathrein dot de ---
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #2)
code built with
-fno-ipa-sra appears to be ok on a visual inspection.
linux-3.10.25 boots fine if globally compiled
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59678
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64950
--- Comment #12 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #11)
Unfortunately, the gcc.dg/tree-ssa/stdarg-2.c part of the patch is wrong:
the test
now FAILs on i686-unknown-linux-gnu, i686-apple-darwin, and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66018
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66028
Bug ID: 66028
Summary: false positive, unused loop variable
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65894
--- Comment #13 from Jürgen Reuter juergen.reuter at desy dot de ---
I will give it a try as soon as possible. Any idea how long propagation into
the trunk might last?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66025
Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66025
Bug ID: 66025
Summary: Implement ThreadSanitizer support for IBM z Systems
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
