https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66166
--- Comment #4 from Zhendong Su ---
Oh yes, that's correct. Sorry for the invalid report.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66140
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Sat May 16 07:28:16 2015
New Revision: 223232
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223232&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/66140
* config/alpha/alpha.c (get_aligne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66140
--- Comment #5 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Sat May 16 07:42:20 2015
New Revision: 223233
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223233&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/66140
* config/alpha/alpha.c (get_aligne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66163
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
--- Comment #24 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
(In reply to Lawrence Velázquez from comment #23)
> I don't see anything in version_as_legacy_macro() that specifically deals
> with major <= 9. Could you point me to the offending code?
In the co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65792
--- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sat May 16 08:09:52 2015
New Revision: 223234
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223234&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-05-16 Mikael Morin
PR fortran/65792
* trans-expr.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66079
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14741
--- Comment #31 from Thomas Koenig ---
If the middle end is not up to this, should we be looking at doing loop
blocking in the Fortran front end, at least for the Matmul intrinsic?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65768
--- Comment #2 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Sat May 16 09:35:52 2015
New Revision: 223235
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223235&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-05-16 Kugan Vivekanandarajah
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60392
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60392
Alexander Vogt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66162
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66175
Bug ID: 66175
Summary: ICE in gfc_free_namespace with unbalanced BLOCKs
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66040
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66168
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Summary|ICE at -O3 in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66176
Bug ID: 66176
Summary: Handle conjg() in inline matmul
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44054
--- Comment #24 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
Author: manu
Date: Sat May 16 12:30:04 2015
New Revision: 223236
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223236&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2015-05-16 Manuel López-Ibáñez
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44054
--- Comment #25 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
Author: manu
Date: Sat May 16 12:31:00 2015
New Revision: 223237
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223237&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2015-05-16 Manuel López-Ibáñez
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66113
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat May 16 12:33:01 2015
New Revision: 223238
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223238&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-05-16 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/66113
* expr.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48997
Bug 48997 depends on bug 66113, which changed state.
Bug 66113 Summary: Variable n cannot appear in the expression with nested blocks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66113
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66113
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66177
Bug ID: 66177
Summary: warn_unused_result doesn't always work
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66177
--- Comment #1 from Sergio Martins ---
It this is known, at least please mention in the documentation it only works
for built-in types.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66079
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 3
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3&action=edit
Initial fix
This is a partial fix, in that it deals with the initial problem.
type subdata
integer, alloca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66174
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66174
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #1)
> Confirmed, adding CC.
Also fails with -O -ftree-vectorize -mavx512f.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66174
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
The problem is in i386.c, function expand_vec_perm_blend, where:
/* This matches five different patterns with the different modes. */
x = gen_rtx_VEC_MERGE (vmode, op1, op0, GEN_INT (mask));
x = gen_rtx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66174
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Untested patch:
--cut here--
Index: i386.c
===
--- i386.c (revision 223231)
+++ i386.c (working copy)
@@ -46780,12 +46780,14 @@ expand_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65903
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat May 16 17:44:15 2015
New Revision: 223248
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223248&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-05-16 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/65903
* io.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65903
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat May 16 17:51:41 2015
New Revision: 223249
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223249&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-05-16 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/65903
* gfortr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30967
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Sat May 16 17:56:55 2015
New Revision: 223250
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223250&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2015-05-13 Segher Boessenkoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66178
Bug ID: 66178
Summary: Another label as values ICE
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66178
--- Comment #1 from SztfG at yandex dot ru ---
better test case
int test(void)
{
static int a = ((char *)&&l2-(char *)&&l3)+((char *)&&l1-(char *)&&l2);
l1:
l2:
l3:
return a;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66178
--- Comment #2 from SztfG at yandex dot ru ---
another testcase:
int test(void)
{
static int a = ((char *)&&l1-(char *)&&l2)-1;
l1:
l2:
return a;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66167
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sat May 16 20:15:01 2015
New Revision: 223251
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223251&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/66167
ada/
* gcc-interface/decl.c (gnat_to_gnu_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66167
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66123
--- Comment #7 from SztfG at yandex dot ru ---
Similar bug https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66178
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66163
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66179
Bug ID: 66179
Summary: Sub-optimal code generation with __attribute__((leaf))
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66179
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias, missed-optimization
--- Comment #
40 matches
Mail list logo
