https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66200
--- Comment #4 from Sharad Singhai ---
Author: singhai
Date: Tue Jun 9 06:45:43 2015
New Revision: 224265
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224265&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r224118 from trunk for Google ref b/20542176 and b/20766120.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66192
--- Comment #3 from Sharad Singhai ---
Author: singhai
Date: Tue Jun 9 06:45:43 2015
New Revision: 224265
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224265&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r224118 from trunk for Google ref b/20542176 and b/20766120.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164
--- Comment #35 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Tue Jun 9 05:05:34 2015
New Revision: 224262
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224262&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR64164] Drop copyrename, use coalescible partition as base when opti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315
--- Comment #31 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Tue Jun 9 05:05:12 2015
New Revision: 224261
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224261&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Reset inlined debug variables at the end of the inlined function
for
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Gilles Gouaillardet
wrote:
> This is a follow-up on a discussion about OpenMPI that started at
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2015/06/27039.php
> and continued at https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/pull/625
>
> The attached test program does not prod
This is a follow-up on a discussion about OpenMPI that started at
http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2015/06/27039.php
and continued at https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/pull/625
The attached test program does not produce correct results with gcc
4.9.2 and gcc 5.1.0 with -O1 or greater (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66030
--- Comment #13 from Jouni Roivas ---
That patch seems to work. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66466
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66466
Bug ID: 66466
Summary: Spurious "warning: array subscript has type 'char'"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66465
Bug ID: 66465
Summary: [4.9.2,5.1.0,6.0.0] procedure pointer component &
non-component interpreted as different type or kind
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66464
Bug ID: 66464
Summary: codecvt_utf16 max_length returning incorrect value
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66446
--- Comment #2 from Evan G ---
Oh wait, I got it. The LRA stuff wasn't added to dbxout.c, so stabs were being
generated based on the old reload1 eliminations. The attached patch takes the
same approach as dwarf2out.c, and uses register eliminatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66446
--- Comment #1 from Evan G ---
Created attachment 35719
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35719&action=edit
Patch to use LRA eliminations in dbxout
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
--- Comment #8 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Created attachment 35718
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35718&action=edit
Tentative patch for issue #3
Regarding the Darwin ld64 warnings, I found one instance of a local static DIE
wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66275
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66275
--- Comment #11 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Jun 8 20:59:07 2015
New Revision: 224249
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224249&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline:
2015-06-03 Uros Bizjak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65378
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Mon Jun 8 20:37:53 2015
New Revision: 224248
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224248&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/65378
* ipa-utils.h (warn_types_mismatch): Update
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66275
--- Comment #10 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Jun 8 20:07:08 2015
New Revision: 224247
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224247&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline:
2015-06-03 Uros Bizjak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe ---
Created attachment 35717
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35717&action=edit
pre-proc file for ipa-pure-const.c
svn rev. 224236 + patch to defer declaration of the extern.
If this is an iss
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66275
--- Comment #9 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Jun 8 18:41:24 2015
New Revision: 224244
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224244&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline:
2015-06-03 Uros Bizjak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merril
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66456
Tim Shen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66461
Harald Anlauf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66450
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66444
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66463
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at redhat dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66463
Bug ID: 66463
Summary: review uses of call_used_regs and
regs_invalidated_by_call
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66444
--- Comment #12 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
patch with test-case committed to trunk and backported to gcc-5-branch. Marking
resolved-fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66444
--- Comment #11 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Mon Jun 8 17:09:08 2015
New Revision: 224241
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224241&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Handle -fipa-ra in reload_combine
2015-06-08 Tom de Vries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66444
--- Comment #10 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Mon Jun 8 16:59:31 2015
New Revision: 224240
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224240&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Handle -fipa-ra in reload_combine
2015-06-08 Tom de Vries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66245
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66245
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Mon Jun 8 16:45:56 2015
New Revision: 224238
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224238&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-06-08 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/66245
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66239
Maciej Andrzejewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65988
--- Comment #5 from Jesus Cea ---
Could you possibly tell me how to do it and what the impact would be?
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66239
--- Comment #6 from Maciej Andrzejewski ---
Libm and other libs have been mixed. Properly compiled toolchain with libs
solved the problem.
Thank you all for assistance!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66245
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Mon Jun 8 15:55:16 2015
New Revision: 224237
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224237&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-06-08 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/66245
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66252
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ---
It's a known fragility of the SPARC back-end in 32-bit mode, which really wants
to forbid DImode values in odd-numbered registers. The problem is that the
calling conventions for 'long long' disagree, so DIm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66252
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ---
cse.c:fold_rtx is miscompiled by the stage2 compiler, more precisely in:
if (const_arg1 != 0 && CONST_INT_P (const_arg1)
&& INTVAL (const_arg1) < 0
/* This used to test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
--- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez ---
I don't have access to a Darwin box. Could you provide a preprocessed file so I
can try to reproduce the defined but not used problem on a cross build?
Also, what triplet?
Thanks.
On Jun 7, 2015 4:09 AM,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66415
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66458
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66415
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Jun 8 15:16:12 2015
New Revision: 224236
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224236&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/66415
* c-format.c (location_from_offset): Return
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66030
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think the patch posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-06/msg00590.html should be equivalent,
if you have time to check it that would be great.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65988
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
You could try building without ISL.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66327
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66462
--- Comment #1 from Wilco ---
Note when this is fixed, GLIBC math/math.h should be updated to enable the
isinf builtins even with -fsignaling-nans.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65988
--- Comment #3 from Jesus Cea ---
Ping...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66422
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jun 8 14:53:19 2015
New Revision: 224235
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224235&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-06-08 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/66422
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66419
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
The difference is that we vectorize parts of stdarg_func:
:
_57 = ap.__vr_top;
_58 = (sizetype) _39;
_59 = _57 + _58;
_60 = *_59;
MEM[(float *)&ha.20] = _60;
_64 = _58 + 16;
_65 = _57 + _64;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66354
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Jun 8 14:42:02 2015
New Revision: 224233
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224233&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/66354
* include/bits/stl_algobase.h (__fill_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66459
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66419
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Ah, because we detect it as subchain which fails to consider gaps.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66354
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66327
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Jun 8 14:42:02 2015
New Revision: 224233
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224233&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/66354
* include/bits/stl_algobase.h (__fill_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66462
Bug ID: 66462
Summary: GCC isinf/isnan/... builtins cause sNaN exceptions
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66354
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Jun 8 14:19:10 2015
New Revision: 224230
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224230&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/66354
* include/bits/stl_algobase.h (__fill_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66327
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Jun 8 14:19:10 2015
New Revision: 224230
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224230&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/66354
* include/bits/stl_algobase.h (__fill_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66413
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, so IPA-CP propagates a constant to fn4 but this function has its parameter
unused (but by debug stmts). It looks like we have a tree sharing issue here,
as the location while initially stripped, gets su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66417
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66441
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66441
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Jun 8 13:42:51 2015
New Revision: 224225
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224225&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/66441
* testsuite/22_locale/conversions/stri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66417
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Jun 8 13:42:46 2015
New Revision: 224224
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224224&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/66417
* src/c++11/codecvt.cc (write_utf16_co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66457
--- Comment #6 from Dangyi Liu ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> Yes you don't define NO_PROFILE_COUNTERS . That is the default i386-elf
> target defaults to NO_PROFILE_COUNTERS not being defined.
Thank you very much!!! But I d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65366
Jan Kratochvil changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65366
--- Comment #5 from jkratoch at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jkratoch
Date: Mon Jun 8 13:35:51 2015
New Revision: 224223
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224223&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR other/65366
* gdbhooks.py: Import sys.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66441
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Jun 8 13:03:45 2015
New Revision: 224222
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224222&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/66441
* testsuite/22_locale/conversions/stri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66461
Bug ID: 66461
Summary: ICE on missing end program in fixed source
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65637
--- Comment #10 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
ping ^2: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-06/msg00558.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65460
--- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
stage1 ping^2: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-06/msg00557.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66013
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|patch |
--- Comment #6 from vries at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65460
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #5 from vrie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66396
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
The code in SESE doesn't deal with virtual operands correctly. In other places
GRAPHITE tries to paper over this with marking all vops for renaming. But
that isn't done when no code is generated, thus this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66444
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #9 from vrie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66442
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65443
Bug 65443 depends on bug 66442, which changed state.
Bug 66442 Summary: [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/autopar/pr46885.c (test for
excess errors)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66442
What|Removed |Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66442
--- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Mon Jun 8 11:59:20 2015
New Revision: 224219
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224219&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix try_transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt
2015-06-08 Tom de Vri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66214
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66442
--- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Mon Jun 8 11:53:27 2015
New Revision: 224218
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224218&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix try_transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt
2015-06-08 Tom de Vri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66396
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
The issue is corrupted VOPs.
:
# .MEM_4 = VDEF <.MEM_3(D)>
iD.1808@ = 1;
# .MEM_5 = VDEF <.MEM_4>
xD.1810@ = &iD.1808@;
# .MEM_6 = VDEF <.MEM_5>
yD.1811@ = &jD.1807@;
# .MEM_7 = VDEF <.MEM_6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66434
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, so it boils down to fold-const.c moving computations into cond ? expr : cst
and thus exposing the possible trapping expressions inside the conditional
(which comes from number of iteration analysis maybe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66434
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66460
Bug ID: 66460
Summary: ICE using __func__ in constexpr function.
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66417
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed on trunk so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66417
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Jun 8 11:09:17 2015
New Revision: 224217
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224217&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/66417
* src/c++11/codecvt.cc (write_utf16_co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66459
Bug ID: 66459
Summary: bogus warning 'w.offset' may be used uninitialized in
this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66325
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66423
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66442
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #5 from vrie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66422
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66452
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66422
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66452
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Jun 8 10:35:24 2015
New Revision: 224216
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224216&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/66452
* toplev.c (check_global_declaration
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66419
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66457
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Yes you don't define NO_PROFILE_COUNTERS . That is the default i386-elf
target defaults to NO_PROFILE_COUNTERS not being defined.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66457
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66413
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
