https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65932
--- Comment #13 from Jim Wilson ---
Created attachment 35774
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35774&action=edit
Experimental patch to force out-of-ssa to use promoted subregs for phi nodes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65932
--- Comment #12 from Jim Wilson ---
Part of the problem here is that the arm port defines PROMOTE_MODE to force
short local variables to unsigned, but arm_promote_function_mode doesn't change
signedness. So a signed short parameter and a signed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66065
--- Comment #2 from Damian Rouson ---
Hi Dominique,
Do you know if anyone is working on fixing this bug? Would it be worthwhile
for me to mail the gfortran developers list for an update?
Damian
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66079
--- Comment #7 from Damian Rouson ---
Thanks for the fix! I'll update my source, rebuild, and test the fix.
Damian
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66082
--- Comment #4 from Damian Rouson ---
Thanks for fixing this! I just verified that the leak is gone with a gcc build
dated 20150607.
Damian
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65932
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilson at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66271
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66527
Bug ID: 66527
Summary: incorrect line number in diagnostics for multiline
initializers
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66203
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilson at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66526
Bug ID: 66526
Summary: Use of uninitialized variable
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66525
Bug ID: 66525
Summary: Implicit function declarations
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65719
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65719
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 12 19:11:35 2015
New Revision: 224443
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224443&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/65719
* pt.c (tsubst_decl) [VAR_DECL]: Mark namespa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65719
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 12 18:16:22 2015
New Revision: 224442
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224442&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/65719
* pt.c (tsubst_decl) [VAR_DECL]: Mark namespa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66301
Sharad Singhai changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||singhai at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66517
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66501
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66524
Bug ID: 66524
Summary: Unable to detect InitializationOrderFiasco when
compiled with "g++ -fsanitize=address"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66523
--- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth ---
Previously filed as radr://21323034, "the new clang-based assembler in Xcode 7
on 10.11 fails on the NXConstStr.s file from FSF gcc 5.1"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66523
Bug ID: 66523
Summary: the new clang-based assembler in Xcode 7 on 10.11
fails on libobjc/NXConstStr.m
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66522
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35772
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35772&action=edit
tentative patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66522
Bug ID: 66522
Summary: handle casts in nr of iterations in
try_transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56688
alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63623
--- Comment #5 from Michael Matz ---
Author: matz
Date: Fri Jun 12 14:13:33 2015
New Revision: 224435
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224435&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2014-10-23 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63623
--- Comment #4 from Michael Matz ---
Author: matz
Date: Fri Jun 12 14:06:41 2015
New Revision: 224434
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224434&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2014-10-23 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66521
Bug ID: 66521
Summary: xgcc: cc1plus segfaults when compiling
libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/ostream-inst.cc
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66521
--- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager ---
Created attachment 35771
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35771&action=edit
preprocessed source of file triggering bug
For what it's worth, re-running the command with -save-temps to gene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54803
alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66301
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #3)
> I have proposed a fix on the mailing list:
>
Oops, this is the correct URL :-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-06/msg00867.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66301
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor ---
I have proposed a fix on the mailing list:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-06/msg00685.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40073
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65550
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55399
Bug 55399 depends on bug 65550, which changed state.
Bug 65550 Summary: [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE (segfault) with pch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65550
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62642
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63608
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65550
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 12 11:56:39 2015
New Revision: 224423
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224423&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2015-04-09 Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65550
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 12 11:56:08 2015
New Revision: 224422
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224422&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2015-04-09 Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62642
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 12 11:55:11 2015
New Revision: 224421
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224421&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2014-12-15 Vladimir Makarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62642
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 12 11:54:43 2015
New Revision: 224420
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224420&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2014-12-15 Vladimir Makarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63608
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 12 11:53:34 2015
New Revision: 224419
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224419&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/63608
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr63608.c: New
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63608
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 12 11:52:42 2015
New Revision: 224418
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224418&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/63608
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr63608.c: New
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66520
Bug ID: 66520
Summary: bad code generated code for branches with single &
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40073
--- Comment #8 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Is there a case where the result is different with vs without all the
extending/truncating?
It seems we should need the extending/truncating on vectors exactly iff we need
it on scalars?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65550
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On June 12, 2015 9:55:30 AM GMT+02:00, "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65550
>
>Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
> What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66417
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Leo Carreon from comment #5)
> Is this fix going to be applied to Fedora 22?
Yes, I expect so, and for your other reports too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66464
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66464
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jun 12 11:22:01 2015
New Revision: 224417
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224417&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/66464
* src/c++11/codecvt.cc (codecvt_utf16_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66519
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66508
--- Comment #3 from Fan You ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2)
> Duplicate of pr66448? Which revision are you using?
Just updated and tried again, get the same result.
Revision: 224410
After changing
diff --git a/gcc/passe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66519
Bug ID: 66519
Summary: [C++14] ICE when using decltype to detect callable
return type during SFINAE
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66464
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jun 12 10:26:05 2015
New Revision: 224415
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224415&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/66464
* src/c++11/codecvt.cc (codecvt_utf16_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
--- Comment #25 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #24)
> I still see
> with the patches in comments 17 and 20. What am I missing?
IIRC, the patch at comment #17 includes the original "lazy creation" of the
exte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66510
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40073
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to alalaw01 from comment #6)
> Same problem on AArch64 (at -O3). We've decided the shift is to be done on
> integers, widening the arguments and then truncating, before we hit the
> vectorizer:
Thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40073
alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
--- Comment #24 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
I still see
FAIL: obj-c++.dg/torture/strings/const-cfstring-1.mm -O0 -fnext-runtime
(test for excess errors)
UNRESOLVED: obj-c++.dg/torture/strings/const-cfstring-1.mm -O0
-fnext-runtime compil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66200
--- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Fri Jun 12 09:49:41 2015
New Revision: 224411
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224411&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Use atomics in guard.cc.
This provides proper definitions for _GL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66192
--- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Fri Jun 12 09:49:41 2015
New Revision: 224411
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224411&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Use atomics in guard.cc.
This provides proper definitions for _GL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66514
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
There is some minimal support in -fsanitize=vptr, but that catches only
destructed objects with virtual methods (by disabling the clobbers and clearing
the vptr).
Other than that, this is something that is mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66508
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63608
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66508
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-apple-darwin13.3.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62642
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65550
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66495
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
Actually, looking at the output, it is surprising that this is caused by my
changes, since GCC 5 did not change errors that generate two locations. Perhaps
that is precisely the problem: The error "Proc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66495
--- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> The ICE appeared between revisions r218570 (2014-12-10, no ICE) and r218658
> (2014-12-12, ICE), likely r218627 (pr44054) or a related commit.
>
> T
66 matches
Mail list logo
