[Bug tree-optimization/66726] missed optimization, factor conversion out of COND_EXPR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66726 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Comment on attachment 35888 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35888 untested prototype patch I thought pre does this already and that seems like a better place than phi-opt. Oh wait pre do

[Bug tree-optimization/66726] missed optimization, factor conversion out of COND_EXPR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66726 --- Comment #1 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 35888 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35888&action=edit untested prototype patch Hi Jeff, Here is a patch (without debug dumps and not tesetd fully). Is thi

[Bug testsuite/66734] New: Many MPX tests are skipped

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66734 Bug ID: 66734 Summary: Many MPX tests are skipped Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite Assi

[Bug middle-end/66568] [CHKP] internal compiler error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66568 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- All tests are failed with FAIL: gcc.target/i386/mpx/pr66568.c -O0 (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.target/i386/mpx/pr66568.c -O1 (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.target/i386/mpx/pr66568.c -O2 (test fo

[Bug rtl-optimization/66626] [4.9/5/6 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/non-local-goto-5.c segfaults w/ -mregparm=3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66626 --- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu --- ix86_static_chain_on_stack is incompatible with LRA since 1. nonlocal_goto generates: lab = copy_to_reg (lab); emit_clobber (gen_rtx_MEM (BLKmode, gen_rtx_SCRATCH (VOIDmode))); emi

[Bug tree-optimization/66733] New: ICE at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20150701 (experimental) [trunk revision 225222] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -O1 -c small.c $ gcc-5.1 -Os -c small.c $ $ gcc-trunk -Os -c small.c small.c: In function ‘fn2’: small.c:26:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

[Bug target/47779] Problem cross-compiling trunk for bfin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47779 Waldemar Brodkorb changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wbx at openadk dot org --- Comment #

[Bug driver/66732] New: ISL 0.15 released, has breaking changes to gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66732 Bug ID: 66732 Summary: ISL 0.15 released, has breaking changes to gcc Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: driv

[Bug target/66509] the new clang-based assembler in Xcode 7 on 10.11 fails on the libjava/java/lang/reflect/natArray.cc file from FSF gcc 5.1 at -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66509 --- Comment #21 from Jack Howarth --- Should we back-port this fix for gcc 5.2.0 as its current gcc/configure errornously fails the filds and fildq test for 64-bit with both the legacy GNU assembler and the clang-based assembler?

[Bug rtl-optimization/66626] [4.9/5/6 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/non-local-goto-5.c segfaults w/ -mregparm=3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66626 --- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu --- lra-eliminations.c has { /* See if this is setting the replacement hard register for an elimination. If DEST is the hard frame pointer, we do nothing because

[Bug rtl-optimization/66626] [4.9/5/6 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/non-local-goto-5.c segfaults w/ -mregparm=3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66626 --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu --- LRA tries to reload SI 90: (insn 14 13 15 3 (set (reg/f:SI 6 bp) (mem:SI (reg/f:SI 90 [ CHAIN.1 ]) [0 S4 A8])) ../y.i:9 86 {*movsi_internal} (nil)) (insn 15 14 16 3 (clobber (mem:BLK (scratch) [0 A

[Bug lto/66687] WPA link fau: internal compiler error: bytecode stream: found non-null terminated string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66687 --- Comment #10 from Guido Haztsis --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9) > Are you sure you produced all LTO bytecode with exactly the same compiler? > Reminds me to bump the LTO bytecode version again on trunk (it's still the > same >

[Bug tree-optimization/66729] Segfault starting with r224967

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66729 --- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Pat Haugen from comment #3) > (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #2) > > (In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #1) > > > Is this the bootstrap failure that Segher tr

[Bug target/64833] [SH]: Error: pcrel too far when compiling imagemagick and graphicsmagick on Debian sh4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64833 Kazumoto Kojima changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/66563] [4.9 Regression] ICE (segmentation fault) on sh4-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563 --- Comment #44 from Kazumoto Kojima --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #43) > Btw, could building the fixed gcc-4.9 with a compiler affected by this > particular bug still propagate the problem? Or, asking the other way arou

[Bug target/64833] [SH]: Error: pcrel too far when compiling imagemagick and graphicsmagick on Debian sh4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64833 --- Comment #23 from Kazumoto Kojima --- Author: kkojima Date: Wed Jul 1 22:05:09 2015 New Revision: 225283 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225283&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/64833 * [SH] Set length of casesi_worker_1 insn to 8 when f

[Bug target/64833] [SH]: Error: pcrel too far when compiling imagemagick and graphicsmagick on Debian sh4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64833 --- Comment #22 from Kazumoto Kojima --- Author: kkojima Date: Wed Jul 1 22:01:09 2015 New Revision: 225282 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225282&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/64833 * [SH] Set length of casesi_worker_1 insn to 8 when f

[Bug target/66731] New: vnmul, fnmul patterns incorrect for -frounding-math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66731 Bug ID: 66731 Summary: vnmul, fnmul patterns incorrect for -frounding-math Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/66729] Segfault starting with r224967

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66729 --- Comment #3 from Pat Haugen --- (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #2) > (In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #1) > > Is this the bootstrap failure that Segher tracked to Richard Sandiford? > > Richard already posted a patch.

[Bug middle-end/66633] [5/6 regression] ICE on valid "verify_gimple failed" with OpenMP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66633 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Bug c++/66730] New: Optimizer seems to make incorrect assumptions about function alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66730 Bug ID: 66730 Summary: Optimizer seems to make incorrect assumptions about function alignment Product: gcc Version: 4.8.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major

[Bug target/66563] [4.9 Regression] ICE (segmentation fault) on sh4-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563 --- Comment #43 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #42) > Cross your fingers ;). Btw, could building the fixed gcc-4.9 with a compiler affected by this particular bug still propagate the probl

[Bug middle-end/66633] [5/6 regression] ICE on valid "verify_gimple failed" with OpenMP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66633 --- Comment #13 from Andrew Benson --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #12) > Fixed everywhere. Thanks for the fix! Unfortunately, while this fixes some instances, it still results in an ICE with optimization at -O1 or higher. Specific

[Bug target/66563] [4.9 Regression] ICE (segmentation fault) on sh4-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563 --- Comment #42 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #41) > So, please bear with me until I can give some feedback. Matthias has uploaded the 4.9.3 release now with additional patches from the sn

[Bug tree-optimization/66729] Segfault starting with r224967

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66729 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed

[Bug tree-optimization/66729] Segfault starting with r224967

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66729 --- Comment #1 from David Edelsohn --- Is this the bootstrap failure that Segher tracked to Richard Sandiford? Richard already posted a patch.

[Bug tree-optimization/66729] New: Segfault starting with r224967

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66729 Bug ID: 66729 Summary: Segfault starting with r224967 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug preprocessor/53690] [C++11] \u0000 and \U00000000 are wrongly encoded as U+0001.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53690 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug target/66509] the new clang-based assembler in Xcode 7 on 10.11 fails on the libjava/java/lang/reflect/natArray.cc file from FSF gcc 5.1 at -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66509 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/65945] C++ alignment of nullptr_t is 1 and might cause unaligned stores to the frame

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65945 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dirk.bo...@inform-ac.com --- Comment #16

[Bug c++/65090] GCC produces instruction with bad alignment on SPARC when using -O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65090 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/65945] C++ alignment of nullptr_t is 1 and might cause unaligned stores to the frame

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65945 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/65090] GCC produces instruction with bad alignment on SPARC when using -O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65090 Bug 65090 depends on bug 65945, which changed state. Bug 65945 Summary: C++ alignment of nullptr_t is 1 and might cause unaligned stores to the frame https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65945 What|Removed

[Bug c++/65945] C++ alignment of nullptr_t is 1 and might cause unaligned stores to the frame

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65945 --- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jul 1 17:59:19 2015 New Revision: 225270 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225270&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/65945 * decl.c (cxx_init_decl_processing): Set TYP

[Bug fortran/56520] Syntax error causes misleading message: "Invalid character in name"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56520 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch submitted for review https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg00071.html

[Bug fortran/56520] Syntax error causes misleading message: "Invalid character in name"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56520 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug debug/66728] CONST_WIDE_INT causes corrupted DWARF debug info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66728 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Related to bug 31690.

[Bug debug/66728] CONST_WIDE_INT causes corrupted DWARF debug info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66728 --- Comment #1 from Ulrich Weigand --- A bit of debugging shows that what's going on here is this: add_const_value_attribute is called with the following constant RTL: (const_wide_int 0x8000) The routine then does:

[Bug testsuite/66723] gcc.target/i386/vararg-loc.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66723 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug testsuite/66723] gcc.target/i386/vararg-loc.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66723 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #2 from vrie

[Bug debug/66728] New: CONST_WIDE_INT causes corrupted DWARF debug info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66728 Bug ID: 66728 Summary: CONST_WIDE_INT causes corrupted DWARF debug info Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug inline-asm/66727] New: Example artificial dependency incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66727 Bug ID: 66727 Summary: Example artificial dependency incorrect Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: inline-a

[Bug testsuite/66723] gcc.target/i386/vararg-loc.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66723 --- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vries Date: Wed Jul 1 17:33:01 2015 New Revision: 225266 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225266&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Use scan-rtl-dump in i386/vararg-loc.c 2015-07-01 Tom de Vries

[Bug tree-optimization/66726] New: missed optimization, factor conversion out of COND_EXPR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66726 Bug ID: 66726 Summary: missed optimization, factor conversion out of COND_EXPR Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug debug/66668] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/stacked-qualified-types-3.c scan-assembler-times DIE \\([^\n]*\\) DW_TAG_(?:const|volatile|atomic|restrict)_type 8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8 --- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez --- Yes, this is a known issue, likely across all architectures. I mentioned this upon merge of the debug-early work: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2015-06/msg00093.html As I discussed in the above post, this is

[Bug c++/65945] C++ alignment of nullptr_t is 1 and might cause unaligned stores to the frame

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65945 --- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jul 1 17:06:52 2015 New Revision: 225265 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225265&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/65945 gcc/c-family/ * c-opts.c (c_common_post_opti

[Bug middle-end/66685] [6 Regression] conftest.c:16:1: internal compiler error: in as_a, at is-a.h:192

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66685 --- Comment #9 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Wed Jul 1 16:48:30 2015 New Revision: 225263 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225263&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ PR bootstrap/66685 * rtl.c (classif

[Bug fortran/66725] Issue with silent conversion int to char, struggling in gfc_widechar_to_char

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66725 --- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- Whereas : $ cat y_test_char_1.f90 program p print *, char(100) end $ gfortran y_test_char_1.f90 $ a.out d --- $ cat y_test_char_2.f90 program p print *, char(257) end $ gfortran y_test_char_

[Bug fortran/66725] New: Issue with silent conversion int to char, struggling in gfc_widechar_to_char

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66725 Bug ID: 66725 Summary: Issue with silent conversion int to char, struggling in gfc_widechar_to_char Product: gcc Version: 5.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug fortran/66724] New: ICE on input/output statements with wrong specifier data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66724 Bug ID: 66724 Summary: ICE on input/output statements with wrong specifier data Product: gcc Version: 5.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug debug/66716] gomp4: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/kernels-loop.c -g ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66716 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #4 from vrie

[Bug debug/66716] gomp4: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/kernels-loop.c -g ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66716 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code, openacc

[Bug rtl-optimization/61047] [4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O1 on x86_64-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61047 --- Comment #26 from Bernd Edlinger --- Author: edlinger Date: Wed Jul 1 16:10:30 2015 New Revision: 225260 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225260&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ChangeLog: 2015-07-01 Bernd Edlinger PR rtl-optimizat

[Bug debug/66716] gomp4: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/kernels-loop.c -g ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66716 --- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vries Date: Wed Jul 1 15:54:14 2015 New Revision: 225259 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225259&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix compilation libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/kernels-loop.c -g 201

[Bug tree-optimization/66718] Non-invariant ADDR_EXPR not vectorized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66718 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug jit/66627] Tracker bug for jit bugs affecting ravi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66627 Bug 66627 depends on bug 66628, which changed state. Bug 66628 Summary: jit: Provide a way to add arbitrary options to the toplev "command line" https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66628 What|Removed |

[Bug jit/66700] Bogus gimplification of jit code using ptrs to functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66700 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug jit/66627] Tracker bug for jit bugs affecting ravi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66627 Bug 66627 depends on bug 66700, which changed state. Bug 66700 Summary: Bogus gimplification of jit code using ptrs to functions https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66700 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug jit/66627] Tracker bug for jit bugs affecting ravi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66627 Bug 66627 depends on bug 66546, which changed state. Bug 66546 Summary: No way to disable check for unreachable blocks https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66546 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug jit/66628] jit: Provide a way to add arbitrary options to the toplev "command line"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66628 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/65867] [5/6 Regression] bootstrap fails for mingw32 due to missing header in ssp.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65867 --- Comment #4 from Daniel Starke --- I have already sent a patch to the ML. https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-04/msg01539.html

[Bug jit/66546] No way to disable check for unreachable blocks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66546 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug jit/66700] Bogus gimplification of jit code using ptrs to functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66700 --- Comment #6 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Wed Jul 1 14:48:55 2015 New Revision: 225258 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225258&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR jit/66700: set TREE_ADDRESSABLE when building an ADDR_EXPR Backport

[Bug jit/66546] No way to disable check for unreachable blocks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66546 --- Comment #4 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Wed Jul 1 14:35:53 2015 New Revision: 225254 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225254&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR jit/66546: Add gcc_jit_context_set_bool_allow_unreachable_blocks Ba

[Bug jit/66628] jit: Provide a way to add arbitrary options to the toplev "command line"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66628 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Wed Jul 1 14:31:48 2015 New Revision: 225253 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225253&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR jit/66628: add gcc_jit_context_add_command_line_option Backport of

[Bug fortran/66578] [F2008] Invalid free on allocate(...,source=a(:)) in block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66578 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #35806|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug tree-optimization/66723] gcc.target/i386/vararg-loc.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66723 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug tree-optimization/66723] New: gcc.target/i386/vararg-loc.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66723 Bug ID: 66723 Summary: gcc.target/i386/vararg-loc.c FAILs Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimizatio

[Bug other/66722] New: libiberty/pex-unix.c warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66722 Bug ID: 66722 Summary: libiberty/pex-unix.c warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type Product: gcc Version: 4.9.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug tree-optimization/66720] gcc.dg/vect/pr48052.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66720 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug tree-optimization/66721] New: [6 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr61403.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66721 Bug ID: 66721 Summary: [6 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr61403.c FAILs Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree

[Bug tree-optimization/66721] [6 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr61403.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66721 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug tree-optimization/66720] gcc.dg/vect/pr48052.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66720 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 35885 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35885&action=edit pr48052.c.132t.vect dump

[Bug tree-optimization/66720] New: gcc.dg/vect/pr48052.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66720 Bug ID: 66720 Summary: gcc.dg/vect/pr48052.c FAILs Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug tree-optimization/66719] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-32.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66719 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 35884 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35884&action=edit bb-slp-32.c.142t.slp2 dump

[Bug tree-optimization/66719] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-32.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66719 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug target/66523] the new clang-based assembler in Xcode 7 on 10.11 fails on libobjc/NXConstStr.m

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66523 --- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth --- This is the last remaining issue with building gcc trunk using the clang-based assembler in Xcode 7. Should we check in Iain's proposed fix for now as a stop-gap fix>

[Bug tree-optimization/66719] New: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-32.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66719 Bug ID: 66719 Summary: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-32.c FAILs Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug target/66509] the new clang-based assembler in Xcode 7 on 10.11 fails on the libjava/java/lang/reflect/natArray.cc file from FSF gcc 5.1 at -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66509 Jack Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/66668] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/stacked-qualified-types-3.c scan-assembler-times DIE \\([^\n]*\\) DW_TAG_(?:const|volatile|atomic|restrict)_type 8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target|hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 |hppa64-hp-hpux11.11, |

[Bug rtl-optimization/66626] [4.9/5/6 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/non-local-goto-5.c segfaults w/ -mregparm=3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66626 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- There is also else if (ix86_function_regparm (fntype, fndecl) == 3) { /* For regparm 3, we have no free call-clobbered registers in which to store the static chain. In order

[Bug jit/66700] Bogus gimplification of jit code using ptrs to functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66700 --- Comment #5 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Wed Jul 1 12:50:50 2015 New Revision: 225248 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225248&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR jit/66700: set TREE_ADDRESSABLE when building an ADDR_EXPR gcc/jit/

[Bug middle-end/66432] libgomp.c/appendix-a/a.29.1.c -O2 -g: type mismatch between an SSA_NAME and its symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66432 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code, patch --- C

[Bug rtl-optimization/66626] [4.9/5/6 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/non-local-goto-5.c segfaults w/ -mregparm=3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66626 --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #8) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #7) > > Created attachment 35882 [details] > > A patch > > Uhuh... it's correct. We want to limit regparm value with local_regparm. >

[Bug c++/66686] Instantiation of dependent template template parameter with non-dependent template rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66686 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/66717] In variable declaration, decltype incorrectly deduces return type of function returning const reference to int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66717 --- Comment #2 from Charlie --- I think you may be right that it's only the diagnostic that's wrong. The following compiles fine https://goo.gl/eyuv17 static int foo = 1; decltype (const_ref_to_int ()) x = foo; static_assert (std::is_same(

[Bug ipa/65844] [5/6 Regression] ICE (verify_cgraph_node failed) on i686-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65844 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Even with fixed configure script, I am unable to reproduce the issue on x86_64-linux-pc with -m32 option added. Martin

[Bug c++/66666] ARM wrong copy constructor address on multiple inheritance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6 --- Comment #16 from Antonio Poggiali --- (In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #15) > > > > > What userspace is running on the target? > > > > Sorry but I don't understand the question. Could you explain a little? > > Debian/Ubuntu/Andr

[Bug c++/66666] ARM wrong copy constructor address on multiple inheritance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6 James Greenhalgh changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/66624] libstdc++ iostream uninitialized data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- I'm not sure, but I don't yet see how _M_state wouldn't get initialized.

[Bug c++/66717] In variable declaration, decltype incorrectly deduces return type of function returning const reference to int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66717 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/65073] dynamic character assignment gives wrong result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65073 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Question asked more than three months ago > Any plan to back port the fix to 4.9? Still present in gcc version 4.9.3. Without answer I'll resolve this PR as FIXED.

[Bug fortran/56520] Syntax error causes misleading message: "Invalid character in name"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56520 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||casey.webster at gmail dot com --

[Bug fortran/66710] Unhelpful error message with unbalanced parenthesis

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66710 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/66718] Non-invariant ADDR_EXPR not vectorized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66718 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/66718] New: Non-invariant ADDR_EXPR not vectorized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66718 Bug ID: 66718 Summary: Non-invariant ADDR_EXPR not vectorized Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal Prior

[Bug c++/60365] multiple noreturn attribute specifiers in a single declaration doesn't result in a diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60365 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/60365] multiple noreturn attribute specifiers in a single declaration doesn't result in a diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60365 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Jul 1 09:08:17 2015 New Revision: 225234 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225234&root=gcc&view=rev Log: /cp 2015-07-01 Paolo Carlini PR c++/60365 *

[Bug middle-end/66685] [6 Regression] conftest.c:16:1: internal compiler error: in as_a, at is-a.h:192

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66685 --- Comment #8 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Wed Jul 1 08:41:33 2015 New Revision: 225230 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225230&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ PR bootstrap/66685 * rtl.c (classif

[Bug middle-end/66633] [5/6 regression] ICE on valid "verify_gimple failed" with OpenMP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66633 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|ebotcazou at

  1   2   >