https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58493
--- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson ---
(In reply to vgrebin...@gmail.com from comment #5)
> (In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #4)
> > Checked that this works with current gcc-6/5/4.9. Can this be closed now?
>
> I'm fine to close i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66798
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66799
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66799
Bug ID: 66799
Summary: [6 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr20122.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66800
Bug ID: 66800
Summary: [6 regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-align-1.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66800
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66801
Bug ID: 66801
Summary: [6 Regression] gcc miscompiled during PGO/LTO
bootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41861
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Aaron, your reply got added to Bug 887 for some reason.
Re-posting Aaron's comment here:
>Thanks. I had already patched our gcc so that gthreads cond always gets
>initialized with CLOCK_MONOTONIC, then I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65988
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jesus Cea from comment #7)
> I close this but report, but I would love future GCC releases to document
> what CLOOG and ISL versions they require.
It already does, see gcc/doc/install.texi in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66799
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66767
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66800
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66801
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66797
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker.cheng at gmail dot com
Target M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66796
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Summary|FAIL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66794
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66782
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Version|5.1.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66802
Bug ID: 66802
Summary: Some of the Bugzilla Bug fields descriptions do not
reflect GCC development
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66793
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66803
Bug ID: 66803
Summary: std::this_thread::sleep_for gets interrupted by
signals.
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66804
Bug ID: 66804
Summary: Alignment issue caused by auto vectorization
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66804
--- Comment #1 from Fei Yang ---
Also reproducible with GCC-5 and GCC-6.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66804
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
You're invoking undefined behavior:
test.c:34:12: runtime error: store to misaligned address 0x00401c8c for
type 'unsigned char *', which requires 8 byte alignment
0x00401c8c: note: pointer poi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66804
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66804
--- Comment #4 from Fei Yang ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #2)
> You're invoking undefined behavior:
test.c:34:12: runtime error: store to
> misaligned address 0x00401c8c for type 'unsigned char *', which requires
> 8 byt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66792
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Would:
// The algorithm used here is unchanged from the SGI STL and is
// described in The C++ Standard Template Library by Plauger,
// Stepanov, Lee, Musser.
be good enough?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66803
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66804
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Fei Yang from comment #4)
> (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #2)
> > You're invoking undefined behavior:
>
> test.c:34:12: runtime error: store to
> > misaligned address 0x0040
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66804
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
See discussion in PR65709 for a similar issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66802
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66804
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
CCP computes this precisely:
Visiting PHI node: # PT = { D.1842 } (nonlocal, escaped)
p_3 = PHI <&MEM[(void *)&xxx + 2444B](2), p_4(3)>
Argument #0 (2 -> 4 executable)
&MEM[(void *)&xxx + 2444B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66792
--- Comment #2 from krichter at posteo dot de ---
I guess, _anything_ would be good enough :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66801
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Started with r225504.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66460
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66801
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|ppc64le |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66460
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini ---
Stack trace very similar to c++/66292
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65186
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66748
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Jul 8 10:36:26 2015
New Revision: 225541
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225541&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/66748
* tree.c (handle_abi_tag_attribute): Check
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66805
Bug ID: 66805
Summary: Crash in gcov_exit when combining --coverage, C++,
#pragma pack
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66805
--- Comment #1 from Jan Engelhardt ---
(gdb) r
Starting program: t
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
compute_summary (max_length=, this_prg=0x7fff9540,
list=0x77dda180)
at ../../../libgcc/libgcov-driver.c:307
307
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66806
Bug ID: 66806
Summary: internal compiler error: in emit_move_insn, at
expr.c:3551
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66801
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66806
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66782
--- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak ---
The difference when clobbers are implemented with direct clobbers (I'll attach
the patch) is:
(---): Unpatched compiler, usign fusage clobbers
(+++): Patched compiler, using direct clobbers
--- pr66782_.s 20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66782
--- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Created attachment 35931
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35931&action=edit
Workaround patch that reintroduces direct call clobbers
The patch vs. [trunk revision 225533] can be used as a wo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61160
--- Comment #18 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Wed Jul 8 11:24:38 2015
New Revision: 225543
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225543&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Make gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/pr61160-3.C main return zero.
2015-07-08
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61820
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Wed Jul 8 11:24:38 2015
New Revision: 225543
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225543&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Make gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/pr61160-3.C main return zero.
2015-07-08
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66805
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61820
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66801
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
The patch doesn't help, unfortunately.
By the way compiling gimple-match.c with -fprofile-generate takes
almost 4 minutes on gcc112.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66805
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66801
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 8 Jul 2015, trippels at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66801
>
> --- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
> The patch doesn't help, unfortunatel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66796
--- Comment #1 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
I don't believe this is a regression. It's a new test that Jeff added with the
changes to
the PA shift support for combine.
--
John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66794
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jul 8 11:47:42 2015
New Revision: 225545
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225545&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-08 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/66794
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66782
Michael Matz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66794
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||6.0
Target Milestone|6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66793
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jul 8 11:54:28 2015
New Revision: 225546
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225546&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-08 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/66793
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66793
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||6.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66805
--- Comment #4 from Jan Engelhardt ---
If one uses
#pragma pack(push, 1)
#pragma pack(pop)
the issue goes away, so indeed, it seems that some gcov parts are implicitly
built with different padding.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66801
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, so the only code-gen difference possible is due to match.pd patterns
applying/not applying because of the changed iteration order making lattice
values final at different times.
Thus I suspect a latent
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66744
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Jul 8 12:25:40 2015
New Revision: 225547
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225547&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR bootstrap/66744.
PR bootstrap/66744
* tree-sra.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66744
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66801
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Oh, and FDO also effectively enables most -O3 optimizations of course. After
reproducing FDO/LTO I'll try FDO only and bootstrap-O3 ... fingers crossing ;)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66806
Yulia Koval changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||julia.koval at intel dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43341
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jengelh at inai dot de
--- Comment #9 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43341
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66805
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66807
Bug ID: 66807
Summary: [6 Regression] --enable-libmpx failed
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65186
--- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #5)
> Dup of c++/30044?
I don't think it's a duplicate but they do seem related. My patch for
c++/30044 does not fix this ICE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66808
Bug ID: 66808
Summary: tree check fail in
symbol_table::decl_assembler_name_hash
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66809
Bug ID: 66809
Summary: stage 1 build failure in libgcc on
sparc-sun-solaris2.10
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66808
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66810
Bug ID: 66810
Summary: [6] ICE on tree error_mark with -miamcu
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66808
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66811
Bug ID: 66811
Summary: RFE: have jit dumps be compileable as C code
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: jit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66801
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, I can't reproduce it on x86_64 with
--enable-languages=c --disable-multilib --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto
--disable-werror
make -j8 profiledbootstrap
on r225546.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66801
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Ah, you used release checking... damn.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66801
--- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9)
> Ah, you used release checking... damn.
Also note the various FLAGS that I use in comment0.
Both PGO and LTO are needed.
PGO alone is fine, LTO alone i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66812
Bug ID: 66812
Summary: jit code-generation example that required
-fno-strict-aliasing to work
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66644
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66808
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
template class A {
int *destroyThreadState_threadStatus = getThreadStatus();
int *getThreadStatus() {
static __thread int a;
return &a;
}
};
A b;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66783
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Jul 8 14:41:59 2015
New Revision: 225557
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225557&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR jit/66783: improve error messages
gcc/jit/ChangeLog:
PR jit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66760
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> I've already questioned the compile-time cost of those at introduction time.
> It is limited by fbi->aa_walked but only if fbi is passed which it is not
> when c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66702
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66421
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini ---
Then let's add the testcase and close the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66807
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65099
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Wed Jul 8 14:59:59 2015
New Revision: 225560
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225560&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[nvptx offloading] Only 64-bit configurations are currently supporte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66334
--- Comment #12 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Jul 8 15:04:54 2015
New Revision: 225561
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225561&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-08 Vladimir Makarov
PR middle-end/66334
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66801
--- Comment #11 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
../gcc/configure --disable-libstdcxx-pch --disable-libvtv --disable-libitm
--disable-libcilkrts --disable-libssp --disable-libgomp --disable-werror
--disable-multilib --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66523
--- Comment #12 from Jack Howarth ---
Regression testing of gcc-5.2.0-RC-20150707 with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35773 applied posted at...
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-07/msg00825.html
showing no regressions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66810
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66809
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson ---
> ld.so.1: cc1: fatal: libmpc.so.3: open failed: No such file or directory
> xgcc: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1)
You need to
1. Tell the dynamic linker where to find the gmp etc shared l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66421
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini ---
Note that this is already fixed for 5.2.0 too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66421
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66421
--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Jul 8 16:08:10 2015
New Revision: 225563
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225563&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-08 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/66421
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66806
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Jul 8 16:19:06 2015
New Revision: 225564
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225564&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Don't pass/return vectors in registers for IAMCU
Vectors should be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66806
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66809
--- Comment #2 from James Ballantine ---
If you look at attachment, you will see that he options
for "--with-gmp=/usr/local/add-on/gmp --with-mpc=/usr/local/add-on/mpc
--with-mpfr=/usr/local/add-on/mpfr" were set
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58740
Barry Revzin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66523
--- Comment #13 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Wed Jul 8 16:56:46 2015
New Revision: 225565
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225565&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-08 Iain Sandoe
PR target/66523
* confi
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
