[Bug libstdc++/67112] New: [MinGW64] build failure due to name conflict with system headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67112 Bug ID: 67112 Summary: [MinGW64] build failure due to name conflict with system headers Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/67114] [MinGW64] build failure with POSIX threads enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67114 --- Comment #1 from Cezary Śliwa sliwa at ifpan dot edu.pl --- Created attachment 36120 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36120action=edit complementary patch to the w32-pthreads library

[Bug c++/67113] New: unintelligent error message only declarations of constructors can be 'explicit' in cpp file's constructor define.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67113 Bug ID: 67113 Summary: unintelligent error message only declarations of constructors can be 'explicit' in cpp file's constructor define. Product: gcc Version:

[Bug libstdc++/67114] New: [MinGW64] build failure with POSIX threads enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67114 Bug ID: 67114 Summary: [MinGW64] build failure with POSIX threads enabled Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/66427] The compiler rejects too complex variable templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66427 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug c/67115] New: [MinGW64] name conflict with system headers (identifier CONST)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67115 Bug ID: 67115 Summary: [MinGW64] name conflict with system headers (identifier CONST) Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/66427] The compiler rejects too complex variable templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66427 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/66427] The compiler rejects too complex variable templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66427 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Aug 4 11:05:02 2015 New Revision: 226568 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226568root=gccview=rev Log: 2015-08-04 Paolo Carlini

[Bug tree-optimization/67109] [6 Regression] ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in vect_analyze_slp_instance, at tree-vect-slp.c:1793

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67109 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/67109] [6 Regression] ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in vect_analyze_slp_instance, at tree-vect-slp.c:1793

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67109 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Started with r224077.

[Bug c++/67108] [6 Regression] ICE: in cxx_eval_call_expression, at cp/constexpr.c:1345 when dumping

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67108 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/67108] [6 Regression] ICE: in cxx_eval_call_expression, at cp/constexpr.c:1345 when dumping

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67108 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- The dumping ICE started with r217663.

[Bug libstdc++/67114] [MinGW64] build failure with POSIX threads enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67114 --- Comment #3 from Cezary Śliwa sliwa at ifpan dot edu.pl --- Yes, I understand. The purpose of the patch is to point the problem. In particular I don't know why operator is needed and what are the required semantics (i.e. comparing pointers vs.

[Bug c++/67104] [5/6 regression] Constant expression factory function initializes std::array with static storage duration strangely

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67104 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug libstdc++/67015] ^[a-z0-9][a-z0-9-]*$, std::regex::extended is miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67015 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4

[Bug libstdc++/67015] ^[a-z0-9][a-z0-9-]*$, std::regex::extended is miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67015 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- OK, let's backport to 4.9 too.

[Bug c++/66602] std::tuple bug when constructed with temporary empty object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66602 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/63510] Wrong line number in Wstrict-overflow message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63510 --- Comment #5 from Iain Buclaw ibuclaw at ubuntu dot com --- I can still reproduce the wrong-line diagnostic using gcc (GCC) 6.0.0 20150720 (experimental). However GDB has been building just fine for a while now. But I don't know if that is

[Bug c++/66921] [4.9/5/6 Regression] failure to determine size of static constexpr array that is nested within a templated class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66921 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug fortran/67063] segfault in opening a formatted file at second time with status=replace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67063 --- Comment #4 from HEMMI, Shigeru textdirected at gmail dot com --- I look into mingw web site and found that the same error has been reported by Yogesh Yadav. Please take a look at http://sourceforge.net/p/mingw-w64/support-requests/103/

[Bug fortran/64022] [F2003][IEEE] ieee_support_flag does not handle kind=10 and kind=16 REAL variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64022 --- Comment #5 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: fxcoudert Date: Tue Aug 4 07:27:19 2015 New Revision: 226548 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226548root=gccview=rev Log: PR fortran/64022

[Bug debug/67043] [6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67043 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/66828] [5/6 Regression] gcc/tree-ssa-math-opts.c:2182:38: runtime error: left shift of 72057594037927936 by 8 places cannot be represented in type 'long int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66828 --- Comment #11 from Thomas Preud'homme thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Sure. Starting bootstrap and testing.

[Bug target/67110] New: gcc.target/i386/iamcu/test_struct_returning.c execution test FAILs with -fpic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67110 Bug ID: 67110 Summary: gcc.target/i386/iamcu/test_struct_returning.c execution test FAILs with -fpic Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/66828] [5/6 Regression] gcc/tree-ssa-math-opts.c:2182:38: runtime error: left shift of 72057594037927936 by 8 places cannot be represented in type 'long int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66828 --- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Thomas, could you backport your fix to the gcc-5 branch, so that we can close this issue?

[Bug tree-optimization/67109] New: ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in vect_analyze_slp_instance, at tree-vect-slp.c:1793

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67109 Bug ID: 67109 Summary: ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in vect_analyze_slp_instance, at tree-vect-slp.c:1793 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/66784] no symbol emitted for builtin with lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66784 --- Comment #2 from Guido Haztsis guido.hatzsis at yandex dot com --- Well I believe that the is_builtin_fn cometh from here: +2488 gcc/lto-streamer-out.c if (!TREE_PUBLIC (t) || is_builtin_fn (t) || DECL_ABSTRACT_P (t)

[Bug lto/67111] New: ld -plugin segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67111 Bug ID: 67111 Summary: ld -plugin segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto

[Bug target/63679] [5/6 Regression][AArch64] Failure to constant fold.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63679 --- Comment #38 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 3 Aug 2015, alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63679 --- Comment #37 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hmmm,

[Bug fortran/66311] [5/6 Regression] Problems with some integer(16) values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311 --- Comment #8 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 36121 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36121action=edit Beginning of a patch The existing code mixes gmp allocation with wide_int allocation.

[Bug target/67110] gcc.target/i386/iamcu/test_struct_returning.c execution test FAILs with -fpic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67110 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|hjl at gcc dot gnu.org |hjl.tools at

[Bug c++/67113] unintelligent error message only declarations of constructors can be 'explicit' in cpp file's constructor define.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67113 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic ---

[Bug c/67115] [MinGW64] name conflict with system headers (identifier CONST)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67115 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Why do mingw system headers use non-reserved names?

[Bug libstdc++/67112] [MinGW64] build failure due to name conflict with system headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67112 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/67113] unintelligent error message only declarations of constructors can be 'explicit' in cpp file's constructor define.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67113 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/67114] [MinGW64] build failure with POSIX threads enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67114 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c/67115] [MinGW64] name conflict with system headers (identifier CONST)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67115 --- Comment #2 from Cezary Śliwa sliwa at ifpan dot edu.pl --- It may be because they follow the OS specific standards, so to say.

[Bug target/67110] gcc.target/i386/iamcu/test_struct_returning.c execution test FAILs with -fpic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67110 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/67110] gcc.target/i386/iamcu/test_struct_returning.c execution test FAILs with -fpic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67110 --- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Tue Aug 4 11:54:20 2015 New Revision: 226570 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226570root=gccview=rev Log: Compile IAMCU tests with -fno-pie -no-pie

[Bug libstdc++/67085] priority queue should not copy comparators when calling push_heap and pop_heap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67085 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Andrew Calcutt from comment #3) Are there technical reasons this is not desirable or possible beyond what you have already stated? Is the behavior of the priority

[Bug fortran/66079] [6 Regression] memory leak with source allocation in internal subprogram

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66079 Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc

[Bug fortran/66311] [5/6 Regression] Problems with some integer(16) values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311 Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc

[Bug c++/66092] [c++-concepts] Concept can't check variadic template arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66092 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/66841] [concepts] bogus error invalid reference to function concept when function concept is overloaded

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66841 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/66834] [concepts] concept parameter kind mismatch causes hard error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66834 --- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 66841 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug driver/66849] Incorrect multilib chosen with -mthumb -mfloat-abi=hard

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66849 --- Comment #5 from simon at pushface dot org --- (In reply to Jim Wilson from comment #4) If you want a proper thumb2 hard multilib, then in the file gcc/config/arm/t-arm-elf see the line MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS+= *mthumb/*mfloat-abi=hard*

[Bug c++/66834] [concepts] variadic concepts and DR 1430

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66834 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED

[Bug libstdc++/67116] New: incorrect detection of thread model when cross-compiling the tool chain

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67116 Bug ID: 67116 Summary: incorrect detection of thread model when cross-compiling the tool chain Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/66564] ICE on explicit instantiation of nested template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66564 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug c++/67056] Wrong code generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67056 --- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 36126 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36126action=edit Somewhat reduced testcase

[Bug ipa/67056] [5/6 regression] Wrong code generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67056 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug libstdc++/67114] [MinGW64] build failure with POSIX threads enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67114 --- Comment #7 from Cezary Śliwa sliwa at ifpan dot edu.pl --- 1. After applying the patch to GCC 5.2.0, the build fails (I do not see PTW32_VERSION defined): Making all in c++11 make[5]: Entering directory

[Bug c++/66392] rejects-valid: copy-initialization through user-defined conversion sequence fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66392 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug driver/66849] Incorrect multilib chosen with -mthumb -mfloat-abi=hard

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66849 --- Comment #6 from jim.wilson at linaro dot org --- On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 6:39 AM, simon at pushface dot org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote: The t-aprofile that Ramana mentioned does support thumb/hard multilibs, but makes this work by

[Bug c++/66696] confusing diagnostic on a friend main definition returning void

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66696 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug c++/66392] rejects-valid: copy-initialization through user-defined conversion sequence fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66392 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/66392] rejects-valid: copy-initialization through user-defined conversion sequence fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66392 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Aug 4 14:54:07 2015 New Revision: 226579 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226579root=gccview=rev Log: 2015-08-04 Paolo Carlini

[Bug c++/66676] pragma omp simd aligned(x) results in internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66676 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug fortran/64022] [F2003][IEEE] ieee_support_flag does not handle kind=10 and kind=16 REAL variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64022 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- I am seeing: FAIL: gfortran.dg/ieee/large_1.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/ieee/large_1.f90 -O1 (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/ieee/large_1.f90

[Bug c++/66604] ICE in use_thunk at cp/method.c:338 when creating a default virtual destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66604 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/66079] [6 Regression] memory leak with source allocation in internal subprogram

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66079 --- Comment #11 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- Hi Mikael, It looks like my finger slipped on the mouse wheel - I'll put it right tonight. Thanks Paul On 4 August 2015 at 11:27, mikael at

[Bug tree-optimization/67109] [6 Regression] ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in vect_analyze_slp_instance, at tree-vect-slp.c:1793

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67109 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/67056] Wrong code generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67056 Vegard Sjonfjell veg...@yahoo-inc.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c/67107] [6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in tree_class_check with -frounding-math -funsafe-math-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67107 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug debug/67106] [6 Regression] ICE: verify_type failed: type variant differs by TYPE_PACKED. with -g -fpack-struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67106 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at

[Bug c++/67056] Wrong code generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67056 --- Comment #6 from Vegard Sjonfjell veg...@yahoo-inc.com --- Created attachment 36123 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36123action=edit Preprocessed file Also adding the preprocessed file.

[Bug libstdc++/67114] [MinGW64] build failure with POSIX threads enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67114 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #36119|0 |1 is

[Bug libstdc++/67114] [MinGW64] build failure with POSIX threads enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67114 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #36124|0 |1 is

[Bug c/67107] [6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in tree_class_check with -frounding-math -funsafe-math-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67107 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c/67107] [6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in tree_class_check with -frounding-math -funsafe-math-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67107 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at

[Bug libstdc++/67114] [MinGW64] build failure with POSIX threads enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67114 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- The C++ standard requires thread::id objects to be comparable with operator and for it to impose a total order. The current libstdc++ code assumes that a total order can be obtained

[Bug libstdc++/64351] std::uniform_real_distributionfloat(0, 1) returns 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64351 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/66586] Template backtrace is truncated/absent after 'template argument deduction/substitution failed:'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66586 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- Happens in c++/66439 too.

[Bug fortran/64022] [F2003][IEEE] ieee_support_flag does not handle kind=10 and kind=16 REAL variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64022 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/67118] New: gcc and gfortran started crashing recently

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67118 Bug ID: 67118 Summary: gcc and gfortran started crashing recently Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug ipa/67056] [5/6 regression] Wrong code generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67056 --- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Started with r215902.

[Bug c++/67117] New: [c++-concepts] Constraints ignored on variable template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67117 Bug ID: 67117 Summary: [c++-concepts] Constraints ignored on variable template Product: gcc Version: c++-concepts Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/66962] [concepts] overloaded function causing memory blow-up and ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66962 --- Comment #17 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Andrew Sutton from comment #14) Created attachment 36054 [details] There is still complexity induced by the use of disjunctions. This manages it a little better. It

[Bug c++/66962] [concepts] overloaded function causing memory blow-up and ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66962 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/66962] [concepts] overloaded function causing memory blow-up and ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66962 --- Comment #18 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Tue Aug 4 15:38:29 2015 New Revision: 226583 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226583root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/66962 * logic.cc

[Bug tree-optimization/67055] [5/6 Regression] Segmentation fault in fold_builtin_alloca_with_align in tree-ssa-ccp.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67055 Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot

[Bug libstdc++/67015] ^[a-z0-9][a-z0-9-]*$, std::regex::extended is miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67015 --- Comment #12 from Tim Shen timshen at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: timshen Date: Wed Aug 5 04:39:23 2015 New Revision: 226607 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226607root=gccview=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2015-07-29

[Bug fortran/67063] segfault in opening a formatted file at second time with status=replace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67063 HEMMI, Shigeru textdirected at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug web/67119] New: URL linking to previous patches are not available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67119 Bug ID: 67119 Summary: URL linking to previous patches are not available Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug web/67119] URL linking to previous patches are not available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67119 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Tue, 4 Aug 2015, songlinhai0543 at gmail dot com wrote: I am tracking some old bugs. I notice that many bug patches are not available from the URL in the

[Bug web/67119] URL linking to previous patches are not available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67119 --- Comment #2 from Linhai songlinhai0543 at gmail dot com --- One of the bug reports I read today is: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8805 I just tried all patch links in this bug report, and all of them will lead to an exception.

[Bug middle-end/63510] Wrong line number in Wstrict-overflow message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63510 --- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #5) I can still reproduce the wrong-line diagnostic using gcc (GCC) 6.0.0 20150720 (experimental). However GDB has been building just

[Bug libstdc++/67116] incorrect detection of thread model when cross-compiling the tool chain

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67116 --- Comment #2 from Cezary Śliwa sliwa at ifpan dot edu.pl --- This is a quite special case, target and host architecture are the same, only the thread models are different. I think libstdc++ uses the preinstalled compiler rather that the one

[Bug fortran/66311] [5/6 Regression] Problems with some integer(16) values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311 --- Comment #10 from Kenneth Zadeck zadeck at naturalbridge dot com --- I have audited the patch for the non memory management issues and it is approved. thanks for doing this. kenny On 08/04/2015 07:38 AM, mikael at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

[Bug fortran/66311] [5/6 Regression] Problems with some integer(16) values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug target/66731] vnmul, fnmul patterns incorrect for -frounding-math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66731 --- Comment #9 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: nsz Date: Tue Aug 4 16:49:54 2015 New Revision: 226588 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226588root=gccview=rev Log: Fix broken backport patch. gcc: Backport from mainline:

[Bug c++/66197] c++1z generic function wrong type for auto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66197 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Aug 4 17:22:05 2015 New Revision: 226591 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226591root=gccview=rev Log: 2015-08-04 Paolo Carlini

[Bug c++/66197] c++1z generic function wrong type for auto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66197 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/66311] [5/6 Regression] Problems with some integer(16) values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311 --- Comment #9 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- I've audited the patch for the memory management nightmares; we are safe with it.

[Bug fortran/66311] [5/6 Regression] Problems with some integer(16) values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311 --- Comment #13 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #12) Here's an alternative patch. I haven't yet tested it beyond an expanded version of the testcase, but I think it's

[Bug c++/66197] c++1z generic function wrong type for auto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66197 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- Indeed, this is also fixed in mainline. I'm adding a testcase and closing the bug.

[Bug target/66731] vnmul, fnmul patterns incorrect for -frounding-math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66731 --- Comment #8 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: nsz Date: Tue Aug 4 16:43:46 2015 New Revision: 226587 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226587root=gccview=rev Log: gcc: Backport from mainline: 2015-08-04 Szabolcs

[Bug libstdc++/67116] incorrect detection of thread model when cross-compiling the tool chain

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67116 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Cezary Śliwa from comment #2) This is a quite special case, target and host architecture are the same, only the thread models are different. I think libstdc++ uses the

[Bug target/66731] vnmul, fnmul patterns incorrect for -frounding-math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66731 --- Comment #10 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: nsz Date: Tue Aug 4 17:42:05 2015 New Revision: 226592 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226592root=gccview=rev Log: gcc: Backport from mainline: 2015-07-06 Szabolcs

[Bug target/66731] vnmul, fnmul patterns incorrect for -frounding-math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66731 --- Comment #7 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: nsz Date: Tue Aug 4 16:22:32 2015 New Revision: 226586 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226586root=gccview=rev Log: [AArch64] PR target/66731 Fix fnmul insn with -frounding-math (rtx

  1   2   >