[Bug ipa/66363] ICE in modified test inline-39.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66363 Dominik Vogt changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |ipa --- Comment #2 from Dominik Vogt ---

[Bug go/66303] runtime.Caller() returns infinitely deep stack frames on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66303 --- Comment #13 from Dominik Vogt --- Can this be closed? It's not a Gcc bug but a Glibc problem.

[Bug c++/67130] New: [6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected identifier_node, have template_decl in write_unqualified_id, at cp/mangle.c:1218

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67130 Bug ID: 67130 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected identifier_node, have template_decl in write_unqualified_id, at cp/mangle.c:1218 Product: gcc Vers

[Bug target/67129] x86: erratic parsing of "#pragma GCC target ("...")"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67129 --- Comment #3 from Dominik Vogt --- Sorry, the expample with t2() in the code snippet above should have the pragmas in the opposite order: -- snip -- #pragma GCC target ("no-sse") #pragma GCC target ("fpmath=sse") void t2(void) { } -- snip --

[Bug target/67129] x86: erratic parsing of "#pragma GCC target ("...")"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67129 --- Comment #2 from Dominik Vogt --- Created attachment 36136 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36136&action=edit warning Code that produces the warning.

[Bug target/67129] x86: erratic parsing of "#pragma GCC target ("...")"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67129 --- Comment #1 from Dominik Vogt --- Created attachment 36135 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36135&action=edit no warning Code that does not produce the warning.

[Bug target/67129] New: x86: erratic parsing of "#pragma GCC target ("...")"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67129 Bug ID: 67129 Summary: x86: erratic parsing of "#pragma GCC target ("...")" Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug ipa/66896] ipa-prop.c:2479 runtime error: member call on null pointer of type 'struct ipa_polymorphic_call_context'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66896 --- Comment #13 from Vittorio Zecca --- I see only two NULL dereferencing in ipa-prop.c my lines 2479 and 2545 same statement dst_ctx->combine_with (ctx); Did you take care of both of them?

[Bug c++/66260] [C++14] Failure to compile variable template with recursively defined partial specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66260 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/66281] [C++14][Variable templates] internal compiler error: in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:12022

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66281 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/66336] [C++14][Variable templates] Spurious "error: expansion pattern contains no argument packs"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66336 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/66649] variable template specializations not being found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66649 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/66596] Type that is not dependent on the variable template template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66596 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/66619] Internal compiler error: variable template deduced by template argument deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66619 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/66923] Variable template initialized using auto deduces wrong type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66923 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/65195] Variable template cannot be used as a function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65195 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/66336] [C++14][Variable templates] Spurious "error: expansion pattern contains no argument packs"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66336 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Aug 6 04:09:49 2015 New Revision: 226655 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226655&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/66336 * pt.c (find_parameter_packs_r): Handle varia

[Bug c++/66596] Type that is not dependent on the variable template template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66596 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Aug 6 04:10:01 2015 New Revision: 226657 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226657&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/66260 PR c++/66596 PR c++/66649 PR

[Bug c++/66923] Variable template initialized using auto deduces wrong type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66923 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Aug 6 04:10:01 2015 New Revision: 226657 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226657&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/66260 PR c++/66596 PR c++/66649 PR

[Bug c++/66260] [C++14] Failure to compile variable template with recursively defined partial specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66260 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Aug 6 04:10:01 2015 New Revision: 226657 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226657&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/66260 PR c++/66596 PR c++/66649 PR

[Bug c++/66619] Internal compiler error: variable template deduced by template argument deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66619 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Aug 6 04:09:55 2015 New Revision: 226656 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226656&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/65195 PR c++/66619 * semantics.c (finish_id

[Bug c++/65195] Variable template cannot be used as a function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65195 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Aug 6 04:09:55 2015 New Revision: 226656 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226656&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/65195 PR c++/66619 * semantics.c (finish_id

[Bug c++/66649] variable template specializations not being found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66649 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Aug 6 04:10:01 2015 New Revision: 226657 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226657&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/66260 PR c++/66596 PR c++/66649 PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/67029] [5/6 regression] gcc-5.2.0 unable to find a register to spill with O3 fsched-pressure fschedule-insns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67029 --- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu --- An updated patch is posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-08/msg00323.html

[Bug lto/66468] [6 Regression] ICE in in check_die, at dwarf2out.c:5719

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66468 Mikhail Maltsev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/67002] [5] [SH]: Bootstrap stage 2/3 comparison failure - gcc/real.o differs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67002 --- Comment #18 from Kazumoto Kojima --- (In reply to Michael Karcher from comment #15) The first different line of diff of the .pre dumps of Michael's test case with/without -g is: < Expression hash table (53 buckets, 12 entries) --- > Expressi

[Bug target/67002] [5] [SH]: Bootstrap stage 2/3 comparison failure - gcc/real.o differs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67002 --- Comment #17 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to Michael Karcher from comment #16) PR 61904 has been marked as a dup of PR 61801, which has been marked as fixed. So this must be some other bug. When compiling the same code as C and as C++ there

[Bug target/67002] [5] [SH]: Bootstrap stage 2/3 comparison failure - gcc/real.o differs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67002 --- Comment #16 from Michael Karcher --- The bug seems to be quite similar to the infamous "sloth that was dropped on the head as a baby"-bug Linus discovered (https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/24/584 , https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=619

[Bug target/67002] [5] [SH]: Bootstrap stage 2/3 comparison failure - gcc/real.o differs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67002 Michael Karcher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gcc-bugzilla at mkarcher dot dialu

[Bug bootstrap/67128] Makefile.in, libcc1 and --enable-shared

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67128 --- Comment #1 from Дилян Палаузов --- To be precise, here is the complete error message, when linking shared libcc1. I use GNU ld 2.25.51.20150804. libtool: link: /src/gcc/gcc-git/./gcc/xg++ -B/src/gcc/gcc-git/./gcc/ -nostdinc++ -nostdinc++ -

[Bug bootstrap/67128] New: Makefile.in, libcc1 and --enable-shared

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67128 Bug ID: 67128 Summary: Makefile.in, libcc1 and --enable-shared Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap

[Bug rtl-optimization/67029] [5/6 regression] gcc-5.2.0 unable to find a register to spill with O3 fsched-pressure fschedule-insns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67029 --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu --- A patch is posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-08/msg00313.html

[Bug rtl-optimization/67029] [5/6 regression] gcc-5.2.0 unable to find a register to spill with O3 fsched-pressure fschedule-insns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67029 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- The problem is /* The value of get_preferred_alternatives for the current instruction, supplemental to recog_data. */ static alternative_mask preferred_alternatives; ira_implicitly_set_insn_hard_regs may use

[Bug bootstrap/66521] xgcc: cc1plus segfaults when compiling libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/ostream-inst.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66521 --- Comment #12 from Eric Gallager --- Created attachment 36133 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36133&action=edit vtv-related warnings printed upon linking libstdc++ (as I said I'd attach in my previous comment)

[Bug bootstrap/66521] xgcc: cc1plus segfaults when compiling libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/ostream-inst.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66521 --- Comment #11 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to ctice from comment #10) > Author: ctice > Date: Sun Aug 2 01:17:39 2015 > New Revision: 226471 > > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226471&root=gcc&view=rev > Log: > Fix PR 66521 > Thank

[Bug c++/67117] [c++-concepts] Constraints ignored on variable template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67117 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/67117] [c++-concepts] Constraints ignored on variable template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67117 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Aug 5 18:13:24 2015 New Revision: 226646 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226646&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/67117 * decl.c (grokvardecl): Set constraints here.

[Bug go/66870] split stack issues on ppc64le and ppc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66870 --- Comment #20 from boger at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: boger Date: Wed Aug 5 18:07:16 2015 New Revision: 226643 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226643&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-08-15 Lynn Boger PR target/66870 * gcc/c

[Bug c++/66649] variable template specializations not being found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66649 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Aug 5 17:56:14 2015 New Revision: 226642 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226642&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/66260 PR c++/66596 PR c++/66649 PR

[Bug c++/66596] Type that is not dependent on the variable template template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66596 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Aug 5 17:56:14 2015 New Revision: 226642 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226642&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/66260 PR c++/66596 PR c++/66649 PR

[Bug c++/66923] Variable template initialized using auto deduces wrong type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66923 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Aug 5 17:56:14 2015 New Revision: 226642 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226642&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/66260 PR c++/66596 PR c++/66649 PR

[Bug c++/66260] [C++14] Failure to compile variable template with recursively defined partial specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66260 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Aug 5 17:56:14 2015 New Revision: 226642 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226642&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/66260 PR c++/66596 PR c++/66649 PR

[Bug c++/65195] Variable template cannot be used as a function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65195 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Aug 5 17:51:29 2015 New Revision: 226641 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226641&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/65195 PR c++/66619 * semantics.c (finish_id

[Bug c++/66619] Internal compiler error: variable template deduced by template argument deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66619 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Aug 5 17:51:29 2015 New Revision: 226641 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226641&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/65195 PR c++/66619 * semantics.c (finish_id

[Bug c++/67041] [C++14] Variable template initialized by call to lambda does not compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67041 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c/16351] NULL dereference warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16351 --- Comment #32 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- The NULL dereference warnings originally requested should be working in GCC 6 (unless we find some issue and the patch gets reverted). However, the original patch by Jeff also used the nonnull attribut

[Bug c++/66923] Variable template initialized using auto deduces wrong type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66923 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/66649] variable template specializations not being found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66649 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/66619] Internal compiler error: variable template deduced by template argument deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66619 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/16351] NULL dereference warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16351 --- Comment #31 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- Author: manu Date: Wed Aug 5 17:36:29 2015 New Revision: 226640 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226640&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ChangeLog: 2015-08-05 Manuel López-Ibáñez Jeff L

[Bug c++/66596] Type that is not dependent on the variable template template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66596 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/66260] [C++14] Failure to compile variable template with recursively defined partial specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66260 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #1) > Fixed on trunk. Oops, haven't checked in the fix yet.

[Bug fortran/64921] [4.9/5/6 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_allocate_18.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64921 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/64921] [4.9/5/6 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_allocate_18.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64921 --- Comment #28 from Mikael Morin --- Author: mikael Date: Wed Aug 5 16:42:00 2015 New Revision: 226639 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226639&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix random class_allocate_18.f90 failure PR fortran/64921 gcc/fo

[Bug fortran/64921] [4.9/5/6 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_allocate_18.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64921 --- Comment #27 from Mikael Morin --- Author: mikael Date: Wed Aug 5 16:15:40 2015 New Revision: 226636 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226636&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix random class_allocate_18.f90 failure PR fortran/64921 gcc/fo

[Bug ipa/66896] ipa-prop.c:2479 runtime error: member call on null pointer of type 'struct ipa_polymorphic_call_context'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66896 --- Comment #12 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Vittorio Zecca from comment #11) > I have a version of gcc 5.2.0 compiled with the -fsanitize=undefined option. > This sanitized version gave me a runtime error due to dereferencing > the pointer

[Bug c++/65195] Variable template cannot be used as a function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65195 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/64921] [4.9/5/6 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_allocate_18.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64921 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug c++/66260] [C++14] Failure to compile variable template with recursively defined partial specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66260 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/64035] [C++11] ICE in reshape_init_r when using initializer list aggregate initialization for default function parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64035 Mikhail Maltsev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/66336] [C++14][Variable templates] Spurious "error: expansion pattern contains no argument packs"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66336 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ldionne.2 at gmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug c++/65706] [c++14] Pack expansion with variable template incorrectly marked as invalid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65706 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/66336] [C++14][Variable templates] Spurious "error: expansion pattern contains no argument packs"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66336 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug go/66870] split stack issues on ppc64le and ppc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66870 --- Comment #19 from boger at us dot ibm.com --- (In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #18) > In the patch in comment #17, the code in gcc/configure.ac looks misplaced: > shouldn't it be before the ";;", and not add another ";;"? > > Can you

[Bug middle-end/63510] Wrong line number in Wstrict-overflow message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63510 --- Comment #7 from xili_gchen_5257 at hotmail dot com --- On 8/5/15 00:45, manu at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63510 > > --- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- > (In reply to Iain Buclaw from comme

[Bug go/66870] split stack issues on ppc64le and ppc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66870 --- Comment #18 from Ian Lance Taylor --- In the patch in comment #17, the code in gcc/configure.ac looks misplaced: shouldn't it be before the ";;", and not add another ";;"? Can you explain why the test in libgo/configure.ac will fail for a li

[Bug target/51931] No support for MIPS16 long branches

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51931 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug target/55721] -mabi=64 compilation results in unknown UNSPEC note

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55721 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|rsa

[Bug target/58271] ICE in gcc for a MIPS target during compilation with -mpaired-single -ftree-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58271 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug ada/66965] gnat.dg/specs/addr1.ads obsolete -- failing on trunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66965 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/66311] [5/6 Regression] Problems with some integer(16) values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311 --- Comment #18 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fixed on trunk. I'll wait a few days to see whether there's any unexpected fallout before backporting to gcc 5.

[Bug fortran/66311] [5/6 Regression] Problems with some integer(16) values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311 --- Comment #17 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Wed Aug 5 14:23:42 2015 New Revision: 226632 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226632&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ PR middle-end/66311 * wide-int.cc

[Bug tree-optimization/67121] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67121 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Fixed on trunk but latent issue on the branches, esp. the gcc 5 branch which also uses old ranges during VRP2.

[Bug tree-optimization/67121] [5 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67121 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.0 Target Milestone|6.0

[Bug tree-optimization/67121] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67121 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Aug 5 14:16:51 2015 New Revision: 226630 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226630&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-08-05 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/67121

[Bug go/66870] split stack issues on ppc64le and ppc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66870 --- Comment #17 from boger at us dot ibm.com --- Created attachment 36132 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36132&action=edit Configure gold linker with split stack if available Attaching my patch to detect for split stack supp

[Bug target/65697] __atomic memory barriers not strong enough for __sync builtins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65697 --- Comment #72 from mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mwahab Date: Wed Aug 5 13:43:04 2015 New Revision: 226628 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226628&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from trunk: 2015-06-29 Matthew Waha

[Bug target/65697] __atomic memory barriers not strong enough for __sync builtins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65697 --- Comment #71 from mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mwahab Date: Wed Aug 5 13:40:14 2015 New Revision: 226627 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226627&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from trunk: 2015-06-29 Matthew Waha

[Bug target/67126] [6 Regression][SH] gcc.target/sh/pr51244-12.c failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67126 --- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Probably related to PR67103. Yep, I've been following the discussion on the patches ML. I was expecting something to break for SH, too :)

[Bug target/65697] __atomic memory barriers not strong enough for __sync builtins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65697 --- Comment #70 from mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mwahab Date: Wed Aug 5 13:27:41 2015 New Revision: 226625 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226625&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from trunk: 2015-06-29 Matthew Waha

[Bug target/67126] [6 Regression][SH] gcc.target/sh/pr51244-12.c failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67126 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |6.0 Depends on|

[Bug middle-end/67120] [6 Regression] wrong code for volatile pointers at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67120 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/67127] New: [ARM] Avoiding odd-number ldrd/strd in movdi introduced a regression on armeb-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67127 Bug ID: 67127 Summary: [ARM] Avoiding odd-number ldrd/strd in movdi introduced a regression on armeb-linux-gnueabihf Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/67124] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67124 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Started with r225852.

[Bug tree-optimization/67121] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67121 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Started with r223863.

[Bug middle-end/67120] [6 Regression] wrong code for volatile pointers at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67120 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Aug 5 12:47:59 2015 New Revision: 226623 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226623&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-08-05 Richard Biener PR middle-end/67120 * mat

[Bug target/67126] New: [6 Regression][SH] gcc.target/sh/pr51244-12.c failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67126 Bug ID: 67126 Summary: [6 Regression][SH] gcc.target/sh/pr51244-12.c failures Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Com

[Bug fortran/52846] [F2008] Support submodules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52846 --- Comment #25 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Aug 5 12:06:25 2015 New Revision: 226622 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226622&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-08-05 Paul Thomas PR fortran/52846 * module.c (che

[Bug target/65697] __atomic memory barriers not strong enough for __sync builtins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65697 --- Comment #69 from mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mwahab Date: Wed Aug 5 11:48:43 2015 New Revision: 226621 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226621&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from trunk 2015-06-01 Matthew Wahab

[Bug fortran/67125] Incorrect bounds with source allocation, source=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67125 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/67125] New: Incorrect bounds with source allocation, source=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67125 Bug ID: 67125 Summary: Incorrect bounds with source allocation, source= Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/65697] __atomic memory barriers not strong enough for __sync builtins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65697 --- Comment #68 from mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mwahab Date: Wed Aug 5 11:40:25 2015 New Revision: 226620 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226620&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from trunk. 2015-06-01 Matthew Waha

[Bug fortran/67123] ICE with source allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67123 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/65697] __atomic memory barriers not strong enough for __sync builtins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65697 --- Comment #67 from mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mwahab Date: Wed Aug 5 11:29:28 2015 New Revision: 226619 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226619&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from trunk. 2015-06-01 Matthew Waha

[Bug target/65697] __atomic memory barriers not strong enough for __sync builtins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65697 --- Comment #66 from mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mwahab Date: Wed Aug 5 11:20:59 2015 New Revision: 226618 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226618&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from trunk 2015-05-12 Andrew MacLeo

[Bug target/67124] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67124 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-* Component|rtl-optim

[Bug tree-optimization/67121] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67121 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/67121] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67121 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Disabling if-conversion fixes it so does disabling VRP2.

[Bug libstdc++/67116] incorrect detection of thread model when cross-compiling the tool chain

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67116 --- Comment #6 from Cezary Śliwa --- Created attachment 36131 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36131&action=edit config.log libstdc++v3 config.log

[Bug c++/66595] [C++14] ICE in partial specialization template variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66595 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

  1   2   >