[Bug fortran/53379] [4.9/5/6 Regression] No backtrace generated for array bounds violation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53379 --- Comment #26 from Joost VandeVondele --- (In reply to Janne Blomqvist from comment #25) > Fixed on trunk, closing. Thanks!

[Bug c++/65009] [4.9 Regression] g++ 4.9 sometimes leaves inline methods undefined when compiling with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65009 --- Comment #4 from Don Lewis --- Still fails with: % gcc49 --version gcc49 (FreeBSD Ports Collection) 4.9.4 20150819 (prerelease) Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

[Bug fortran/34040] Support for DOUBLE_TYPE_SIZE != 64 targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34040 --- Comment #14 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #13) > > I think it would be easier to leave DOUBLE_TYPE_SIZE == 64 in all cases and > use software fp if the hardware can't do double precision. If users insist > on double

[Bug debug/54694] [4.7/4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr, at dwarf2out.c:2387

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54694 Chen Gang changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gang.chen.5i5j at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/65804] blackfin: Not support global frame pointer with -fno-omit-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65804 --- Comment #2 from Chen Gang --- It is about git commit "e52beba PR debug/54694". I am just consulting about it in gcc-help mailing list.

[Bug objc/67455] Inheriting from Object doesn't provide alloc, init or new rendering methods usless

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67455 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Object in both apple's runtime and the gnu runtime never provided these.

[Bug rtl-optimization/67456] New: wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20150904 (experimental) [trunk revision 227491] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -Os small.c; ./a.out -1 $ gcc-5.2 -O2 small.c; ./a.out -1 $ $ gcc-trunk -O2 small.c $ ./a.out -2 $ - int printf (const char *, ...); short d = -1; char e

[Bug fortran/67451] [5/6 Regression] ICE with sourced allocation from coarray.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67451 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug objc/67455] New: Inheriting from Object doesn't provide alloc, init or new rendering methods usless

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67455 Bug ID: 67455 Summary: Inheriting from Object doesn't provide alloc, init or new rendering methods usless Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug c++/53878] [C++11] Abstract class constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53878 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Schepler --- Created attachment 36293 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36293&action=edit Abstract class constructors may skip virtual bases Attached is my attempt at a patch for this issue. In addi

[Bug fortran/53379] [4.9/5/6 Regression] No backtrace generated for array bounds violation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53379 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/53379] [4.9/5/6 Regression] No backtrace generated for array bounds violation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53379 --- Comment #24 from Janne Blomqvist --- Author: jb Date: Fri Sep 4 22:17:11 2015 New Revision: 227503 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227503&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR 53379 Print backtrace on error termination. 2015-09-05 Janne Blomqvis

[Bug c++/56701] [C++11] The *this* pointer fails to bind to rvalue reference to pointer type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56701 TC changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com --- Comment #3 from TC ---

[Bug libfortran/63930] libgfortran should use 'abort ()' instead of 'exit (2)' for run-time errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63930 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug fortran/53379] [4.9/5/6 Regression] No backtrace generated for array bounds violation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53379 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-

[Bug fortran/67454] GCC-5.2.0 `GCC_4.3.0' not found (required by file /usr/local/add-on/gcc/lib/libgfortran.so.3)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67454 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/67450] [6 Regression] ERROR: can't unset "et_cache(ia32,value)": no such element in array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67450 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/60725] [-Wreturn-type] false positive in trivial switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60725 --- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #5) > The program in the Description, however, > has well-defined behavior because f1's return value isn't used. It is also easy to silence the warning by adding

[Bug fortran/67429] [5/6 Regression] Missing part of error messages.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67429 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/67429] [5/6 Regression] Missing part of error messages.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67429 --- Comment #17 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Fri Sep 4 18:41:08 2015 New Revision: 227501 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227501&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-09-04 Manuel López-Ibáñez PR fortran/67429 * error

[Bug middle-end/67452] LTO ICE with -fopenmp-simd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67452 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Sep 4 18:36:59 2015 New Revision: 227499 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227499&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/67452 * tree-ssa-live.c: Include cfgloop.h.

[Bug fortran/67429] [5/6 Regression] Missing part of error messages.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67429 --- Comment #16 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Fri Sep 4 18:37:50 2015 New Revision: 227500 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227500&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-09-04 Manuel López-Ibáñez PR fortran/67429 * error

[Bug middle-end/60725] [-Wreturn-type] false positive in trivial switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60725 --- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #5) > Not to complicate things too much, but reaching the closing } of a non-void > function is valid in C. What is not valid (i.e., has undefined behavior) is >

[Bug middle-end/67452] LTO ICE with -fopenmp-simd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67452 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/67452] LTO ICE with -fopenmp-simd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67452 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Sep 4 18:32:00 2015 New Revision: 227498 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227498&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/67452 * tree-ssa-live.c: Include cfgloop.h.

[Bug c/66516] missing diagnostic on taking the address of a builtin function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66516 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/60725] [-Wreturn-type] false positive in trivial switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60725 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug middle-end/60725] [-Wreturn-type] false positive in trivial switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60725 --- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Jens Auer from comment #2) > This warnings becomes annoying when you also compile with -Wswitch-enum > which forces you to cover all enum values. When they are all covered, I do > not need

[Bug middle-end/60725] [-Wreturn-type] false positive in trivial switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60725 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug fortran/67454] New: GCC-5.2.0 `GCC_4.3.0' not found (required by file /usr/local/add-on/gcc/lib/libgfortran.so.3)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67454 Bug ID: 67454 Summary: GCC-5.2.0 `GCC_4.3.0' not found (required by file /usr/local/add-on/gcc/lib/libgfortran.so.3) Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/67453] vtable not emitted for class with no key method and defaulted destructor with attribute((used))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67453 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/65210] [avr] ICE: when using attributs 'address' and 'io_low'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65210 --- Comment #3 from denisc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: denisc Date: Fri Sep 4 16:34:11 2015 New Revision: 227496 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227496&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ChangeLog PR target/65210 * config/avr/av

[Bug bootstrap/67363] [6 Regression] r227188 breaks build for mingw-w64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67363 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug libstdc++/65704] Provide portable versions of std::timed_mutex and std::recursive_timed_mutex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65704 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- I wasn't actually testing the new code at all due to a cock up when trying to undefine the macro that differs between darwin and other targets. Should be OK now.

[Bug libstdc++/65704] Provide portable versions of std::timed_mutex and std::recursive_timed_mutex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65704 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Fri Sep 4 16:09:05 2015 New Revision: 227495 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227495&root=gcc&view=rev Log: fix darwin bootstrap errors due to . PR libstdc++/65704

[Bug target/66960] Need a builtin function to access interrupt or exception data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66960 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86 Summary|Add a builtin to get th

[Bug c++/67376] [5/6 regression] Comparison with pointer to past-the-end of array fails inside constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67376 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug c++/67376] [5/6 regression] Comparison with pointer to past-the-end of array fails inside constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67376 --- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- And: static_assert(a.elems_ + 1, ""); started to get rejected with r212499.

[Bug middle-end/60725] [-Wreturn-type] false positive in trivial switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60725 Jens Auer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jens.auer at cgi dot com --- Comment #2 from

[Bug c++/67453] New: vtable not emitted for class with no key method and defaulted destructor with attribute((used))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67453 Bug ID: 67453 Summary: vtable not emitted for class with no key method and defaulted destructor with attribute((used)) Product: gcc Version: 4.9.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/67452] New: LTO ICE with -fopenmp-simd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67452 Bug ID: 67452 Summary: LTO ICE with -fopenmp-simd Product: gcc Version: 5.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug testsuite/67450] [6 Regression] ERROR: can't unset "et_cache(ia32,value)": no such element in array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67450 --- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Fri Sep 4 15:09:22 2015 New Revision: 227492 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227492&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Apppend $prop to et_prop_list only if needed PR testsuite/

[Bug c++/67376] [5/6 regression] Comparison with pointer to past-the-end of array fails inside constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67376 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Summary|C

[Bug bootstrap/67373] Can't compile gcc snapshot for avr target with mingw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67373 --- Comment #2 from kontakt at michaelstather dot com --- Thank you very much, compiling works now. But, I get linker errors. With gcc4.9.2 it works fine, but both with 5.2 and 6 I get e.g.: C:\AVRTools4Windows\share\doc\avr-libc-1.8.1\examples\d

[Bug c++/52902] Pointer to member rejected in constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52902 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 52902, which changed state. Bug 52902 Summary: Pointer to member rejected in constant expression https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52902 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/52902] Pointer to member rejected in constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52902 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/67376] Comparison with pointer to past-the-end of array fails inside constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67376 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/65704] Provide portable versions of std::timed_mutex and std::recursive_timed_mutex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65704 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Sorry, that was a stupid last minute copy & paste error. Fix coming...

[Bug libstdc++/65704] Provide portable versions of std::timed_mutex and std::recursive_timed_mutex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65704 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 fr

[Bug c++/52902] Pointer to member rejected in constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52902 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/52902] Pointer to member rejected in constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52902 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ldionne.2 at gmail dot com --- Com

[Bug c++/67376] Comparison with pointer to past-the-end of array fails inside constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67376 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug inline-asm/67448] compiler crash#inline assembly#rvalue operand with constraint "m"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67448 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Perhaps gimplify_asm_expr should also reject MODIFY_EXPR: --- a/gcc/gimplify.c +++ b/gcc/gimplify.c @@ -5210,7 +5210,8 @@ gimplify_asm_expr (tree *expr_p, gimple_seq *pre_p, gimple_seq *post_p) if (TRE

[Bug fortran/67451] New: ICE with sourced allocation from coarray.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67451 Bug ID: 67451 Summary: ICE with sourced allocation from coarray. Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug inline-asm/67448] compiler crash#inline assembly#rvalue operand with constraint "m"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67448 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/67279] -fsanitize=undefined spurious error: initializer element is not constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67279 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/67279] -fsanitize=undefined spurious error: initializer element is not constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67279 --- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Fri Sep 4 12:37:39 2015 New Revision: 227491 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227491&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR sanitizer/67279 * c-typeck.c (build_binary_op): Don'

[Bug fortran/67444] RHS in assignment of polymorphic types not finalized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67444 --- Comment #2 from Bálint Aradi --- Apparently, this is point c) in PR 37336 comment 27.

[Bug testsuite/67450] New: [6 Regression] ERROR: can't unset "et_cache(ia32,value)": no such element in array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67450 Bug ID: 67450 Summary: [6 Regression] ERROR: can't unset "et_cache(ia32,value)": no such element in array Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug libstdc++/65704] Provide portable versions of std::timed_mutex and std::recursive_timed_mutex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65704 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/65704] Provide portable versions of std::timed_mutex and std::recursive_timed_mutex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65704 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Fri Sep 4 11:23:44 2015 New Revision: 227490 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227490&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Add portable timed_mutex and recursive_timed_mutex. PR libstdc++

[Bug c/67435] Feature request: Implement align-loops attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67435 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/67449] Branch elimination problem on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67449 lh_mouse changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|minor |trivial

[Bug rtl-optimization/67449] New: Branch elimination problem on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67449 Bug ID: 67449 Summary: Branch elimination problem on x86 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization

[Bug c/67435] Large performance drop on apparently unrelated changes (potential cause : hot loop alignment)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67435 --- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Yann Collet from comment #8) > However, for some reason, in the table provided, both Sandy Bridge and > Haswell get a default loop alignment value of 16. not 32. > > Is there a reason for

[Bug fortran/67430] reallocate lhs with overloaded assignment operators causes memory error and wrong size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67430 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Am I correct to summarize (simplify?) your expectation (interpretation as: use the overloaded assignment if the lhs and rhs are conforming, otherwise use the intrinsic assignment? If yes, what the co

[Bug c/67448] New: compiler crash#inline assembly#rvalue operand with constraint "m"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67448 Bug ID: 67448 Summary: compiler crash#inline assembly#rvalue operand with constraint "m" Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/65473] Including does not define __GLIBCXX__

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65473 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/65473] Including does not define __GLIBCXX__

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65473 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Fri Sep 4 09:16:29 2015 New Revision: 227484 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227484&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Make all headers include PR libstdc++/65473 * include/

[Bug fortran/63158] Possible wrong code with absend optional BT_CLASS -> optional BT_DERIVED dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63158 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Ping!

[Bug fortran/67431] ALLOCATE with SOURCE ignores overloaded assignment operator and uses intrinsic when copying values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67431 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- >From Damian Rouson: NAG 6.0 ouptput: SIZE(A) 4 A 765 765 765 765 Cray Compiler Environment (CCE) 8.3.14 output: SIZE(A) 4 A 4*765 Portland Group 15.7-0 output: SIZE(A)4 A

[Bug c++/56568] std::initializer_list return value contents lost prematurely

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56568 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to fuzzyTew from comment #4) > I'm not as experienced in the details. I think perhaps my example is > invalid as you state but the original testcase is not (see &&). That makes no difference. Us

[Bug other/67446] libiberty sha1.c:324 sanitizer runtime error: load of misaligned address 0x62f00011847e for type 'const sha1_uint32', which requires 4 byte alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67446 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Mikhail Maltsev from comment #2) > BTW, a similar bug reproduces during GCC bootstrap with ubsan: > > /home/jenkins/workspace/ubsan-bootstrap/src/libiberty/md5.c:336:7: runtime > error: load of

[Bug other/67446] libiberty sha1.c:324 sanitizer runtime error: load of misaligned address 0x62f00011847e for type 'const sha1_uint32', which requires 4 byte alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67446 Mikhail Maltsev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/67447] New: [6 Regression] ICE in extract_constrain_insn (reload_cse_simplify_operands): insn does not satisfy its constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67447 Bug ID: 67447 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in extract_constrain_insn (reload_cse_simplify_operands): insn does not satisfy its constraints Product: gcc Version: 6.