[Bug fortran/42568] [Cygwin] BLOCKDATA referenced in EXTERNAL not loading from library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42568 --- Comment #28 from urbanjost at comcast dot net --- This is still a problem with Cygwin 2.2.1 and gfortran 4.9.3 $ cygcheck --version cygcheck (cygwin) 2.2.1 System Checker for Cygwie $ gfortran --version GNU Fortran (GCC) 4.9.3 $ bash bug1

[Bug target/67484] options-save.c sanitizer asan detects freed storage referenced heap-use-after-free

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67484 Vittorio Zecca changed: What|Removed |Added Version|5.2.0 |6.0 --- Comment #1 from Vittorio Zecca

[Bug c/67580] Improve error message on missing "struct" tag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67580 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCO

[Bug c++/67581] New: ICE on transparent union with -g enabled on x86_64-linux-gnu (verify_type failed)

++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20150914 (experimental) [trunk revision 227747] (GCC) $ $ g++-trunk -c t.cc $ g++-5.2 -c -g t.cc $ $ g++-trunk -c -g t.cc t.cc:1:7: error: type variant differs by TYPE_TRANSPARENT_AGGR. union U ^ constant 32

[Bug c/67580] New: Improve error message on missing "struct" tag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67580 Bug ID: 67580 Summary: Improve error message on missing "struct" tag Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug tree-optimization/47679] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Strange uninitialized warning after SRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47679 --- Comment #23 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Mon Sep 14 20:10:30 2015 New Revision: 227762 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227762&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PATCH] Minor DOM cleanup PR tree-optimization/47679 * tr

[Bug c++/44282] fastcall is not mangled at all

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44282 --- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Sep 14 19:54:27 2015 New Revision: 227761 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227761&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/44282 * mangle.c (write_CV_qualifiers_for_type):

[Bug c++/67579] New: [concepts] Memoization for constraint expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67579 Bug ID: 67579 Summary: [concepts] Memoization for constraint expressions Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug fortran/67460] [5 Regression] Spurious: f951: all warnings being treated as errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67460 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/67460] [5/6 Regression] Spurious: f951: all warnings being treated as errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67460 --- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- Author: manu Date: Mon Sep 14 19:27:50 2015 New Revision: 227760 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227760&root=gcc&view=rev Log: The flag diagnostic_context::some_warnings_are_errors controls whethe

[Bug rtl-optimization/67577] Trivial float-vectorization foiled by a loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67577 --- Comment #1 from Joel Yliluoma --- It may be also worth mentioning that adding an explicit '#pragma omp simd' before each of those loops, inside the operator functions, will make sure that GCC at least does the mathematics using packed registe

[Bug c/67570] comparison rules fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67570 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- If I understand what you are doing correctly, this is an unnormal representation (exponent not zero or maximal, explicit MSB of mantissa zero). Such representations, which cannot be produc

[Bug c++/67576] [4.9/5/6 Regression] expression of typeid( expression ) is evaluated twice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67576 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug libstdc++/67578] New: std::random_device::entropy() always returns 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67578 Bug ID: 67578 Summary: std::random_device::entropy() always returns 0 Product: gcc Version: 5.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: li

[Bug rtl-optimization/67577] New: Trivial float-vectorization foiled by a loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67577 Bug ID: 67577 Summary: Trivial float-vectorization foiled by a loop Product: gcc Version: 5.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-

[Bug sanitizer/67575] tsan: double instrumentation of x++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67575 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/67575] tsan: double instrumentation of x++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67575 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- This is needed to be done for thread. There was a thread (so no pun intended) about this on the mailing list IIRC.

[Bug c++/67576] New: expression of typeid( expression ) is evaluated twice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67576 Bug ID: 67576 Summary: expression of typeid( expression ) is evaluated twice Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug fortran/67567] resolve.c: gfc_error called with iface->module == NULL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67567 --- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Vittorio Zecca from comment #2) > Unfortunately I do not master gdb and gcc internals enough for that. > The check costs two instructions on my x86-64. Two instructions that we do not need

[Bug c++/67557] Calling copy constructor of base class in constructor of derived class produces crashing code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67557 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug tree-optimization/67476] Add --param parloops-schedule=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67476 --- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Updated patch series: - https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-09/msg00938.html - https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-09/msg00940.html

[Bug c++/51911] [C++11] G++ accepts new auto { list }

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51911 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/51911] [C++11] G++ accepts new auto { list }

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51911 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Sep 14 15:25:00 2015 New Revision: 227753 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227753&root=gcc&view=rev Log: /cp 2015-09-14 Paolo Carlini PR c++/51911 *

[Bug libstdc++/65142] std::random_device Ignores Read Return Code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65142 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- And the check is wrong in the fread() case as it will only ever return 0 or 1.

[Bug libstdc++/65142] std::random_device Ignores Read Return Code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65142 --- Comment #5 from Florian Weimer --- The fix is incomplete because short reads can happen in practice for /dev/random at least. The usual retry loop is needed. It is not clear what to do on EINTR.

[Bug sanitizer/67575] New: tsan: double instrumentation of x++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67575 Bug ID: 67575 Summary: tsan: double instrumentation of x++ Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sanitizer

[Bug fortran/67567] resolve.c: gfc_error called with iface->module == NULL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67567 --- Comment #2 from Vittorio Zecca --- Unfortunately I do not master gdb and gcc internals enough for that. The check costs two instructions on my x86-64.

[Bug tree-optimization/67530] Failure to eliminate dead code produced by vector lowering

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67530 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/66142] Loop is not vectorized because not sufficient support for GOMP_SIMD_LANE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66142 --- Comment #20 from Richard Biener --- Yes, I plan to come back to this during stage3.

[Bug target/67061] sh64-elf: internal compiler error: in sh_find_set_of_reg, at config/sh/sh-protos.h:235

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67061 --- Comment #7 from Oleg Endo --- Author: olegendo Date: Mon Sep 14 13:46:14 2015 New Revision: 227750 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227750&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ PR target/67061 * config/sh/sh-protos.h (sh_find_set_o

[Bug c++/67574] New: Misleading error message for method explicitly defaulted two times

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67574 Bug ID: 67574 Summary: Misleading error message for method explicitly defaulted two times Product: gcc Version: 5.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor

[Bug c/67569] wrong type in error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67569 --- Comment #5 from BENAÏSSA --- Thank you.          A.Benaïssa Le Lundi 14 septembre 2015 13h27, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org a écrit : https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67569 Andrew Pinski changed:           What    |Rem

[Bug libstdc++/65142] std::random_device Ignores Read Return Code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65142 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fweimer at redhat dot com --- Comment #

[Bug c/67569] wrong type in error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67569 --- Comment #4 from BENAÏSSA --- Thank you for your replty. A.Benaïssa Le Lundi 14 septembre 2015 11h22, mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org a écrit : https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67569 Marek Polacek changed:          

[Bug target/63304] Aarch64 pc-relative load offset out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304 --- Comment #25 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- Author: ramana Date: Mon Sep 14 13:16:59 2015 New Revision: 227748 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227748&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [AArch64] Handle literal pools for functions > 1 MiB in size. T

[Bug target/67573] [SH] wrong code generated for libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/cxx11-shim_facets.cc at -mlra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67573 --- Comment #1 from Kazumoto Kojima --- Created attachment 36333 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36333&action=edit test case

[Bug target/55212] [SH] Switch to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212 --- Comment #111 from Kazumoto Kojima --- (In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #110) It seems that those failures are the latent wrong code problem triggered with -mlra accidentally. I've filed it as PR67573.

[Bug c/67569] wrong type in error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67569 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/67573] New: [SH] wrong code generated for libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/cxx11-shim_facets.cc at -mlra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67573 Bug ID: 67573 Summary: [SH] wrong code generated for libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/cxx11-shim_facets.cc at -mlra Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords

[Bug c/67569] erroneous compiler error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67569 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|WORKSFORM

[Bug libstdc++/67566] std::move is in global scope g++ 5.1 -std=c++14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67566 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Roman Koptev from comment #2) > That'is if I compile any program with the option -std=c++14, after including > (may be and other headers) std::move surely and always is in global > namespace,

[Bug libstdc++/67566] std::move is in global scope g++ 5.1 -std=c++14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67566 --- Comment #2 from Roman Koptev --- I've installed gcc 5.1 from repository http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-toolchain-r/ppa/ubuntu on Ubuntu Studio: lsb_release -a LSB Version: core-2.0-amd64:core-2.0-noarch:core-3.0-amd64:core-3.0-noarch:cor

[Bug middle-end/67401] Incorrect expand of __atomic_compare_exchange_8 using __sync_val_compare_and_swap_8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67401 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin --- Author: danglin Date: Mon Sep 14 12:05:58 2015 New Revision: 227746 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227746&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/67401 * optabs.c (expand_atomic_compar

[Bug libstdc++/67572] std::atomic, std::mutex and others are trivially copyable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67572 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/67572] New: std::atomic, std::mutex and others are trivially copyable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67572 Bug ID: 67572 Summary: std::atomic, std::mutex and others are trivially copyable Product: gcc Version: 4.9.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug middle-end/67438] [6 Regression] ~X op ~Y pattern relocation causes loop performance degradation on 32bit x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67438 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug lto/67568] lto-streamer-in.c sanitizer runtime error: load of value 255, which is not a valid value for type 'bool'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67568 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/67563] [5/6 Regression] verify_flow_info failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67563 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug rtl-optimization/67553] Saturating SSE/AVX instructions do not get optimized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67553 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Target|

[Bug c++/67550] [5/6 regression] Initialization of local struct array with elements of global array yields zeros instead of initializer values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67550 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.3

[Bug c++/67549] internal compiler error: in fold_binary_loc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67549 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug lto/67548] [5/6 Regression] LTO drops weak binding with "ld -r"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67548 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- I thought we do nothing in an incremental link but concat the LTO input sections? That's why we put that $ID suffix on the section names. So maybe with plugin auto-loading (and thus slim objects?) the LTO p

[Bug other/67552] [meta] x86 interrupt attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67552 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/67533] internal compiler error: in build_call_a, at cp/call.c:372

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67533 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/67520] libmpx should abort() instead of exit(255) on bound violation detection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67520 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- IMHO libraries should have a way to specify a custom handler (and default that to abort maybe). Indeed exit (255) isn't very canonical.

[Bug middle-end/67518] [6 Regression] ISL: position out of bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67518 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug target/67510] x86: Faster code is possible for integer absolute value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67510 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|

[Bug c++/67571] Error: open CFI at the end of file; missing .cfi_endproc directive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67571 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug fortran/67509] [6 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_7.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67509 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug tree-optimization/67470] [5/6 Regression] ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in compute_live_loop_exits, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:235

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67470 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/67474] [6 regression] tree-vect-loop.c:2759:1: error: insn does not satisfy its constraints breaks ARM bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67474 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/67477] [6 Regression] ICE in cselib_record_set, at cselib.c:2388

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67477 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/67490] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/pr16458-1.c scan-assembler-not cmpw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67490 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug target/67507] Code size increase with -Os from GCC 4.8.x to GCC 4.9.x for ARM thumb1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67507 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |4.9.4 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biene

[Bug c++/67571] Error: open CFI at the end of file; missing .cfi_endproc directive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67571 --- Comment #6 from werner at beroux dot com --- Humm no sorry I'm building from the same git tag (which is of Jan 24). So it looks like something caused GCC to use more memory than before. I did notice a GCC5 compilation fix, probably unrelated,

[Bug target/67447] [6 Regression] ICE in extract_constrain_insn (reload_cse_simplify_operands): insn does not satisfy its constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67447 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug target/67462] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ifcvt-3.c scan-rtl-dump ce1 "3 true changes made"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67462 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener

[Bug c++/67571] Error: open CFI at the end of file; missing .cfi_endproc directive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67571 --- Comment #5 from werner at beroux dot com --- I'm trying to build with newer GCC and older code to confirm that (build takes a while).

[Bug middle-end/67239] [6 Regression] FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_set/insert/hash_policy.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67239 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/67571] Error: open CFI at the end of file; missing .cfi_endproc directive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67571 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/67571] Error: open CFI at the end of file; missing .cfi_endproc directive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67571 --- Comment #3 from werner at beroux dot com --- I should clarify that the code being compiled might have changed as well between the two: https://github.com/ariya/phantomjs/commits/master from 2015-06-25T20:16:02.750261Z (working) to 2015-09-05

[Bug c++/67571] Error: open CFI at the end of file; missing .cfi_endproc directive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67571 --- Comment #2 from werner at beroux dot com --- It worked on gcc (Debian 4.9.2-2). Also I tried on two machines with pretty different spec. I'm not excluding the memory issue, just saying it used to work on those two machines and now it doesn't.

[Bug c/67569] erroneous compiler error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67569 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/67567] resolve.c: gfc_error called with iface->module == NULL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67567 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/67571] Error: open CFI at the end of file; missing .cfi_endproc directive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67571 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/67563] [5/6 Regression] verify_flow_info failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67563 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Com

[Bug c++/67571] New: Error: open CFI at the end of file; missing .cfi_endproc directive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67571 Bug ID: 67571 Summary: Error: open CFI at the end of file; missing .cfi_endproc directive Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major

[Bug c/28901] -Wunused-variable ignores unused const initialised variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28901 --- Comment #9 from Mark Wielaard --- Author: mark Date: Mon Sep 14 09:49:47 2015 New Revision: 227742 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227742&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR28901 -Wunused-variable ignores unused const initialised variables in C

[Bug c/67570] New: comparison rules fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67570 Bug ID: 67570 Summary: comparison rules fails Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unas

[Bug c/67569] New: erroneous compiler error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67569 Bug ID: 67569 Summary: erroneous compiler error message Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assi

[Bug other/67552] [meta] x86 interrupt attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67552 --- Comment #5 from Yulia Koval --- Sorry, I don't understand why we shouldn't preserve the red zone. The function "foo", executing before the interrupt was called, used its red zone. If the interrupt does not adjust the stack pointer, who contro

[Bug lto/67568] New: lto-streamer-in.c sanitizer runtime error: load of value 255, which is not a valid value for type 'bool'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67568 Bug ID: 67568 Summary: lto-streamer-in.c sanitizer runtime error: load of value 255, which is not a valid value for type 'bool' Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIR