[Bug lto/67923] [6 Regression] ICEs in the gfortran test suite with -flto after r228680

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67923 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener

[Bug libstdc++/67922] std::unordered_map::clear should take time linear in the number of elements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67922 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/67600] [5/6 Regression] Segfault when assigning only one char to ostreambuf_iterator compiled with -O2 or -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67600 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug rtl-optimization/67864] [6 Regression] CSiBE size regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67864 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- No difference for x86 (but that may have been expected)

[Bug c++/67918] -fdevirtualize causes binary to crash with Segmentation Fault (CryptoPP involved)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67918 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/67920] [6 Regression] wrong code with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67920 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/67917] ICE in openssl-1.0.2d.tar.gz "/usr/include/openssl/bn.h:335:3: error: TYPE_CANONICAL is not compatible"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67917 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/67921] [6 Regression] "internal compiler error: in build_polynomial_chrec, at tree-chrec.h:147" when using -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67921 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0 Summary|"internal

[Bug c/67925] docs lie about being unable to inline function call before definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67925 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Patches welcome ;) I think refering to -Winline here might make most sense.

[Bug ipa/66738] [5/6 Regression] optimizer bug related to exceptions and static symbols

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66738 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug tree-optimization/67915] ICE on valid code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67915 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/67907] regression: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67907 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/67916] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67916 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/67557] [4.9/5/6 regression] Calling copy constructor of base class in constructor of derived class produces crashing code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67557 --- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Oct 12 07:58:43 2015 New Revision: 228704 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228704=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/67557 * expr.c (store_field): Call store_constructor

[Bug ipa/67056] [5/6 regression] Wrong code generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67056 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug tree-optimization/66070] [GRAPHITE] cc1 gets killed by OOM killer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66070 --- Comment #3 from Steffen Hau --- Could you please provide the corresponding revision which fixed the issue?

[Bug ipa/62051] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Undefined reference to vtable with -O2 and -fdevirtualize-speculatively

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62051 --- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill --- Created attachment 36480 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36480=edit visibility flag patch Is this the sort of thing you had in mind?

[Bug rtl-optimization/67715] [6 Regression][ARM] ICE in cselib.c during reload_cse_regs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67715 renlin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||renlin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/67929] New: [4.9/5/6 Regression][arm] Wrong code for FP mult-by-power-of-2 + int conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67929 Bug ID: 67929 Summary: [4.9/5/6 Regression][arm] Wrong code for FP mult-by-power-of-2 + int conversion Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug target/67849] AVX512 Hitting upper-bank register on extract insn split

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67849 --- Comment #3 from Kirill Yukhin --- Author: kyukhin Date: Mon Oct 12 11:03:56 2015 New Revision: 228709 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228709=gcc=rev Log: PR target/67849 gcc/ * config/i386/sse.md (define_split

[Bug middle-end/67908] gcc segfaults with -fstack-check (internal compiler error) / armv7 host and target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67908 --- Comment #2 from Stefan Keller --- The distribution's compiler is built without debug symbols. I need to rebuild, which may take a while. Here's the output of gdb in case it helps anyways: Reading symbols from

[Bug fortran/67779] Strange ordering with strings in extended object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67779 --- Comment #7 from Arjen Markus --- Yes, I can confirm this - I also tried with the Intel Fortran compiler and that sorts the integers and strings in the way one would expect.

[Bug c++/67888] Compiling clang 3.7.0 results in is used but never defined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67888 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug libstdc++/67922] std::unordered_map::clear should take time linear in the number of elements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67922 --- Comment #2 from Yegor Derevenets --- > But then the issue is that clear () doesn't shrink the map. No, the issue is that clear() touches all the buckets, instead of touching only those containing the elements. libc++'s implementation does

[Bug target/67929] [4.9/5/6 Regression][arm] Wrong code for FP mult-by-power-of-2 + int conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67929 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ktkachov at gcc dot

[Bug c++/58566] [c++11] ICE with invalid expression in lambda body

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58566 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/58566] [c++11] ICE with invalid expression in lambda body

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58566 --- Comment #6 from ville at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ville Date: Mon Oct 12 08:55:19 2015 New Revision: 228706 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228706=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/58566 /cp 2015-10-12 Ville Voutilainen

[Bug c++/54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367 Bug 54367 depends on bug 58566, which changed state. Bug 58566 Summary: [c++11] ICE with invalid expression in lambda body https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58566 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/67908] gcc segfaults with -fstack-check (internal compiler error) / armv7 host and target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67908 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/67888] Compiling clang 3.7.0 results in is used but never defined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67888 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #7) > I have no objections, the patch seems safe to backport. Jason, shall I go > ahead if it regtests Ok on the branch? Sure.

[Bug c++/67928] New: Ambiguous call not diagnosed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67928 Bug ID: 67928 Summary: Ambiguous call not diagnosed Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/61362] g++ (Ubuntu 4.8.2-19ubuntu1) 4.8.2 does not compile lambda with template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61362 --- Comment #6 from Thibaut LUTZ --- My previous test cases still fails with 6.0.0 20151012 on linux64. It passes with "-std=c++11". Fails with "-std=c++14", "-std=c++17", "-std=c++1y". Same error

[Bug target/67849] AVX512 Hitting upper-bank register on extract insn split

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67849 Alexander Fomin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #4 from Alexander

[Bug tree-optimization/67908] gcc segfaults with -fstack-check (internal compiler error) / armv7 host and target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67908 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Component|middle-end

[Bug libstdc++/63176] std::generate_canonical<float, std::numeric_limits::digits>() generates 1.0f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63176 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Meh. Don't use generate_canonical then.

[Bug gcov-profile/67937] New: gcov gives wrong results when negative counts are involved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67937 Bug ID: 67937 Summary: gcov gives wrong results when negative counts are involved Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/67938] New: ICE on using assumed rank character with some intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67938 Bug ID: 67938 Summary: ICE on using assumed rank character with some intrinsics Product: gcc Version: 5.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug gcov-profile/67937] gcov gives wrong results when negative counts are involved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67937 --- Comment #2 from Joshua Cranmer --- Created attachment 36486 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36486=edit test-case.gcno And the corresponding .gcno file. The testcase was minimized by bisecting the original .gcda/.gcno

[Bug fortran/67939] ICE on using data with negative substring range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67939 --- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- $ echo $LANG de_DE.UTF-8 $ echo $LC_ALL $ cat z3.f90 program p character(8) :: x data x(3:1) /'abc'/ end $ gfortran -g -O0 z3.f90 z3.f90:3:17: data

[Bug target/66697] Feature request: -mstackrealign and force_align_arg_pointer for x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66697 --- Comment #28 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Mon Oct 12 16:29:37 2015 New Revision: 228728 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228728=gcc=rev Log: Backport from mainline 2015-10-08 H.J. Lu

[Bug fortran/67885] ICE on using parameter array in block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67885 --- Comment #4 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- Deleting the dimension from parameter a (making it scalar) lets examples z1.f90 and z5.f90 compile and run fine. $ cat y1.f90 program p block real,

[Bug fortran/67939] New: ICE on using data with negative substring range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67939 Bug ID: 67939 Summary: ICE on using data with negative substring range Product: gcc Version: 5.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/67936] New: Off-by-one columns in caret

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67936 Bug ID: 67936 Summary: Off-by-one columns in caret Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug gcov-profile/67937] gcov gives wrong results when negative counts are involved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67937 --- Comment #1 from Joshua Cranmer --- Created attachment 36485 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36485=edit test-case.gcda (It's a 4.7 test case, but the file format can still be read with trunk gcov the last I checked.

[Bug target/66697] Feature request: -mstackrealign and force_align_arg_pointer for x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66697 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/67912] [6 Regression] ICE in gen_lowpart_common, at emit-rtl.c:1399

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67912 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/67938] ICE on using assumed rank character with some intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67938 --- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- $ cat z1.f90 program p implicit none character(1) :: z(3) call s(z) contains subroutine s(x) character(1) :: x(..) print *, lbound(x)

[Bug c++/51048] Class template inheritance doesn't work well with function-local types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51048 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rodrigc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/67888] Compiling clang 3.7.0 results in is used but never defined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67888 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/67552] [meta] x86 interrupt attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67552 Bug 67552 depends on bug 67850, which changed state. Bug 67850 Summary: Wrong call_used_regs used in aggregate_value_p https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67850 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/67850] Wrong call_used_regs used in aggregate_value_p

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67850 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/67919] GCC Compiler failed with "gcc-5.2.0/gcc/expr.c:6529:1: internal compiler error: output_operand: invalid shift operand"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67919 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |target Version|5.2.0

[Bug c/67930] New: segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67930 Bug ID: 67930 Summary: segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee:

[Bug bootstrap/67931] New: [6 Regression] Gcc [trunk revision 228704] failed to profiledbootstrap on x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67931 Bug ID: 67931 Summary: [6 Regression] Gcc [trunk revision 228704] failed to profiledbootstrap on x86_64 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/51048] Class template inheritance doesn't work well with function-local types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51048 --- Comment #9 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Oct 12 13:15:30 2015 New Revision: 228714 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228714=gcc=rev Log: /cp 2015-10-12 Paolo Carlini

[Bug c/67930] segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67930 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ipa/67783] [4.9/5 Regression] quadratic time consumption in IPA inlining with -O1 and higher

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67783 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Oct 12 12:26:02 2015 New Revision: 228710 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228710=gcc=rev Log: 2015-10-12 Richard Biener PR ipa/67783 *

[Bug target/67850] Wrong call_used_regs used in aggregate_value_p

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67850 --- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Mon Oct 12 12:26:09 2015 New Revision: 228711 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228711=gcc=rev Log: Merge ix86_maybe_switch_abi with ix86_set_current_function

[Bug libstdc++/67932] New: Incorrect conversion to hexfloat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67932 Bug ID: 67932 Summary: Incorrect conversion to hexfloat Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug libstdc++/67932] Incorrect conversion to hexfloat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67932 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Your preprocessed source doesn't use std::hexfloat, so any problem comes from std::printf, which is part of your C library not part of GCC.

[Bug fortran/67933] New: [4.9/5/Trunk Regression] ICE for array of a derived type with allocatable class in derived type object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67933 Bug ID: 67933 Summary: [4.9/5/Trunk Regression] ICE for array of a derived type with allocatable class in derived type object Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status:

[Bug debug/67192] [6 Regression] Backward-goto in loop can get wrong line number

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67192 --- Comment #20 from Andreas Arnez --- Posted a patch that is not as ambitious as completely getting rid of input_location, but also doesn't require a new function like c_parser_peek_token_keep_input_location():

[Bug c++/67934] New: [concepts] ICE when providing default function implementations using concepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67934 Bug ID: 67934 Summary: [concepts] ICE when providing default function implementations using concepts Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug rtl-optimization/66790] Invalid uninitialized register handling in REE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66790 --- Comment #43 from Pierre-Marie de Rodat --- (In reply to Bernd Schmidt from comment #42) > I don't think that would actually help. Even if something is an actual > incoming argument register, it may still be uninitialized by the caller. Sure,

[Bug c++/67935] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67935 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/67931] [6 Regression] Gcc [trunk revision 228704] failed to profiledbootstrap on x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67931 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/67834] [5 Regression] Local references inside comdat groups

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67834 --- Comment #4 from John David Anglin --- I suppose this is a package bug but it is present in a number of packages: static inline void handle_overflow_nop(void){} class recv_packet_handler{ public: ... private: vrt_unpacker_type

[Bug tree-optimization/67476] Add --param parloops-schedule=<static|dynamic|guided|auto|runtime>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67476 --- Comment #9 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vries Date: Mon Oct 12 14:14:11 2015 New Revision: 228717 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228717=gcc=rev Log: Handle simple latch in expand_omp_for_generic 2015-10-12 Tom de Vries

[Bug tree-optimization/67476] Add --param parloops-schedule=<static|dynamic|guided|auto|runtime>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67476 --- Comment #10 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vries Date: Mon Oct 12 14:14:22 2015 New Revision: 228718 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228718=gcc=rev Log: Add missing phis in expand_omp_for_generic 2015-10-12 Tom de Vries

[Bug tree-optimization/66070] [GRAPHITE] cc1 gets killed by OOM killer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66070 --- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop --- r227572

[Bug c++/67935] New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67935 Bug ID: 67935 Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/67934] [concepts] ICE when providing default function implementations using concepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67934 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/67940] Wrong stack alignment adjustment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67940 --- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Mon Oct 12 17:36:21 2015 New Revision: 228732 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228732=gcc=rev Log: Correct x86 backend stack alignment adjustment Add missing -1 in x86

[Bug target/67940] New: Wrong stack alignment adjustment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67940 Bug ID: 67940 Summary: Wrong stack alignment adjustment Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug target/67940] Wrong stack alignment adjustment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67940 --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak --- This doesn't need a PR. Just commit the (pre-approved) obvious patch.

[Bug libgcc/59412] __fixunsdfDI triggers wrong inexact exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59412 --- Comment #1 from Joseph S. Myers --- Note that in addition to spurious "inexact" exceptions, this division can cause spurious "underflow" exceptions when converting tiny values to integer 0. Other spurious exceptions can occur in overflow

[Bug tree-optimization/67815] Optimize const1 * copysign (const2, y) into copysign (const1 * const2, y) if const1 > 0 or -copysign (const1 * const2, y) if const1 < 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67815 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Created attachment 36487 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36487=edit r2 Untested preliminary patch. I'm not sure about the floating-point matter in there.

[Bug c++/67942] New: diagnose placement new buffer overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67942 Bug ID: 67942 Summary: diagnose placement new buffer overflow Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug libstdc++/67932] Incorrect conversion to hexfloat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67932 --- Comment #2 from R Copley --- Thanks Jonathan. It's clear enough from what I wrote that: (1) The same kind of incorrect output is produced by (a) including and using std::printf, and (b) using iostreams and std::hexfloat; (2) The correct

[Bug target/67940] Wrong stack alignment adjustment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67940 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/67941] New: calls on function pointer from a captureless lambda cause ubsan warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67941 Bug ID: 67941 Summary: calls on function pointer from a captureless lambda cause ubsan warning Product: gcc Version: 5.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/67815] Optimize const1 * copysign (const2, y) into copysign (const1 * const2, y) if const1 > 0 or -copysign (const1 * const2, y) if const1 < 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67815 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Comment on attachment 36487 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36487 r2 I think for copysign we don't want/need the first_pass_instance guard, and likely also not

[Bug fortran/67744] polymorphic associating entity is refused TBP invocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67744 --- Comment #3 from Bader at lrz dot de --- The question on validity is not unjustified. The 2008 standard appears to be not fully clear on this, but the current 2015 draft has the following amended text in para 2 of section 8.1.3.3: --- The

[Bug fortran/67744] polymorphic associating entity is refused TBP invocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67744 --- Comment #2 from Bader at lrz dot de --- The question on validity is not unjustified. The 2008 standard appears to be not fully clear on this, but the current 2015 draft has the following amended text in para 2 of section 8.1.3.3: --- The

[Bug c++/67942] diagnose placement new buffer overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67942 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/67943] Friend declaration applied to base class, leading to allowing access to protected base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67943 --- Comment #1 from Barry Revzin --- Actually, according to [class.base.access], this is valid code. Unless CWG 472 gets adopted I guess. In any case, disregard - my bad.

[Bug c++/67917] ICE in openssl-1.0.2d.tar.gz "/usr/include/openssl/bn.h:335:3: error: TYPE_CANONICAL is not compatible"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67917 Guille changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/67909] [6 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67909 Pat Haugen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c/67925] docs lie about being unable to inline function call before definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67925 --- Comment #4 from Arkadiusz Drabczyk --- Created attachment 36488 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36488=edit suggested patch

[Bug c/67925] docs lie about being unable to inline function call before definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67925 --- Comment #5 from Arkadiusz Drabczyk --- -Winline is mentioned in the next paragraph. The whole sentence I posted in the first comment is: "Some calls cannot be integrated for various reasons (in particular, calls that precede the function's

[Bug c/67925] docs lie about being unable to inline function call before definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67925 --- Comment #6 from Arkadiusz Drabczyk --- Sorry, this code is wrong of course, value returned by factorial() must be used to generate an actual code: $ cat bug1.c #include #include inline static int factorial(unsigned int i) { if(i <= 1)

[Bug c++/67943] New: Friend declaration applied to base class, leading to allowing access to protected base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67943 Bug ID: 67943 Summary: Friend declaration applied to base class, leading to allowing access to protected base Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug inline-asm/67944] New: GCC emits unnecessary push/pop for callee-save reads.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67944 Bug ID: 67944 Summary: GCC emits unnecessary push/pop for callee-save reads. Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/67932] Incorrect conversion to hexfloat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67932 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Libstdc++ has no implementation of printf, so ::printf and std::printf are exactly the same function, with std::printf defined as: namespace std { using ::printf; }

[Bug libstdc++/67932] Incorrect conversion to hexfloat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67932 --- Comment #8 from R Copley --- Thanks. I've emailed the mingw-w64 list at http://sourceforge.net/p/mingw-w64/mailman/mingw-w64-public. (You expressed it better but I hadn't seen your last comment.)

[Bug libstdc++/67932] Incorrect conversion to hexfloat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67932 --- Comment #6 from R Copley --- Created attachment 36490 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36490=edit hexfloat-bug-2b.ii (see Comment 4)

[Bug target/65804] blackfin: Not support global frame pointer with -fno-omit-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65804 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/67945] New: Testsuite failures starting with revision 228616

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67945 Bug ID: 67945 Summary: Testsuite failures starting with revision 228616 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/67920] [6 Regression] wrong code with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67920 James Almer changed: What|Removed |Added Component|rtl-optimization|tree-optimization --- Comment #5 from

[Bug libstdc++/67932] Incorrect conversion to hexfloat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67932 --- Comment #4 from R Copley --- That's what I understood to be the case. Nevertheless, with the toolchain I am using (see above for version; same command-line etc.), I get the results below. Both testcases below give the correct results with

  1   2   >