[Bug target/67946] Function multiversioning ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67946 --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak --- You should compile this with -mavx, otherwise x, y and z global variables get expanded in BLKmode. So, we get: (gdb) p code $1 = PLUS_EXPR (gdb) p op0 $2 = (rtx) 0x2aaab05a4918 (gdb) p debug_rtx (op0) (mem/c:B

[Bug fortran/67938] ICE on using assumed rank character with some intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67938 --- Comment #2 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- As meanwhile noticed, example z1.f90 from comment #1 overlaps with PR66833. Examples z2.f90 (comment #0) and z1s.f90 are describing additional effects.

[Bug target/67946] Function multiversioning ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67946 --- Comment #2 from Stupachenko Evgeny --- I see, but shouldn't compiler generate en error on this instead of ICE?

[Bug tree-optimization/67945] Testsuite failures starting with revision 228616

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67945 Alexander Fomin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||afomin.mailbox at gmail dot com --- Co

[Bug fortran/67938] ICE on using assumed rank character with some intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67938 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Sta

[Bug debug/63135] [4.9 regression] Infinite loop in var-tracking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63135 Maxim Kuvyrkov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug lto/67923] [6 Regression] ICEs in the gfortran test suite with -flto after r228680

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67923 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/65141] ISO_10646 constant parameters convert kind when used with substring references

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65141 Alexandros Syrakos changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alexandros.syrakos@outlook.

[Bug fortran/65141] ISO_10646 constant parameters convert kind when used with substring references

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65141 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Confirmed and the problem is in the front end side. Yes, if I remove 'parameter' in the definition of 'string', I get the correct KIND for the section. > The bug is still present in gfortran 5.2.0.

[Bug fortran/67939] ICE on using data with negative substring range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67939 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/62279] Demangler crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62279 Stanislav Angelovic changed: What|Removed |Added CC||stanislav.angelovic@kistler

[Bug target/67366] Poor assembly generation for unaligned memory accesses on ARM v6 & v7 cpus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67366 --- Comment #17 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- (In reply to Fredrik Hederstierna from comment #16) > Could this fix also possibly improve: > Bug 67507 - "Code size increase with -Os from GCC 4.8.x to GCC 4.9.x for ARM > thumb1", which also seems r

[Bug tree-optimization/67947] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67947 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0 Summary|wrong code at -O

[Bug middle-end/67946] Function multiversioning ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67946 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/62279] Demangler crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62279 Mikhail Maltsev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/67945] [6 Regression] Testsuite failures starting with revision 228616

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67945 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0 Summary|Testsuite failur

[Bug c++/67935] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67935 Yi Qingliang changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #36484|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug gcov-profile/67937] gcov gives wrong results when negative counts are involved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67937 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Most interesting would be a C testcase that produces the CFG with the bogus counters ;)

[Bug c++/67935] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67935 --- Comment #3 from Yi Qingliang --- Created attachment 36493 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36493&action=edit the array version 'save-temps' result the array version 'save-temps' result

[Bug fortran/67933] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE for array of a derived type with allocatable class in derived type object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67933 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4 Summary|[4.9/5/Trunk R

[Bug tree-optimization/67945] [6 Regression] Testsuite failures starting with revision 228616

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67945 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Preud'homme --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > Was this maybe fixed by > > 2015-10-13 Richard Sandiford > > * real.h (real_isinteger): Declare. > * real.c (real_isinteger): New funct

[Bug tree-optimization/67915] ICE on valid code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67915 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- So sth like the following (ISTR some missed foldings that way, it's not too long ago that I tested this) Index: gcc/tree-cfgcleanup.c === ---

[Bug tree-optimization/67949] New: Regression in GCC-6.0.0's optimizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67949 Bug ID: 67949 Summary: Regression in GCC-6.0.0's optimizer Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimizati

[Bug fortran/67933] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE for array of a derived type with allocatable class in derived type object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67933 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Sta

[Bug rtl-optimization/67814] cmp instruction register allocation error (x86)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67814 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/67476] Add --param parloops-schedule=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67476 --- Comment #11 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vries Date: Tue Oct 13 10:08:40 2015 New Revision: 228754 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228754&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Handle original loop tree in expand_omp_for_generic 2015-10-13

[Bug tree-optimization/67476] Add --param parloops-schedule=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67476 --- Comment #12 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vries Date: Tue Oct 13 10:08:59 2015 New Revision: 228756 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228756&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Add param parloops-schedule 2015-10-13 Tom de Vries

[Bug c++/67950] New: AIX: Illegal instruction in accept()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67950 Bug ID: 67950 Summary: AIX: Illegal instruction in accept() Product: gcc Version: 4.9.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/67951] New: Wshadow for type inferenced (auto) lambda parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67951 Bug ID: 67951 Summary: Wshadow for type inferenced (auto) lambda parameters Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug tree-optimization/67947] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67947 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/67920] [6 Regression] wrong code with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67920 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/67916] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67916 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/67949] Regression in GCC-6.0.0's optimizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67949 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/67950] AIX: Illegal instruction in accept()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67950 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/67921] [6 Regression] "internal compiler error: in build_polynomial_chrec, at tree-chrec.h:147" when using -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67921 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/67952] New: Compilation error with boost::signals2 and generic lambda: cannot call member function without object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67952 Bug ID: 67952 Summary: Compilation error with boost::signals2 and generic lambda: cannot call member function without object Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRM

[Bug c++/67952] [C++14] Compilation error with boost::signals2 and generic lambda: cannot call member function without object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67952 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCON

[Bug c++/67952] [C++14] Compilation error with boost::signals2 and generic lambda: cannot call member function without object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67952 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/61636] generic lambda "cannot call member function without object"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61636 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jens.auer at cgi dot com --- Comment #

[Bug other/62279] Demangler crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62279 --- Comment #5 from Stanislav Angelovic --- (In reply to Mikhail Maltsev from comment #4) > (In reply to Stanislav Angelovic from comment #3) > > GDB 7.7.1 demangler crashes upon this symbol in our binary: > > > > _ZSt7forwardIKSaINSt6thread5_Im

[Bug c++/67950] AIX: Illegal instruction in accept()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67950 --- Comment #2 from Hans Streibel --- Ok, here is the missing Information: [root@dev71 tmp]# /opt/gcc-4.9.3-hans/bin/gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/opt/gcc-4.9.3-hans/bin/gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/opt/gcc-4.9.3-hans/libexec/gcc/powerpc

[Bug c++/67950] AIX: Illegal instruction in accept()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67950 --- Comment #3 from Hans Streibel --- Created attachment 36496 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36496&action=edit gcc preprocessed result

[Bug c++/67950] AIX: Illegal instruction in accept()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67950 --- Comment #4 from Hans Streibel --- Created attachment 36497 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36497&action=edit g++ preprocessed result

[Bug c++/67950] AIX: Illegal instruction in accept()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67950 --- Comment #5 from Hans Streibel --- Just noticed: Adding an optimization flag -O1 or -O2 to g++ removes this bug (-O0 does not help): [root@dev71 tmp]# /opt/gcc-4.9.3-hans/bin/g++ -o tcpserver.4.9.3++ -O1 -Wall tcpserver.c [root@dev71 tmp]# ./

[Bug tree-optimization/67909] [6 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67909 --- Comment #3 from Yuri Rumyantsev --- Check that guard edge is around the inner loop was missed. After adding it 416.gamess run successfully. I sent the fix for review.

[Bug tree-optimization/67909] [6 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67909 --- Comment #4 from Yuri Rumyantsev --- Created attachment 36498 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36498&action=edit proposed patch This patch cures run-time error for 416.gamess.

[Bug tree-optimization/67953] New: [6 Regression] match.pd: X - (X / Y) * Y wrong on change of sign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67953 Bug ID: 67953 Summary: [6 Regression] match.pd: X - (X / Y) * Y wrong on change of sign Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug tree-optimization/67953] [6 Regression] match.pd: X - (X / Y) * Y wrong on change of sign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67953 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/67915] ICE on valid code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67915 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Index: gcc/tree-cfgcleanup.c === --- gcc/tree-cfgcleanup.c (revision 228753) +++ gcc/tree-cfgcleanup.c (working copy) @@ -103,17 +1

[Bug other/60040] AVR: error: unable to find a register to spill in class 'POINTER_REGS'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60040 Matthijs Kooijman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matthijs at stdin dot nl --- Comment

[Bug other/60040] AVR: error: unable to find a register to spill in class 'POINTER_REGS'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60040 --- Comment #9 from Matthijs Kooijman --- Created attachment 36499 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36499&action=edit Second testcase, needs -Os to break

[Bug fortran/58002] [IR tracking] Pointer function results in non pointer context: Shall use a temporary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58002 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The test Module m200c2 Integer,Target :: x = 42 Contains Function fx() Integer,Pointer :: fx fx => x End Function End Module Program q1 Use m200c2 C

[Bug fortran/67936] Off-by-one column for some caret locations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67936 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/67949] Regression in GCC-6.0.0's optimizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67949 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/67945] [6 Regression] Testsuite failures starting with revision 228616

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67945 --- Comment #5 from Alexander Fomin --- Created attachment 36500 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36500&action=edit Folding regression reproducer Unfortunately, it does not for x86-64. Please take a look at the attached repro

[Bug tree-optimization/67909] [6 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67909 --- Comment #5 from Ilya Enkovich --- Author: ienkovich Date: Tue Oct 13 13:08:31 2015 New Revision: 228760 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228760&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ 2014-10-13 Yuri Rumyantsev PR tree-optimization/6790

[Bug fortran/67743] Associating entity is not auto-typed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67743 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug inline-asm/67944] GCC emits unnecessary push/pop for callee-save reads.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67944 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- Your expectation is not in line with what the compiler actually promises you: the only guarantee is that the local register variable will be in (in your case) ebx _where used in an asm statement_. Other

[Bug tree-optimization/67920] [6 Regression] wrong code with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67920 --- Comment #8 from Yuri Rumyantsev --- Please check that revision 228760 will cure your issue.

[Bug fortran/67744] polymorphic associating entity is refused TBP invocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67744 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #4 from Dominique

[Bug tree-optimization/67947] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67947 --- Comment #2 from Yuri Rumyantsev --- revision 228760 must fix this bug.

[Bug fortran/67696] libbacktrace prints C++ demangled name for Fortran symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67696 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/58002] [IR tracking] Pointer function results in non pointer context: Shall use a temporary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58002 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/67954] New: [5 Regression] internal compiler error: in patch_jump_insn, at cfgrtl.c:1281

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67954 Bug ID: 67954 Summary: [5 Regression] internal compiler error: in patch_jump_insn, at cfgrtl.c:1281 Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug fortran/52265] [OOP] TREE dump confusing with nested SELECT TYPE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52265 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/51380] ASSIGNMENT(=): Reject ALLOCATABLE/POINTER dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51380 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/48997] Don't use allocatable arrays for function elimination

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48997 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/49590] ENTRY: Reject combining USE associated variable with RESULT variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49590 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/47495] .mod files: File modification time - Makefile build issue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47495 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/51820] [doc] underscoring documentation incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51820 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/47469] Check whether arrayfunc_assign_needs_temporary misses TBP/PPC attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47469 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/58315] [4.9/5 Regression] Excessive memory use with -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58315 --- Comment #39 from Christopher Torres --- (In reply to Alexandre Oliva from comment #36) > Created attachment 36472 [details] > backported patch for the 4.9 branch > > Chris, > > retbnd is of no concern, nothing equivalent existed back then.

[Bug fortran/67696] libbacktrace prints C++ demangled name for Fortran symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67696 Joost VandeVondele changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

[Bug tree-optimization/67955] New: tree-dse does not use pointer info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67955 Bug ID: 67955 Summary: tree-dse does not use pointer info Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimi

[Bug tree-optimization/67915] ICE on valid code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67915 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/67955] tree-dse does not use pointer info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67955 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- We use "must point to" nowhere because we don't compute it ;) The same points-to set results from int *p = (int *)((char *)&a + 2); or even int *p = &a + 1; so you can't use points-to info that way (to

[Bug rtl-optimization/67954] [5 Regression] internal compiler error: in patch_jump_insn, at cfgrtl.c:1303

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67954 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.3

[Bug c/67930] segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67930 --- Comment #2 from BENAÏSSA ---  Thank you for your reply.  Comments::  I am not convinced by your point of view.  1- the compilation step does not deliver any message.  2- I modify the string by address and this is permitted by C for any e

[Bug libstdc++/67932] Incorrect conversion to hexfloat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67932 --- Comment #9 from R Copley --- For information, this has already been entered on the mingw-w64 issue tracker (months ago) (see http://sourceforge.net/p/mingw-w64/bugs/459/).

[Bug gcov-profile/67937] gcov gives wrong results when negative counts are involved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67937 --- Comment #4 from Joshua Cranmer --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > Most interesting would be a C testcase that produces the CFG with the bogus > counters ;) Yeah, I know, but doing the minimization on a 5MLOC program takes tim

[Bug c/67930] segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67930 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Try adding -W -Wall and also -WWrite-string

[Bug libstdc++/67932] Incorrect conversion to hexfloat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67932 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED URL|

[Bug c/67925] docs lie about being unable to inline function call before definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67925 Arkadiusz Drabczyk changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #36488|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c/67925] docs lie about being unable to inline function call before definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67925 --- Comment #8 from Arkadiusz Drabczyk --- I attach a new patch with an extra whitespace after dot to keep up with an existing convention.

[Bug c/67956] New: gcc's printf attribute accepts %m as a format character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67956 Bug ID: 67956 Summary: gcc's printf attribute accepts %m as a format character Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug c/67957] New: gcc's printf attribute accepts %m as a format character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67957 Bug ID: 67957 Summary: gcc's printf attribute accepts %m as a format character Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug c/67957] gcc's printf attribute accepts %m as a format character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67957 --- Comment #1 from Christos Zoulas --- Created attachment 36504 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36504&action=edit patch

[Bug c/67957] gcc's printf attribute accepts %m as a format character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67957 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/67956] gcc's printf attribute accepts %m as a format character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67956 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- *** Bug 67957 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/67955] tree-dse does not use pointer info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67955 --- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > The same points-to set results from > > int *p = (int *)((char *)&a + 2); > > or even > > int *p = &a + 1; > I see, I didn't realize that. But AFA

[Bug c/67956] gcc's printf attribute accepts %m as a format character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67956 --- Comment #2 from Christos Zoulas --- something is wrong with the bug tracking system, when posting a bug with an attachment as the first post; this is how the dup got created.

[Bug fortran/65141] ISO_10646 constant parameters convert kind when used with substring references

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65141 --- Comment #4 from Alexandros Syrakos --- Dominique, thanks for the quick reply. Your answer is just, but I'm afraid that due to lack of appropriate skills I can't be much more help than reporting bugs. Concerning the present bug, let me add s

[Bug tree-optimization/67945] [6 Regression] Testsuite failures starting with revision 228616

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67945 --- Comment #6 from Pat Haugen --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > Was this maybe fixed by > > 2015-10-13 Richard Sandiford > > * real.h (real_isinteger): Declare. > * real.c (real_isinteger): New function. >

[Bug fortran/53940] Optionally warn about multiple explicit USE-association of the same symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53940 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/67956] gcc's printf attribute accepts %m as a format character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67956 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- The gnu_printf format attribute is specifically supposed to accept %m; you can use -pedantic to disallow it. Targets can override what the printf attribute maps to; see config/i386/msforma

[Bug fortran/51802] [OOP] Duplicate mangling for OOP symbols

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51802 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/67912] [6 Regression] ICE in gen_lowpart_common, at emit-rtl.c:1399

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67912 --- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva --- Author: aoliva Date: Tue Oct 13 16:34:29 2015 New Revision: 228774 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228774&root=gcc&view=rev Log: support BLKmode inputs for store_bit_field Revision 228586 changed use

[Bug middle-end/67912] [6 Regression] ICE in gen_lowpart_common, at emit-rtl.c:1399

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67912 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/54082] Program name shadows other entities with the same name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54082 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/67953] [6 Regression] match.pd: X - (X / Y) * Y wrong on change of sign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67953 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

  1   2   >