[Bug tree-optimization/67800] [6 Regression] Missed vectorization opportunity on x86

2015-10-29 Thread izamyatin at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67800 --- Comment #3 from Igor Zamyatin --- Richard, do you have any plans regarding this?

[Bug middle-end/68117] [6 Regression] error: invalid PHI argument <<< Unknown tree: >>>

2015-10-29 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68117 --- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- ... ==123276== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==123276==at 0x10B3FFB8: extract_range_from_binary_expr_1(value_range*, tree_code, tree_node*, value_range*, value_range*)

[Bug middle-end/68142] New: unsafe association of multiplication

2015-10-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68142 Bug ID: 68142 Summary: unsafe association of multiplication Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/65962] Missed vectorization of strided stores

2015-10-29 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65962 --- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, clyon at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65962 > > Christophe Lyon changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug fortran/67885] ICE on using parameter array in block

2015-10-29 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67885 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Patch submitted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-10/msg00153.html and approved at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-10/msg00154.html.

[Bug tree-optimization/67800] [6 Regression] Missed vectorization opportunity on x86

2015-10-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67800 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||67612 --- Comment #4 from Richard

[Bug target/68143] [5/6 Regression][ARM] Wrong code initialising struct member after zeroing out the whole struct

2015-10-29 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68143 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug middle-end/68142] unsafe association of multiplication

2015-10-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68142 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/68117] [6 Regression] error: invalid PHI argument <<< Unknown tree: >>>

2015-10-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68117 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/67845] ICE on invalid use of const qualifier on x86_64-linux-gnu in merge_types, at cp/typeck.c:854

2015-10-29 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67845 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/68143] New: [5/6 Regression][ARM] Wrong code initialising struct member after zeroing out the whole struct

2015-10-29 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68143 Bug ID: 68143 Summary: [5/6 Regression][ARM] Wrong code initialising struct member after zeroing out the whole struct Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/68143] [5/6 Regression][ARM] Wrong code initialising struct member after zeroing out the whole struct

2015-10-29 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68143 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/51993] Erroneous type component initialization leads to internal compiler error

2015-10-29 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51993 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The first test in comment 1 has been fixed between revisions r229283 (ICE) and r229293 (Error: Scalar INTEGER expression expected at (1)), likely r229287 (pr67805). Compiling the second test in

[Bug target/68028] Compilation error "lto1: error: target attribute or pragma changes single precision floating point", with "-flto" on different variant of powerpc like -mcpu=e6500, 8540, 8548, e500m

2015-10-29 Thread ranjan.amit8 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68028 --- Comment #5 from martin --- Hi Richard, There are the changes came after gcc-4.9.3 because of that I am getting above issue, but if I comment these 2 line in file (tree-streamer-in.c & tree-streamer-out.c) then it resolves the issue I am

[Bug target/59593] [arm big-endian] using "ldrh" access a immediate which stored in a memory by word

2015-10-29 Thread thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59593 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

<    1   2