https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68422
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66420
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Still seems to be happening with gcc trunk dated as follows
Last Changed Rev: 230563
Last Changed Date: 2015-11-18 19:45:47 + (Wed, 18 Nov 2015)
==12746== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitia
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68455
Bug ID: 68455
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst,
have plus_expr in decompose, at tree.h:5123
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68173
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68173
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 36779
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36779&action=edit
cut-down testcase
Cut-down testcase. With GCC 5 needs 7.5s (-O0) vs. 2.1s (-O1)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68435
--- Comment #6 from Yuri Rumyantsev ---
It turned out that fresh gcc performs tail duplication (aka path splitting)
preventing if-conversion. So I post a dump for 20150929 compiler which
reproduces the issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67354
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 20 09:03:45 2015
New Revision: 230646
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230646&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/67354
* cp-tree.h (defer_mangling_aliases): Declare
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68435
--- Comment #7 from Yuri Rumyantsev ---
Created attachment 36780
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36780&action=edit
rtl-ce1 dump file
The dump is for 20150929 compiler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52272
--- Comment #28 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Fri Nov 20 09:05:08 2015
New Revision: 230647
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230647&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/52272
* tree-ssa-loop-ivo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68435
--- Comment #8 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Yuri Rumyantsev from comment #6)
> It turned out that fresh gcc performs tail duplication (aka path splitting)
> preventing if-conversion. So I post a dump for 20150929 compiler whic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67354
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6 regression] internal |[5 regression] internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68173
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68435
--- Comment #9 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Since the provided testcase is affected by the path splitting patch, here's an
alternative testcase that exhibits the ifcvt issue even with the latest trunk.
I'll be working on this:
typedef str
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68317
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jiong Wang from comment #9)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
> > (In reply to Jiong Wang from comment #6)
> > > Created attachment 36741 [details]
> > > prototype-fix
> > >
> > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68417
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68173
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stevenb.gcc at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68455
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68454
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68453
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |tree-optimization
Target Milestone|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68445
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68438
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68436
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68446
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Hi David.
I've just verified that the invalid free is presented since introduction of
driver::finalize in r227188.
This is valgrind report coming from r230263 (one revision before the
suspected):
$ /home/ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68455
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68373
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Fri Nov 20 10:25:26 2015
New Revision: 230650
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230650&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Do final value replacement in try_create_reduction_list
2015-11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68373
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68456
Bug ID: 68456
Summary: UINT32_TYPE is long unsigned for 32bit targets
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68376
Zdenek Sojka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #8 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68409
Adrian Wielgosik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||adrian.wielgosik at gmail dot
com
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68457
Bug ID: 68457
Summary: make check RUNTESTFLAGS="--outdir=$OUT_PATH" does not
work with -j
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68409
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68409
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Adrian Wielgosik from comment #2)
> Your operator< doesn't seem to satisfy strict weak ordering. Once I rewrote
> it to a basic but safer version:
>
> bool operator< (const chave& lhs, const c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68456
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Yulia Koval from comment #0)
> This problem causes strange warnings, for example in printf("%u...", if this
> type is not overriden somewhere in the library:
> ": format '%u' expects argument o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68290
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
This issue is host-dependent, it doesn't reproduce with a cross to 64-bit
SPARC.
The problematic types are:
(gdb) p debug_tree(t1)
>
(gdb) p debug_tree(t2)
>
and they compare equal according to structur
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68339
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68339
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 36781
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36781&action=edit
gcc6-pr68339.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65701
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65660
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65908
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
Martin or Honza, can you work on a backport please?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65908
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68409
--- Comment #5 from f3rn4nd0.c354r ---
You are both clearly right. Sorry to waist your time.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68445
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu |powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68456
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68458
Bug ID: 68458
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68458
rgaveiga at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rgaveiga at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68459
Bug ID: 68459
Summary: ICE when compiling for alpha with -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68459
--- Comment #1 from dhowells at redhat dot com ---
The backtrace was obtained from a compiler built from unpatched gcc sources
produced from a gcc SVN branch with the following parameters:
SVNREV 225895
DATE 20150716
gcc_version 5.2.1
The compi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67055
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dhowells at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68459
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68456
--- Comment #3 from Yulia Koval ---
I agree, that %u usage is not a bug, but it still looks strange..
For gcc --target=i586-elf macro has:
#define __UINT32_TYPE__ long unsigned int
For non-target gcc or gcc --target=i586-unknown-linux it has:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68128
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Can't reproduce, at least not on i7-5960X (thus OMP_NUM_THREADS=16).
gcc -Ofast -fopenmp built cutcp is roughly the same performance in all of 4.6,
4.8, 5.1 and 6, the only thing that reliably helps (but only
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67822
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68413
--- Comment #9 from alahay01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: alahay01
Date: Fri Nov 20 14:20:24 2015
New Revision: 230658
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230658&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-20 Alan Hayward
PR tree-optimization/68
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68413
alahay01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68237
--- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Nov 20 14:50:35 2015
New Revision: 230661
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230661&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-20 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/68237
* decl.c (gfc_m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66762
--- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Nov 20 14:50:35 2015
New Revision: 230661
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230661&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-20 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/68237
* decl.c (gfc_m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66762
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52846
Bug 52846 depends on bug 66762, which changed state.
Bug 66762 Summary: ICE when compiling gfortran.dg/submodule_[16].f90 with -flto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66762
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68237
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68312
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 36783
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36783&action=edit
Suggested patch1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68243
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68312
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 36784
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36784&action=edit
Suggested patch2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68456
Dmitry Polukhin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmitry.polukhin at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68149
--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Fri Nov 20 15:15:31 2015
New Revision: 230663
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230663&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM] PR 68149 Fix ICE in unaligned_loaddi split
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68149
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68128
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note, even if we fix this issue, it really won't help the phoronix benchmark
results, as it (intentionally?) penalizes the code for non-Intel compilers.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68128
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55765
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68173
--- Comment #13 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #12)
> callgrind points at bitmap_set_bit called via process_bb_lives ->
> mark_regno_dead.
> Maybe some code in that (the DCE code?) can be keyed on if (optimize)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68460
Bug ID: 68460
Summary: ICE in init_stmt_vec_info_vec with -ftree-vectorize
and -ftree-parallelize-loops
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68460
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #1 from vrie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68315
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Yes. The easiest way would be to make tree-data-ref.c use it I suppose.
Hmm, Jakub's comment at https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46032#c2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68458
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67550
Jason Wyatt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jwyatt at feralinteractive dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66432
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jakub at gcc dot gnu.org |
Component|middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66432
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 36785
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36785&action=edit
gcc6-pr66432.patch
Untested fix. We actually rely on decl_debug_args being the DECL_ORIGIN, not
something simi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66432
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67226
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68438
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68458
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68269
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68461
Bug ID: 68461
Summary: make stage1-bubble all-target error: No rule to make
target `../src/c++98/libc++98convenience.la'
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68458
--- Comment #3 from rgaveiga at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2)
> > Where did you GCC?
>
> and where did you get GCC?
From Cygwin.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68269
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|target
--- Comment #5 from mrs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68458
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> > and where did you get GCC?
>
> From Cygwin.
Then you should ask them for support. As you might guess the status of this PR
is WORKSFORME for all the other gfortran users!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68448
--- Comment #4 from jkratoch at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jkratoch
Date: Fri Nov 20 19:00:51 2015
New Revision: 230669
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230669&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/68448
* python/hook.in: Call
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68448
--- Comment #5 from jkratoch at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jkratoch
Date: Fri Nov 20 19:10:12 2015
New Revision: 230670
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230670&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/68448
* python/hook.in: Call
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68448
Jan Kratochvil changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68462
Bug ID: 68462
Summary: -fno-strict-aliasing not respected
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68462
--- Comment #1 from Manjeet Dahiya ---
GCC version details:
gcc version 4.8.4 (Ubuntu 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04)
Here are the options I used:
gcc -c -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -m32 -S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68463
Bug ID: 68463
Summary: Offloading fails when some objects are compiled with
LTO and some without
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68339
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 20 19:49:47 2015
New Revision: 230671
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230671&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/68339
* omp-low.c (expand_simd_clones): Call
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68221
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 20 19:50:46 2015
New Revision: 230672
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230672&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/68221
* omp-low.c (lower_rec_input_clauses):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68339
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 20 19:57:50 2015
New Revision: 230673
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230673&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/68339
* omp-low.c (expand_simd_clones): Call
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68462
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62314
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Fri Nov 20 20:08:47 2015
New Revision: 230674
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230674&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 62314: add ability to add fixit-hints to a diagnostic
This is the c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68438
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg02536.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62314
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
I've committed support for fix-it hints within diagnostics to trunk (for gcc 6)
as r230674 (along with one trivial example of a fix-it hint in the C frontend).
Keeping this bug open, since it has lots of exa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68454
M Joshua Ryan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #36778|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68464
Bug ID: 68464
Summary: ICE in constexpr function: ../../src/gcc/tree.c:11497
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo