https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68227
--- Comment #11 from İsmail Dönmez ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #10)
> > This test currently fails on Linux x86-64 machine. Is there a way to get a
> > better debug output for the failure. For now I see:
> >
> > FAIL: gfortr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67289
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68549
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
This will take a while: 8 input files required, 46MB preprocessed code...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67289
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
I am reducing testcase. BTW it seems wasteful to build all the dwarfs we are
going to throw away for slim LTO -g. Can't we just disable the dwarf production
at slim LTO build time until early dwarf materialize
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68549
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68453
--- Comment #3 from Joost VandeVondele
---
at r230923 this testcase seems not to fail anymore. Should this be closed as
fixed (maybe after adding the testcase ?)
I ran into a new ICE however, but I'll open a PR once I have this reduced.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68549
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
My Firofox tree is quite old, too: Oct 15 2014
But it is good enough as a guinea pig for finding compiler bugs...
T_GCC=gfortran
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/data/vjoost/gnu/gcc_trunk/install/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/data/vjoost/gnu/gcc_trunk/install
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --disable-multilib --enable-plugins
--enable-l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67289
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67289
>
> --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
> I am reducing testcase. BTW it seems wastef
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #30 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
With Xcode 6.4 as, 32-bit bootstrap is now well into running the testsuite.
I've filed bug
23669324 Xcode 7 as creates relocation ld cannot handle
Rainer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68302
--- Comment #3 from Aurelien Jarno ---
I built GCC with the following options:
configure --enable-languages=c --prefix=/usr --target=mipsel-linux-gnu
--includedir=/usr/mipsel-linux-gnu/include
Then I build the file with -O2 -g -o test.o -c te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68550
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68549
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #31 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #30)
> With Xcode 6.4 as, 32-bit bootstrap is now well into running the testsuite.
>
> I've filed bug
>
> 23669324 Xcode 7 as creates relocation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68508
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 26 09:52:48 2015
New Revision: 230928
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230928&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/68508
* cp-tree.h (cp_ubsan_maybe_instrument_downca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67239
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ABI
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67226
--- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Thu Nov 26 09:58:28 2015
New Revision: 230929
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230929&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[calls.c] PR rtl-optimization/67226: Take into account pre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67876
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab ---
FAIL: g++.dg/pr67876.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20151126/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr67876.C:23:8: error:
redefinition of 'struct S'
/usr/local/gcc/gcc-20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67226
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.0 |4.9.5
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68128
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 26 10:18:50 2015
New Revision: 230932
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230932&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/68128
* tree.h (OMP_CLAUSE_SHARED_REA
#5 from David Binderman ---
Created attachment 36843
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36843&action=edit
gzipped C source code
Might be a simpler test case.
Found on gcc trunk dated 20151126. Compiler flag -O3 required.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68508
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 26 10:21:42 2015
New Revision: 230933
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230933&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/68508
* cp-tree.h (cp_ubsan_maybe_instrument_downca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68551
Bug ID: 68551
Summary: GCC 5.2 build broken on arm/rasbian
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68551
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67313
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini ---
This is already fixed, I'm adding the testcase and closing the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68508
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68551
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67313
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Nov 26 10:37:33 2015
New Revision: 230934
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230934&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-26 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/67313
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67313
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68549
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68549
--- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Rough reduction:
a;
fn1() {
int b = 0;
char *c;
unsigned d, e = &d;
for (; a; a++)
if (*c) {
char **f = &c;
lbl72855FC2:
c = b > (**f = c && b);
d = 2;
lbl4BD212AD
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67249
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini ---
This is already fixed. I'm adding the testcase and closing the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61034
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
We arrive at different final optimizations depending on PUSH_ARGS_REVERSED
(see PR67203). Current (GCC 6) final state is either 3 or 4 calls depending
on that. And this is only because the final DCE (whic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67226
--- Comment #8 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Thu Nov 26 11:36:40 2015
New Revision: 230936
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230936&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[calls.c] PR rtl-optimization/67226: Take into account pre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67226
--- Comment #9 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Thu Nov 26 11:40:16 2015
New Revision: 230937
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230937&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[calls.c] PR rtl-optimization/67226: Take into account pre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67226
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65358
Bug 65358 depends on bug 67226, which changed state.
Bug 67226 Summary: Incorrect code generated for tail call, where parameters are
structs passed by value, -O2 is used, and target is ARM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67226
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68416
--- Comment #4 from Ilya Enkovich ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #3)
> The first I thought it is a LRA inheritance bug but after more thorough
> analysis I found that the problem comes from IRA. IRA never assigns BND
> hard regis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68416
--- Comment #5 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Thu Nov 26 11:49:20 2015
New Revision: 230938
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230938&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2015-11-26 Vladimir Makarov
PR target/68416
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68249
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 26 11:52:11 2015
New Revision: 230939
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230939&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/68249
PR rtl-optimization/68321
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68321
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 26 11:52:11 2015
New Revision: 230939
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230939&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/68249
PR rtl-optimization/68321
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67203
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Nov 26 11:53:13 2015
New Revision: 230940
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230940&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-26 Richard Biener
PR testsuite/67203
* g++.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67203
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68527
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68527
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68249
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 26 11:55:14 2015
New Revision: 230941
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230941&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/68249
PR rtl-optimization/68321
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68321
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 26 11:55:14 2015
New Revision: 230941
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230941&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/68249
PR rtl-optimization/68321
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68194
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
*** Bug 68321 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68321
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68249
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68194
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
*** Bug 68249 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68527
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Nov 26 12:04:50 2015
New Revision: 230942
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230942&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/68527
* c-ada-spec.c (dump_nested_types): Add g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68527
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773
--- Comment #32 from Iain Sandoe ---
reduced testcase:
.text
.align 4,0x90
.globl _choose_tmpdir
_choose_tmpdir:
sbbl$3+_vartmp, %esi
ret
.space 254
.const
.align 2
_vartmp:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66799
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Component|tree-optimi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68552
Bug ID: 68552
Summary: [6 Regression]: ICE in in expand_expr_real_2 with -O2
-ftree-vectorize
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66799
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66799
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Nov 26 12:15:43 2015
New Revision: 230943
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230943&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-26 Richard Biener
PR testsuite/66799
* gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66678
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66598
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.5
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66379
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68416
--- Comment #6 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Thu Nov 26 12:28:57 2015
New Revision: 230945
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230945&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline r230938.
2015-11-26 Vlad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68416
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66598
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
The relevant hunk is the following but as it requires us to know the
final vectorization factor it requires us to re-order (and split)
the pipeline quite a bit. r223670 has bits of the prerequesites but not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68553
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68553
Bug ID: 68553
Summary: gcc.dg/vect/pr68445.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68554
Bug ID: 68554
Summary: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-subgroups-2.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimiz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68554
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67249
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Nov 26 13:14:45 2015
New Revision: 230947
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230947&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-26 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/67249
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 67249, which changed state.
Bug 67249 Summary: [concepts] ICE parsing f(pair)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67249
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67249
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66598
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Oh, and it needs r223798.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68555
Bug ID: 68555
Summary: [6 regression] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-10.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68555
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68556
Bug ID: 68556
Summary: [6 Regression] -r -flto test failures
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68556
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68552
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68553
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66721
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Nov 26 13:46:59 2015
New Revision: 230956
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230956&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-26 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/66721
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67323
Bug 67323 depends on bug 66721, which changed state.
Bug 66721 Summary: [6 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr61403.c FAILs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66721
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66721
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68554
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68554
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68554
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Nov 26 13:51:40 2015
New Revision: 230961
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230961&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-26 Richard Biener
PR testsuite/68554
* gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68549
alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68555
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68557
Bug ID: 68557
Summary: Missed x86 peephole optimization for multiplying by a
bool
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68555
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Nov 26 14:01:26 2015
New Revision: 230963
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230963&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-26 Richard Biener
PR testsuite/68555
* gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67037
--- Comment #8 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Thu Nov 26 14:07:55 2015
New Revision: 230964
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230964&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-26 Bernd Edlinger
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68555
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66238
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68558
Bug ID: 68558
Summary: Fails to SLP loop
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68558
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68551
James Greenhalgh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68557
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53927
--- Comment #24 from pmderodat at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: pmderodat
Date: Thu Nov 26 14:56:24 2015
New Revision: 230968
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230968&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
DWARF: fix loc. descr. generation for DW_AT_static_link
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68368
chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DUPLICATE |FIXED
--- Comment #7 from chrb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68368
chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #8 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68385
--- Comment #5 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 68368 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51509
Allan Jensen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||linux at carewolf dot com
--- Comment #6
1 - 100 of 178 matches
Mail list logo
