https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68665
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Try adding -lcygquadmath .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68064
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
Hmm, I can't make much sense of get_pointer_alignment_1 returning 0. I suppose
this happens because here:
else if (TREE_CODE (exp) == SSA_NAME
&& POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (exp)))
{
unsig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68513
--- Comment #9 from Jan Smets ---
Could you please tell me in which commit the issue was fixed. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68667
--- Comment #1 from vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to vekumar from comment #0)
> Build breaks while compiling graphite related file.
> Occurred with trunk r231212.
>
> (Snip)
> ../../gcc-fsf-trunk/gcc/graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c: In m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68667
Bug ID: 68667
Summary: GCC trunk build fails compiling
graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68556
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68560
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka ---
The reason here is that the types differ in number of parameters:
(gdb) p debug_tree (type)
>
QI
size constant 8>
unit size constant 1>
align 8 symtab 0 alias set -1 structural equality
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68666
Bug ID: 68666
Summary: [concepts] "is not a function template" using
class-scoped variable template in constraint
expression
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68009
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68640
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joseph at codesourcery dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68649
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka ---
The function is:
>
QI
size
unit size
align 8 symtab 0 alias set -1 structural equality
attributes
value >>
arg-types
chain
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68665
Bug ID: 68665
Summary: fails to link quad math functions even though
cygquadmath-0.dll is present
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: bloc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67106
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67581
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65745
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64812
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenther at suse dot de
--- Comment #12 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64919
--- Comment #20 from Alexander ---
I have no issue to build it now.
Only important thing that is sed must be GNU.
(can check it in config.log)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66004
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
HP, I think I need bit more analysis here. Do you know what inline decision
actually causes the trouble?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65982
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka ---
I am testing:
Index: symtab.c
===
--- symtab.c(revision 231216)
+++ symtab.c(working copy)
@@ -1650,7 +1650,7 @@ symtab_node::get_partitio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66394
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66616
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
Martin, this is your area, can you take a look?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67548
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6 Regression] LTO drops |[5 Regression] LTO drops
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68184
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5/6 Regression]|[4.9/5 Regression]
|Exce
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68661
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68184
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Thu Dec 3 04:13:33 2015
New Revision: 231217
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231217&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/68184
* g++.dg/torture/pr68184.C: New testcase.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68645
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68659
--- Comment #2 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I will have a look.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68644
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2015-12-02, at 5:20 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Please attach ivopts-details-scev dumps.
Attached.
--
John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68640
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57580
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 2 23:53:43 2015
New Revision: 231213
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231213&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR preprocessor/57580
* c-ppoutput.c (print): Change print
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68664
Bug ID: 68664
Summary: PowerPC: speculative sqrt in c-ray main loop causes
large slow down
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66054
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68550
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68656
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68657
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68663
Bug ID: 68663
Summary: Build failure on AIX 7.1
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68600
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
> I took the example code found in
> http://wiki.cs.utexas.edu/rvdg/HowToOptimizeGemm/ where the register based
> vector computations are explicitly called via the SSE registers and
> converted it to use the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68550
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop ---
Author: spop
Date: Wed Dec 2 20:40:17 2015
New Revision: 231206
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231206&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
fix PR68550: do not handle ISL loop peeled statements
In case ISL did some
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66949
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68662
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka ---
That looks like (latent?) bug in the target asm output - we should not produce
invalid asm based on visibility changes. I will see if I can reproduce it on
gcc compile farm.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63861
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68513
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68513
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Dec 2 20:01:37 2015
New Revision: 231205
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231205&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/68513
* gcc.dg/pr68513.c: New test.
Added:
tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67337
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63861
--- Comment #13 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Wed Dec 2 19:59:27 2015
New Revision: 231204
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231204&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/
PR fortran/63861
* openmp.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67337
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Author: trippels
Date: Wed Dec 2 19:57:55 2015
New Revision: 231203
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231203&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix c++/67337 (segfault in mangle.c)
PR c++/67337
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68647
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68662
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||67548
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68662
Bug ID: 68662
Summary: [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090210
c_lto_20090210_0.o-c_lto_20090210_1.o link, -O2 -flto
-flto-partition=none -fuse-linker-plugin
-fno-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68647
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 2 19:39:11 2015
New Revision: 231201
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231201&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/68647
* optabs.c (expand_doubleword_popcount, ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68653
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65534
--- Comment #3 from Bernhard Reutner-Fischer ---
(In reply to Bernhard Reutner-Fischer from comment #2)
> (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #1)
> > > #ifndef OPTIMIZE_MANUALLY
> > > void setutent(void) {
> > > ((void)0);
> > > __setut
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68653
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Dec 2 19:29:17 2015
New Revision: 231200
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231200&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/68653
* tree.c (nonnull_arg_p): Allow OFFSET_TYP
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66054
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66147
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66147
--- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Dec 2 19:27:58 2015
New Revision: 231199
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231199&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
./:
PR go/66147
* Makefile.tpl (HOST_EXPORTS): Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64919
--- Comment #19 from The Written Word
---
The latest linker patch for HP-UX 11.23/IA is PHSS_44401 and the latest for
HP-UX 11.31/IA is PHSS_44402. Both are dated 2015/10/24.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68162
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6 Regression]|[5 Regression] Incompatible
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68162
--- Comment #15 from Joseph S. Myers ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Wed Dec 2 18:24:23 2015
New Revision: 231194
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231194&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT construction for arrays of qualified typedefs (PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68661
Bug ID: 68661
Summary: __attribute__ ((no_caller_saved_registers)) trashes
stack
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32415
Hugues de Lassus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||huguesdelassus at hotmail dot
fr
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68638
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68653
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65654
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka ---
> It was made P1 to make you fix it during stage1 of GCC 6 ;)
Yep, I even made patch in last P3 for turning to sreals, but then did not have
time to pull it out.
I will look it up - it needed some changes to ge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64868
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68550
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68193
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Yes, so this would be somehow tied to c_inhibit_evaluation_warnings as in we
warn for
0 ? foo () : 2;
if foo() wasn't declared but not for the div-by-zero here:
0 ? 1 / 0 : 2;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63861
--- Comment #12 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #11)
> (In reply to cesar from comment #10)
> > Thanks for reducing this Dominique. I'm not sure what caused the ICE yet, I
> > don't think this test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68550
--- Comment #2 from Joost VandeVondele
---
The following simpler looking testcase fails at -O1:
> cat bug.f90
SUBROUTINE PD2VAL(RES,NDERIV,TG1,TG2,C0)
INTEGER, PARAMETER :: dp=8
REAL(KIND=dp), INTENT(OUT) :: res(*)
REAL(KIND=dp),
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68660
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68660
--- Comment #2 from Leo Yuriev ---
Hm, it is a devel-status of 5.3, not 5.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68290
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63914
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68193
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
I agree delaying warnings would help, but you'd need to distinguish
warnings relating to execution of the code that should be disabled in
unevaluated code from warnings that should always b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68290
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Dec 2 16:41:02 2015
New Revision: 231189
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231189&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/68290
* constraint.cc (make_constrained_auto):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68193
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
I think some kind of delayed warning could help (so parse expressions and print
possible warnings to some "printer" and then print warnings from this "printer"
only for the association that matched). Because
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68660
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57580
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68599
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Patch posted, waiting on review.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68637
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
Run-time test:
[hjl@gnu-6 pr68637]$ cat x.i
extern void (*bar[]) (int, int) __attribute__ ((regparm (2)));
void
foo (void)
{
bar[0] (1, 2);
}
[hjl@gnu-6 pr68637]$ cat main.i
static void
__attribute__ ((regparm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68660
Bug ID: 68660
Summary: "5.2" instead of "5.3" on the main page at
https://gcc.gnu.org/
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68620
--- Comment #1 from Christophe Lyon ---
The problem happens when trying to extract subregs from V4HF.
On big-endian, CANNOT_CHANGE_MODE_CLASS returns 1, which at some point makes
xpart = operand_subword (x, i, 1, mode); (in emit_move_multi_word)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68636
--- Comment #2 from Jan Smets ---
The vreg pass is different
OLD
ode_label 16 9 17 6 2 "" [1 uses])
(note 17 16 18 6 [bb 6] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK)
(insn 18 17 0 6 (set (mem/v:SI (reg/f:SI 194 [ iftmp$0 ]) [2 *iftmp$0_1+0 S4
A32])
(const
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68658
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63861
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Schwinge ---
(In reply to cesar from comment #10)
> Thanks for reducing this Dominique. I'm not sure what caused the ICE yet, I
> don't think this test case is valid anymore.
But still shouldn't result in an ICE.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68641
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #13 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68659
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68659
Bug ID: 68659
Summary: [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/id-pr45230-1.c
(internal compiler error)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68653
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63861
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68658
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68658
Bug ID: 68658
Summary: [6 Regression] LTO - bogus redefinition of warning
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68654
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Interesting the only effect could be different GC allocation pattern because
the non-splice variant may end up re-allocating the target vector multiple
times. But this alone should never change code generat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56383
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Dec 2 15:08:18 2015
New Revision: 231181
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231181&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix ambiguity with multiple enable_shared_from_this bases
PR lib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68657
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56383
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.3 |4.9.4
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68655
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67778
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68634
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68603
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 187 matches
Mail list logo
