https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39772
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Summary|add a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66735
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68609
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68609
--- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn ---
Author: dje
Date: Sat Dec 5 12:53:45 2015
New Revision: 231317
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231317=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/68609
* config/rs6000/rs6000-protos.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68716
Bug ID: 68716
Summary: libgomp c.exp with -fipa-pta failures
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68718
Bug ID: 68718
Summary: libgomp c.exp with -fipa-pta hang in sort-1.c
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68560
--- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Looks like it's PR68540.
So it should work now?
The statement in fortran/trans-intrinsic.c
gfc_copy_formal_args_intr (sym, expr->value.function.isym,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55916
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot
ethz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67068
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
For openmpi-1.10.0 and trunk (6.0) compiling examples/hello_mpifh.f with
-freal-4-real-8 gives
mpif-sizeof.h:575:72:
Error: Ambiguous interfaces 'mpi_sizeof_real64_r7' and 'mpi_sizeof_real32_r7'
in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68705
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68652
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68717
Bug ID: 68717
Summary: [6 Regression] New (bogus?) warnings when compiling
some gfortran.dg tests with -flto after r231239
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68458
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68719
Bug ID: 68719
Summary: [concepts] placeholder deduction doesn't work for
member functions
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34883
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35567
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35793
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38009
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37956
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38332
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40310
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40285
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68711
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39756
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ---
On which platform exactly? I have never seen it...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68723
Bug ID: 68723
Summary: ice in pop_nested_namespace, at cp/name-lookup.c:3816
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68727
Bug ID: 68727
Summary: [4.9 regression] invalid offsetof expressions accepted
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68729
Bug ID: 68729
Summary: ../Xbae/Methods.c:1772:1: ICE: in extract_insn, at
recog.c:2343
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36638
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36619
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37110
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37620
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37619
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36638
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2015-12-05, at 11:44 AM, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Is this still a problem?
I haven't checked recently. The breakage in PR 60403 broke build.
--
John David Anglin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38327
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38974
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68713
Dâniel Fraga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20896
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #17 from Jerry
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52251
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38325
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39756
--- Comment #8 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
It fails on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11. See for example:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-12/msg00395.html
--
John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35796
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35984
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36785
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37618
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68721
Bug ID: 68721
Summary: wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68676
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sat Dec 5 17:10:33 2015
New Revision: 231319
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231319=gcc=rev
Log:
2015-12-05 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/68676
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38329
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38349
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38229
--- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2015-12-05, at 12:14 PM, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Is this still a problem?
It is no longer a problem on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11.
--
John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39160
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40185
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68722
Bug ID: 68722
Summary: internal compiler error: in
merge_exception_specifiers, at cp/typeck2.c:2108
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39793
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40025
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40933
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40936
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40984
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41286
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41854
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42073
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41416
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35372
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35880
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68560
--- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> > The statement in fortran/trans-intrinsic.c
> >
> > gfc_copy_formal_args_intr (sym, expr->value.function.isym,
> > ignore_optional ? expr->value.function.actual
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68712
Steven Stewart-Gallus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
Resolution|MOVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35919
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35920
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50201
--- Comment #16 from Steve Kargl ---
On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 08:13:25AM +, jouko.orava at iki dot fi wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50201
>
> --- Comment #14 from Jouko Orava ---
> (In reply to Steve Kargl from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37252
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37602
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37796
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38330
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38493
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68676
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38511
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40929
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40931
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40932
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39290
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot
ethz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41416
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41845
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38325
--- Comment #4 from Bechir Zalila ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #3)
> Is this still a problem?
Sorry, I no longer have access to a FreeBSD machine to check this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68724
Bug ID: 68724
Summary: ice in unify, at cp/pt.c:19902
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68726
Bug ID: 68726
Summary: ice: tree check: expected tree_vec, have error_mark in
comp_template_args_with_info, at cp/pt.c:7890
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68728
Bug ID: 68728
Summary: ice: unexpected expression ‘(const char*)__s’ of kind
implicit_conv_expr
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68560
--- Comment #13 from Mikael Morin ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #12)
> The statement in fortran/trans-intrinsic.c
>
> gfc_copy_formal_args_intr (sym, expr->value.function.isym,
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68720
Bug ID: 68720
Summary: Build failure on AIX 5.2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34598
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36678
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68560
--- Comment #15 from Mikael Morin ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #14)
> > > The statement in fortran/trans-intrinsic.c
> > >
> > > gfc_copy_formal_args_intr (sym, expr->value.function.isym,
> > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38325
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38229
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68560
--- Comment #16 from Mikael Morin ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #15)
> (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #12)
> > > Looks like it's PR68540.
> >
> > So it should work now?
> >
> I have yet to find the best way to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38315
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38882
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38874
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39174
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39756
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41041
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39756
--- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
Yes.
--
John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net
1 - 100 of 212 matches
Mail list logo