[Bug c++/68810] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-reinterpret1.C -- test for errors -- -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68810 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/59832] [c++11] ICE in reshape_init_class with initializer list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59832 --- Comment #11 from Paul Pluzhnikov --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #10) > Patches are welcome. Yes, I know. As I lamented in comment #7, I don't know enough GCC internals to take this on.

[Bug c++/59832] [c++11] ICE in reshape_init_class with initializer list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59832 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug middle-end/68215] [6 regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/opaque-vector.c -std=c++11 (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68215 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc-*-* |powerpc-*-* sparc-*-* Status

[Bug inline-asm/68843] ICE with "u" input constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68843 David changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gccbugzilla@limegreensocks. |

[Bug fortran/68649] [6 Regression] note: code may be misoptimized unless -fno-strict-aliasing is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68649 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug lto/68820] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/memops-asm.c execution, -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68820 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug rtl-optimization/67778] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2297

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67778 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/67778] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2297

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67778 --- Comment #14 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Fri Dec 11 00:27:14 2015 New Revision: 231552 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231552&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix shrink-wrapping bug (PR67778, PR68634) After shrink-wrapping h

[Bug target/68634] [6 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2284 w/ -O2 -fmodulo-sched

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68634 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Fri Dec 11 00:27:14 2015 New Revision: 231552 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231552&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix shrink-wrapping bug (PR67778, PR68634) After shrink-wrapping ha

[Bug rtl-optimization/68814] [6 regression] gcc.dg/pr63594-2.c fails since r226005

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68814 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/61886] [4.9/5/6 Regression] LTO breaks fread with _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #52 from Jan Hubicka

[Bug rtl-optimization/68814] [6 regression] gcc.dg/pr63594-2.c fails since r226005

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68814 --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Revision: 231547 Modified property: svn:log Modified: svn:log at Thu Dec 10 23:57:54 2015 -- --- svn:log (origi

[Bug lto/61886] [4.9/5/6 Regression] LTO breaks fread with _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886 --- Comment #51 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Thu Dec 10 23:57:15 2015 New Revision: 231548 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231548&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR ipa/61886 * lto-symtab.c (lto_symtab_merge_p): Avoid m

[Bug c++/67550] [5/6 regression] Initialization of local struct array with elements of global array yields zeros instead of initializer values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67550 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug middle-end/68733] [6 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.c/target-29.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68733 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2015-12-10, at 12:31 PM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Has OpenMP ever worked on PA? Likely not. Although the issue is not exposed in the libgomp for earlier gcc versions, I came across

[Bug target/68779] [5.3 Regression] HPPA/PARISC 32-bit Linux kernel build triggers multiple ICEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68779 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug target/66551] [SPARC64] Fails to bootstrap in stage 3 with linker error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66551 --- Comment #4 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- Hi! (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #3) > Did you retry with a more recent version? What's the linker error exactly? Sorry for not reporting back. This issue seems to have been resolve

[Bug c/68845] -Werror=array-bounds=[12] doesn't turn warning into error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68845 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at redhat dot com --- Commen

[Bug rtl-optimization/68670] [4.9 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68376-2.c FAILs with -ftracer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68670 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.0 Summary|[4.9/5/6 Regressi

[Bug c/68845] -Werror=array-bounds=[12] doesn't turn warning into error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68845 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug rtl-optimization/68670] [4.9/5/6 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68376-2.c FAILs with -ftracer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68670 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Dec 10 22:29:12 2015 New Revision: 231546 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231546&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/68376 PR rtl-optimization/68670

[Bug rtl-optimization/68376] [4.9 Regression] wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68376 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Dec 10 22:29:12 2015 New Revision: 231546 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231546&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/68376 PR rtl-optimization/68670

[Bug ada/68849] New: Bug box when using a type with static predicate as formal parameter of generic procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68849 Bug ID: 68849 Summary: Bug box when using a type with static predicate as formal parameter of generic procedure Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/66305] -ffat-lto-objects create unreproducible objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66305 Daniel Kahn Gillmor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dkg at fifthhorseman dot net --- C

[Bug debug/68848] New: allow -fdebug-prefix-map to read OLD prefix from environment (improve reproducibility)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68848 Bug ID: 68848 Summary: allow -fdebug-prefix-map to read OLD prefix from environment (improve reproducibility) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/59832] [c++11] ICE in reshape_init_class with initializer list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59832 --- Comment #9 from Paul Pluzhnikov --- Still broken on trunk @r231541. Closing on 2 years now.

[Bug tree-optimization/68775] spec2006 test case 465.tonto fails with the gcc 6.0 fortran compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68775 --- Comment #6 from William Seurer --- Sorry, I wasn't very clear there. I was adding options to the default set. Compiling as-is using the default options the run will fail. Adding -fno-tree-loop-vectorize the run will fail. Adding -fno-tree

[Bug target/66551] [SPARC64] Fails to bootstrap in stage 3 with linker error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66551 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou --- Did you retry with a more recent version? What's the linker error exactly?

[Bug c++/68449] [5/6 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_constant_expression on atomic_load in C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68449 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug c++/68847] New: [6 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_constant_expression on __atomic_compare_exchange (constexpr.c:3719) in c++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68847 Bug ID: 68847 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_constant_expression on __atomic_compare_exchange (constexpr.c:3719) in c++ Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNC

[Bug target/68543] [AArch64] Implement overflow arithmetic standard names {u,}{add,sub,mul}v4 and/or negv3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68543 --- Comment #2 from Michael Collison --- Great idea I will look into this. On 12/10/2015 4:02 AM, ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68543 > > --- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- > M

[Bug fortran/68846] New: Pointer function as LValue doesn't work when the assignment regards a dummy argument.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68846 Bug ID: 68846 Summary: Pointer function as LValue doesn't work when the assignment regards a dummy argument. Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug middle-end/47344] [4.9/5/6 Regression][meta-bug] GCC gets slower and uses more memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47344 Bug 47344 depends on bug 61515, which changed state. Bug 61515 Summary: [4.9 Regression] Extremely long compile time for generated code https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61515 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/46590] long compile time with -O2 and many loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46590 --- Comment #46 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Thu Dec 10 19:40:23 2015 New Revision: 231542 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231542&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/61515 PR tree-optimization/46590

[Bug tree-optimization/46590] long compile time with -O2 and many loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46590 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #47 f

[Bug tree-optimization/46590] long compile time with -O2 and many loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46590 Bug 46590 depends on bug 61515, which changed state. Bug 61515 Summary: [4.9 Regression] Extremely long compile time for generated code https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61515 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/61515] [4.9 Regression] Extremely long compile time for generated code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61515 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/61515] [4.9 Regression] Extremely long compile time for generated code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61515 --- Comment #33 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Thu Dec 10 19:40:23 2015 New Revision: 231542 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231542&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/61515 PR tree-optimization/46590

[Bug c/68839] [6 regression] ICE in contains_point at diagnostic-show-locus.c:340

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68839 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug inline-asm/68843] ICE with "u" input constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68843 --- Comment #2 from Bernd Edlinger --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #1) > There are several non-intuitive rules that one has to follow to avoid ICEs > with x87 asm operands. Just don't go down that path, there is only pain and > suffer.

[Bug c/68473] [6 Regression] ICE: in contains_point, at diagnostic-show-locus.c:340 after error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68473 --- Comment #8 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to Jay Foad from comment #6) > FYI here's another test case that seems to trigger the same bug. Your > candidate patch fixes it. > > $ cat x.c > #define P(b) b&&4 > int a[]=0; > int f() { X||P(d);

[Bug tree-optimization/68840] Wrong code in loop optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68840 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/68840] Wrong code in loop optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68840 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson --- Your program invokes undefined behaviour by running off the end of that array. Your loop termination condition is off by one. It's also the wrong way around: you must check the index before indexing the

[Bug c/68845] New: -Werror=array-bounds=[12] doesn't turn warning into error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68845 Bug ID: 68845 Summary: -Werror=array-bounds=[12] doesn't turn warning into error Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug inline-asm/68843] ICE with "u" input constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68843 --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak --- There are several non-intuitive rules that one has to follow to avoid ICEs with x87 asm operands. Just don't go down that path, there is only pain and suffer.

[Bug tree-optimization/68835] [5/6 Regression] ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:387, with __int128 bit field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68835 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Assig

[Bug c/68833] [6 Regression] -Werror=format issues an error now

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68833 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/68833] [6 Regression] -Werror=format issues an error now

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68833 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0 Summary|-Werror=format

[Bug tree-optimization/68844] [6 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-thread-4.c fails since r228306

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68844 --- Comment #1 from Bill Schmidt --- Created attachment 36987 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36987&action=edit dom1 dump from r228306

[Bug tree-optimization/68844] New: [6 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-thread-4.c fails since r228306

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68844 Bug ID: 68844 Summary: [6 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-thread-4.c fails since r228306 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug inline-asm/68843] New: ICE with "u" input constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68843 Bug ID: 68843 Summary: ICE with "u" input constraint Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: inline-asm

[Bug rtl-optimization/68691] ICE at -O3 with -g enabled on x86_64-linux-gnu in alter_subregs, at lra-spills.c:610 (in 32-bit mode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68691 --- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Thu Dec 10 18:00:47 2015 New Revision: 231538 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231538&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-12-10 Vladimir Makarov PR rtl-optimization/68691

[Bug c++/68842] New: Better error output when template needed before dependent name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68842 Bug ID: 68842 Summary: Better error output when template needed before dependent name Product: gcc Version: 4.8.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/68841] New: [6 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr59358.c FAILs with custom compiler flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68841 Bug ID: 68841 Summary: [6 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr59358.c FAILs with custom compiler flags Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: w

[Bug middle-end/68733] [6 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.c/target-29.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68733 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/68619] [6 Regression] error: loop with header 6 not in loop tree

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68619 --- Comment #7 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Thu Dec 10 17:14:07 2015 New Revision: 231532 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231532&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/68619 * graphite-scop-detecti

[Bug rtl-optimization/64818] User specified register don't work correctly in inline-asm operands.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64818 --- Comment #3 from Tejas Belagod --- Author: belagod Date: Thu Dec 10 17:13:47 2015 New Revision: 231531 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231531&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ChangeLog.arm: 2015-12-10 Tejas Belagod Backport from Mainli

[Bug tree-optimization/61515] [4.9 Regression] Extremely long compile time for generated code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61515 --- Comment #32 from Jeffrey A. Law --- That patch ought to be trivial to backport to 4.9. I just never considered it that much of a priority. I'll do a bootstrap/regression test on 4.9 and commit it.

[Bug target/68701] [4.9/5/6 Regression] "gcc -m32 -finstrument-functions -ffixed-ebp" produces internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68701 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/68701] [4.9/5/6 Regression] "gcc -m32 -finstrument-functions -ffixed-ebp" produces internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68701 --- Comment #14 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Thu Dec 10 16:42:05 2015 New Revision: 231528 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231528&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from mainline 2015-12-08 Uros Bizjak

[Bug target/68701] [4.9/5/6 Regression] "gcc -m32 -finstrument-functions -ffixed-ebp" produces internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68701 --- Comment #15 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Thu Dec 10 16:43:49 2015 New Revision: 231529 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231529&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from mainline 2015-12-08 Uros Bizjak

[Bug tree-optimization/68619] [6 Regression] error: loop with header 6 not in loop tree

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68619 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/68619] [6 Regression] error: loop with header 6 not in loop tree

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68619 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Thu Dec 10 16:34:43 2015 New Revision: 231527 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231527&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-12-10 Jeff Law PR tree-optimization/68619 * tree-s

[Bug tree-optimization/68840] New: Wrong code in loop optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68840 Bug ID: 68840 Summary: Wrong code in loop optimization Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug c/68839] [6 regression] ICE in contains_point at diagnostic-show-locus.c:340

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68839 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- The patch from comment 5 on bug 68473 fixes the ICE.

[Bug c/68473] [6 Regression] ICE: in contains_point, at diagnostic-show-locus.c:340 after error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68473 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug c/68839] [6 regression] ICE in contains_point at diagnostic-show-locus.c:340

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68839 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/68839] New: [6 regression] ICE in contains_point at diagnostic-show-locus.c:340

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68839 Bug ID: 68839 Summary: [6 regression] ICE in contains_point at diagnostic-show-locus.c:340 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/68376] [4.9 Regression] wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68376 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Dec 10 16:11:49 2015 New Revision: 231526 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231526&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/68376 PR rtl-optimization/68670

[Bug rtl-optimization/68670] [4.9/5/6 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68376-2.c FAILs with -ftracer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68670 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Dec 10 16:11:49 2015 New Revision: 231526 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231526&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/68376 PR rtl-optimization/68670

[Bug middle-end/68697] [6 regression] CHKP] Many vararg-*.c tests fail (bounds violation is not detected)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68697 Ilya Enkovich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/68730] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 32-bit mode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68730 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/63469] Automatic reallocation of allocatable scalar length even when substring implicitly specified

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63469 zmi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zmi007 at gmail dot com --- Comment #4 from zmi -

[Bug libstdc++/68825] testsuite/experimental/memory/shared_ptr/cons/copy_ctor_neg.cc fails to compile on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68825 --- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt --- Thanks, Jonathan!

[Bug c++/68348] [6 regression] ICE: segfault in cxx_eval_constant_expression at cp/constexpr.c:3172

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68348 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/68348] [6 regression] ICE: segfault in cxx_eval_constant_expression at cp/constexpr.c:3172

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68348 --- Comment #14 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu Dec 10 15:45:49 2015 New Revision: 231524 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231524&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/68348 * g++.dg/cpp0x/pr68348.C: New test. Adde

[Bug libstdc++/68838] AIX 32 bit wchar_t testsuite failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68838 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/68838] New: AIX 32 bit wchar_t testsuite failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68838 Bug ID: 68838 Summary: AIX 32 bit wchar_t testsuite failures Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug target/68837] PowerPC switch statement performance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68837 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/68837] New: PowerPC switch statement performance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68837 Bug ID: 68837 Summary: PowerPC switch statement performance Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug libstdc++/68825] testsuite/experimental/memory/shared_ptr/cons/copy_ctor_neg.cc fails to compile on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68825 --- Comment #3 from Fan You --- Yes. I was mean to do compile only test! Thanks for fixing this!!

[Bug libstdc++/68825] testsuite/experimental/memory/shared_ptr/cons/copy_ctor_neg.cc fails to compile on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68825 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/68825] testsuite/experimental/memory/shared_ptr/cons/copy_ctor_neg.cc fails to compile on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68825 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Thu Dec 10 14:32:16 2015 New Revision: 231516 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231516&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix dejagnu directives in shared_ptr test PR libstdc++/68825

[Bug ada/48013] generic instantiation breaks the No_Elaboration_Code restriction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48013 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ada/48013] generic instantiation breaks the No_Elaboration_Code restriction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48013 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Thu Dec 10 14:20:50 2015 New Revision: 231515 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231515&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR ada/48013 * gcc-interface/trans.c (empty_stmt_list_

[Bug tree-optimization/68835] [5/6 Regression] ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:387, with __int128 bit field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68835 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/68835] [5/6 Regression] ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:387, with __int128 bit field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68835 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #4) > Because in set_value_range_to_nonnegative the type is > and its TYPE_MAX_VALUE is -1. Huh? I think that's just a lack of debug printing being able to handle 9

[Bug tree-optimization/58135] [x86] Missed opportunities for partial SLP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58135 vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/61515] [4.9 Regression] Extremely long compile time for generated code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61515 --- Comment #31 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Bernd Schmidt from comment #30) > Can this be closed? The reduced testcase currently compiles in slightly over > a minute with -O2 and -Os. Not great, but good enough maybe? On the 4.9 branch?

[Bug tree-optimization/61171] vectorization fails for a reduction in presence of subtraction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61171 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- it's a matter of association being "unfortunate" or vector reduction detection being too simplistic. # prephitmp_21 = PHI ... _2 = pretmp_18 + prephitmp_21; _9 = _2 - _6; needs to be associated as

[Bug bootstrap/17601] gcc/Makefile.in: Setting up XX_FOR_TARGET does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17601 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/68832] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/alias-2.c -O1 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68832 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|aarch64-*-* |aarch64-*-*, arm*-*-* --- C

[Bug tree-optimization/58135] [x86] Missed opportunities for partial SLP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58135 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- which would kind-of automagically work if we just delay that "unrolling" check (that's of course somewhat expensive). There are more group splitting improvement possibilities.

[Bug tree-optimization/58135] [x86] Missed opportunities for partial SLP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58135 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Should be handled via the code we already have for splitting groups into vector-sized pieces.

[Bug middle-end/68832] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/alias-2.c -O1 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68832 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/61515] [4.9 Regression] Extremely long compile time for generated code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61515 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug tree-optimization/68817] [6 regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program f951)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68817 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/68817] [6 regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program f951)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68817 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Dec 10 13:23:22 2015 New Revision: 231508 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231508&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-12-10 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/68817

[Bug target/67484] options-save.c sanitizer asan detects freed storage referenced heap-use-after-free

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67484 --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška --- I've just triggered regression tests with Richard's suggested change: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-09/msg01154.html

  1   2   >