[Bug libstdc++/68880] New: [4.9 Regression][Bisected to r202992] std::operator< overload ignored when using std::lower_bound

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68880 Bug ID: 68880 Summary: [4.9 Regression][Bisected to r202992] std::operator< overload ignored when using std::lower_bound Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libfortran/68867] numeric formatting problem in the fortran library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68867 --- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle --- A Patch has been submitted for approval. https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-12/msg00080.html

[Bug target/68865] [6 regression] gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-2.c fails since r231165

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68865 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anton at samba dot org --- Comment

[Bug target/68879] PowerPC: SImode cstore optimisation produces bad code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68879 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/68879] New: PowerPC: SImode cstore optimisation produces bad code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68879 Bug ID: 68879 Summary: PowerPC: SImode cstore optimisation produces bad code Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug sanitizer/68418] ubsan complains about left shifts even with -fwrapv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68418 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Bonzini --- Author: bonzini Date: Sat Dec 12 08:29:27 2015 New Revision: 231582 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231582=gcc=rev Log: gcc: PR sanitizer/68418 * c-family/c-ubsan.c

[Bug ipa/68871] New: fipa-pta tracks function-level nonlocal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68871 Bug ID: 68871 Summary: fipa-pta tracks function-level nonlocal Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: ipa

[Bug lto/68799] lto ICE on powerpc64le-linux-gnu builing python 2.7.x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68799 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Klose --- > Matthias, can you please incorporate th3 debug patch > from the previous comment into your source done.

[Bug middle-end/68870] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68870 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/68867] numeric formatting problem in the fortran library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68867 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Removing the comment gives: > > 3 39 0.6919E-0001 > In the test case, I need to adjust the line; > > if (astring(2:2) /= '9') then > > to: > > if

[Bug other/68875] Add pass parameter to TERMINATE_PASS_LIST

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68875 --- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- ok-ed for stage1: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg01305.html

[Bug other/68875] New: Add pass parameter to TERMINATE_PASS_LIST

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68875 Bug ID: 68875 Summary: Add pass parameter to TERMINATE_PASS_LIST Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug libstdc++/68869] map::insert(P&&) broken in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68869 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/67781] Wrong code generated on mips32 with -O1 -fexpensive-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67781 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com ---

[Bug other/68874] New: Allow pass groups to be cloned

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68874 Bug ID: 68874 Summary: Allow pass groups to be cloned Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug other/68874] Allow pass groups to be cloned

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68874 --- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 37009 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37009=edit tentative patch This tentative patch introduces a prev variable (maintained in NEXT_PASS) and uses that to

[Bug target/68872] New: -mcpu=powerpc64le does not pass -mpower8 to gas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68872 Bug ID: 68872 Summary: -mcpu=powerpc64le does not pass -mpower8 to gas Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug other/68873] New: excessive duplicate checking during build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68873 Bug ID: 68873 Summary: excessive duplicate checking during build Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug tree-optimization/67781] Wrong code generated on mips32 with -O1 -fexpensive-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67781 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson --- m68k is also affected, so it looks like all big-endian targets have this bug: --- shift.s-m68k-r2108422015-12-12 18:50:53.358503028 +0100 +++ shift.s-m68k-r2108432015-12-12

[Bug libfortran/68867] numeric formatting problem in the fortran library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68867 --- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #8) > > I doubt that will fix the problem: it seems related to to a rounding issue > with REAL(16). Which REAL(16) is used? "IBM" one or float_128? True, it

[Bug rtl-optimization/67477] [6 Regression] ICE in cselib_record_set, at cselib.c:2388

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67477 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- The ICE has been on (insn 105 746 971 5 (parallel [ (set (reg:V16QI 60 d22 [720]) (unspec:V16QI [ (reg:V16QI 60 d22 [720])

[Bug tree-optimization/68714] [6 Regression] less folding of vector comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68714 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug rtl-optimization/67477] [6 Regression] ICE in cselib_record_set, at cselib.c:2388

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67477 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/68876] New: Segmentation fault with variadic templates, std::forward and decltype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68876 Bug ID: 68876 Summary: Segmentation fault with variadic templates, std::forward and decltype Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical

[Bug c++/68876] Segmentation fault with variadic templates, std::forward and decltype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68876 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/67247] ICE on std::forward args&& inside nested lambda function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67247 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vittorio.romeo at outlook dot com

[Bug tree-optimization/67781] Wrong code generated on mips32 with -O1 -fexpensive-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67781 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thomas.preudhomme at arm dot com

[Bug c/42979] OpenMP #pragma omp taskwait after a label is not permitted - should fail at compile time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42979 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/67781] [5/6 Regression] Wrong code generated on mips32 with -O1 -fexpensive-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67781 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/68815] Error/warning diagnostic: '%s' should be converted to %qs-like or %<%s%>-like string strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68815 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus --- Author: burnus Date: Sat Dec 12 18:55:25 2015 New Revision: 231584 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231584=gcc=rev Log: 2014-12-12 Tobias Burnus gcc/c-family/ PR

[Bug middle-end/68878] [6 Regression] 471.omnetpp in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68878 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug fortran/68743] FAIL: gfortran.dg/aint_anint_1.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68743 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2015-12-07, at 5:58 PM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > Could you > please investigate what is wrong with your libs? There is a problem with the call to floor in the floorf function at

[Bug boehm-gc/66848] boehm-gc fails test suite on x86_64-apple-darwin15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66848 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/45859] [Coarray, F2008, IR] Rejects valid actuals to coarray dummies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45859 --- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus --- Author: burnus Date: Sat Dec 12 19:00:32 2015 New Revision: 231585 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231585=gcc=rev Log: 2014-12-12 Tobias Burnus gcc/fortran PR fortran/45859

[Bug libstdc++/68877] swap for multidimensional array of int ill-formed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68877 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/68877] [6 Regression] swap for multidimensional array of int ill-formed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68877 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse --- I suggest (this is not a joke) that the right fix is to implement noexcept(auto) as an extension (possibly available only in system headers for now), and use it inside the library.

[Bug libstdc++/68877] New: swap for multidimensional array of int ill-formed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68877 Bug ID: 68877 Summary: swap for multidimensional array of int ill-formed Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug bootstrap/68873] excessive duplicate checking during build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68873 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|other |bootstrap Severity|normal

[Bug middle-end/68878] New: [6 Regression] 471.omnetpp in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68878 Bug ID: 68878 Summary: [6 Regression] 471.omnetpp in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled with LTO Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/68877] [6 Regression] swap for multidimensional array of int ill-formed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68877 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0 Summary|swap for

[Bug fortran/68743] FAIL: gfortran.dg/aint_anint_1.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68743 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > floorf (x=42.708, > x@entry= (257).>) > at ../../../gcc/libgfortran/intrinsics/c99_functions.c:293 AFAIU #ifndef HAVE_FLOORF #define

[Bug fortran/68864] [6 Regression] ICE: in gfc_get_descriptor_dimension, at fortran/trans-array.c:268

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68864 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/68744] FAIL: gfortran.dg/backtrace_1.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68744 --- Comment #7 from John David Anglin --- Created attachment 37012 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37012=edit Patch I don't expect this to work but it points at the problem. The call to backtrace_create_state() assumes

[Bug middle-end/68878] [6 Regression] 471.omnetpp in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68878 Mikhail Maltsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/68878] [6 Regression] 471.omnetpp in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68878 --- Comment #3 from Mikhail Maltsev --- Created attachment 37013 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37013=edit cSimpleModule ctor before transformation - good revision

[Bug middle-end/68878] [6 Regression] 471.omnetpp in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68878 --- Comment #4 from Mikhail Maltsev --- Created attachment 37014 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37014=edit cSimpleModule ctor after transformation - good revision

[Bug middle-end/68878] [6 Regression] 471.omnetpp in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68878 --- Comment #5 from Mikhail Maltsev --- Created attachment 37015 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37015=edit cSimpleModule ctor before transformation - bad revision Almost identical to "good revision"

[Bug middle-end/68878] [6 Regression] 471.omnetpp in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68878 --- Comment #6 from Mikhail Maltsev --- Created attachment 37016 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37016=edit cSimpleModule ctor after transformation - bad revision Note that lots of code is removed and we fall through BB4 to

[Bug middle-end/68878] [6 Regression] 471.omnetpp in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68878 --- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka --- Looks like a result of redirection to builtin_unreachable. Can you check the WPA dumps if there is difference in redirections, please? Honza

[Bug tree-optimization/68743] [6 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/aint_anint_1.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68743 --- Comment #12 from John David Anglin --- libtool: compile: /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc/xgcc -B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc/ -B/opt/gnu64/gcc/gcc-6/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/bin/ -B/opt/gnu64/gcc/gcc-6/hppa64-h p-hpux11.11/lib/ -isystem

[Bug fortran/68743] FAIL: gfortran.dg/aint_anint_1.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68743 --- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2015-12-12, at 3:50 PM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68743 > > --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- >> Program received signal

[Bug tree-optimization/67781] [5/6 Regression] wrong code generated on big-endian with -O1 -fexpensive-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67781 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Target|mips-linux; powerpc-linux |m68k-*-* mips-*-* |

[Bug tree-optimization/68743] [6 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/aint_anint_1.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68743 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Component|fortran |tree-optimization

[Bug fortran/68747] FAIL: gfortran.dg/specifics_1.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68747 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Duplicate of pr68743? Ping!

[Bug fortran/68748] FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/20010430.f -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68748 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Duplicate of pr68743? Ping!

[Bug fortran/68744] FAIL: gfortran.dg/backtrace_1.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68744 --- Comment #5 from John David Anglin --- (gdb) r Starting program: /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/backtrace_1.exe warning: Private mapping of shared library text was not specified by the executable; setting a breakpoint in a

[Bug fortran/68746] FAIL: gfortran.dg/read_dir.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68746 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin --- Looks like but this one is hard to debug with gdb.

[Bug fortran/68743] FAIL: gfortran.dg/aint_anint_1.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68743 --- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2015-12-12, at 4:21 PM, dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote: >> Yes. The puzzle is why "return (float) floor (x);" calls floorf. It comets from the forwprop1 pass: ;; Function floorf

[Bug fortran/68745] FAIL: gfortran.dg/intrinsic_modulo_1.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68745 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Duplicate of pr68743? Ping!

[Bug fortran/68747] FAIL: gfortran.dg/specifics_1.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68747 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/68743] [6 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/aint_anint_1.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68743 --- Comment #10 from John David Anglin --- *** Bug 68747 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/68743] [6 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/aint_anint_1.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68743 --- Comment #11 from John David Anglin --- *** Bug 68748 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/68748] FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/20010430.f -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68748 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/68743] FAIL: gfortran.dg/aint_anint_1.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68743 --- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2015-12-12, at 4:10 PM, dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote: > Yes. The puzzle is why "return (float) floor (x);" calls floorf. floorf: .PROC .CALLINFO

[Bug tree-optimization/68743] [6 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/aint_anint_1.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68743 --- Comment #8 from John David Anglin --- Created attachment 37011 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37011=edit Preprocessed source

[Bug tree-optimization/68743] [6 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/aint_anint_1.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68743 --- Comment #9 from John David Anglin --- *** Bug 68745 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/68745] FAIL: gfortran.dg/intrinsic_modulo_1.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68745 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/63651] Lot of failures in obj(c|-c++) with yosemite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651 --- Comment #18 from Dominique d'Humieres --- For the record with darwin15 I had to add /System/Library/Frameworks/Foundation.framework/Versions/C/Headers/NSEnumerator.h

[Bug fortran/68742] FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray/event_2.f90 -fcoarray=lib -O2 -lcaf_single -latomic execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68742 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin --- (gdb) r Starting program: /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/event_2.exe warning: Private mapping of shared library text was not specified by the executable; setting a breakpoint in a shared

[Bug fortran/68742] FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray/event_2.f90 -fcoarray=lib -O2 -lcaf_single -latomic execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68742 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/68744] FAIL: gfortran.dg/backtrace_1.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68744 --- Comment #6 from John David Anglin --- *** Bug 68742 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***